AzTrials
AzTrials

HIV InfectionsVMMC-RITeNCT04677374

Uptake of Medical Male Circumcision Among Men With Sexually Transmitted Infections

A study testing Intensified Health Education, SMS/telephonic Tracing and Transportation Reimbursement in people with HIV Infections and Sexually Transmitted Infections, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in Malawi.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The intervention includes provision of transport reimbursement for men who will undergo voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC), intensified health education by a VMMC mobilizer and a male and female VMMC champion and use of a cell phone short messaging service (SMS) and/or telephonic tracing to remind clients of… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 99 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Intensified Health Education, SMS/telephonic Tracing and Transportation Reimbursement
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
2,242 participants
Where
1 siteMalawi
Study dates
1 Feb 2021to 30 Aug 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 99 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male
  • 18 years or older
  • Seeking STI care at the Bwaila STI clinic
  • Not circumcised
  • Healthcare workers at Bwaila STI and VMMC clinic

Who cannot join

  • < 18 years of age

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Malawi1 site
  • UNC Project-Malawi (Bwaila District Hospital)

    Lilongwe

Other trials in Malawi

About this study

Official title: Uptake of Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision Among Men Attending a Sexually Transmitted Infections Clinic in Lilongwe, Malawi

The intervention includes provision of transport reimbursement for men who will undergo voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC), intensified health education by a VMMC mobilizer and a male and female VMMC champion and use of a cell phone short messaging service (SMS) and/or telephonic tracing to remind clients of their VMMC appointment (the RITe intervention). The investigators will assess the uptake of VMMC, and acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility of the RITe intervention among uncircumcised men attending a Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) clinic and health care workers.

This intervention was initially designed to include escorting men interested in circumcision from the STI clinic to a VMMC clinic co-located in the same facility. However, the VMMC clinic space was repurposed to a COVID-19 isolation unit therefore clinic escorts were excluded. In Lieu of clinic escorts, participants will be linked to the nearest health facility of choice where VMMC services are provided by the VMMC mobilizer.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the impact of using transport reimbursement, intensified health education and SMS/telephonic tracing in increasing the uptake of voluntary medical male circumcision at this clinic.

Read the detailed description

This study will be a pragmatic, pre- and post-interventional quasi-experimental study combined with a prospective observational study design. The study will have pre-implementation and implementation phases and use a concurrent exploratory mixed method approach.

The study will evaluate the effect of multi-faceted intervention on the uptake of VMMC. The intervention includes use of transport reimbursement for men who will undergo VMMC, Intensified health education by VMMC champions and women and use of SMS/telephonic Tracing to remind clients of their VMMC appointment (the RITe intervention).

The intervention will be conducted in a sequential and incremental manner called implementation blocks. After collecting data from the standard of care period, the first implementation block will be for intensified health education. The next block will combine intensified health education with SMS/telephonic tracing. The last block will combine intensified health education with SMS/telephonic tracing and transport reimbursements. This approach will allow the investigator to compare the effectiveness of different combinations of the strategies in the intervention without necessarily randomizing participants. The sample size for each block is expected to be at least 80 uncircumcised men with STIs. The investigators anticipate that each block may last about 4-12 weeks (to allow the interventions to mature) with one week of no intervention between interventions as a wash out period. However, sample size may be higher if more uncircumcised men present within the minimum 4-week intervention period.

The study population will be men attending the Bwaila STI clinic in Lilongwe Malawi. The study will enroll a minimum of 320 men to depict an uptake rate of circumcision of about 28% (national average including traditional circumcision) among uncircumcised men. However, for each intervention to settle, the investigator will implement each intervention for at least 4 weeks.

Data on uptake of VMMC will be collected through a standardize data collection form in conjunction with routine data from the STI clinic electronic medical registry. Data on acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility will be collected through surveys, interviews and focus group discussions. The investigators will conduct about 280 surveys for acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility with men selected randomly through the implementation period (70 men per intervention block). About 20 in-depth interviews with healthcare workers equally divided by intervention block will be conducted to assess acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility. Finally, the investigators will conduct four focus group discussions with men through the study period to assess acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility of the RITe strategy.

Being tested
Standard of care, Intensified Health Education, SMS/telephonic Tracing, Transportation Reimbursement
Keywords
Voluntary medical male circumcision, Men with sexually transmitted infections, Uptake, Acceptability, Feasibility
Medical subject headings
HIV Infections, Sexually Transmitted Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Standard of careOther

    Standard of care referral approach which is a brief health talk conducted once every morning by a VMMC mobilizer.

