Substance UseSubstanceNCT04689997
Online System for Primary Care to Prevent and Address Teen Substance Use
A study testing cSBI in people with Substance Use, run by Total Child Health, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This Quality Improvement (QI) project for physician education will build on an existing platform, CHADIS (Comprehensive Health and Decision Information System; www.CHADIS.com). We plan to further develop and test innovations that will assist primary care providers (PCPs) in addressing the serious morbidity of teen… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 19 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Substance Use
- What is being tested?
- cSBI
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 5,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2021to Aug 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 19 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- English speaking and reading
Who cannot join
- None
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Total Child Health dba CHADIS, Inc.
Baltimore, Maryland, 21210
About this study
This Quality Improvement (QI) project for physician education will build on an existing platform, CHADIS (Comprehensive Health and Decision Information System; www.CHADIS.com). We plan to further develop and test innovations that will assist primary care providers (PCPs) in addressing the serious morbidity of teen substance use during routine check-up visits and follow up care using a new Module of CHADIS that facilitates guideline-based care. The CHADIS c-SBI (computer-facilitated Substance screening and provider Brief Intervention) Module will include pre-visit screening tools that cover substance use and strengths and goals. It will also include reminders to the patient about their goals and commitments for change and a teleprompter for interview hints for the PCP. These hints will be aimed at enhancing a patient focused discussion of individual strengths and barriers related to the teens' goals in a motivational interviewing style.
Read the detailed description
The primary goals of this project are to develop and test an innovative teen substance use (SU) module in CHADIS integrating the cSBI questionnaire and decision support into CHADIS along with teen strength and goal data to be called CHADIS-cSBI. The CHADIS-cSBI will facilitate evidence-based SU screening, severity assessment and initiation of primary care management and care coordination for any referrals to reduce morbidity, mortality and costs of SU. Inclusion of strength and goal data is anticipated to foster the doctor-teen relationship and make SU advice more effective.
Primary Research Questions
- Of those who reported any substance use at their annual well-visit, is there a lower rate of reported use at 3- and 12- months follow-up among those exposed to CHADIS-cSBI as compared to those who received treatment as usual?
- Of those who reported no substance use at their annual well-visit, is there a lower rate of reported use at 3- and 12- months follow-up among those exposed to CHADIS-cSBI as compared to those who received treatment as usual? Secondary Research Question
- Among all patients, is there are lower rate of reported driving after using or riding with a driver who has been using substances (risky driving/riding) at 3- and 12-months follow-up among those exposed to CHADIS-cSBI as compared to those who received treatment as usual? We will employ a cluster randomized two-group pre-test-post-test design, clustered at the provider level. Given the nature of the enhanced care and the measurement it is not possible to randomize at the patient level, and it is not necessary to randomize at the clinic level. The use of a cluster-randomized design adds complexity, and generally requires larger samples to achieve sufficient statistical power as compared to simple randomized control trials. Sample size estimates consider the design effect resulting from a cluster randomized design as well as other assumptions.
A total of 40 PCPs reporting at least 2 teen well visits per week, either in person or by telemedicine visit, will be recruited and randomly assigned in equal numbers to the enhanced care and standard care arms of the study. We will randomize clinicians stratified by whether they have completed Adolescent Medicine fellowships, as those with Adolescent Medicine training have been shown to have higher rates of addressing substance use in their practice. The authors' prior experience showed that, in a trial where the patients were randomized, individual PCPs being trained to deliver the counseling did not give similar levels of counseling to intervention and control patients. Their studies also show wide variation in patient-reported receipt of counseling across participating providers; e.g., within the intervention group, there was a range from 65%-93% across providers within one site. Such heterogeneity within a site reduces concern about contamination of practice across providers. All 12-18 year old patients in the practice will complete pre-visit screens dependent on the randomization of their own attributed PCP. While there are, in fact, three levels (i.e., patient -> practitioner -> practice), we confine the fundamental design herein to two levels (i.e., patient -> practitioner). Intra-class correlations will be used to adjust sample size estimates during power analyses, and also used to account for the covariance that is presumed to exist wherein patients from the same cluster (i.e., PCP) are likely to be more similar to each other than to patients from other clusters. The study design is depicted by the following research design notation figure:
T0 T1 T2 T3 NR O X O O NR O O O
Each line represents the study timeline for an enhanced care group (i.e., first line represents the CHADIS-cSBI group; second line represents the Standard CHADIS group using CRAFFT), N: Indicates the groups are nonequivalent (i.e., subjects are not randomly assigned to treatment).
R: Indicates the groups are derived from randomly assigned PCPs (i.e., the subjects are treated by clinicians randomly assigned to a treatment protocol).
O: Indicates an observation timepoint (i.e., data collection). The first observation (T0) represents baseline substance use for patients at their well-visit; the second and third refer to follow-up assessments at 3 and 12 months post-visit.
X: Indicates the enhanced care (i.e., CHADIS-cSBI) that patients of enhanced care providers will receive.
