AzTrials
AzTrials

Glaucoma, Angle-ClosureNCT04703712

Lens Extraction Combined With Goniosynechialysis Versus Trabeculectomy

A study testing Lens extraction combined with goniosynechialysis and Trabeculectomy surgery in people with Glaucoma, Angle-Closure, run by Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To compare the effectiveness of lens extraction combined with goniosynechialysis and trabeculectomy in treating advanced angle-closure glaucoma. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Glaucoma, Angle-Closure
What is being tested?
Lens extraction combined with goniosynechialysis and Trabeculectomy surgery
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
316 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
30 Jan 2021to Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age between 40 years old to 80 years old
  • more than 180-degree synechial closure of anterior chamber angle on gonioscopy
  • IOP higher than 21mmHg under the use of more than two anti-glaucoma eye drops
  • mean deviation of visual field worse than -12dB on Humphrey 24-2
  • phakic eyes

Who cannot join

  • Snellen visual acuity worse than 0.02
  • history of ocular trauma
  • uveitis
  • previous ocular surgeries
  • significant conjunctival scar
  • visible neovascular on iris or anterior chamber angle
  • other severe eye diseases that would affect visual function significantly, such as age-related macular degeneration and pathogenic myopia.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Feng Gao, Doctor contact

(86)021-64377134

fenggao@fudan.edu.cn

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Eye & ENT Hospital

    Shanghai, 200031

    Feng Gao, Doctor, 021-64377134, fenggao@fudan.edu.cn

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of Lens Extraction Combined With Goniosynechialysis Versus Trabeculectomy in Treating Advanced Angle-closure Glaucoma: a Randomized Controlled Trial

To compare the effectiveness of lens extraction combined with goniosynechialysis and trabeculectomy in treating advanced angle-closure glaucoma.

Read the detailed description

Advanced angle closure glaucoma (AACG) can result in severe visual function defect or even blindness with or without acute attacks. Different from open angle glaucoma (OAG), the main principle of treatment for AACG is not only to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) but also to protect the anterior chamber angle from closing. Previously, the most common and classical treatment for AACG was trabeculectomy. However, both doctors and patients are not satisfied with this surgery because of its limited success rate due to fibrosis of the filtration pathway. Besides, trabeculectomy has various complications, such as shallow anterior chamber, choroidal effusion, suprachoroidal hemorrhage, malignant glaucoma, and bleb leakage associated endophthalmitis. In addition, patients who underwent trabeculectomy will have decreased visual acuity in a couple of years due to accelerated development of cataract. Since a thickened and anterior-positioned lens could play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of AACG, cataract surgery has also been used. Accumulative evidence shows lens extraction alone is an efficient way in treating the early stage of ACG but has limited success rate in AACG. Lens extraction combined with goniosynechialysis (LEG) has been proved to be better than lens extraction alone in re-opening the anterior chamber angle for ACG patients with extensive peripheral anterior synechia and possibly have better effect than trabeculectomy as well from our preliminary data, which has not been proved yet. Thus, this investigation is designed to compare the effect of LEG and trabeculectomy in AACG patients prospectively in 3 years of follow-up. The investigators hypothesize that LEG could have better IOP control and better visual function than trabeculectomy in long term for AACG patients.

Being tested
Lens extraction combined with goniosynechialysis, Trabeculectomy surgery
Keywords
phacoemulsification, goniosynechialysis, trabeculectomy
Medical subject headings
Glaucoma, Angle-Closure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Lens extraction combined with goniosynechialysisProcedure or surgery

    The patients enrolled underwent phacoemulsification combined with goniosynechialysis surgery.

  • Trabeculectomy surgeryProcedure or surgery

    The patients enrolled underwent trabeculectomy surgery

Study groups in NCT04703712
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Lens extraction combined with goniosynechialysis groupActive comparatorOne hundred and fifty-eight patients with advanced angle-closure glaucoma underwent phacoemulsification combined with goniosynechialysis.
Receives: Procedure: Lens extraction combined with goniosynechialysis
Trabeculectomy GroupActive comparatorOne hundred and fifty-eight patients with advanced angle-closure glaucoma underwent trabeculectomy.
Receives: Procedure: Trabeculectomy surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Intraocular pressure (IOP) change at one month

    Change from baseline IOP after phacoemulsification combined with goniosynechialysis or trabeculectomy at one month.

    Measured: one month

  2. IOP change at three months

    Change from baseline IOP after phacoemulsification combined with goniosynechialysis or trabeculectomy at three months.

    Measured: three months

  3. IOP change at six months

    Change from baseline IOP after phacoemulsification combined with goniosynechialysis or trabeculectomy at six months.

    Measured: six months

  4. IOP change at one year

    Change from baseline IOP after phacoemulsification combined with goniosynechialysis or trabeculectomy at one year.

    Measured: one year

  5. IOP change at two years

    Change from baseline IOP after phacoemulsification combined with goniosynechialysis or trabeculectomy at two years.

    Measured: two years

  6. IOP change at three years

    Change from baseline IOP after phacoemulsification combined with goniosynechialysis or trabeculectomy at three years.

    Measured: three years

  7. Best corrected visual acuity at one month

    Best corrected visual acuity of participants after surgery at one month

    Measured: one month

  8. Best corrected visual acuity at three months

    Best corrected visual acuity of participants after surgery at three months

    Measured: three months

  9. Best corrected visual acuity at six months

    Best corrected visual acuity of participants after surgery at six months

    Measured: six months

  10. Best corrected visual acuity at one year

    Best corrected visual acuity of participants after surgery at one year

    Measured: one year

  11. Best corrected visual acuity at two years

    Best corrected visual acuity of participants after surgery at two years

    Measured: two years

  12. Best corrected visual acuity at three years

    Best corrected visual acuity of participants after surgery at three years

    Measured: three years

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Mean deviation

    The mean deviation value of Humphery visual filed tests before and after surgery.

    Measured: one month, three months, six months, one year, two years, three years

  2. The thickness of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL)

    The RNFL thickness measured by optical coherence topography (OCT)

    Measured: one month, three months, six months, one year, two years, three years

  3. The thickness of ganglion cell complex (GCC)

    The GCC thickness measured by OCT

    Measured: one month, three months, six months, one year, two years, three years

  4. Number of eye drops

    The number of eye drops after surgery.

    Measured: one month, three months, six months, one year, two years, three years

  5. Adverse event

    Adverse events of each group, such as cornea edma, ocular hypotension, hemorrhage

    Measured: one month, three months, six months, one year, two years, three years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jan 2021
  2. Study start30 Jan 2021
  3. Primary completionDec 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
316 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04703712
Sponsor's protocol ID
AAC Glaucoma
Status last verified
Feb 2023
First submitted
3 Jan 2021
Last updated
1 Mar 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Lens extraction combined with goniosynechialysis and Trabeculectomy surgery in people with Glaucoma, Angle-Closure, run by Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Feng Gao, Doctor ((86)021-64377134, fenggao@fudan.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Intraocular pressure (IOP) change at one month (time frame: one month). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Mar 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in