Parkinson DiseaseNCT04675398
Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation to Improve Motor and Gait Functions in Parkinson's Disease
A study testing Summit RC+S in people with Parkinson Disease, run by Doris Wang, MD, PhD at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a single-center phase I clinical study aiming to improve gait functions in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) by using adaptive neurostimulation to the pallidum. The investigators will use a bidirectional deep brain stimulation device with sensing and stimulation capabilities to 1) decode the physiological… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Parkinson Disease
- What is being tested?
- Summit RC+S
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 15 Jun 2021to 1 Apr 2030
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Ability to give informed consent for the study
- Movement disorder symptoms that are sufficiently severe, in spite of best medical therapy, to warrant surgical implantation of deep brain stimulators according to standard clinical criteria
- Patient has requested surgical intervention with deep brain stimulation for their disorder
- No movement -elated abnormalities that suggest an alternative diagnosis or contraindicate surgery
- Absence of significant cognitive impairment (score of 21 or greater on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA),
- Signed informed consent
Show all 14Show fewer
- Ability to comply with study follow-up visits for brain recording, testing of adaptive stimulation, and clinical assessment.
- Age 21-75
- Diagnosis of idiopathic PD with duration of motor symptoms for 3 years or greater
- Patient has undergone appropriate therapy with oral medications with inadequate relief as determined by a movement disorders neurologist.
- UPDRS-III score off medication between 20 and 80 and an improvement of at least 30% in the baseline UPDRS-III on medication score, compared to the baseline off-medication score, and motor fluctuations with at least 2 hours per day of on time without dyskinesia or with non-bothersome dyskinesia. OR Patients with tremor-dominant PD (a tremor score of at least 2 on a UPDRS-III sub-score for tremor), treatment resistant, with significant functional disability despite maximal medical management
- Patients with gait impairments: slowed gait, shuffling steps, postural instability, or freezing of gait off medication.
- Ability of patient and/or caregivers to recharge the system evaluated by all clinicians and study personnel.
- Geographical proximity and/or ability to travel to study sites for patient to receive re-programming via investigational devices (e.g. Summit Research Laboratory Programmer).
Who cannot join
- Coagulopathy, anticoagulant medications, uncontrolled hypertension, history of seizures, heart disease, or other medical conditions considered to place the patient at elevated risk for surgical complications
- Evidence of a psychogenic movement disorder: Motor symptoms that remit with suggestion or "while unobserved", symptoms that are inconsistent over time or incongruent with clinical condition, plus other manifestation such as "false" signs, multiple somatizations, or obvious psychiatric disturbance.
- Pregnancy: all women of child bearing potential will have a negative urine pregnancy test prior to undergoing their surgical procedure.
- Significant untreated depression (BDI-II score >20). History of suicidal attempt or active suicidal ideation (Yes to #2-5 on C-SSRS)
- Any personality or mood symptoms that study personnel believe will interfere with study requirements.
- Subjects who require electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or diathermy
Show all 11Show fewer
- Implanted stimulation systems such as; cochlear implant, pacemaker, defibrillator, or neurostimulator
- Previous cranial surgery
- Drug or alcohol abuse
- Meets criteria for Parkinson's disease with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI). These criteria are: performance of more than two standard deviations below appropriate norms, for tests from two or more of these five cognitive domains: attention, executive function, language, memory, and visuospatial tests.
- Known allergies to the implantable device components including titanium, polyurethane, silicone, and nylon.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Adaptive Cortical and Subcortical Brain Stimulation to Improve Motor Behaviors and Gait in Parkinson's Disease
This is a single-center phase I clinical study aiming to improve gait functions in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) by using adaptive neurostimulation to the pallidum. The investigators will use a bidirectional deep brain stimulation device with sensing and stimulation capabilities to 1) decode the physiological signatures of gait and gait adaptation by recording neural activities from the motor cortical areas and the globus pallidus during natural walking and a gait adaptation task, and 2) develop an adaptive deep brain stimulation (DBS) paradigm to selectively stimulate the pallidum during different phases of the gait cycle and measure improvements in gait parameters. This is the first exploration of network dynamics of gait in PD using chronically implanted cortical and subcortical electrodes. In addition to providing insights into a fundamental process, the proposed therapy will deliver personalized neurostimulation based on individual physiological biomarkers to enhance locomotor skills in patients with PD. Ten patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease undergoing evaluation for DBS implantation will be enrolled in this single treatment arm study.
