Allergic Fungal RhinosinusitisPhase 3AIMSNCT04684524
Dupilumab in Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis (AFRS)
A Phase 3 study testing Dupilumab SAR231893 in people with Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis, run by Sanofi at 47 sites in 9 countries.
Trial summary
Primary Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of treatment with dupilumab to reduce sinus opacification in a population with allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) Secondary Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of treatment with dupilumab to reduce sinus opacification in a population with allergic fungal rhinosinusitis… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis
- What is being tested?
- Dupilumab SAR231893
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 62 participants
- Where
- 47 sitesin 9 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2020to 7 Mar 2025
- Phase
- Phase 3
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participant must be at least 6 years of age (or the minimum legal age for adolescents in the country of the investigational site) at the time of signing the informed consent.
- Participants with the diagnosis of AFRS adapted from criteria by Bent and Kuhn (meeting all):
- IgE mediated inflammatory response to fungal hyphae (specific IgE serology or skin test) Evidence of sensitization to fungus by skin testing (at screening or documented historical positive skin test in the previous 12 months), or positive fungal-specific IgE in serum at screening.
- Nasal polyposis confirmed by nasal endoscopy at screening.
- Characteristic CT signs to be performed during screening period and can include any of the below signs as assessed by central reader:
- hyperdensities
Show all 13Show fewer
- bony demineralization
- bone erosion of sinus
- Eosinophilic mucin/mucus identified within 5 years prior to screening or at screening with or without positive fungal stain
- AFRS patients with the following:
- An endoscopic NPS of at least 2 out of 4 for unilateral polyps or 3 out of 8 for bilateral polyps at Visit 1 (central reading) and Visit 2 (local reading) and,
- Sinus opacification in CT scan with an LMK score of 9 for patients with unilateral polyps or 12 for patients with bilateral polyps during screening period and,
- Body weight ≥15 kg
Who cannot join
- Patients with nasal conditions/concomitant nasal diseases making them non-evaluable at Visit 1 or for the primary efficacy
- Nasal cavity malignant tumor and benign tumors.
- Known of fungal invasion into sinus tissue.
- Severe concomitant illness(es) that, in the investigator's judgment, would adversely affect the patient's participation in the study
- Active tuberculosis or non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection, or a history of incompletely treated tuberculosis unless documented adequately treated.
- Diagnosed active endoparasitic infections; suspected or high risk of endoparasitic infection
Show all 20Show fewer
- Known or suspected immunodeficiency
- Active chronic or acute infection requiring treatment with systemic antibiotics, antivirals, or antifungals within 2 weeks before the Screening Visit 1 or during the screening period.
- History of systemic hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis to dupilumab or any of its excipients.
- Treatment with commercially available dupilumab within 12 months, participation in prior dupilumab clinical trial, or discontinued dupilumab use due to adverse event.
- Patients who are treated with intranasal corticosteroid drops; intranasal steroid emitting devices/stents; nasal spray using exhalation delivery system, such as Xhance™, during screening period.
- Patients who are on intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) spray unless they have received stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1.
- Patients who have undergone sinus intranasal surgery (including polypectomy) within 6 months prior to Visit 1.
- Patients who have taken:
- Biologic therapy/systemic immunosuppressant to treat inflammatory disease or autoimmune disease within 5 half-lives prior to Visit 1
- Any investigational mAb within 5 half-lives prior to Visit 1
- Anti-IgE therapy (omalizumab) within 4 months prior to Visit 1. - Treatment with a live (attenuated) vaccine within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1
- Leukotriene antagonists/modifiers unless patient is on a continuous treatment for at least 30 days prior to Visit 1.
- Initiation of allergen immunotherapy within 3 months prior to Visit 1 or a plan to begin therapy or change its dose during the screening or treatment period. - Patients received SCS during screening period. - Either intravenous immunoglobulin therapy and/or plasmapheresis within 30 days prior to Screening Visit (Visit 1).
- The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Trial locations and contacts
47 sites in 9 countries.
