Coronary Microvascular DiseaseRAIN FLOWNCT04685941
Treatment of Slow-flow After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Flow-mediated Hyperemia
A study testing Drug-mediated hyperemia and Flow-mediated hyperemia in people with Coronary Microvascular Disease and Myocardial Infarction, run by Fundación EPIC at 5 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
A total of 100 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presenting slow-flow after primary-percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) will be randomized to pharmacologic treatment with hyperemic drugs versus flow-mediated hyperemia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Microvascular Disease, Myocardial Infarction
- What is being tested?
- Drug-mediated hyperemia and Flow-mediated hyperemia
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 67 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- 25 Jan 2021to 31 Oct 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ST elevation myocardial infarction Killip I <12 hours since symptoms onset.
- ST elevation > 2 mm anterior leads or > 1 mm inferior or lateral leads.
- Sustained slow coronary flow (TIMI flow 0-2) for at least 30 seconds after stent implantation or stent post-dilatation.
Who cannot join
- Previous myocardial infarction in the culprit artery
- Previous stroke
- Advanced kidney disease (creatinine clearance <30 ml / min).
- Active bleeding
- Allergy to contrast, nitroprussiate or adenosine.
- Culprit lesion in coronary bypass, left main coronary artery or stent thrombosis
- Macroscopic thrombus embolization in the infarct-related artery
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
Spain5 sites
Hospital del Mar
Barcelona, 08003
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
Barcelona, 08036
Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar
Cadiz, 11009
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907
Hospital La Princesa
Madrid, 28006
About this study
A total of 100 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presenting slow-flow after primary-percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) will be randomized to pharmacologic treatment with hyperemic drugs versus flow-mediated hyperemia.
Read the detailed description
Slow-flow phenomena is observed around 15% of patients undergoing PPCI and has been associated with poor prognosis. Hyperemic drugs, such as nitroprussiate and adenosine, have not yet demonstrated to reduce the infarct size and prognosis in patients with slow flow. Controlled flow-mediated hyperemia using a dedicated catheter for intracoronary saline infusion has been shown to stimulate microcirculatory vasodilatation in stable patients similarly as hyperemic drugs.
The aims of the study are to compare the absolute microcirculatory resistance of the infarct-related artery presenting with slow flow after PPCI, as assessed by intracoronary thermo-dilution, treated with standard pharmacologic hyperemia versus flow-mediated hyperemia; and to compare the angiographic TIMI frame count after treatment of slow flow phenomena with the two investigated strategies.
- Being tested
- Drug-mediated hyperemia, Flow-mediated hyperemia
- Keywords
- Coronary Microvascular Disease, Myocardial Infarction
- Medical subject headings
- Microvascular Angina, Myocardial Infarction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Drug-mediated hyperemiaDrug
Intracoronary bolus of at least 200 mcg of nitroprussiate or 500 mcg of intracoronary adenosine during 2 minutes. Operators are allowed to combine both drugs.
Flow-mediated hyperemiaOther
Intracoronary saline infusion at 20 ml/min via dedicated microcatheter (RayFlow; Hexacath, France) during two minutes.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Drug-mediated hyperemia | Other | Patients presenting with slow flow after PPCI undergo to at least 200 mcg of intracoronary nitroprussiate or 500 mcg of intracoronary adenosine during 2 minutes Receives: Drug: Drug-mediated hyperemia |
| Flow-mediated hyperemia | Experimental | Patients presenting with slow flow after PPCI undergo to controlled saline intracoronary infusion by a dedicated microcatheter (RayFlow) at 20 ml/min during 2 minutes Receives: Other: Flow-mediated hyperemia |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Angiographic TIMI frame count
Cine-fluoroscopic recording of the infarct-related artery (IRA) at 30 frames/second and off-line core-laboratory assessment of the number of cineframes needed for dye to reach standardized distal landmarks is the coprimary endpoint. Long TIMI frame counts are indicative of slow coronary flow. Previous studies showed TIMI frame counts of 30 (SD 12) after nitroprussiate in slow flow STEMI patients. The present study is powered to assess 25 percent difference between study groups (80 percent power and 5 percent alfa error).
Measured: 2 minutes
Minimal microcirculatory resistance (MMR)
MMR is assessed by intracoronary thermodilution with a dedicated pressure wire and microcatheter (RayFlow, Hexacath) during saline infusion at 20 ml/min. MMR is measured offline by the core-laboratory at 20 seconds of the saline infusion in the standard medical treatment group and at 2 minutes and 20 seconds in the experimental group. According to previous studies, MMR was 537 Wood units (SD 289). The present study is powered to assess 30 percent difference between study groups after study intervention (80 percent power and 5 percent alfa error).
Measured: 2 minutes
Comparison of the MMR in the experimental group during the two-minutes saline infusion
Experimental treatment with saline infusion via microcatheter is performed continuously recording the pressure and temperature values of the culprit artery. Off-line core-laboratory assessment of the MMR will be performed at 20 seconds and at 2 minutes of the saline infusion.
Measured: 2 minutes
Comparison of the Absolute coronary flow between the study groups.