Read the detailed description
This study will allow the investigators to evaluate the efficacy of an adaptive stimulation paradigm in deep brain stimulation (DBS) to treat motor-related behaviours and motor skill learning in Parkinson's disease (PD). Parkinson's disease patients will be implanted unilaterally or bilaterally with a totally internalized bidirectional neural interface, Medtronic Summit RC+S.
While current DBS therapy improves motor symptoms of PD, it does not address problems with acquiring additional motor skills (i.e. adapting gait patterns to avoid falls)) in PD, therefore, limiting benefits of physical rehabilitation programs aimed at improving mobility. Motor skill learning is critical in acquiring any new behaviors related to motor function. The overall objective is to identify personalized electrophysiological signatures of motor skill learning in PD patients and use adaptive control algorithms to enhance these signatures. The study will discover new ways to rehabilitate the disease brain circuits using adaptive neuromodulation.
In a small, double-blinded trial, ten patients with idiopathic PD and motor fluctuations will be implanted with unilateral or bilateral RC+S devices, each connected to a standard quadripolar DBS lead implanted in the basal ganglia, along with a 4-contact paddle type electrode placed subdurally over the motor cortex. The investigators will compare the overall efficacy of closed-loop and open-loop paradigms in terms of behavioral performance improvements in validated motor skill learning tasks and measurements from wearable devices. During this chronic adaptive DBS phase, adaptive DBS and open-loop stimulation settings will be randomized for 30-day periods and motor skill and gait related measurements will be obtained from a combination of computerized motor tasks and wearable devices that track movement kinematics. Patients will participate in daily, if possible, motor learning and gait tasks at home with triggered stimulation settings and recordings.
The investigators expect to successfully develop a prototype adaptive DBS algorithm based on cortical and / or basal ganglia LFPs (local field potentials). The investigators hypothesize that an adaptive paradigm will provide improvements in motor skilled learning compared to the conventional, open-loop paradigm, in which stimulation parameters remain constant until changed by the patient or clinician using an external programmer.
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease
- Being tested
- Summit RC+S
- Keywords
- neuromodulation, closed-loop deep brain stimulation, gait impairments, motor learning, parkinson's disease
- Medical subject headings
- Parkinson Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Summit RC+SDevice
Also called continuous deep brain stimulation
Using the RC+S pulse generator, patients receive clinically-optimized open loop DBS stimulation to the pallidum.
Summit RC+SDevice
Also called random stimulation
Using the RC+S pulse generator, the patients will receive closed-loop stimulation at random time points. These random stimulation times will in total equal the total amount of time of active movement.
Summit RC+SDevice
Also called adaptive stimulation
Using the RC+S pulse generator, the patients will receive closed-loop stimulation during time of contralateral limb movement (e.g. left brain stimulation during right leg/arm movement).
Summit RC+SDevice
Also called adaptive stimulation
Using the RC+S pulse generator, the patients will receive closed-loop stimulation during time of no movement for the contralateral limb (e.g. left brain stimulation while right leg/arm is not moving).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Open-loop deep brain stimulation | Active comparator | Parkinson's disease patients implanted with Summit RC+S and brain lead implanted in the pallidal/striatal region receiving open-loop deep brain stimulation. Receives: Device: Summit RC+S |
| Randomized deep brain stimulation | Active comparator | Parkinson's disease patients implanted with Summit RC+S and brain lead implanted in the pallidal/striatal region receiving closed-loop stimulation at random time points. Receives: Device: Summit RC+S |
| Deep brain stimulation during contralateral limb movement | Active comparator | Parkinson's disease patients implanted with Summit RC+S and brain lead implanted in the pallidal/striatal region receiving closed-loop stimulation during time of contralateral limb movement. Receives: Device: Summit RC+S |
| Deep brain stimulation during contralateral limb rest | Active comparator | Parkinson's disease patients implanted with Summit RC+S and brain lead implanted in the pallidal/striatal region receiving closed-loop stimulation during time of no movement for contralateral limb. Receives: Device: Summit RC+S |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in motor learning task completion with closed-loop compared to open-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS)
Change in percentage of motor learning task trials that were completed with closed-loop compared to open-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS). The task is made up of 840 trials, completion will be measured by percent of trials completed (e.g. 750/840 trials completed would be 89%). The task has a built in function which logs completed trials in a CSV document.
