AzTrials
AzTrials

Allergic Fungal RhinosinusitisPhase 3AIMSNCT04684524

Dupilumab in Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis (AFRS)

A Phase 3 study testing Dupilumab SAR231893 in people with Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis, run by Sanofi at 47 sites in 9 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Primary Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of treatment with dupilumab to reduce sinus opacification in a population with allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) Secondary Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of treatment with dupilumab to reduce sinus opacification in a population with allergic fungal rhinosinusitis… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis
What is being tested?
Dupilumab SAR231893
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
62 participants
Where
47 sitesin 9 countries
Study dates
1 Dec 2020to 7 Mar 2025
Phase
Phase 3

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participant must be at least 6 years of age (or the minimum legal age for adolescents in the country of the investigational site) at the time of signing the informed consent.
  • Participants with the diagnosis of AFRS adapted from criteria by Bent and Kuhn (meeting all):
  • IgE mediated inflammatory response to fungal hyphae (specific IgE serology or skin test) Evidence of sensitization to fungus by skin testing (at screening or documented historical positive skin test in the previous 12 months), or positive fungal-specific IgE in serum at screening.
  • Nasal polyposis confirmed by nasal endoscopy at screening.
  • Characteristic CT signs to be performed during screening period and can include any of the below signs as assessed by central reader:
  • hyperdensities
Show all 13Show fewer
  • bony demineralization
  • bone erosion of sinus
  • Eosinophilic mucin/mucus identified within 5 years prior to screening or at screening with or without positive fungal stain
  • AFRS patients with the following:
  • An endoscopic NPS of at least 2 out of 4 for unilateral polyps or 3 out of 8 for bilateral polyps at Visit 1 (central reading) and Visit 2 (local reading) and,
  • Sinus opacification in CT scan with an LMK score of 9 for patients with unilateral polyps or 12 for patients with bilateral polyps during screening period and,
  • Body weight ≥15 kg

Who cannot join

  • Patients with nasal conditions/concomitant nasal diseases making them non-evaluable at Visit 1 or for the primary efficacy
  • Nasal cavity malignant tumor and benign tumors.
  • Known of fungal invasion into sinus tissue.
  • Severe concomitant illness(es) that, in the investigator's judgment, would adversely affect the patient's participation in the study
  • Active tuberculosis or non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection, or a history of incompletely treated tuberculosis unless documented adequately treated.
  • Diagnosed active endoparasitic infections; suspected or high risk of endoparasitic infection
Show all 20Show fewer
  • Known or suspected immunodeficiency
  • Active chronic or acute infection requiring treatment with systemic antibiotics, antivirals, or antifungals within 2 weeks before the Screening Visit 1 or during the screening period.
  • History of systemic hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis to dupilumab or any of its excipients.
  • Treatment with commercially available dupilumab within 12 months, participation in prior dupilumab clinical trial, or discontinued dupilumab use due to adverse event.
  • Patients who are treated with intranasal corticosteroid drops; intranasal steroid emitting devices/stents; nasal spray using exhalation delivery system, such as Xhance™, during screening period.
  • Patients who are on intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) spray unless they have received stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1.
  • Patients who have undergone sinus intranasal surgery (including polypectomy) within 6 months prior to Visit 1.
  • Patients who have taken:
  • Biologic therapy/systemic immunosuppressant to treat inflammatory disease or autoimmune disease within 5 half-lives prior to Visit 1
  • Any investigational mAb within 5 half-lives prior to Visit 1
  • Anti-IgE therapy (omalizumab) within 4 months prior to Visit 1. - Treatment with a live (attenuated) vaccine within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1
  • Leukotriene antagonists/modifiers unless patient is on a continuous treatment for at least 30 days prior to Visit 1.
  • Initiation of allergen immunotherapy within 3 months prior to Visit 1 or a plan to begin therapy or change its dose during the screening or treatment period. - Patients received SCS during screening period. - Either intravenous immunoglobulin therapy and/or plasmapheresis within 30 days prior to Screening Visit (Visit 1).
  • The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Trial locations and contacts

47 sites in 9 countries.

