Pilonidal SinusNCT04697082
Application of Platelet-rich Plasma in Pilonidal Sinus Disease
A study testing Open surgery, Minimal invasive surgery and Platelet rich plasma administration in people with Pilonidal Sinus and Pilonidal Disease, run by Cihangir Akyol at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Pilonidal sinus disease is a common health-care problem, and surgical excision is the standard treatment modality. Controversy still exists regarding the best surgical technique for treating pilonidal disease in terms of minimizing disease recurrence and patient discomfort. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pilonidal Sinus, Pilonidal Disease, Wound Heal
- What is being tested?
- Open surgery, Minimal invasive surgery and Platelet rich plasma administration
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 63 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2018to 1 Jul 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- chronic pilonial sinus disease
- patients who had undergone abscess drainage and remained diseased after 8-10 weeks of drainage
Who cannot join
- patients with acute abscess
- patients with anemia
- patients that use immunosuppressive drugs
- patients with haematological malignancy
- patients with bleeding disorder
- patients with recurrent pilonida sinus disease
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Ankara University School of Medicine Department of General Surgery
Ankara, 06100
About this study
Official title: Application of Platelet-rich Plasma for the Management of Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial of Different Treatment Modalities
Pilonidal sinus disease is a common health-care problem, and surgical excision is the standard treatment modality. Controversy still exists regarding the best surgical technique for treating pilonidal disease in terms of minimizing disease recurrence and patient discomfort. In this study, the investigators compared the impact of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) with that of minimally invasive techniques on pain reduction, return to daily activities, quality of life, and duration of wound healing after open excision and secondary closure.
Read the detailed description
Pilonidal sinus disease is a health problem that has been attempted to be overcome by various treatment modalities since the first time it was described by Herbert Mayo in 1833. PS is usually diagnosed at 30 years of age, and the disease has a male predominance of 70-80%.
Common morbidities after the surgical treatment of PS are pain, loss of productive work hours and wound infections owing to long healing times. Therefore, the main goals of treatment are accelerating the healing time by decreasing pain and reducing the loss of productive work hours.
Local administration of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), which contains growth factors (Gfs), is a new method that has been reported to accelerate the healing process by 30-40% [2].
In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of PRP on the pain score, wound-healing process and quality of life in the treatment process for PS disease.
METHOD
Trial Design The investigators designed the trial as a prospective, controlled-randomized study. The study was started after obtaining patient consent and approval from the Ethics Committee of Ankara University Medicine Faculty in Ankara (Ethics Committee no: 03-162-18).
Randomization The patients were divided into three groups randomly. A simple randomization diagram was used for randomization. The open surgical method and a moist dressing were applied to patients in group A. Open surgery and then PRP application were performed on patients in group B. PRP was applied to the patients in group C after curettage of the sinus cavity.
Medical and Demographic History After enrolling the patients, the investigators noted all demographic data, including gender, age, education, comorbid disease existence and drug use. Then, Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) quality-of-life score forms were given to the patients, who were asked to complete the questionnaires before the surgery.
All patients were asked to clean the sacrococcygeal region from hair using depilatory cream.
Surgical Procedure The investigators designed group A as the control group. In this group, each patient entered the operating room, and after the administration of general anaesthesia, the patient was placed in the prone position. Then, the buttocks were stretched to the lateral sides using adhesive bands to remove the disease area. The sacrococcygeal region was cleaned and disinfected with 10% povidone iodine. After covering the area around the region, the sinus tract was examined by using a thin-steel cane. The length and wealth of the cavity were noted. Then, the sinus tract was removed. The depth of the cavity was noted. Then, 50 cc of 0.9% saline solution (SS) was taken into a syringe and applied to the cavity until it filled the whole space, allowing the cavity volume to be measured accurately. The measurement was performed by subtracting the remaining saline-solution volume in the syringe from the whole syringe volume, which was 50 cc. After measurement of the cavity volume, the cavity was dressed with wet gauze, and the operation ended.