Measured: Baseline and 2 years
Change in motor learning task reaction times with closed-loop compared to open-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS)
Change in gait sequence motor learning task reaction times (measured in milliseconds) with closed-loop compared to open-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS).
Measured: Baseline and 2 years
Change in motor learning task mean accuracy with closed-loop compared to open-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS).
Change in motor learning task mean accuracy with closed-loop compared to open-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS). Accuracy will be measured as a percent using the tasks proprietary output log which records which trials out of the 840 total trials were target hits (i.e. correct trials). Mean accuracy will be calculated by taking the average of each patient's accuracy score across all attempts of the task done by said patient.
Measured: Baseline and 2 years
Secondary outcomes (8)
Change in Gait
Change in gait measurements using the 10-meter walk timed test. The 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) is a performance measure used to assess walking speed in meters per second over a short distance of 10 meters. It is employed to determine functional mobility and gait. The gait speed is used as the outcome by which to compare change in performance capacity. Lower times indicate higher levels of physical functioning.
Measured: Baseline and 2 years
Change in Balance
Change in balance measurements using:
Mini-Best Test: Clinical balance assessment tool. The score range is 0-2 with high score indicating higher levels of physical functioning.
Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC): Measures of confidence in performing various ambulatory activities without falling or experiencing a sense of unsteadiness. The score range is 0-100 with higher scores indicating higher levels of physical functioning.
Measured: Baseline and 2 years
Change in MDS-UPDRS III scores
Change in Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) III score. The scale consists of 18 items that are each scored 0 to 3, making the total score out of 72 points, with higher scores indicating higher impairment.
Measured: Baseline and 2 years
Change in NIHTB Cognition Battery Test
Change in National Institute of Health Toolbox (NIHTB) Cognition battery test (during adaptive stimulation compared to open loop stimulation). A score known as a theta score is calculated for each participant; it represents the relative overall ability or performance of the participant. The theta score is converted to a Computed Score which ranges from roughly 0 to 2000 depending on the age-adjusted averages, with higher scores indicating higher levels of cognitive functioning.
Measured: Baseline and 2 years
Change in Five-Times Sit to Stand Test Results
Five-Times Sit to Stand Test: Assesses functional lower extremity strength, transitional movements, balance, and fall risk in older adults. Scoring based on amount of time a patient is able to transfer from a seated to a standing position and back to sitting five times, with lower times indicating higher levels of physical functioning.
Measured: Baseline and 2 years
Change in Stride Length
Change in stride length measured by Rover (a gait measurement device) and Xsens (a kinematic measurement device) with closed-loop compared to open-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS). Stride length is measured in meters.
Measured: Baseline and 2 years
Change in Stride Time
Change in stride time measured by Rover (a gait measurement device) and Xsens (a kinematic measurement device) with closed-loop compared to open-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS). Stride time is measured in seconds.
Measured: Baseline and 2 years
Change in double support time
Change in double support time measured by Rover (a gait measurement device). Each gait cycle consists of two phases, where both feet are in contact with the ground, called Double Support. Double support time will be measured in seconds (i.e. amount of time both feet are in contact with the ground).