Finally, because this will be a Quality Improvement study, and practical utility of the CHADIS-cSBI enhanced care applies at the practitioner level rather than the patient level, we will conduct all analyses using Intent to Treat groups, retaining all patients initially enrolled regardless of participation or compliance.
- Conditions
- Substance Use
- Being tested
- cSBI
- Keywords
- substance use
- Medical subject headings
- Substance-Related Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cSBIBehavioural
The standard CRAFFT SU screen has additional questions about reasons to use or not use, SU expectancies of effect and embedded education. The teens of enhanced care PCPs will also complete a Strengths and Goals tool. Data from both will be used by the PCP in counseling regarding continued abstention, reduction or cessation of SU or referral. Teens will also get monthly text messages about goals.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| computerized Substance Brief Intervention cSBI | Experimental | Enhanced care PCPs will address the serious morbidity of teen substance use during routine check-up visits using cSBI and follow up care using a new Module of CHADIS that facilitates guideline-based care. The CHADIS c-SBI Module will include pre-visit screening tools and embedded education that cover substance use and strengths and goals. It will also include reminders to the patient about their goals and commitments for change and teleprompted interview hints for the PCP. These hints will be aimed at enhancing a patient focused discussion of individual strengths and barriers related to the teens' goals in a motivational interviewing style. Receives: Behavioral: cSBI |
| Standard care | No intervention | Standard care PCPs will screen using a standard SU tool and carry out their usual health supervision visits without additional decision support. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Substance use level
Repeated CRAFFT screens at 3 months documenting SU level.
Measured: Change from Day 0 to 3 months
Substance use at one year
Repeated CRAFFT screens at 3 months documenting SU level.
Measured: Change from Day 0 to 11.5 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Riding/driving risky behavior
rate of reported driving after using or riding with a driver who has been using substances
Measured: Change from Day 0 to 3 months
Riding/driving risky behavior
rate of reported driving after using or riding with a driver who has been using substances
Measured: Change from Day 0 to 11.5 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Dec 2020
- Study start1 Feb 2021
- Primary completionAug 2024 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Substance UseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- We will employ a cluster randomized two-group pretest-posttest design, clustered at the provider level.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 5,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Total Child Health, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Boston Children's Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Barbara J Howard, MD, Principal investigator, CHADIS aka Total Child HealthRaymond Sturner, MD, Principal investigator, Center for Promotion of Child DevlopmentSion Harris, PhD, Principal investigator, Boston Children's HospitalLydia Shrier, MD, Principal investigator, Boston Children's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04689997
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R44DA046262
- Acronym
- Substance
- Status last verified
- Jul 2023
- First submitted
- 25 Dec 2020
- Last updated
- 20 Jul 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Only group deidentified data will be shared to qualified researchers after the study results have been reported.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Jul 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Online System for Primary Care to Prevent and Address Teen Substance Use
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04689997
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Substance / R44DA046262
- Conditions
- Substance Use
- Keywords
- substance use
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 5,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Total Child Health, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Boston Children's Hospital
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This Quality Improvement (QI) project for physician education will build on an existing platform, CHADIS (Comprehensive Health and Decision Information System; www.CHADIS.com). We plan to further develop and test innovations that will assist primary care providers (PCPs) in addressing the serious morbidity of teen substance use during routine check-up visits and follow up care using a new Module of CHADIS that facilitates guideline-based care. The CHADIS c-SBI (computer-facilitated Substance screening and provider Brief Intervention) Module will include pre-visit screening tools that cover substance use and strengths and goals. It will also include reminders to the patient about their goals and commitments for change and a teleprompter for interview hints for the PCP. These hints will be aimed at enhancing a patient focused discussion of individual strengths and barriers related to the teens' goals in a motivational interviewing style.
Detailed description
The primary goals of this project are to develop and test an innovative teen substance use (SU) module in CHADIS integrating the cSBI questionnaire and decision support into CHADIS along with teen strength and goal data to be called CHADIS-cSBI. The CHADIS-cSBI will facilitate evidence-based SU screening, severity assessment and initiation of primary care management and care coordination for any referrals to reduce morbidity, mortality and costs of SU. Inclusion of strength and goal data is anticipated to foster the doctor-teen relationship and make SU advice more effective.
Primary Research Questions
- Of those who reported any substance use at their annual well-visit, is there a lower rate of reported use at 3- and 12- months follow-up among those exposed to CHADIS-cSBI as compared to those who received treatment as usual?
- Of those who reported no substance use at their annual well-visit, is there a lower rate of reported use at 3- and 12- months follow-up among those exposed to CHADIS-cSBI as compared to those who received treatment as usual? Secondary Research Question
- Among all patients, is there are lower rate of reported driving after using or riding with a driver who has been using substances (risky driving/riding) at 3- and 12-months follow-up among those exposed to CHADIS-cSBI as compared to those who received treatment as usual? We will employ a cluster randomized two-group pre-test-post-test design, clustered at the provider level. Given the nature of the enhanced care and the measurement it is not possible to randomize at the patient level, and it is not necessary to randomize at the clinic level. The use of a cluster-randomized design adds complexity, and generally requires larger samples to achieve sufficient statistical power as compared to simple randomized control trials. Sample size estimates consider the design effect resulting from a cluster randomized design as well as other assumptions.