PRP Administration Group B was designed as local PRP administration after excision. Whole steps were applied the same as in the first group until the step of dressing the cavity. After measurement of the cavity volume with 0.9% SS, PRP was administered by filling the whole space from the lateral side of the cavity. After the first implementation of PRP, the second one was applied at 48 hours. Until that time, the dressing was not uncovered. PRP was applied on the 3rd, 4th and 5th days postoperatively.
Minimal Invasive Surgery Group C was designed to receive local PRP administration after minimally invasive surgery with local anaesthesia. In the operating room, after the patient was placed in the prone position, the region was removed by stretching the buttocks with adhesive bands and cleaning the area with 10% povidone iodine. The largest pit was excised, and hairs in the cavity were removed with forceps. Then, the whole cavity was curetted meticulously and irrigated with SS. After haemostasis, the cavity volume was measured, and PRP was applied to the cavity. After the first implementation, as in the second group, we applied PRP on the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th days after surgery.
Preparation of PRP For clinical applications, GMP-compliant human platelet concentrates can be created by the PRP method. Erythrocyte concentrate and platelet-containing plasma are separated by the first centrifugation, and platelet-poor plasma (PPP) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP)/platelet concentrate are created by the second centrifugation of the platelet-containing plasma [3]. Platelets contain coagulation factors, growth factors (PDGF, TGFβ1, IGF1, HGF1, VEGF, FGF2) and interleukins (IL1, IL4, IL6, IL10, IL13) [4].
The investigators prepared the platelet concentrate by the PRP method in Hacettepe University Blood Center Laboratory considering all standardized processes for healthy blood donors. In accordance with the 'National Blood and Blood Components Preparation Use and Quality Assurance Guidelines', the requirements for PRP should include at least 40 mL in volume, at least 60x109/unit platelets [5], and a maximum of 0.2x109/unit leukocytes [6]. After approval, 450 cc of blood was drawn from the patient by phlebotomy on the morning of surgery. A two-stage centrifugation method was used in the process of separating complete blood into its components. In the first stage, plasma was separated with the erythrocyte suspension by using temperature-controlled Heraeus Cryofuge 6000i low-speed centrifugation (22°C, 2500 rpm, 7 minutes). After a 1-hour waiting period at the second stage, the PRP/platelet concentrate was separated from the PPP by using high-speed centrifugation (22°C, 3200 rpm, 15 minutes). The PRP/platelet concentrate obtained after the second centrifugation step was shaken in the agitator for 1 hour, divided into 5 equal parts with a sterile connection device (Figure) and then sent to the Ankara University General Surgery Department.
The investigators preserved the PRP at 25 degrees Celsius in agitators. Before each dressing, the investigators applied the PRP aliquots to the wound by taking them one by one into the injector.
Postoperative Care All patients were discharged on the first postoperative day. Patients in all groups were advised not to open the wound for 2 days. Additionally, the surgical area had to be kept clean after bathing and bowel movements. If the patients experienced pain, they were recommended to take the prescribed pain reliever no more than 2 times a day.
- Conditions
- Pilonidal Sinus, Pilonidal Disease, Wound Heal, Quality of Life, Pain
- Being tested
- Open surgery, Minimal invasive surgery, Platelet rich plasma administration
- Keywords
- PRP, Wound healing, Pilonidal sinus, Quality of life, Pain
- Medical subject headings
- Pilonidal Sinus, Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Open surgeryProcedure or surgery
Each patient entered the operating room, and after the administration of general anaesthesia, the patient was placed in the prone position. Then, the buttocks were stretched to the lateral sides using adhesive bands to remove the disease area. The sacrococcygeal region was cleaned and disinfected with 10% povidone iodine. After covering the area around the region, the sinus tract was examined by using a thin-steel cane. The length and wealth of the cavity were noted. Then, the sinus tract was removed. The depth of the cavity was noted. Then, 50 cc of 0.9% saline solution (SS) was taken into a syringe and applied to the cavity until it filled the whole space, allowing the cavity volume to be measured accurately. The measurement was performed by subtracting the remaining saline-solution volume in the syringe from the whole syringe volume, which was 50 cc.