Measured: Baseline and 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Dec 2020
- Study start15 Jun 2021
- Primary completion1 Apr 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Apr 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Parkinson DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- In a small, double-blinded trial, the investigators will compare the overall efficacy of closed-loop and open-loop paradigms in terms of behavioral performance improvements in validated motor skill learning tasks and measurements from wearable devices. During this chronic aDBS phase, aDBS and open-loop stimulation settings will be randomized for 30-day periods and motor skill and gait related measurements will be obtained from a combination of computerized motor tasks and wearable devices that track movement kinematics. Patients will participate in daily, if possible, motor learning and gait tasks at home with triggered stimulation settings and recordings. Data will be collected and reviewed from the wearable monitors, Summit RC+S, and home motor learning tasks remotely. Researchers will have weekly check-in sessions with patients by video conferencing or in-person meetings. At minimum, researchers will have in-person sessions with patients every 4 weeks during Phase 3.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Doris Wang, MD, PhD
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research, Burroughs Wellcome
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Doris Wang, MD, PhD, University of California, San Francisco
- Investigators
- Doris Wang, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, University of California, San Francisco
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04675398
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 18649
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 23 Sep 2020
- Last updated
- 15 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Swann NC, de Hemptinne C, Miocinovic S, Qasim S, Ostrem JL, Galifianakis NB, Luciano MS, Wang SS, Ziman N, Taylor R, Starr PA. Chronic multisite brain recordings from a totally implantable bidirectional neural interface: experience in 5 patients with Parkinson's disease. J Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;128(2):605-616. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.JNS161162. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
PubMed 28409730Little S, Pogosyan A, Neal S, Zavala B, Zrinzo L, Hariz M, Foltynie T, Limousin P, Ashkan K, FitzGerald J, Green AL, Aziz TZ, Brown P. Adaptive deep brain stimulation in advanced Parkinson disease. Ann Neurol. 2013 Sep;74(3):449-57. doi: 10.1002/ana.23951. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
PubMed 23852650Louie KH, Balakid JP, Bath JE, Song S, Fekri Azgomi H, Marks JH, Choi JT, Starr PA, Wang DD. Adaptive deep brain stimulation for dynamic gait control in Parkinson's disease: a randomized feasibility trial. Nat Med. 2026 Jun 15. doi: 10.1038/s41591-026-04434-2. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42297980
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Adaptive Cortical and Subcortical Brain Stimulation to Improve Motor Behaviors and Gait in Parkinson's Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04675398
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 18649
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease
- Keywords
- neuromodulation, closed-loop deep brain stimulation, gait impairments, motor learning, parkinson's disease
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Doris Wang, MD, PhDUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research, Burroughs Wellcome
- Study start
- 15 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a single-center phase I clinical study aiming to improve gait functions in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) by using adaptive neurostimulation to the pallidum. The investigators will use a bidirectional deep brain stimulation device with sensing and stimulation capabilities to 1) decode the physiological signatures of gait and gait adaptation by recording neural activities from the motor cortical areas and the globus pallidus during natural walking and a gait adaptation task, and 2) develop an adaptive deep brain stimulation (DBS) paradigm to selectively stimulate the pallidum during different phases of the gait cycle and measure improvements in gait parameters. This is the first exploration of network dynamics of gait in PD using chronically implanted cortical and subcortical electrodes. In addition to providing insights into a fundamental process, the proposed therapy will deliver personalized neurostimulation based on individual physiological biomarkers to enhance locomotor skills in patients with PD. Ten patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease undergoing evaluation for DBS implantation will be enrolled in this single treatment arm study.
Detailed description
This study will allow the investigators to evaluate the efficacy of an adaptive stimulation paradigm in deep brain stimulation (DBS) to treat motor-related behaviours and motor skill learning in Parkinson's disease (PD). Parkinson's disease patients will be implanted unilaterally or bilaterally with a totally internalized bidirectional neural interface, Medtronic Summit RC+S.
While current DBS therapy improves motor symptoms of PD, it does not address problems with acquiring additional motor skills (i.e. adapting gait patterns to avoid falls)) in PD, therefore, limiting benefits of physical rehabilitation programs aimed at improving mobility. Motor skill learning is critical in acquiring any new behaviors related to motor function. The overall objective is to identify personalized electrophysiological signatures of motor skill learning in PD patients and use adaptive control algorithms to enhance these signatures. The study will discover new ways to rehabilitate the disease brain circuits using adaptive neuromodulation.