47 sites in 9 countries

United States11 sites
  • Emory University Hospital Midtown Campus Site Number : 8400009

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30308

  • REX Clinical Trials Site Number : 8400017

    Beaumont, Texas, 77701-3713

  • National Allergy and Asthma Research, LLC Site Number : 8400002

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29407

  • Ut- Houston Medical School Site Number : 8400010

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Advanced ENT and Allergy Site Number : 8400004

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40220

  • South Louisiana Ear, Nose, Throat and Facial Plastic Surgery Site Number : 8400019

    Mandeville, Louisiana, 70471

  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center Site Number : 8400013

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232

  • Eastern Virginia Medical School (EVMS) Medical Group - Otola Site Number : 8400008

    Norfolk, Virginia, 23507

  • USA Clinical Trials Site Number : 8400020

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • Alamo ENT Associates Site Number : 8400018

    San Antonio, Texas, 78258

  • Asthma Allergy & Immunology Clinical Research Unit Site Number : 8400001

    Tampa, Florida, 33613

Other trials in United States

China11 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560005

    Beijing, 100050

  • Investigational Site Number : 1560001

    Beijing, 100730

  • Investigational Site Number : 1560004

    Changsha, 410013

  • Investigational Site Number : 1560003

    Chengdu, 610041

  • Investigational Site Number : 1560013

    Fuzhou, 350005

  • Investigational Site Number : 1560006

    Hangzhou, 310003

  • Investigational Site Number : 1560012

    Hefei

  • Investigational Site Number : 1560002

    Nanjing, 210029

  • Investigational Site Number : 1560011

    Qingdao, 266555

  • Investigational Site Number : 1560009

    Shanghai, 200030

  • Investigational Site Number : 1560008

    Taiyuan, 030001

Other trials in China

Japan6 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 3920008

    Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8431

  • Investigational Site Number : 3920010

    Isehara, Kanagawa, 2591193

  • Investigational Site Number : 3920001

    Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8515

  • Investigational Site Number : 3920003

    Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 141-0001

  • Investigational Site Number : 3920009

    Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582

  • Investigational Site Number : 3920006

    Shizuoka, Shizuoka, 420-0853

Other trials in Japan

Turkey (Türkiye)6 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 7920004

    Adana, 01380

  • Investigational Site Number : 7920001

    Istanbul, 34093

  • Investigational Site Number : 7920007

    Istanbul, 34865

  • Investigational Site Number : 7920006

    Izmir, 35100

  • Investigational Site Number : 7920003

    Izmir, 35340

  • Investigational Site Number : 7920005

    Malatya, 44280

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Argentina5 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 0320002

    Buenos Aires, C1121ABE

  • Investigational Site Number : 0320003

    CABA, Buenos Aires, C1414AIF

  • Investigational Site Number : 0320001

    CABA, Buenos Aires, C1425BEN

  • Investigational Site Number : 0320004

    Mendoza, 5500

  • Investigational Site Number : 0320005

    Rosario, Santa Fe Province, 2000

Other trials in Argentina

India3 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 3560003

    Coimbatore, 641028

  • Investigational Site Number : 3560006

    Jodhpur, 342005

  • Investigational Site Number : 3560008

    New Delhi, 110 062.

Other trials in India

Israel2 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 3760001

    Petah Tikva, 49100

  • Investigational Site Number : 3760002

    Rehovot, 76100

Other trials in Israel

Saudi Arabia2 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 6820002

    Riyadh, 12713

  • Investigational Site Number : 6820001

    Riyadh, 22252

Other trials in Saudi Arabia

Canada1 site
  • Investigational Site Number : 1240001

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Parallel Group Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Patients With Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis (AFRS)

Primary Objective:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of treatment with dupilumab to reduce sinus opacification in a population with allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS)
Read more