Minimal invasive surgeryProcedure or surgery
In the operating room, after the patient was placed in the prone position, the region was removed by stretching the buttocks with adhesive bands and cleaning the area with 10% povidone iodine. The largest pit was excised, and hairs in the cavity were removed with forceps. Then, the whole cavity was curetted meticulously and irrigated with SS. After haemostasis, the cavity volume was measured
Platelet rich plasma administrationOther
Platelet rich plasma (PRP) was administered by filling the whole space from the lateral side of the cavity. After the first implementation of PRP, the second one was applied at 48 hours. Until that time, the dressing was not uncovered. PRP was applied on the 3rd, 4th and 5th days postoperatively.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Placebo comparator | The open surgical method and a moist gauze (with saline) were applied to patients in group A Receives: Procedure: Open surgery |
| Group B | Experimental | Open surgery and then PRP application were performed on patients in group B. After the cavity was filled with PRP, the wound was covered with a dry gauze. Receives: Procedure: Open surgery; Other: Platelet rich plasma administration |
| Group C | Experimental | PRP was applied to the patients in group C after curettage of the sinus cavity. And again the wound was covered with a dry gauze. Receives: Procedure: Minimal invasive surgery; Other: Platelet rich plasma administration |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Wound Healing
Wound healing rate was evaluated as recovery time per the cavity volume (day/cc). This showed the time required for each 1 cc volume of the cavity to be filled on a daily basis. After open or minimally invasive surgery, the volume of the cavity was measured with saline solution. The cavity was filled with saline and the volume of the cavity was determined by calculating how much fluid it took. The measurements were performed on postoperative days 0, 2, 3, 4 and 21. Therefore recovery time per the cavity volume was calculated according to the differences between the measurements.
Measured: on postoperative days 0, 2, 3, 4 and 21
Secondary outcomes (2)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score
We used a visual analogue scale (VAS) to evaluate the pain score. The VAS score can range from 0 to 10. The higher the score, the higher sensation of pain. The VAS was applied five times after surgery: at 24 hours, 48 hours, 96 hours, 120 hours and 3 weeks. Patients were routinely prescribed "dexketoprofen trometamol" and recommended to take it no more than 2 times a day. How many tablets the patients used after the operation was recorded.
Measured: at 24th hour, 48th hour, 96th hour, 120th hour and 3rd week
Short Form-36 and Nottingham Health Profile
Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) questionnaires were applied to evaluate the quality of life before the surgery and three weeks after.
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scoresand each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability.
The NHP consists of two parts. The highest score in any section is 100 The higher the score, the greater the number and severity of problems We assessed the general health, limitations or activities, physical health problems, emotional health problems, social activity, pain, energy and emotions of the patients with the SF-36 questionnaire. Additionally, we evaluated the pain, energy level, emotional reaction, sleep, social isolation, and physical abilities of patients with the NHP questionnaire.
Measured: before the surgery and in the postoperative 3rd week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jan 2021
- Study start1 Mar 2018
- Primary completion1 Jan 2019
- Study completion1 Jul 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pilonidal SinusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The patients were divided into three groups randomly. A simple randomization diagram was used for randomization. The open surgical method and a moist dressing were applied to patients in group A. Open surgery and then PRP application were performed on patients in group B. PRP was applied to the patients in group C after curettage of the sinus cavity. 49 patients were included in the analysis. In this study, we compared the impact of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) with that of minimally invasive techniques on pain reduction, return to daily activities, quality of life, and duration of wound healing after open excision and secondary closure.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 63 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cihangir Akyol
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Cihangir Akyol, Ankara University
- Investigators
- Can Y Boztug, MD, Principal investigator, Ankara University School of Medicine Departmernt of General SurgeryCihangir Akyol, MD, Study chair, Ankara University School of Medicine Departmernt of General Surgery
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04697082
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- U1111-1263-3749
- Status last verified
- Jan 2021
- First submitted
- 1 Jan 2021
- Last updated
- 6 Jan 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Boztug CY, Karaagac Akyol T, Benlice C, Koc MA, Doganay Erdogan B, Ozcebe OI, Kuzu MA, Akyol C. Platelet-rich plasma treatment improves postoperative recovery in patients with pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Surg. 2021 Oct 21;21(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01370-5.