47 sites in 9 countries
United States11 sites
Emory University Hospital Midtown Campus Site Number : 8400009
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308
REX Clinical Trials Site Number : 8400017
Beaumont, Texas, 77701-3713
National Allergy and Asthma Research, LLC Site Number : 8400002
Charleston, South Carolina, 29407
Ut- Houston Medical School Site Number : 8400010
Houston, Texas, 77030
Advanced ENT and Allergy Site Number : 8400004
Louisville, Kentucky, 40220
South Louisiana Ear, Nose, Throat and Facial Plastic Surgery Site Number : 8400019
Mandeville, Louisiana, 70471
Vanderbilt University Medical Center Site Number : 8400013
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Eastern Virginia Medical School (EVMS) Medical Group - Otola Site Number : 8400008
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
USA Clinical Trials Site Number : 8400020
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Alamo ENT Associates Site Number : 8400018
San Antonio, Texas, 78258
Asthma Allergy & Immunology Clinical Research Unit Site Number : 8400001
Tampa, Florida, 33613
China11 sites
Investigational Site Number : 1560005
Beijing, 100050
Investigational Site Number : 1560001
Beijing, 100730
Investigational Site Number : 1560004
Changsha, 410013
Investigational Site Number : 1560003
Chengdu, 610041
Investigational Site Number : 1560013
Fuzhou, 350005
Investigational Site Number : 1560006
Hangzhou, 310003
Investigational Site Number : 1560012
Hefei
Investigational Site Number : 1560002
Nanjing, 210029
Investigational Site Number : 1560011
Qingdao, 266555
Investigational Site Number : 1560009
Shanghai, 200030
Investigational Site Number : 1560008
Taiyuan, 030001
Japan6 sites
Investigational Site Number : 3920008
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8431
Investigational Site Number : 3920010
Isehara, Kanagawa, 2591193
Investigational Site Number : 3920001
Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8515
Investigational Site Number : 3920003
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 141-0001
Investigational Site Number : 3920009
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582
Investigational Site Number : 3920006
Shizuoka, Shizuoka, 420-0853
Turkey (Türkiye)6 sites
Investigational Site Number : 7920004
Adana, 01380
Investigational Site Number : 7920001
Istanbul, 34093
Investigational Site Number : 7920007
Istanbul, 34865
Investigational Site Number : 7920006
Izmir, 35100
Investigational Site Number : 7920003
Izmir, 35340
Investigational Site Number : 7920005
Malatya, 44280
Argentina5 sites
Investigational Site Number : 0320002
Buenos Aires, C1121ABE
Investigational Site Number : 0320003
CABA, Buenos Aires, C1414AIF
Investigational Site Number : 0320001
CABA, Buenos Aires, C1425BEN
Investigational Site Number : 0320004
Mendoza, 5500
Investigational Site Number : 0320005
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, 2000
India3 sites
Investigational Site Number : 3560003
Coimbatore, 641028
Investigational Site Number : 3560006
Jodhpur, 342005
Investigational Site Number : 3560008
New Delhi, 110 062.
Israel2 sites
Investigational Site Number : 3760001
Petah Tikva, 49100
Investigational Site Number : 3760002
Rehovot, 76100
Saudi Arabia2 sites
Investigational Site Number : 6820002
Riyadh, 12713
Investigational Site Number : 6820001
Riyadh, 22252
Canada1 site
Investigational Site Number : 1240001
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Parallel Group Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Patients With Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis (AFRS)
Primary Objective:
- To evaluate the efficacy of treatment with dupilumab to reduce sinus opacification in a population with allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS)
Read more
Secondary Objectives:
- To evaluate the efficacy of treatment with dupilumab to reduce sinus opacification in a population with allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) at Week 24
- To assess the efficacy of dupilumab to reduce the need for rescue treatments
- To evaluate the efficacy of treatment with dupilumab in improving symptoms in AFRS
- To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab to reduce nasal polyp formation in participants with AFRS
- To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving overall symptom severity and quality of life in AFRS
- To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving sense of smell in participants with AFRS
- To explore the effect of dupilumab as assessed by three-Dimensional CT volumetric measurement of the paranasal sinuses
- To evaluate the safety and tolerability of dupilumab when administered to participants with AFRS
- To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of dupilumab in participants with AFRS
- To characterize the effect of dupilumab on total IgE and specific IgE
- To assess immunogenicity to dupilumab in participants with AFRS
Read the detailed description
The duration of study for each participant will include 2-4 weeks of screening period (2 additional weeks could be allowed), 52 weeks of randomized investigational medicinal product (IMP) intervention period and 12 weeks of follow-up period.