  • Intensified Health EducationBehavioural

    More detailed health talk conducted during each group health talk session by the VMMC mobilizer and champions describing VMMC, its benefits and how to access the service and testimonies from men who have successfully undergone VMMC

  • SMS/telephonic TracingBehavioural

    SMS tracing to remind participants of VMMC appointments

  • Transportation ReimbursementBehavioural

    Transportation reimbursement to offset the cost of transportation for VMMC appointments

Study groups in NCT04677374
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard of carePlacebo comparatorParticipants in this arm will be offered Standard of Care (SOC) referral process for voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) services
Receives: Other: Standard of care
Block 1 (intensified health education)ExperimentalParticipants in this arm will be offered intensified health education
Receives: Behavioral: Intensified Health Education
Block 2 (intensified health education and SMS/telephonic tracing)ExperimentalParticipants in this arm will be offered intensified health education and SMS/telephonic tracing
Receives: Behavioral: SMS/telephonic Tracing
Block 3 (intensified health education, SMS/telephonic tracing and transport reimbursement)ExperimentalParticipants in this arm will be offered intensified health education, SMS/telephonic tracing and transport reimbursement
Receives: Behavioral: Transportation Reimbursement

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Male Clients Who Will Undergo Circumcision (Uptake of VMMC)

    Each participant will be followed for 30 days to determine whether or not they receive circumcision. Number of participants who will undergo circumcision will be reported. The investigators will collect data on the number of participants offered VMMC and the number of participants who will undergo VMMC for each intervention block.

    Measured: up to 30 days

  2. Median Number of Days Taken for Male Clients to Undergo Circumcision From the Day Offered Circumcision at the STI Clinic (Time-to-circumcision)

    The duration in days from when participants are offered VMMC to when the participants will undergo VMMC. The investigators will collect data on the number of days taken from the day circumcision is offered for each participant to undergo VMMC through the 30-day Follow-Up period.

    Measured: up to 30 days

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Percentage of Male Clients Who Reported the RITe Intervention As Acceptable

    Acceptability measured quantitatively using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) Likert scale surveys. The AIM Likert scale measures acceptability based on four constructs that assess whether an intervention is appealing, likable, welcome and approvable. The AIM score ranges from 6 - 80 1=completely disagree, 2=disagree, 3=Neutral, 4=agree and 5=completely agree. Higher scores indicate agreement with more acceptability items. The percentage is reported for those who strongly agree or agree assessed at Baseline and Follow-Up.

    Measured: Baseline and Follow-Up, up to 30 days

  2. Number of Male Clients With Perception That the RITe Intervention is Acceptable

    Qualitative assessments for acceptability conducted using focus group discussions with uncircumcised men. Focus group discussions were conducted at Baseline and End of Study Follow Up to complement quantitative findings. Focus group discussions analyzed using thematic analysis and a summary of common themes presented.

    Measured: Baseline, End of Study Follow Up (approximately Week 82)

  3. Percentage of Healthcare Workers Who Rated the RITe Intervention as Feasible

    Feasibility measured quantitatively using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) Likert scale surveys. The FIM measures feasibility based on four constructs that assess whether an intervention is implementable, possible, resources, and difficult to use. Feasibility assessed among Healthcare Workers only as implementers of the intervention. Surveys for feasibility will be conducted for each intervention block during the implementation phase only. The FIM score range is 5 - 60 with 1=completely disagree, 2=disagree, 3=Neutral, 4=agree and 5=completely agree. Higher scores indicate agreement with more feasibility items. The percentage is reported for those who strongly agree or agree assessed at End of Study Follow Up.

    Measured: End of Study Follow Up (approximately Week 82)

  4. Number of Healthcare Workers With Perception That the RITe Intervention is Feasible

    Qualitative assessments for intervention feasibility conducted using in-depth interviews with Healthcare Workers only at End of Study Follow Up to complement quantitative findings. The interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis and a summary of common themes presented.

    Measured: End of Study Follow Up (approximately Week 82)

  5. Number of Healthcare Workers With Perception That the RITe Intervention is Acceptable at Baseline

    Qualitative assessments for acceptability conducted using in-depth interviews with Healthcare Workers at Baseline for the Standard of Care arm to complement quantitative findings. In-depth interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis and a summary of common themes presented.