In a small, double-blinded trial, ten patients with idiopathic PD and motor fluctuations will be implanted with unilateral or bilateral RC+S devices, each connected to a standard quadripolar DBS lead implanted in the basal ganglia, along with a 4-contact paddle type electrode placed subdurally over the motor cortex. The investigators will compare the overall efficacy of closed-loop and open-loop paradigms in terms of behavioral performance improvements in validated motor skill learning tasks and measurements from wearable devices. During this chronic adaptive DBS phase, adaptive DBS and open-loop stimulation settings will be randomized for 30-day periods and motor skill and gait related measurements will be obtained from a combination of computerized motor tasks and wearable devices that track movement kinematics. Patients will participate in daily, if possible, motor learning and gait tasks at home with triggered stimulation settings and recordings.
The investigators expect to successfully develop a prototype adaptive DBS algorithm based on cortical and / or basal ganglia LFPs (local field potentials). The investigators hypothesize that an adaptive paradigm will provide improvements in motor skilled learning compared to the conventional, open-loop paradigm, in which stimulation parameters remain constant until changed by the patient or clinician using an external programmer.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
- Model description
- In a small, double-blinded trial, the investigators will compare the overall efficacy of closed-loop and open-loop paradigms in terms of behavioral performance improvements in validated motor skill learning tasks and measurements from wearable devices. During this chronic aDBS phase, aDBS and open-loop stimulation settings will be randomized for 30-day periods and motor skill and gait related measurements will be obtained from a combination of computerized motor tasks and wearable devices that track movement kinematics. Patients will participate in daily, if possible, motor learning and gait tasks at home with triggered stimulation settings and recordings. Data will be collected and reviewed from the wearable monitors, Summit RC+S, and home motor learning tasks remotely. Researchers will have weekly check-in sessions with patients by video conferencing or in-person meetings. At minimum, researchers will have in-person sessions with patients every 4 weeks during Phase 3.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Open-loop deep brain stimulation | Active comparator | Device: Summit RC+SParkinson's disease patients implanted with Summit RC+S and brain lead implanted in the pallidal/striatal region receiving open-loop deep brain stimulation. |
| Randomized deep brain stimulation | Active comparator | Device: Summit RC+SParkinson's disease patients implanted with Summit RC+S and brain lead implanted in the pallidal/striatal region receiving closed-loop stimulation at random time points. |
| Deep brain stimulation during contralateral limb movement | Active comparator | Device: Summit RC+SParkinson's disease patients implanted with Summit RC+S and brain lead implanted in the pallidal/striatal region receiving closed-loop stimulation during time of contralateral limb movement. |
| Deep brain stimulation during contralateral limb rest | Active comparator | Device: Summit RC+SParkinson's disease patients implanted with Summit RC+S and brain lead implanted in the pallidal/striatal region receiving closed-loop stimulation during time of no movement for contralateral limb. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Ability to give informed consent for the study
- Movement disorder symptoms that are sufficiently severe, in spite of best medical therapy, to warrant surgical implantation of deep brain stimulators according to standard clinical criteria
- Patient has requested surgical intervention with deep brain stimulation for their disorder
- No movement -elated abnormalities that suggest an alternative diagnosis or contraindicate surgery
- Absence of significant cognitive impairment (score of 21 or greater on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA),
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Coagulopathy, anticoagulant medications, uncontrolled hypertension, history of seizures, heart disease, or other medical conditions considered to place the patient at elevated risk for surgical complications
- Evidence of a psychogenic movement disorder: Motor symptoms that remit with suggestion or "while unobserved", symptoms that are inconsistent over time or incongruent with clinical condition, plus other manifestation such as "false" signs, multiple somatizations, or obvious psychiatric disturbance.
- Pregnancy: all women of child bearing potential will have a negative urine pregnancy test prior to undergoing their surgical procedure.
