Pediatric CancerRePlayNCT04672681
Rehabilitation Including Structured Active Play for Preschoolers With Cancer.
A study testing Play-based physical activity intervention in people with Pediatric Cancer, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Treatment for childhood cancer causes treatment-related acute adverse events such as muscle weakness and physical incompetence. With long admissions, isolation, and long-term bed rest, this means reduced physical activity and, ultimately, gross motor functioning development is affected. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 months to 5 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pediatric Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Play-based physical activity intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 84 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 7 Jan 2021to 30 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 months to 5 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Children diagnosed with cancer or benign disorders and are being treated with chemotherapy and/or radiation and are admitted to the Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology at University Hospital Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet.
- Children at the age of 1-5,9 years at diagnosis.
- Children whose parents can communicate in Danish.
Who cannot join
- Children with mental disabilities that complicates the ability to follow instructions.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Treatment for childhood cancer causes treatment-related acute adverse events such as muscle weakness and physical incompetence. With long admissions, isolation, and long-term bed rest, this means reduced physical activity and, ultimately, gross motor functioning development is affected. Furthermore, the children participate less in sport and leisure activities, inhibiting social skills, and the children feel isolated from peers. The above makes it difficult for children to return to everyday activities. Physical activity in the form of play and movement activities is essential for preschool children's gross motor, social, and personal development- a development where parents play a crucial role.
Replay is a randomized controlled trial that will include 84 children with cancer aged 1-5 years at the University Hospital Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet. The children are included at the treatment initiation and are randomized to either the intervention group or the control group. The intervention consists of six months of daily structured play-based physical activity, including daily parent administered play and movement and three weekly group-based play and movement sessions at the hospital during admissions. Gross motor and physical function is measured with 1) Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition (PDMS-2), Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI), Handgrip strength, and a six-minute walk test. The assessment time points are baseline (initiated timepoint), 3- and 6 months (endpoint) after initiated treatment. The intervention group will be observed and invited to participate in qualitative interviews. The control group will receive usual care and specific physiotherapy if needed.
Read the detailed description
Aim
Project RePlay aims to investigate the effectiveness of a play-based physical activity intervention on gross motor functioning measured by Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition (PDMS-2) with the primary end-point six months after diagnosis in children with newly diagnosed cancer aged 1-5 years old. The investigators hypothesize that the intervention will reduce short- and long-term physical and psychosocial consequences, including reduced gross motor function and lack of social interaction.
- Background Physical play and movement activities are essential for preschool children's gross motor, social, and personal development. Through play and movement, children develop motor skills crucial for participation in physical and social activities throughout life. A study showed that an 18-week play intervention among healthy preschool children significantly improved (p<.0005) gross motor function in the intervention group compared with the control group. Play is also the children's first arena for socializing, and these interactions have an immense role in developing emotional, personal, and social skills. Physical play and movement activities are more than just physical exercise; it is social teamwork, emotions, and learning. Reduced physical activity or inactivity in children is highly dependent on three factors; 1) reduced dynapenia (muscle strength and power), 2) exercise deficit disorder (physical inactivity), and 3) physical illiteracy (reduced competence, confidence, and knowledge in movement). Due to more intensive treatment with chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery, children with cancer experience acute adverse events such as myopathy and neuropathy, resulting in muscle weakness, physical incompetence, and inactivity. Furthermore, treatment-related complications such as infections can cause extended periods of hospitalization, periods of isolation, and long-term bed rest. Thus, many children with cancer experience several physical side effects as impaired motor skills, physical capacity, and decreased motivation to engage in physical activity. The cancer treatment has a significant impact on the children's physical development and socialization as the lack of motor development leads to inactivity and less participation in sport and leisure activities. This leads to a reduced understanding of the social playing field in joint activities, and the children feel more isolated from peers. Children with cancer experiences challenges in all three factors leading to physical inactivity. Compared with siblings and