Feasibility of a Goal-based Agenda Setting Intervention

Presence of a response to each of the coopeRATE Prompt intervention questions. The coopeRATE Prompt includes two items with open-text response format.

Patient-reported intervention acceptability, assessed using an adapted version of the 4-item Acceptability of Intervention Measure (Weiner et al., 2017). Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ('Completely disagree') to 5 ('Completely agree'). A respondent's total score is the mean of all item responses.

Patient-reported utility (helpfulness) of intervention, assessed using a single adapted item (Dalcin et al., 2015). The item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ('Not at all helpful') to 4 ('Extremely helpful').

Patient-reported way(s) in which intervention was helpful, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (multiple answer) format.

Patient-reported initiator of discussion of intervention responses in the visit with physician, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (single answer) format.

Patient-reported satisfaction with amount of time spent discussing intervention responses in the visit with physician, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (single answer) format.

Patient-reported preference for sharing intervention responses with other members of the care team, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (multiple response) format.

Patient-reported discussion of intervention responses in the visit with other members of the care team, assessed using two items. The first item assesses whether intervention responses were discussed, with a multiple choice (single answer) format. The second item assesses the specific team members with whom discussions were had, with a multiple choice (multiple answer) format.

Patient-reported satisfaction with timing of intervention delivery, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (single answer) format.

Patient-reported preferred timing of intervention delivery, assessed using a single item with open-text response format.

Patient-reported preference for receiving the intervention again in the future, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (single answer) format.

A new 3-item patient-reported measure under evaluation to assess collaborative goal setting between a patient and physician during the health care visit. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 ('Strongly disagree') to 3 ('Strongly agree'), with an additional 'Not sure' option. Scoring method is to be determined.

Patient-reported shared decision-making with physician during the health care visit, assessed using the 3-item collaboRATE measure (Elwyn et al., 2013; Barr et al., 2014). Each item is rated on a 10-point scale ranging from 0 ('No effort was made') to 9 ('Every effort was made'). Respondent's are assigned a score of 1 if every item is rated 'Every effort was made' and a score of 0 for all other response combinations.

Clinician-reported frequency of receiving patient intervention responses, assessed using a single item with open-text response format.

Clinician-reported frequency of use of intervention responses with patients in the visit, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (single answer) format.

Clinician-reported utility (helpfulness) of intervention, assessed using a single adapted item (Dalcin et al., 2015). The item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ('Not at all helpful') to 4 ('Extremely helpful').

Clinician-reported way(s) in which intervention was helpful, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (multiple answer) format.

Clinician-reported impact on amount of time spent with patients, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (single answer) format.

Clinician-reported reason(s) for never discussing intervention responses with patients, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (multiple answer) format.

Clinician-reported reason(s) for only sometimes discussing intervention responses with patients, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (multiple answer) format.

Clinician-reported intervention acceptability, assessed using an adapted version of the 4-item Acceptability of Intervention Measure (Weiner et al., 2017). Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ('Completely disagree') to 5 ('Completely agree'). A respondent's total score is the mean of all item responses.

Clinician-reported preference for using the intervention with patients in the future, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (single answer) format.