- Significant untreated depression (BDI-II score >20). History of suicidal attempt or active suicidal ideation (Yes to #2-5 on C-SSRS)
- Any personality or mood symptoms that study personnel believe will interfere with study requirements.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Summit RC+SAlso: continuous deep brain stimulationUsing the RC+S pulse generator, patients receive clinically-optimized open loop DBS stimulation to the pallidum. | Device | Open-loop deep brain stimulation |
| Summit RC+SAlso: random stimulationUsing the RC+S pulse generator, the patients will receive closed-loop stimulation at random time points. These random stimulation times will in total equal the total amount of time of active movement. | Device | Randomized deep brain stimulation |
| Summit RC+SAlso: adaptive stimulationUsing the RC+S pulse generator, the patients will receive closed-loop stimulation during time of contralateral limb movement (e.g. left brain stimulation during right leg/arm movement). | Device | Deep brain stimulation during contralateral limb movement |
| Summit RC+SAlso: adaptive stimulationUsing the RC+S pulse generator, the patients will receive closed-loop stimulation during time of no movement for the contralateral limb (e.g. left brain stimulation while right leg/arm is not moving). | Device | Deep brain stimulation during contralateral limb rest |
Primary outcome
Change in motor learning task completion with closed-loop compared to open-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS)
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Change in percentage of motor learning task trials that were completed with closed-loop compared to open-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS). The task is made up of 840 trials, completion will be measured by percent of trials completed (e.g. 750/840 trials completed would be 89%). The task has a built in function which logs completed trials in a CSV document.
Change in motor learning task reaction times with closed-loop compared to open-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS)
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Change in gait sequence motor learning task reaction times (measured in milliseconds) with closed-loop compared to open-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS).
Change in motor learning task mean accuracy with closed-loop compared to open-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS).
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Change in motor learning task mean accuracy with closed-loop compared to open-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS). Accuracy will be measured as a percent using the tasks proprietary output log which records which trials out of the 840 total trials were target hits (i.e. correct trials). Mean accuracy will be calculated by taking the average of each patient's accuracy score across all attempts of the task done by said patient.
8 secondary outcomes
Change in Gait
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Change in Balance
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Change in MDS-UPDRS III scores
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Change in NIHTB Cognition Battery Test
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Change in Five-Times Sit to Stand Test Results
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Change in Stride Length
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Change in Stride Time
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Change in double support time
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 28409730Swann NC, de Hemptinne C, Miocinovic S, Qasim S, Ostrem JL, Galifianakis NB, Luciano MS, Wang SS, Ziman N, Taylor R, Starr PA. Chronic multisite brain recordings from a totally implantable bidirectional neural interface: experience in 5 patients with Parkinson's disease. J Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;128(2):605-616. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.JNS161162. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
- Background: PubMed 23852650Little S, Pogosyan A, Neal S, Zavala B, Zrinzo L, Hariz M, Foltynie T, Limousin P, Ashkan K, FitzGerald J, Green AL, Aziz TZ, Brown P. Adaptive deep brain stimulation in advanced Parkinson disease. Ann Neurol. 2013 Sep;74(3):449-57. doi: 10.1002/ana.23951. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42297980Louie KH, Balakid JP, Bath JE, Song S, Fekri Azgomi H, Marks JH, Choi JT, Starr PA, Wang DD. Adaptive deep brain stimulation for dynamic gait control in Parkinson's disease: a randomized feasibility trial. Nat Med. 2026 Jun 15. doi: 10.1038/s41591-026-04434-2. Online ahead of print.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Parkinson Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Early Molecular Biomarkers for Differentiating Parkinsonian Syndromes
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Atypical Parkinsonism
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (MK-2870) in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) as First-line Maintenance Treatment of Cervical Cancer (MK-2870-036/TroFuse-036/GOG-3123/ENGOT-cx22)
Cervical Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stromal Cells-derived Exosomes in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson Disease (PD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Adaptive DBS to Offset STN Dysregulation During Exercise in PD
Parkinson Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Doris Wang, MD, PhD principal investigator
University of California, San Francisco
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Summit RC+S in people with Parkinson Disease, run by Doris Wang, MD, PhD at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in motor learning task completion with closed-loop compared to open-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS) (time frame: Baseline and 2 years). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04675398, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Oct 2026.