the general population, these social and physical challenges persist for the rest of their lives. Hence, children diagnosed with cancer have lower school performance, lower education level, higher unemployment, and increased socioeconomic challenges. Thus, the investigators hypothesize that early initiated rehabilitation programs during initial treatment, focusing on maintaining a typical physical activity level, are crucial for continuing everyday activities during and after treatment. The rehabilitation, including social and physical activity and education in children and teenagers with cancer (RESPECT) study for children with cancer aged 6-18 years, showed that it is feasible to carry out physical tests and motivate them to participate in physical activities. Physical activity maintained the hospitalized children's physical fitness and gross motor function during treatment compared with hospitalized children who did not receive physical activity intervention. A systematic review covering international studies show similar findings; that physical activities positively affect mobility, physical fitness, muscle strength, and quality of life in children with cancer. Additionally, children with cancer who participate in structured physical activities during treatment have fewer admission days than children who received standard care, corresponding to a 17% reduction in hospitalization's total economic cost. Most studies focusing on physical activity as part of an early initiated rehabilitation program designed interventions for school children aged 6-18. Only a few of the studies include children under the age of 6 years. Each year 200 children and adolescents aged 0-18 years are diagnosed with cancer in Denmark. Of these, approximately one-third is diagnosed before the age of 5. None of the published studies on physical activity in pediatric oncology designed interventions for preschool children (1-5 years old). Thus, there is a lack of studies with an intervention designed for preschool children with cancer focusing on physical and social rehabilitation. Improvements in cure-rates of childhood cancer mean that today's 5-year survival is 85%. Thus, more research into the best strategies for physical activity and rehabilitation for all age groups of children with cancer is needed. A single study of parent-controlled physical activity at home included children with cancer from age 1-17. The intervention didn't improve the children's motor function compared with the control group, mainly due to poor adherence to the intervention. Project RESPECT shows that motivation and adherence to physical activity interventions are dependent on the support from "significant others" such as parents and exercise professionals. Parents are an essential resource for children with cancer. The parents follow the child's treatment closely, and the parents' support throughout the treatment is crucial for the child's need for presence and support so the child can feel safe and in control. Furthermore, the focus on home-based care is increasing to minimize hospital visits. Consequently, parents play an essential role in physical activity and rehabilitation for children with cancer. For preschool children, the parents' role is even more essential. When small children and parents play together, it creates a unique and safe environment where the children can be challenged physically and socially. Children's development is dependent on parents, and parents of a child with cancer must acquire the necessary skills concerning play and movement for the child. With project RePlay, the aim is to develop prophylactic strategies by investigating a play-based physical activity intervention for children with cancer aged 1-5 years to ensure the retention of natural motor and social development and participation in everyday activities. The hypothesis is that individual and social play and movement activities, with parents as resources, can reduce gross motor and social development impairments. Thus, the objectives of RePlay are:
- To investigate the effects of a six-month play-based physical activity intervention in children with cancer, aged 1-5 years on gross motor function compared with a control group receiving usual care.
- To investigate the children with cancer and the parents' experiences with a play-based physical activity intervention during treatment and the influence on the children's social and personal development.
- Research plan
Design:
The randomized controlled trial study takes place at the Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology at Rigshospitalet. RePlay will include 84 children aged 1-5 years diagnosed with cancer. The children are randomized to either the intervention- or control group after the children have performed the baseline testing. The children will be stratified by age at inclusion (respectively, over and under three years old) and treatment group (hematologic malignancy, solid tumors, CNS-tumors). The intervention group will participate in a six-month play-based physical activity intervention starting from initiated treatment. The study will be an open-ended cohort where newly diagnosed patients are included on an ongoing basis.
The intervention will consist of 45 min daily play-based physical activities inspired by Mighty Moves from the study of Bellows et al. [5], where the activities are playful and focus on gross motor skills. The intervention combines hospital and home-based physical activity. Three days a week, there will be 45 minutes of group-based physical activity at the hospital for the children, siblings, and parents during admissions or appointments at the outpatient clinic. An exercise professional or pediatric physiotherapist administers the group-based sessions at the hospital. Children isolated in the hospital room are offered individual sessions as a substitute for the group-based sessions.