    Measured: Baseline

  6. Number of Healthcare Workers With Perception That the RITe Intervention is Acceptable at End of Study Follow Up

    Qualitative assessments for acceptability conducted using in-depth interviews with Healthcare Workers at End of Study Follow Up for the Block 3 arm to complement quantitative findings. In-depth interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis and a summary of common themes presented.

    Measured: End of Study Follow Up (approximately Week 82)

  7. Percentage of Male Clients Who Reported the RITe Intervention As Appropriate

    Appropriateness measured quantitatively using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) Likert scale surveys. The IAM Likert scale measures appropriateness based on four constructs that assess whether an intervention is embarrassing, culturally \& religiously suitable, and a good idea. Surveys for appropriateness were conducted at baseline and during implementation of each intervention block. The IAM score range is 5 - 85 from a scale with 1=completely disagree, 2=disagree, 3=Neutral, 4=agree and 5=completely agree. Higher scores indicate agreement with more appropriateness items. The percentage is reported for those who strongly agree or agree assessed at Baseline and Follow-Up.

    Measured: Baseline and Follow-Up, up to 30 days

  8. Number of Male Clients With Perception That the RITe Intervention is Appropriate

    Qualitative assessments for appropriateness conducted using focus group discussions with uncircumcised men. Focus group discussions conducted at Baseline and End of Study Follow Up to complement quantitative findings. Focus group discussions were analyzed using thematic analysis and a summary of common themes presented.

    Measured: Baseline, End of Study Follow Up (approximately Week 82)

  9. Number of Healthcare Workers With Perception That the RITe Intervention is Appropriate at Baseline

    Qualitative assessments for appropriateness conducted using in-depth interviews with Healthcare Workers only. The interviews were conducted at Baseline to complement quantitative findings. The Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis and a summary of common themes presented.

    Measured: Baseline

  10. Number of Healthcare Workers With Perception That the RITe Intervention is Appropriate at End of Study Follow Up

    Qualitative assessments for appropriateness conducted using in-depth interviews with Healthcare Workers only. The interviews were conducted at End of Study Follow Up to complement quantitative findings. The Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis and a summary of common themes presented.

    Measured: End of Study Follow Up (approximately Week 82)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Dec 2020
  2. Study start1 Feb 2021
  3. Primary completion30 Aug 2022
  4. Study completion30 Aug 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Sequential
Model description
The intervention will be rolled-out in the implementation phase in a sequential and incremental manner called implementation blocks. Implementation blocks will be as follows: block 1: Intensified health education (I); block 2: Intensified health education and SMS/telephonic Tracing (IT) and finally, Block 3: Intensified health education, SMS/telephonic tracing and transport Reimbursement (RITe)
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
2,242 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04677374
Sponsor's protocol ID
19-2559
Other IDs
D43TW010060
Acronym
VMMC-RITe
Status last verified
Jul 2023
First submitted
15 Dec 2020
Last updated
14 Sep 2023
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Matoga MM, Kudowa E, Chikuni J, Tsidya M, Tseka J, Ndalama B, Bonongwe N, Mathiya E, Jere E, Yatina D, Kamtambe B, Kapito M, Hosseinipour MC, Chasela CS, Jewett S. Acceptability, feasibility and appropriateness of intensified health education, SMS/phone tracing and transport reimbursement for uptake of voluntary medical male circumcision in a sexually transmitted infections clinic in Malawi: a mixed methods study. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Apr 4:2024.03.27.24304985. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.27.24304985.

    PubMed 38633812
  • Matoga MM, Kudowa E, Ndalama B, Bonongwe N, Mathiya E, Jere E, Kamtambe B, Chagomerana M, Chasela C, Jewett S, Hosseinipour MC. Effectiveness of an intervention to increase uptake of voluntary medical male circumcision among men with sexually transmitted infections in Malawi: a preinterventional and postinterventional study. BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 3;13(10):e072855. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072855.

    PubMed 37788927
  • Matoga MM, Hosseinipour MC, Jewett S, Chasela C. Uptake of voluntary medical male circumcision among men with sexually transmitted infections in Lilongwe, Malawi: a protocol for a pre-interventional and post-interventional study. BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 18;12(1):e057507. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057507.

    PubMed 35042709

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Intensified Health Education, SMS/telephonic Tracing and Transportation Reimbursement in people with HIV Infections and Sexually Transmitted Infections, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in Malawi.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Malawi. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Sep 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Male Clients Who Will Undergo Circumcision (Uptake of VMMC) (time frame: up to 30 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04677374, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Sep 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in