PubMed 34670534
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jan 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Application of Platelet-rich Plasma for the Management of Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial of Different Treatment Modalities
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04697082
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- U1111-1263-3749
- Conditions
- Pilonidal Sinus, Pilonidal Disease, Wound Heal, Quality of Life, Pain
- Keywords
- PRP, Wound healing, Pilonidal sinus, Quality of life, Pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 63 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cihangir AkyolUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Pilonidal sinus disease is a common health-care problem, and surgical excision is the standard treatment modality. Controversy still exists regarding the best surgical technique for treating pilonidal disease in terms of minimizing disease recurrence and patient discomfort. In this study, the investigators compared the impact of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) with that of minimally invasive techniques on pain reduction, return to daily activities, quality of life, and duration of wound healing after open excision and secondary closure.
Detailed description
Pilonidal sinus disease is a health problem that has been attempted to be overcome by various treatment modalities since the first time it was described by Herbert Mayo in 1833. PS is usually diagnosed at 30 years of age, and the disease has a male predominance of 70-80%.
Common morbidities after the surgical treatment of PS are pain, loss of productive work hours and wound infections owing to long healing times. Therefore, the main goals of treatment are accelerating the healing time by decreasing pain and reducing the loss of productive work hours.
Local administration of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), which contains growth factors (Gfs), is a new method that has been reported to accelerate the healing process by 30-40% [2].
In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of PRP on the pain score, wound-healing process and quality of life in the treatment process for PS disease.
METHOD
Trial Design The investigators designed the trial as a prospective, controlled-randomized study. The study was started after obtaining patient consent and approval from the Ethics Committee of Ankara University Medicine Faculty in Ankara (Ethics Committee no: 03-162-18).
Randomization The patients were divided into three groups randomly. A simple randomization diagram was used for randomization. The open surgical method and a moist dressing were applied to patients in group A. Open surgery and then PRP application were performed on patients in group B. PRP was applied to the patients in group C after curettage of the sinus cavity.
Medical and Demographic History After enrolling the patients, the investigators noted all demographic data, including gender, age, education, comorbid disease existence and drug use. Then, Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) quality-of-life score forms were given to the patients, who were asked to complete the questionnaires before the surgery.
All patients were asked to clean the sacrococcygeal region from hair using depilatory cream.
Surgical Procedure The investigators designed group A as the control group. In this group, each patient entered the operating room, and after the administration of general anaesthesia, the patient was placed in the prone position. Then, the buttocks were stretched to the lateral sides using adhesive bands to remove the disease area. The sacrococcygeal region was cleaned and disinfected with 10% povidone iodine. After covering the area around the region, the sinus tract was examined by using a thin-steel cane. The length and wealth of the cavity were noted. Then, the sinus tract was removed. The depth of the cavity was noted. Then, 50 cc of 0.9% saline solution (SS) was taken into a syringe and applied to the cavity until it filled the whole space, allowing the cavity volume to be measured accurately. The measurement was performed by subtracting the remaining saline-solution volume in the syringe from the whole syringe volume, which was 50 cc. After measurement of the cavity volume, the cavity was dressed with wet gauze, and the operation ended.
PRP Administration Group B was designed as local PRP administration after excision. Whole steps were applied the same as in the first group until the step of dressing the cavity. After measurement of the cavity volume with 0.9% SS, PRP was administered by filling the whole space from the lateral side of the cavity. After the first implementation of PRP, the second one was applied at 48 hours. Until that time, the dressing was not uncovered. PRP was applied on the 3rd, 4th and 5th days postoperatively.