During the other four days a week or on days where the family is at home, the parents administer the play-based physical activity. The parents receive education and supervision on conducting play-based physical activity with their child in the hospital room or at home. The parents will receive inspiration material containing numerous different plays, games, and activities in different intensities, ensuring that their child is physically active every day with different intensity. The material is designed to engage the child in choosing what activities to do.
Due to age-specific development and movement, the children in the intervention group are split into two groups for the group-based sessions:
- Tumble: 1-2 years old • Tumble turbo: 3-5 years old
An example of a weekly schedule:
Monday: parent administered play
Tuesday: parents administered play OR group-based session at the hospital
Wednesday: parent administered play
Thursday: parents administered play OR group-based session at the hospital
Friday: parents administered play OR group-based session at the hospital
Saturday: parents administered play
Sunday: parents administered play
The control group will receive standard treatment and physiotherapy if needed. After six months of treatment, the child and parents will receive a status on the child's motor development and be invited to receive individual instructions and invited to participate in the social sessions.
Sample size:
Since there is no evidence on the potential effect of gross motor function in children with cancer, the sample size is estimated based on Bellows et al.'s (2013). The study objective was to research the potential of a play intervention on gross motor function in healthy preschool children measured by Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition (PDMS-2). The sample size is estimated with an Alpha = 0,05 and Power = 80%. Based on a mean (SD) in the interventions group = 99,31 (9,07) and a mean (SD) in the control group = 93,24, n=70 (35 intervention group; 35 control group) are to be included. Assuming a 20% dropout rate, RePlay will include 84 children.
- Conditions
- Pediatric Cancer
- Being tested
- Play-based physical activity intervention
- Keywords
- physical activity, preschool, cancer, play, social development, gross motor function
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Play-based physical activity interventionBehavioural
The intervention group will participate in a six-month play-based physical activity intervention starting from their initiated treatment. The intervention combines hospital and home-based physical activity. Three days a week, there will be 45 minutes of group-based physical activity at the hospital during admissions or appointments at the outpatient clinic, supervised by an exercise professional or pediatric physiotherapist. Children who are isolated during treatment are offered supervised individual 45 min. training sessions 3 times a week as a substitute. During the other four days a week, or on days where the family is at home, the parents administer the play-based physical activity. At inclusion, the parents receive education and supervision on conducting play-based physical activity with their child in the hospital room or at home. They will receive inspiration material containing numerous different plays, games, and activities in different intensities.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | The intervention group will receive a 6-month play-based physical activity intervention with daily play and movement activities starting from treatment initiation. Receives: Behavioral: Play-based physical activity intervention |
| Standard care | No intervention | The control group will receive standard treatment and physiotherapy if needed. For ethical reasons, after the primary study end-point at six months, the participants and parents allocated to this group will be offered the same inspirational material and the possibility to participate in the group-based physical activity as the participants and parents allocated to the intervention group, but they will not receive education and supervision play-based physical activity with their child in the hospital room. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Gross Motor Function
Gross Motor Function is measured with the gross motor function subscale of Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition (PDMS-2). PDMS-2 gives a gross motor standard score summed by the standard score from the three gross motor domians; stationary, locomotion and object manipulation. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Measured: Baseline (treatment initiation)
Gross Motor Function
Gross Motor Function is measured with the gross motor function subscale of Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition (PDMS-2). PDMS-2 gives a gross motor standard score summed by the standard score from the three gross motor domians; stationary, locomotion and object manipulation. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Measured: 3 months after treatment initiation
Gross Motor Function
Gross Motor Function is measured with the gross motor function subscale of Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition (PDMS-2). PDMS-2 gives a gross motor standard score summed by the standard score from the three gross motor domians; stationary, locomotion and object manipulation. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Measured: 6 months after treatment initiation (primary endpoint)
Gross Motor Function