Absolute coronary flow is performed simultaneously with the MMR. This value shows the coronary blood flow of the culprit artery during maximal hyperemia.
Measured: 2 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Dec 2020
- Study start25 Jan 2021
- Primary completion31 Oct 2022
- Study completion31 Oct 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Microvascular DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 67 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fundación EPIC
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Barcicore-Lab
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04685941
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EPIC24-RAIN-FLOW
- Acronym
- RAIN FLOW
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 22 Dec 2020
- Last updated
- 10 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Ndrepepa G, Tiroch K, Keta D, Fusaro M, Seyfarth M, Pache J, Mehilli J, Schomig A, Kastrati A. Predictive factors and impact of no reflow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Feb 1;3(1):27-33. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.896225. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
PubMed 20118156Airoldi F, Briguori C, Cianflone D, Cosgrave J, Stankovic G, Godino C, Carlino M, Chieffo A, Montorfano M, Mussardo M, Michev I, Colombo A, Maseri A. Frequency of slow coronary flow following successful stent implantation and effect of Nitroprusside. Am J Cardiol. 2007 Apr 1;99(7):916-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.10.057. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
PubMed 17398183Wijnbergen I, van 't Veer M, Lammers J, Ubachs J, Pijls NH. Absolute coronary blood flow measurement and microvascular resistance in ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the acute and subacute phase. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Mar;17(2):81-7. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.12.013. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
PubMed 26905054van 't Veer M, Adjedj J, Wijnbergen I, Toth GG, Rutten MC, Barbato E, van Nunen LX, Pijls NH, De Bruyne B. Novel monorail infusion catheter for volumetric coronary blood flow measurement in humans: in vitro validation. EuroIntervention. 2016 Aug 20;12(6):701-7. doi: 10.4244/EIJV12I6A114.
PubMed 27542781Gibson CM, Schomig A. Coronary and myocardial angiography: angiographic assessment of both epicardial and myocardial perfusion. Circulation. 2004 Jun 29;109(25):3096-105. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000134278.50359.CB. No abstract available.
PubMed 15226226Gomez-Lara J, Gracida M, Rivero F, Gutierrez-Barrios A, Muntane-Carol G, Romaguera R, Fuentes L, Marcano A, Roura G, Ferreiro JL, Teruel L, Brugaletta S, Alfonso F, Comin-Colet J, Gomez-Hospital JA. Treatment of Slow-Flow After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Flow-Mediated Hyperemia: The Randomized RAIN-FLOW Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Jul 4;12(13):e030285. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030285. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
PubMed 37345805
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Treatment of Slow-flow After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Flow-mediated Hyperemia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04685941
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RAIN FLOW / EPIC24-RAIN-FLOW
- Keywords
- Coronary Microvascular Disease, Myocardial Infarction
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 67 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fundación EPICUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Barcicore-Lab
- Study start
- 25 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Oct 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A total of 100 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presenting slow-flow after primary-percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) will be randomized to pharmacologic treatment with hyperemic drugs versus flow-mediated hyperemia.
Detailed description
Slow-flow phenomena is observed around 15% of patients undergoing PPCI and has been associated with poor prognosis. Hyperemic drugs, such as nitroprussiate and adenosine, have not yet demonstrated to reduce the infarct size and prognosis in patients with slow flow. Controlled flow-mediated hyperemia using a dedicated catheter for intracoronary saline infusion has been shown to stimulate microcirculatory vasodilatation in stable patients similarly as hyperemic drugs.
The aims of the study are to compare the absolute microcirculatory resistance of the infarct-related artery presenting with slow flow after PPCI, as assessed by intracoronary thermo-dilution, treated with standard pharmacologic hyperemia versus flow-mediated hyperemia; and to compare the angiographic TIMI frame count after treatment of slow flow phenomena with the two investigated strategies.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Drug-mediated hyperemia | Other | Drug: Drug-mediated hyperemiaPatients presenting with slow flow after PPCI undergo to at least 200 mcg of intracoronary nitroprussiate or 500 mcg of intracoronary adenosine during 2 minutes |
| Flow-mediated hyperemia | Experimental | Other: Flow-mediated hyperemiaPatients presenting with slow flow after PPCI undergo to controlled saline intracoronary infusion by a dedicated microcatheter (RayFlow) at 20 ml/min during 2 minutes |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- ST elevation myocardial infarction Killip I <12 hours since symptoms onset.
- ST elevation > 2 mm anterior leads or > 1 mm inferior or lateral leads.
- Sustained slow coronary flow (TIMI flow 0-2) for at least 30 seconds after stent implantation or stent post-dilatation.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Previous myocardial infarction in the culprit artery
- Previous stroke
- Advanced kidney disease (creatinine clearance <30 ml / min).
