Sedentary BehaviorNCT04716582
The Effect of Different Ways of Sitting on Cognitive Performance and Muscle Activity
A study testing Sitting interrupted by light physical activity, Sitting with cognitive task and uninterrupted sitting in people with Sedentary Behavior and Light Intensity Physical Activity, run by Maastricht University at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Academic educations concurs with a lot of sitting. Studies have shown that prolonged sitting not only has disruptive effects on physical health, but also influence mental health and cognition negatively. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 30 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Sedentary Behavior, Light Intensity Physical Activity
- What is being tested?
- Sitting interrupted by light physical activity, Sitting with cognitive task and uninterrupted sitting
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 21 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- 7 Jun 2019to 30 May 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 30 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- age 18-30 years
- BMI between 18-28
- steady dietary habits
- generally healthy
- Female on contraceptive pills/Male
Who cannot join
- High score (score: 11-21) in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Netherlands1 site
Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences
Maastricht, Limburg, 6229 ER
About this study
Academic educations concurs with a lot of sitting. Studies have shown that prolonged sitting not only has disruptive effects on physical health, but also influence mental health and cognition negatively. For physical health evidence grows that short light intense interruptions of sitting time effectively counterbalance the impact of prolonged sitting. It is not clear of light intense physical activity breaks have a similar positive effect on cognitive performance. Also, it is unclear whether cognitive loading might be able to compensate the impact of prolonged sitting.This study compares the effects of uninterrupted sitting with or without cognitive loading and interrupted sitting on cognitive functioning; muscle activation of leg and trunk muscles under various modes of sitting with walking, in order to calibrate the physical impact of different sitting modes.
Read the detailed description
healthy university students will attend three separate intervention visits with 6-days (no more than 14 days) washout in between: 1) uninterrupted sitting (SIT); 2) uninterrupted sitting with a cognitive task (COGN); 3) sitting interrupted by light physical activity (INTERRUPT). For the SIT and INTERRUPT conditions, subjects watch a series of documentaries while sitting. In the COGN condition, while sitting, participants undergo the online GED test as cognitive load. Four cognitive tests (D2 test, stroop test, trail making test and 2-BACK test) and mood states will be performed before and after each intervention. On a separate day, using surface electromyography, activations of major leg and trunk muscles of sitting on chair, active and passive sitting on a yoga ball and walking were assessed.
- Being tested
- Sitting interrupted by light physical activity, Sitting with cognitive task, uninterrupted sitting
- Keywords
- sedentary behavior, light physical activity, executive function, active sitting
- Medical subject headings
- Sedentary Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sitting interrupted by light physical activityBehavioural
Also called INTERRUPT
Each 30 minutes will be 25 minutes sitting followed by 5 minutes walking that designed as prescribed walking route outside laboratory corridor.
Sitting with cognitive taskBehavioural
Also called COGN
Participants will perform online cognitive task during prolonged sitting.
uninterrupted sittingBehavioural
Also called SIT
Participants will watch documentary during prolonged sitting.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SIT group | Experimental | participants will sitting 4 hours continuously. Receives: Behavioral: uninterrupted sitting |
| INTERRUPT group | Experimental | participants will sitting 25 minutes with 5 minutes walking per half hour,40minutes walking in total Receives: Behavioral: Sitting interrupted by light physical activity |
| COGN group | Experimental | participants will perform GED test as cognitive loading task during 4-hour sitting Receives: Behavioral: Sitting with cognitive task |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cognitive processes as assessed using Stroop test
Stroop test is a computer-based Stroop word and color test, including congruent trials and incongruent trials to assess inhibition. Reaction time and accuracy of the Stroop test will be collected before and after the intervention
Measured: change from baseline after 4 hour intervention on day1, day8, day16
Cognitive processes as assessed using D2 attention test
D2 attention test is a paper and pencil test to assess attention. Concentration performance will be collected before and after the intervention.
Measured: change from baseline after 4 hour intervention on day1, day8, day16
Cognitive processes as assessed using N back test
N back test is a computer-based test, including target images and non-target images. this test is for updating and working memory. The correct reaction number of N back test will be collected before and after the intervention.
Measured: change from baseline after 4 hour intervention on day1, day8, day16
Cognitive processes as assessed using Trail making test
Trail making test is a computer-based test to assess task-switching. reaction time and accuracy of the trail making test will be collected before and after the intervention.
Measured: change from baseline after 4 hour intervention on day1, day8, day16
Secondary outcomes (10)
mood status assessed by tension score
mood questionnaire(an abbreviated version of Profile of Mood States (POMS)) will be used before and after the intervention, such as tension, anger, depression, vigor, esteem-related effect, confusion, fatigue, total mood level data included. The scale is 0 to 4.