- Conditions
- Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis
- Being tested
- Dupilumab SAR231893, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Allergic Fungal Sinusitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dupilumab SAR231893Drug
Pharmaceutical form:Injection solution Route of administration: Subcutaneous
PlaceboDrug
Pharmaceutical form:Injection solution Route of administration: Subcutaneous
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dupilumab | Experimental | Dupilumab administered every 2 or 4 weeks based on weights Receives: Drug: Dupilumab SAR231893 |
| Matching placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo administered every 2 or 4 weeks based on weights Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK Score
The LMK score is used to quantify the degree of opacification of each sinus on CT scan. The CT scan LMK staging system represents the most widely established method of sinus CT scoring. The LMK total score is based on assessment of the CT scan findings for each sinus area (maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinus plus the osteomeatal complex on each side). The extent of sinus opacification is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 = normal to 2 = total opacification. In addition, the osteomeatal complex is graded as 0 = not occluded or 2 = occluded. The maximum score is 12 per side; total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified) corresponding to the sum of all sinuses and the osteomeatal complexes bilaterally. Higher score indicate worse outcome; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Secondary outcomes (22)
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score From the Nasal Symptom Diary
The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) nasal symptoms on daily basis. Score range: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms (symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness and easily tolerated), 2= moderate symptoms (definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3 = severe symptoms (symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living). Higher scores denote greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 24
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Endoscopy Nasal Polyp Score (NPS)
The bilateral endoscopy NPS is determined by the clinician who assesses nasal polyp formation. Polyps on each side of the nose are graded based on polyp size; scores: 0 = no polyps; 1 = small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate; 2 = polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate; 3 = large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate or polyps medial to the middle turbinate and 4 = large polyps causing complete obstruction. The total score is the sum of the right and left nostrils, ranging from 0 (no obstruction) to 8 (complete obstruction); higher score indicating worse outcome; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK Score
The LMK score is used to quantify the degree of opacification of each sinus on CT scan. The CT scan LMK staging system represents the most widely established method of sinus CT scoring. The LMK total score is based on assessment of the CT scan findings for each sinus area (maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinus plus the osteomeatal complex on each side). The extent of sinus opacification is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 = normal to 2 = total opacification. In addition, the osteomeatal complex is graded as 0 = not occluded or 2 = occluded. The maximum score is 12 per side; total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified) corresponding to the sum of all sinuses and the osteomeatal complexes bilaterally. Higher score indicate worse outcome; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Total Symptom Score (TSS) Derived From the Nasal Symptom Diary
The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of CRS nasal symptoms on daily basis. The TSS is a composite score consisting of the sum of the following symptoms assessed daily in the morning: nasal congestion/obstruction, decreased/loss of sense of smell, rhinorrhea (average of anterior/posterior nasal discharge). Each of the individual items were scored from 0 = no symptoms to 3 = severe symptoms. TSS is the sum of individual items and ranges between 0 = no symptoms and 9 = severe symptoms. Higher scores on the TSS indicate greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 24
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT)