Minimal Invasive Surgery Group C was designed to receive local PRP administration after minimally invasive surgery with local anaesthesia. In the operating room, after the patient was placed in the prone position, the region was removed by stretching the buttocks with adhesive bands and cleaning the area with 10% povidone iodine. The largest pit was excised, and hairs in the cavity were removed with forceps. Then, the whole cavity was curetted meticulously and irrigated with SS. After haemostasis, the cavity volume was measured, and PRP was applied to the cavity. After the first implementation, as in the second group, we applied PRP on the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th days after surgery.
Preparation of PRP For clinical applications, GMP-compliant human platelet concentrates can be created by the PRP method. Erythrocyte concentrate and platelet-containing plasma are separated by the first centrifugation, and platelet-poor plasma (PPP) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP)/platelet concentrate are created by the second centrifugation of the platelet-containing plasma [3]. Platelets contain coagulation factors, growth factors (PDGF, TGFβ1, IGF1, HGF1, VEGF, FGF2) and interleukins (IL1, IL4, IL6, IL10, IL13) [4].
The investigators prepared the platelet concentrate by the PRP method in Hacettepe University Blood Center Laboratory considering all standardized processes for healthy blood donors. In accordance with the 'National Blood and Blood Components Preparation Use and Quality Assurance Guidelines', the requirements for PRP should include at least 40 mL in volume, at least 60x109/unit platelets [5], and a maximum of 0.2x109/unit leukocytes [6]. After approval, 450 cc of blood was drawn from the patient by phlebotomy on the morning of surgery. A two-stage centrifugation method was used in the process of separating complete blood into its components. In the first stage, plasma was separated with the erythrocyte suspension by using temperature-controlled Heraeus Cryofuge 6000i low-speed centrifugation (22°C, 2500 rpm, 7 minutes). After a 1-hour waiting period at the second stage, the PRP/platelet concentrate was separated from the PPP by using high-speed centrifugation (22°C, 3200 rpm, 15 minutes). The PRP/platelet concentrate obtained after the second centrifugation step was shaken in the agitator for 1 hour, divided into 5 equal parts with a sterile connection device (Figure) and then sent to the Ankara University General Surgery Department.
The investigators preserved the PRP at 25 degrees Celsius in agitators. Before each dressing, the investigators applied the PRP aliquots to the wound by taking them one by one into the injector.
Postoperative Care All patients were discharged on the first postoperative day. Patients in all groups were advised not to open the wound for 2 days. Additionally, the surgical area had to be kept clean after bathing and bowel movements. If the patients experienced pain, they were recommended to take the prescribed pain reliever no more than 2 times a day.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- The patients were divided into three groups randomly. A simple randomization diagram was used for randomization. The open surgical method and a moist dressing were applied to patients in group A. Open surgery and then PRP application were performed on patients in group B. PRP was applied to the patients in group C after curettage of the sinus cavity. 49 patients were included in the analysis. In this study, we compared the impact of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) with that of minimally invasive techniques on pain reduction, return to daily activities, quality of life, and duration of wound healing after open excision and secondary closure.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Placebo comparator | Procedure: Open surgeryThe open surgical method and a moist gauze (with saline) were applied to patients in group A |
| Group B | Experimental | Procedure: Open surgery, Other: Platelet rich plasma administrationOpen surgery and then PRP application were performed on patients in group B. After the cavity was filled with PRP, the wound was covered with a dry gauze. |
| Group C | Experimental | Procedure: Minimal invasive surgery, Other: Platelet rich plasma administrationPRP was applied to the patients in group C after curettage of the sinus cavity. And again the wound was covered with a dry gauze. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- chronic pilonial sinus disease
- patients who had undergone abscess drainage and remained diseased after 8-10 weeks of drainage
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- patients with acute abscess