- Active bleeding
- Allergy to contrast, nitroprussiate or adenosine.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Drug-mediated hyperemiaIntracoronary bolus of at least 200 mcg of nitroprussiate or 500 mcg of intracoronary adenosine during 2 minutes. Operators are allowed to combine both drugs. | Drug | Drug-mediated hyperemia |
| Flow-mediated hyperemiaIntracoronary saline infusion at 20 ml/min via dedicated microcatheter (RayFlow; Hexacath, France) during two minutes. | Other | Flow-mediated hyperemia |
Primary outcome
Angiographic TIMI frame count
Time frame: 2 minutes
Cine-fluoroscopic recording of the infarct-related artery (IRA) at 30 frames/second and off-line core-laboratory assessment of the number of cineframes needed for dye to reach standardized distal landmarks is the coprimary endpoint. Long TIMI frame counts are indicative of slow coronary flow. Previous studies showed TIMI frame counts of 30 (SD 12) after nitroprussiate in slow flow STEMI patients. The present study is powered to assess 25 percent difference between study groups (80 percent power and 5 percent alfa error).
Minimal microcirculatory resistance (MMR)
Time frame: 2 minutes
MMR is assessed by intracoronary thermodilution with a dedicated pressure wire and microcatheter (RayFlow, Hexacath) during saline infusion at 20 ml/min. MMR is measured offline by the core-laboratory at 20 seconds of the saline infusion in the standard medical treatment group and at 2 minutes and 20 seconds in the experimental group. According to previous studies, MMR was 537 Wood units (SD 289). The present study is powered to assess 30 percent difference between study groups after study intervention (80 percent power and 5 percent alfa error).
Comparison of the MMR in the experimental group during the two-minutes saline infusion
Time frame: 2 minutes
Experimental treatment with saline infusion via microcatheter is performed continuously recording the pressure and temperature values of the culprit artery. Off-line core-laboratory assessment of the MMR will be performed at 20 seconds and at 2 minutes of the saline infusion.
Comparison of the Absolute coronary flow between the study groups.
Time frame: 2 minutes
Absolute coronary flow is performed simultaneously with the MMR. This value shows the coronary blood flow of the culprit artery during maximal hyperemia.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Nov 2022.
- Background: PubMed 20118156Ndrepepa G, Tiroch K, Keta D, Fusaro M, Seyfarth M, Pache J, Mehilli J, Schomig A, Kastrati A. Predictive factors and impact of no reflow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Feb 1;3(1):27-33. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.896225. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
- Background: PubMed 17398183Airoldi F, Briguori C, Cianflone D, Cosgrave J, Stankovic G, Godino C, Carlino M, Chieffo A, Montorfano M, Mussardo M, Michev I, Colombo A, Maseri A. Frequency of slow coronary flow following successful stent implantation and effect of Nitroprusside. Am J Cardiol. 2007 Apr 1;99(7):916-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.10.057. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
- Background: PubMed 26905054Wijnbergen I, van 't Veer M, Lammers J, Ubachs J, Pijls NH. Absolute coronary blood flow measurement and microvascular resistance in ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the acute and subacute phase. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Mar;17(2):81-7. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.12.013. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
- Background: PubMed 27542781van 't Veer M, Adjedj J, Wijnbergen I, Toth GG, Rutten MC, Barbato E, van Nunen LX, Pijls NH, De Bruyne B. Novel monorail infusion catheter for volumetric coronary blood flow measurement in humans: in vitro validation. EuroIntervention. 2016 Aug 20;12(6):701-7. doi: 10.4244/EIJV12I6A114.
- Background: PubMed 15226226Gibson CM, Schomig A. Coronary and myocardial angiography: angiographic assessment of both epicardial and myocardial perfusion. Circulation. 2004 Jun 29;109(25):3096-105. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000134278.50359.CB. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37345805Gomez-Lara J, Gracida M, Rivero F, Gutierrez-Barrios A, Muntane-Carol G, Romaguera R, Fuentes L, Marcano A, Roura G, Ferreiro JL, Teruel L, Brugaletta S, Alfonso F, Comin-Colet J, Gomez-Hospital JA. Treatment of Slow-Flow After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Flow-Mediated Hyperemia: The Randomized RAIN-FLOW Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Jul 4;12(13):e030285. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030285. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
Related trials for Coronary Microvascular Disease
Active, not recruiting
A Single Center Diagnostic, Cross-sectional Study of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction
Coronary Microvascular Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The Role of CD34+ Stem Cells in the Pathogenesis of Takotsubo Syndrome
Tako Tsubo Cardiomyopathy, Microvascular Dysfunction
Recruiting
Invasive Evaluation and Phenotype-Guided Treatment of ANOCA in Women
ANOCA - Angina With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries, Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction (CMD)
RecruitingObservational study
Mechanical Dyssynchrony and Microvascular Dysfunction by SPECT
Myocardial Blood Flow Reserve, Mechanical Dyssynchrony
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Simultaneous Measurement of EpicArdial and Microvascular ResisTance Via Angiographic FLOW Study
Non-obstructive Coronary Disease, Acute or Chronic Coronary Artery Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Drug-mediated hyperemia and Flow-mediated hyperemia in people with Coronary Microvascular Disease and Myocardial Infarction, run by Fundación EPIC at 5 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Angiographic TIMI frame count (time frame: 2 minutes). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04685941, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Nov 2022.