The UPSIT (UPSIT 40 odorant test) is a rapid and easy-to-administer method to quantitatively assess human olfactory function. The test consists of 4 booklets, each containing 10 odorants with 1 odorant per page. Above each odorant strip is a multiple-choice question with 4 alternative words to describe the odor and the participant is asked to indicate which word best describes the odor. Each smell has a possible of 4 answers with one being correct, therefore the potential total scores can range from 0 (worst possible score) to 40 (best possible score), with 1 point being awarded for each correctly identified odor. Scores of <=18 were classified as anosmia, 19 to 25 as severe microsmia, 26 to 30 as moderate microsmia, 31 to 34 as mild microsmia, and 35 to 40 as normal smell appreciation. Higher scores indicated better olfactory function; i.e. better sense of smell. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Decreased/Loss of Smell Using the Nasal Symptom Diary
The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of CRS nasal symptoms on daily basis. Decreased/loss of smell is scored as: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms (symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness and easily tolerated), 2= moderate symptoms (definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3 = severe symptoms (symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living). Higher scores denote greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 24
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Endoscopy NPS
The bilateral endoscopy NPS is determined by the clinician who assesses nasal polyp formation. Polyps on each side of the nose are graded based on polyp size; scores: 0 = no polyps; 1 = small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate; 2 = polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate; 3 = large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate or polyps medial to the middle turbinate and 4 = large polyps causing complete obstruction. The total score is the sum of the right and left nostrils, ranging from 0 (no obstruction) to 8 (complete obstruction); higher score indicating worse outcome; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Monthly Average Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score From the Nasal Symptom Diary
The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of CRS nasal symptoms on daily basis. Score range: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms (symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness and easily tolerated), 2= moderate symptoms (definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3 = severe symptoms (symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living). Higher scores denote greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 52
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Total Score
The SNOT-22 is a validated questionnaire designed to assess the impact of CRS on participants health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and has 22 items covering symptoms, social/emotional impact, productivity, and sleep consequences of CRS. The recall period is past 2 weeks. Each item is rated on a 6-point Likert scale; response options ranging from 0 = no problem to 5 = problem as bad as it can be. A global score ranging from 0 (no impact) to 110 (severe impact) is calculated by summing the responses to all items; higher score indicates greater rhinosinusitis-related health burden; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Three-dimensional CT Total Volume Occupied by Disease in All Sinuses
This method is used to calculate the percent occupied by disease. It is performed at locations including ethmoid sinus, frontal sinus, maxillary sinus, and sphenoid sinus. The total volume occupied by disease in all sinuses is reported here. For the analysis, central reading at baseline was used for comparison with Week 52 reading. It is graded on a scale of 0-100%; a higher score is worse and indicates greater volume occupied by disease. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Percentage of Participants Who Received Systemic Corticosteroids (SCS) and/or Underwent or Planned to Undergo Surgery for Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis (AFRS) at Week 52
SCS use was defined as the use of SCS for rescue treatment of AFRS or for another reason and was captured by the Investigator (or designee) in electronic case report form (eCRF). Participants who underwent or planned to undergo surgery for AFRS were also recorded in eCRF.