- patients with anemia
- patients that use immunosuppressive drugs
- patients with haematological malignancy
- patients with bleeding disorder
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Open surgeryEach patient entered the operating room, and after the administration of general anaesthesia, the patient was placed in the prone position. Then, the buttocks were stretched to the lateral sides using adhesive bands to remove the disease area. The sacrococcygeal region was cleaned and disinfected with 10% povidone iodine. After covering the area around the region, the sinus tract was examined by using a thin-steel cane. The length and wealth of the cavity were noted. Then, the sinus tract was removed. The depth of the cavity was noted. Then, 50 cc of 0.9% saline solution (SS) was taken into a syringe and applied to the cavity until it filled the whole space, allowing the cavity volume to be measured accurately. The measurement was performed by subtracting the remaining saline-solution volume in the syringe from the whole syringe volume, which was 50 cc. | Procedure or surgery | Group A, Group B |
| Minimal invasive surgeryIn the operating room, after the patient was placed in the prone position, the region was removed by stretching the buttocks with adhesive bands and cleaning the area with 10% povidone iodine. The largest pit was excised, and hairs in the cavity were removed with forceps. Then, the whole cavity was curetted meticulously and irrigated with SS. After haemostasis, the cavity volume was measured | Procedure or surgery | Group C |
| Platelet rich plasma administrationPlatelet rich plasma (PRP) was administered by filling the whole space from the lateral side of the cavity. After the first implementation of PRP, the second one was applied at 48 hours. Until that time, the dressing was not uncovered. PRP was applied on the 3rd, 4th and 5th days postoperatively. | Other | Group B, Group C |
Primary outcome
Change in Wound Healing
Time frame: on postoperative days 0, 2, 3, 4 and 21
Wound healing rate was evaluated as recovery time per the cavity volume (day/cc). This showed the time required for each 1 cc volume of the cavity to be filled on a daily basis. After open or minimally invasive surgery, the volume of the cavity was measured with saline solution. The cavity was filled with saline and the volume of the cavity was determined by calculating how much fluid it took. The measurements were performed on postoperative days 0, 2, 3, 4 and 21. Therefore recovery time per the cavity volume was calculated according to the differences between the measurements.
2 secondary outcomes
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score
Time frame: at 24th hour, 48th hour, 96th hour, 120th hour and 3rd week
Short Form-36 and Nottingham Health Profile
Time frame: before the surgery and in the postoperative 3rd week
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jan 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34670534Boztug CY, Karaagac Akyol T, Benlice C, Koc MA, Doganay Erdogan B, Ozcebe OI, Kuzu MA, Akyol C. Platelet-rich plasma treatment improves postoperative recovery in patients with pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Surg. 2021 Oct 21;21(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01370-5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pilonidal Sinus
Recruiting
VAAPS Combined With Loose Seton Drainage for Postoperative Self-Care: A Prospective Single-Arm Cohort Study
Pilonidal Sinus Disease
Not yet recruiting
Teach-Back Discharge Education After Pilonidal Sinus Surgery
Pilonidal Sinus Disease, Pilonidal Sinus Treatment
Recruiting
ENVELOP: Wound Care Following Pilonidal Sinus Surgery
Pilonidal Sinus, Wound Healing
Not yet recruiting
Laser Coagulation of Pilonidal Sinus With/Without Intraoperative Ultrasound Control
Pilonidal Cyst Without Abscess
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Urinary Bladder Matrix (UBM) Registry
Tissue Repair, Soft Tissue Reconstruction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Can Y Boztug, MD principal investigator
Ankara University School of Medicine Departmernt of General Surgery
Cihangir Akyol, MD study chair
Ankara University School of Medicine Departmernt of General Surgery
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Open surgery, Minimal invasive surgery and Platelet rich plasma administration in people with Pilonidal Sinus and Pilonidal Disease, run by Cihangir Akyol at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Wound Healing (time frame: on postoperative days 0, 2, 3, 4 and 21). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04697082, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jan 2021.