Secondary Objectives:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of treatment with dupilumab to reduce sinus opacification in a population with allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) at Week 24
  • To assess the efficacy of dupilumab to reduce the need for rescue treatments
  • To evaluate the efficacy of treatment with dupilumab in improving symptoms in AFRS
  • To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab to reduce nasal polyp formation in participants with AFRS
  • To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving overall symptom severity and quality of life in AFRS
  • To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving sense of smell in participants with AFRS
  • To explore the effect of dupilumab as assessed by three-Dimensional CT volumetric measurement of the paranasal sinuses
  • To evaluate the safety and tolerability of dupilumab when administered to participants with AFRS
  • To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of dupilumab in participants with AFRS
  • To characterize the effect of dupilumab on total IgE and specific IgE
  • To assess immunogenicity to dupilumab in participants with AFRS
Read the detailed description

The duration of study for each participant will include 2-4 weeks of screening period (2 additional weeks could be allowed), 52 weeks of randomized investigational medicinal product (IMP) intervention period and 12 weeks of follow-up period.

Being tested
Dupilumab SAR231893, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Allergic Fungal Sinusitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Dupilumab SAR231893Drug

    Pharmaceutical form:Injection solution Route of administration: Subcutaneous

  • PlaceboDrug

    Pharmaceutical form:Injection solution Route of administration: Subcutaneous

Study groups in NCT04684524
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
DupilumabExperimentalDupilumab administered every 2 or 4 weeks based on weights
Receives: Drug: Dupilumab SAR231893
Matching placeboPlacebo comparatorPlacebo administered every 2 or 4 weeks based on weights
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK Score

    The LMK score is used to quantify the degree of opacification of each sinus on CT scan. The CT scan LMK staging system represents the most widely established method of sinus CT scoring. The LMK total score is based on assessment of the CT scan findings for each sinus area (maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinus plus the osteomeatal complex on each side). The extent of sinus opacification is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 = normal to 2 = total opacification. In addition, the osteomeatal complex is graded as 0 = not occluded or 2 = occluded. The maximum score is 12 per side; total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified) corresponding to the sum of all sinuses and the osteomeatal complexes bilaterally. Higher score indicate worse outcome; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

Secondary outcomes (22)
  1. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score From the Nasal Symptom Diary

    The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) nasal symptoms on daily basis. Score range: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms (symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness and easily tolerated), 2= moderate symptoms (definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3 = severe symptoms (symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living). Higher scores denote greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug.

    Measured: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 24

  2. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Endoscopy Nasal Polyp Score (NPS)

    The bilateral endoscopy NPS is determined by the clinician who assesses nasal polyp formation. Polyps on each side of the nose are graded based on polyp size; scores: 0 = no polyps; 1 = small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate; 2 = polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate; 3 = large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate or polyps medial to the middle turbinate and 4 = large polyps causing complete obstruction. The total score is the sum of the right and left nostrils, ranging from 0 (no obstruction) to 8 (complete obstruction); higher score indicating worse outcome; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24

  3. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK Score

    The LMK score is used to quantify the degree of opacification of each sinus on CT scan. The CT scan LMK staging system represents the most widely established method of sinus CT scoring. The LMK total score is based on assessment of the CT scan findings for each sinus area (maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinus plus the osteomeatal complex on each side). The extent of sinus opacification is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 = normal to 2 = total opacification. In addition, the osteomeatal complex is graded as 0 = not occluded or 2 = occluded. The maximum score is 12 per side; total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified) corresponding to the sum of all sinuses and the osteomeatal complexes bilaterally. Higher score indicate worse outcome; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24

  4. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Total Symptom Score (TSS) Derived From the Nasal Symptom Diary

    The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of CRS nasal symptoms on daily basis. The TSS is a composite score consisting of the sum of the following symptoms assessed daily in the morning: nasal congestion/obstruction, decreased/loss of sense of smell, rhinorrhea (average of anterior/posterior nasal discharge). Each of the individual items were scored from 0 = no symptoms to 3 = severe symptoms. TSS is the sum of individual items and ranges between 0 = no symptoms and 9 = severe symptoms. Higher scores on the TSS indicate greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug.