Measured: change from baseline after 4 hour intervention on day1, day8, day16
mood status assessed by anger score
mood questionnaire(an abbreviated version of Profile of Mood States (POMS)) will be used before and after the intervention, such as tension, anger, depression, vigor, esteem-related effect, confusion, fatigue, total mood level data included. The scale is 0 to 4.
Measured: change from baseline all mood outcomes after 4 hour intervention on day1, day8, day16
mood status assessed by depression score
mood questionnaire(an abbreviated version of Profile of Mood States (POMS)) will be used before and after the intervention, such as tension, anger, depression, vigor, esteem-related effect, confusion, fatigue, total mood level data included. The scale is 0 to 4.
Measured: change from baseline all mood outcomes after 4 hour intervention on day1, day8, day16
mood status assessed by vigor score
mood questionnaire(an abbreviated version of Profile of Mood States (POMS)) will be used before and after the intervention, such as tension, anger, depression, vigor, esteem-related effect, confusion, fatigue, total mood level data included. The scale is 0 to 4.
Measured: change from baseline all mood outcomes after 4 hour intervention on day1, day8, day16
mood status assessed by esteem-related effect score
mood questionnaire(an abbreviated version of Profile of Mood States (POMS)) will be used before and after the intervention, such as tension, anger, depression, vigor, esteem-related effect, confusion, fatigue, total mood level data included. The scale is 0 to 4.
Measured: change from baseline all mood outcomes after 4 hour intervention on day1, day8, day16
mood status assessed by confusion score
mood questionnaire(an abbreviated version of Profile of Mood States (POMS)) will be used before and after the intervention, such as tension, anger, depression, vigor, esteem-related effect, confusion, fatigue, total mood level data included. The scale is 0 to 4.
Measured: change from baseline all mood outcomes after 4 hour intervention on day1, day8, day16
mood status assessed by fatigue score
mood questionnaire(an abbreviated version of Profile of Mood States (POMS)) will be used before and after the intervention, such as tension, anger, depression, vigor, esteem-related effect, confusion, fatigue, total mood level data included. The scale is 0 to 4.
Measured: change from baseline all mood outcomes after 4 hour intervention on day1, day8, day16
mood status assessed by total mood level score
mood questionnaire(an abbreviated version of Profile of Mood States (POMS)) will be used before and after the intervention, such as tension, anger, depression, vigor, esteem-related effect, confusion, fatigue, total mood level data included. The scale is 0 to 4.
Measured: change from baseline all mood outcomes after 4 hour intervention on day1, day8, day16
muscle activity
Muscle activity is measured by the electromyograph (EMG)machine. RMS values will be collected and calculated as muscle activation during each sittings condition
Measured: recording 5 minutes' muscle activity for each sitting posture, average RMS will be collected.it will be performed on another experiment day.
discomfort level
after each sitting condition, self discomfort level will be asked.0 means no discomfort,10 means the worst discomfort
Measured: report discomfort level immediately after each sitting condition(each sitting posture lasts 5 minutes).it will be performed on another experiment day.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jan 2021
- Study start7 Jun 2019
- Primary completion20 Oct 2020
- Study completion30 May 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Sedentary BehaviorStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Maastricht University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Hans HCM Savelberg, PhD, Study director, Maastricht University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04716582
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DSIT
- Status last verified
- Jan 2021
- First submitted
- 21 Sep 2020
- Last updated
- 20 Jan 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: there is no sharing individual participant data
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Jan 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Different Ways of Sitting on Cognitive Performance and Muscle Activity
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04716582
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DSIT
- Keywords
- sedentary behavior, light physical activity, executive function, active sitting
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Maastricht UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 7 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 May 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Academic educations concurs with a lot of sitting. Studies have shown that prolonged sitting not only has disruptive effects on physical health, but also influence mental health and cognition negatively. For physical health evidence grows that short light intense interruptions of sitting time effectively counterbalance the impact of prolonged sitting. It is not clear of light intense physical activity breaks have a similar positive effect on cognitive performance. Also, it is unclear whether cognitive loading might be able to compensate the impact of prolonged sitting.This study compares the effects of uninterrupted sitting with or without cognitive loading and interrupted sitting on cognitive functioning; muscle activation of leg and trunk muscles under various modes of sitting with walking, in order to calibrate the physical impact of different sitting modes.