Measured: Week 52
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in SNOT-22 Total Score
The SNOT-22 is a validated questionnaire designed to assess the impact of CRS on participants HRQoL and has 22 items covering symptoms, social/emotional impact, productivity, and sleep consequences of CRS. The recall period is past 2 weeks. Each item is rated on a 6-point Likert scale; response options ranging from 0 = no problem to 5 = problem as bad as it can be. A global score ranging from 0 (no impact) to 110 (severe impact) is calculated by summing the responses to all items; higher score indicates greater rhinosinusitis-related health burden; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Total Immunoglobulin-E (IgE) to Week 52
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for the assessment of IgE. Total IgE was measured with a quantitative method approved for diagnostic testing; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 52 in the Monthly Average Rhinorrhea Score From the Nasal Symptom Diary
The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of CRS nasal symptoms on daily basis. Score range: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms (symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness and easily tolerated), 2= moderate symptoms (definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3 = severe symptoms (symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living). Higher scores denote greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Severity of rhinorrhea (average of anterior [runny nose]/posterior nasal discharge [post-nasal drip]) is presented here. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Weeks 24 and 52
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Monthly Average TSS Derived From the Nasal Symptom Diary
The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of CRS nasal symptoms on daily basis. The TSS is a composite score consisting of the sum of the following symptoms assessed daily in the morning: nasal congestion/obstruction, decreased/loss of sense of smell, rhinorrhea (average of anterior/posterior nasal discharge). Each of the individual items were scored from 0 = no symptoms to 3 = severe symptoms. TSS is the sum of individual items and ranges between 0 = no symptoms and 9 = severe symptoms. Higher scores on the TSS indicate greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 52
Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 52 in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Rhinosinusitis
The rhinosinusitis VAS is used to evaluate the overall severity of the rhinosinusitis. It is a recommended scale to determine the participant's disease severity and to guide the treatment for CRS. The participant is asked to answer the following question: "How troublesome are your symptoms of your rhinosinusitis" on a 10-centimeter VAS from 0 = not troublesome to 10 = worst thinkable troublesome. Based on their score on the VAS, the severity of rhinosinusitis is divided into 3 categories as follows: mild = VAS 0 to 3, moderate = VAS >3 to 7 and severe = VAS >7 to 10; higher score indicating worse outcome; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 52
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in UPSIT
The UPSIT (UPSIT 40 odorant test) is a rapid and easy-to-administer method to quantitatively assess human olfactory function. The test consists of 4 booklets, each containing 10 odorants with 1 odorant per page. Above each odorant strip is a multiple-choice question with 4 alternative words to describe the odor and the participant is asked to indicate which word best describes the odor. Each smell has a possible of 4 answers with one being correct, therefore the potential total scores can range from 0 (worst possible score) to 40 (best possible score), with 1 point being awarded for each correctly identified odor. Scores of <=18 were classified as anosmia, 19 to 25 as severe microsmia, 26 to 30 as moderate microsmia, 31 to 34 as mild microsmia, and 35 to 40 as normal smell appreciation. Higher scores indicated better olfactory function, i.e. better sense of smell. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Monthly Average Decreased/Loss of Smell Using the Nasal Symptom Diary
The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of CRS nasal symptoms on daily basis. Decreased/loss of smell is scored as: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms (symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness and easily tolerated), 2= moderate symptoms (definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3 = severe symptoms (symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living). Higher scores denote greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 52
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. A SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was a medically important event. TEAEs were AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the treatment-emergent period.
Measured: From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of follow-up per participant, up to approximately 64 weeks
Serum Concentration of Dupilumab Over Time
Blood samples were collected at the specified timepoints to obtain serum concentration of dupilumab.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12, 24 and 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Fungal-specific IgE at Week 52
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for the assessment of fungal-specific IgE which was measured with a quantitative method approved for diagnostic testing; a negative change from baseline indicated improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to Dupilumab
Plasma samples were collected to evaluate antibodies to dupilumab. Treatment-emergent ADA responses were defined as a positive response in the ADA assay post first dose, when baseline results were negative or missing.
Measured: From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of follow-up per participant, up to approximately 64 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Dec 2020
- Study start1 Dec 2020
- Primary completion14 Dec 2024
- Study completion7 Mar 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Allergic Fungal RhinosinusitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by SanofiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 62 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sanofi
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Sciences & Operations, Study director, Sanofi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04684524
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EFC16724
- Other IDs
- U1111-1246-7549, 2020-002999-12
- Acronym
- AIMS
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 21 Dec 2020
- Last updated
- 3 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
Publications
Luong AU, Levy JM, Wise SK, Han JK, Yoshikawa M, Zhang L, Schlosser R, Ranganathan P, Dakin P, Maloney J, Yancopoulos GD, Fontenot AP, Phadke NA, Robinson LR. Dupilumab for patients with allergic fungal rhinosinusitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2026 Jul 24:S0091-6749(26)00522-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2026.07.006. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42498125