    Measured: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 24

  5. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT)

    The UPSIT (UPSIT 40 odorant test) is a rapid and easy-to-administer method to quantitatively assess human olfactory function. The test consists of 4 booklets, each containing 10 odorants with 1 odorant per page. Above each odorant strip is a multiple-choice question with 4 alternative words to describe the odor and the participant is asked to indicate which word best describes the odor. Each smell has a possible of 4 answers with one being correct, therefore the potential total scores can range from 0 (worst possible score) to 40 (best possible score), with 1 point being awarded for each correctly identified odor. Scores of <=18 were classified as anosmia, 19 to 25 as severe microsmia, 26 to 30 as moderate microsmia, 31 to 34 as mild microsmia, and 35 to 40 as normal smell appreciation. Higher scores indicated better olfactory function; i.e. better sense of smell. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24

  6. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Decreased/Loss of Smell Using the Nasal Symptom Diary

    The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of CRS nasal symptoms on daily basis. Decreased/loss of smell is scored as: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms (symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness and easily tolerated), 2= moderate symptoms (definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3 = severe symptoms (symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living). Higher scores denote greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug.

    Measured: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 24

  7. Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Endoscopy NPS

    The bilateral endoscopy NPS is determined by the clinician who assesses nasal polyp formation. Polyps on each side of the nose are graded based on polyp size; scores: 0 = no polyps; 1 = small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate; 2 = polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate; 3 = large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate or polyps medial to the middle turbinate and 4 = large polyps causing complete obstruction. The total score is the sum of the right and left nostrils, ranging from 0 (no obstruction) to 8 (complete obstruction); higher score indicating worse outcome; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

  8. Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Monthly Average Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score From the Nasal Symptom Diary

    The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of CRS nasal symptoms on daily basis. Score range: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms (symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness and easily tolerated), 2= moderate symptoms (definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3 = severe symptoms (symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living). Higher scores denote greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug.

    Measured: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 52

  9. Change From Baseline to Week 52 in 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Total Score

    The SNOT-22 is a validated questionnaire designed to assess the impact of CRS on participants health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and has 22 items covering symptoms, social/emotional impact, productivity, and sleep consequences of CRS. The recall period is past 2 weeks. Each item is rated on a 6-point Likert scale; response options ranging from 0 = no problem to 5 = problem as bad as it can be. A global score ranging from 0 (no impact) to 110 (severe impact) is calculated by summing the responses to all items; higher score indicates greater rhinosinusitis-related health burden; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

  10. Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Three-dimensional CT Total Volume Occupied by Disease in All Sinuses

    This method is used to calculate the percent occupied by disease. It is performed at locations including ethmoid sinus, frontal sinus, maxillary sinus, and sphenoid sinus. The total volume occupied by disease in all sinuses is reported here. For the analysis, central reading at baseline was used for comparison with Week 52 reading. It is graded on a scale of 0-100%; a higher score is worse and indicates greater volume occupied by disease. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

  11. Percentage of Participants Who Received Systemic Corticosteroids (SCS) and/or Underwent or Planned to Undergo Surgery for Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis (AFRS) at Week 52

    SCS use was defined as the use of SCS for rescue treatment of AFRS or for another reason and was captured by the Investigator (or designee) in electronic case report form (eCRF). Participants who underwent or planned to undergo surgery for AFRS were also recorded in eCRF.

    Measured: Week 52

  12. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in SNOT-22 Total Score

    The SNOT-22 is a validated questionnaire designed to assess the impact of CRS on participants HRQoL and has 22 items covering symptoms, social/emotional impact, productivity, and sleep consequences of CRS. The recall period is past 2 weeks. Each item is rated on a 6-point Likert scale; response options ranging from 0 = no problem to 5 = problem as bad as it can be. A global score ranging from 0 (no impact) to 110 (severe impact) is calculated by summing the responses to all items; higher score indicates greater rhinosinusitis-related health burden; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24

  13. Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Total Immunoglobulin-E (IgE) to Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for the assessment of IgE. Total IgE was measured with a quantitative method approved for diagnostic testing; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

  14. Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 52 in the Monthly Average Rhinorrhea Score From the Nasal Symptom Diary

    The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of CRS nasal symptoms on daily basis. Score range: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms (symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness and easily tolerated), 2= moderate symptoms (definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3 = severe symptoms (symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living). Higher scores denote greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Severity of rhinorrhea (average of anterior [runny nose]/posterior nasal discharge [post-nasal drip]) is presented here. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug.