Detailed description
healthy university students will attend three separate intervention visits with 6-days (no more than 14 days) washout in between: 1) uninterrupted sitting (SIT); 2) uninterrupted sitting with a cognitive task (COGN); 3) sitting interrupted by light physical activity (INTERRUPT). For the SIT and INTERRUPT conditions, subjects watch a series of documentaries while sitting. In the COGN condition, while sitting, participants undergo the online GED test as cognitive load. Four cognitive tests (D2 test, stroop test, trail making test and 2-BACK test) and mood states will be performed before and after each intervention. On a separate day, using surface electromyography, activations of major leg and trunk muscles of sitting on chair, active and passive sitting on a yoga ball and walking were assessed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SIT group | Experimental | Behavioral: uninterrupted sittingparticipants will sitting 4 hours continuously. |
| INTERRUPT group | Experimental | Behavioral: Sitting interrupted by light physical activityparticipants will sitting 25 minutes with 5 minutes walking per half hour,40minutes walking in total |
| COGN group | Experimental | Behavioral: Sitting with cognitive taskparticipants will perform GED test as cognitive loading task during 4-hour sitting |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 30 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- age 18-30 years
- BMI between 18-28
- steady dietary habits
- generally healthy
- Female on contraceptive pills/Male
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- High score (score: 11-21) in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sitting interrupted by light physical activityAlso: INTERRUPTEach 30 minutes will be 25 minutes sitting followed by 5 minutes walking that designed as prescribed walking route outside laboratory corridor. | Behavioural | INTERRUPT group |
| Sitting with cognitive taskAlso: COGNParticipants will perform online cognitive task during prolonged sitting. | Behavioural | COGN group |
| uninterrupted sittingAlso: SITParticipants will watch documentary during prolonged sitting. | Behavioural | SIT group |
Primary outcome
Cognitive processes as assessed using Stroop test
Time frame: change from baseline after 4 hour intervention on day1, day8, day16
Stroop test is a computer-based Stroop word and color test, including congruent trials and incongruent trials to assess inhibition. Reaction time and accuracy of the Stroop test will be collected before and after the intervention
Cognitive processes as assessed using D2 attention test
Time frame: change from baseline after 4 hour intervention on day1, day8, day16
D2 attention test is a paper and pencil test to assess attention. Concentration performance will be collected before and after the intervention.
Cognitive processes as assessed using N back test
Time frame: change from baseline after 4 hour intervention on day1, day8, day16
N back test is a computer-based test, including target images and non-target images. this test is for updating and working memory. The correct reaction number of N back test will be collected before and after the intervention.
Cognitive processes as assessed using Trail making test
Time frame: change from baseline after 4 hour intervention on day1, day8, day16
Trail making test is a computer-based test to assess task-switching. reaction time and accuracy of the trail making test will be collected before and after the intervention.
10 secondary outcomes
mood status assessed by tension score
Time frame: change from baseline after 4 hour intervention on day1, day8, day16
mood status assessed by anger score
Time frame: change from baseline all mood outcomes after 4 hour intervention on day1, day8, day16
mood status assessed by depression score
Time frame: change from baseline all mood outcomes after 4 hour intervention on day1, day8, day16
mood status assessed by vigor score
Time frame: change from baseline all mood outcomes after 4 hour intervention on day1, day8, day16
mood status assessed by esteem-related effect score
Time frame: change from baseline all mood outcomes after 4 hour intervention on day1, day8, day16
mood status assessed by confusion score
Time frame: change from baseline all mood outcomes after 4 hour intervention on day1, day8, day16
mood status assessed by fatigue score
Time frame: change from baseline all mood outcomes after 4 hour intervention on day1, day8, day16
mood status assessed by total mood level score
Time frame: change from baseline all mood outcomes after 4 hour intervention on day1, day8, day16
muscle activity
Time frame: recording 5 minutes' muscle activity for each sitting posture, average RMS will be collected.it will be performed on another experiment day.
discomfort level
Time frame: report discomfort level immediately after each sitting condition(each sitting posture lasts 5 minutes).it will be performed on another experiment day.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Jan 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. there is no sharing individual participant data
Related trials for Sedentary Behavior
Active, not recruiting
A Pilot Factorial Trial of an Integrated Lifestyle Intervention
Physical Inactivity, Overweight and Obesity
Recruiting
Yoga vs. Stretching-Strengthening: Physical Fitness in Sedentary Young Adults
Sedentary Lifestlye, Exercise
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Longitudinal Cohort Study to Evaluate Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Disease in Haiti
Hypertension, Diabetes
Recruiting
Scalable TELeheaLth Cancer CARe: The STELLAR Program to Treat Cancer Risk Behaviors
Obesity, Smoking Cessation
Not yet recruiting
Be Well at Work-Plus: A Depression and Physical Activity Intervention for Hospital Service Workers (Aim 3)
Depression, Physical Inactivity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hans HCM Savelberg, PhD study director
Maastricht University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Sitting interrupted by light physical activity, Sitting with cognitive task and uninterrupted sitting in people with Sedentary Behavior and Light Intensity Physical Activity, run by Maastricht University at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cognitive processes as assessed using Stroop test (time frame: change from baseline after 4 hour intervention on day1, day8, day16). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jan 2021.