A total of 40 PCPs reporting at least 2 teen well visits per week, either in person or by telemedicine visit, will be recruited and randomly assigned in equal numbers to the enhanced care and standard care arms of the study. We will randomize clinicians stratified by whether they have completed Adolescent Medicine fellowships, as those with Adolescent Medicine training have been shown to have higher rates of addressing substance use in their practice. The authors' prior experience showed that, in a trial where the patients were randomized, individual PCPs being trained to deliver the counseling did not give similar levels of counseling to intervention and control patients. Their studies also show wide variation in patient-reported receipt of counseling across participating providers; e.g., within the intervention group, there was a range from 65%-93% across providers within one site. Such heterogeneity within a site reduces concern about contamination of practice across providers. All 12-18 year old patients in the practice will complete pre-visit screens dependent on the randomization of their own attributed PCP. While there are, in fact, three levels (i.e., patient -> practitioner -> practice), we confine the fundamental design herein to two levels (i.e., patient -> practitioner). Intra-class correlations will be used to adjust sample size estimates during power analyses, and also used to account for the covariance that is presumed to exist wherein patients from the same cluster (i.e., PCP) are likely to be more similar to each other than to patients from other clusters. The study design is depicted by the following research design notation figure:
T0 T1 T2 T3 NR O X O O NR O O O
Each line represents the study timeline for an enhanced care group (i.e., first line represents the CHADIS-cSBI group; second line represents the Standard CHADIS group using CRAFFT), N: Indicates the groups are nonequivalent (i.e., subjects are not randomly assigned to treatment).
R: Indicates the groups are derived from randomly assigned PCPs (i.e., the subjects are treated by clinicians randomly assigned to a treatment protocol).
O: Indicates an observation timepoint (i.e., data collection). The first observation (T0) represents baseline substance use for patients at their well-visit; the second and third refer to follow-up assessments at 3 and 12 months post-visit.
X: Indicates the enhanced care (i.e., CHADIS-cSBI) that patients of enhanced care providers will receive.
Finally, because this will be a Quality Improvement study, and practical utility of the CHADIS-cSBI enhanced care applies at the practitioner level rather than the patient level, we will conduct all analyses using Intent to Treat groups, retaining all patients initially enrolled regardless of participation or compliance.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- We will employ a cluster randomized two-group pretest-posttest design, clustered at the provider level.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| computerized Substance Brief Intervention cSBI | Experimental | Behavioral: cSBIEnhanced care PCPs will address the serious morbidity of teen substance use during routine check-up visits using cSBI and follow up care using a new Module of CHADIS that facilitates guideline-based care. The CHADIS c-SBI Module will include pre-visit screening tools and embedded education that cover substance use and strengths and goals. It will also include reminders to the patient about their goals and commitments for change and teleprompted interview hints for the PCP. These hints will be aimed at enhancing a patient focused discussion of individual strengths and barriers related to the teens' goals in a motivational interviewing style. |
| Standard care | No intervention | –Standard care PCPs will screen using a standard SU tool and carry out their usual health supervision visits without additional decision support. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 19 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- English speaking and reading
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- None
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cSBIThe standard CRAFFT SU screen has additional questions about reasons to use or not use, SU expectancies of effect and embedded education. The teens of enhanced care PCPs will also complete a Strengths and Goals tool. Data from both will be used by the PCP in counseling regarding continued abstention, reduction or cessation of SU or referral. Teens will also get monthly text messages about goals. | Behavioural | computerized Substance Brief Intervention cSBI |
Primary outcome
Substance use level
Time frame: Change from Day 0 to 3 months
Repeated CRAFFT screens at 3 months documenting SU level.
Substance use at one year
Time frame: Change from Day 0 to 11.5 months
Repeated CRAFFT screens at 3 months documenting SU level.
2 secondary outcomes
Riding/driving risky behavior
Time frame: Change from Day 0 to 3 months
Riding/driving risky behavior
Time frame: Change from Day 0 to 11.5 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Jul 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Only group deidentified data will be shared to qualified researchers after the study results have been reported.
Related trials for Substance Use
RecruitingObservational study
Structural Stressors, Reward Related Decision Making and Substance Use Risk
Substance Use Risk, Structural Stressors
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Development of an Interview-Informed Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) for Opioid Use in the Era of Fentanyl
Substance Use Disorders (SUDs)
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Barbara J Howard, MD principal investigator
CHADIS aka Total Child Health
Raymond Sturner, MD principal investigator
Center for Promotion of Child Devlopment
Sion Harris, PhD principal investigator
Boston Children's Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing cSBI in people with Substance Use, run by Total Child Health, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Substance use level (time frame: Change from Day 0 to 3 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jul 2023.