    Measured: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Weeks 24 and 52

  15. Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Monthly Average TSS Derived From the Nasal Symptom Diary

    The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of CRS nasal symptoms on daily basis. The TSS is a composite score consisting of the sum of the following symptoms assessed daily in the morning: nasal congestion/obstruction, decreased/loss of sense of smell, rhinorrhea (average of anterior/posterior nasal discharge). Each of the individual items were scored from 0 = no symptoms to 3 = severe symptoms. TSS is the sum of individual items and ranges between 0 = no symptoms and 9 = severe symptoms. Higher scores on the TSS indicate greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug.

    Measured: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 52

  16. Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 52 in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Rhinosinusitis

    The rhinosinusitis VAS is used to evaluate the overall severity of the rhinosinusitis. It is a recommended scale to determine the participant's disease severity and to guide the treatment for CRS. The participant is asked to answer the following question: "How troublesome are your symptoms of your rhinosinusitis" on a 10-centimeter VAS from 0 = not troublesome to 10 = worst thinkable troublesome. Based on their score on the VAS, the severity of rhinosinusitis is divided into 3 categories as follows: mild = VAS 0 to 3, moderate = VAS >3 to 7 and severe = VAS >7 to 10; higher score indicating worse outcome; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 52

  17. Change From Baseline to Week 52 in UPSIT

    The UPSIT (UPSIT 40 odorant test) is a rapid and easy-to-administer method to quantitatively assess human olfactory function. The test consists of 4 booklets, each containing 10 odorants with 1 odorant per page. Above each odorant strip is a multiple-choice question with 4 alternative words to describe the odor and the participant is asked to indicate which word best describes the odor. Each smell has a possible of 4 answers with one being correct, therefore the potential total scores can range from 0 (worst possible score) to 40 (best possible score), with 1 point being awarded for each correctly identified odor. Scores of <=18 were classified as anosmia, 19 to 25 as severe microsmia, 26 to 30 as moderate microsmia, 31 to 34 as mild microsmia, and 35 to 40 as normal smell appreciation. Higher scores indicated better olfactory function, i.e. better sense of smell. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

  18. Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Monthly Average Decreased/Loss of Smell Using the Nasal Symptom Diary

    The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of CRS nasal symptoms on daily basis. Decreased/loss of smell is scored as: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms (symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness and easily tolerated), 2= moderate symptoms (definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3 = severe symptoms (symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living). Higher scores denote greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug.

    Measured: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 52

  19. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. A SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was a medically important event. TEAEs were AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the treatment-emergent period.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of follow-up per participant, up to approximately 64 weeks

  20. Serum Concentration of Dupilumab Over Time

    Blood samples were collected at the specified timepoints to obtain serum concentration of dupilumab.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12, 24 and 52

  21. Percent Change From Baseline in Fungal-specific IgE at Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for the assessment of fungal-specific IgE which was measured with a quantitative method approved for diagnostic testing; a negative change from baseline indicated improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

  22. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to Dupilumab

    Plasma samples were collected to evaluate antibodies to dupilumab. Treatment-emergent ADA responses were defined as a positive response in the ADA assay post first dose, when baseline results were negative or missing.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of follow-up per participant, up to approximately 64 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Dec 2020
  2. Study start1 Dec 2020
  3. Primary completion14 Dec 2024
  4. Study completion7 Mar 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
62 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04684524
Sponsor's protocol ID
EFC16724
Other IDs
U1111-1246-7549, 2020-002999-12
Acronym
AIMS
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
21 Dec 2020
Last updated
3 Sep 2026
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org

Publications

  • Luong AU, Levy JM, Wise SK, Han JK, Yoshikawa M, Zhang L, Schlosser R, Ranganathan P, Dakin P, Maloney J, Yancopoulos GD, Fontenot AP, Phadke NA, Robinson LR. Dupilumab for patients with allergic fungal rhinosinusitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2026 Jul 24:S0091-6749(26)00522-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2026.07.006. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42498125

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in