Gross Motor Function is measured with the gross motor function subscale of Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition (PDMS-2). PDMS-2 gives a gross motor standard score summed by the standard score from the three gross motor domians; stationary, locomotion and object manipulation. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Measured: 12 months after treatment initiation
Gross Motor Function
Gross Motor Function is measured with the gross motor function subscale of Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition (PDMS-2). PDMS-2 gives a gross motor standard score summed by the standard score from the three gross motor domians; stationary, locomotion and object manipulation. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Measured: 12 months after ended treatment
Secondary outcomes (20)
Level of child's function in everyday life
Level of function is measured through parent structured interviews with Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) where parents answer wuestions about their child's function in three domains self-care, mobiliy and social functioning and the child's need for help in the same three domains. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Measured: Baseline (treatment initiation)
Level of child's function in everyday life
Level of function is measured through parent structured interviews with Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) where parents answer wuestions about their child's function in three domains self-care, mobiliy and social functioning and the child's need for help in the same three domains. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Measured: 3 months after treatment initiation
Level of child's function in everyday life
Level of function is measured through parent structured interviews with Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) where parents answer wuestions about their child's function in three domains self-care, mobiliy and social functioning and the child's need for help in the same three domains. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Measured: 6 months after treatment initiation (primary endpoint)
Level of child's function in everyday life
Level of function is measured through parent structured interviews with Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) where parents answer wuestions about their child's function in three domains self-care, mobiliy and social functioning and the child's need for help in the same three domains. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Measured: 12 months after treatment initiation
Level of child's function in everyday life
Level of function is measured through parent structured interviews with Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) where parents answer wuestions about their child's function in three domains self-care, mobiliy and social functioning and the child's need for help in the same three domains. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Measured: 12 months after ended treatment
Handgrip strength
Handgrip strength measured with the KLS Martin Vigorimeter. Measures in bar. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Measured: Baseline (treatment initiation)
Handgrip strength
Handgrip strength measured with the KLS Martin Vigorimeter. Measures in bar. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Measured: 3 months after treatment initiation
Handgrip strength
Handgrip strength measured with the KLS Martin Vigorimeter. Measures in bar. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Measured: 6 months after treatment initiation (primary endpoint)
Handgrip strength
Handgrip strength measured with the KLS Martin Vigorimeter. Measures in bar. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Measured: 12 months after treatment initiation
Handgrip strength
Handgrip strength measured with the KLS Martin Vigorimeter. Measures in bar. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Measured: 12 months after ended treatment
Six-minute walk
Six-minute walk test is done with the measurement of total meters walk after 6 minutes. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Measured: Baseline (treatment initiation)
Six-minute walk
Six-minute walk test is done with the measurement of total meters walk after 6 minutes. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Measured: 3 months after treatment initiation
Six-minute walk
Six-minute walk test is done with the measurement of total meters walk after 6 minutes. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Measured: 6 months after treatment initiation (primary endpoint)
Six-minute walk
Six-minute walk test is done with the measurement of total meters walk after 6 minutes. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Measured: 12 months after treatment initiation
Six-minute walk
Six-minute walk test is done with the measurement of total meters walk after 6 minutes. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Measured: 12 months after ended treatment
Two-minute walk
Two-minute walk test is done with the measurement of total meters walk after 2 minutes during the six-minute walk. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Measured: Baseline (treatment initiation)
Two-minute walk
Two-minute walk test is done with the measurement of total meters walk after 2 minutes during the six-minute walk. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Measured: 3 months after treatment initiation
Two-minute walk
Two-minute walk test is done with the measurement of total meters walk after 2 minutes during the six-minute walk. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Measured: 6 months after treatment initiation (primary endpoint)
Two-minute walk
Two-minute walk test is done with the measurement of total meters walk after 2 minutes during the six-minute walk. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Measured: 12 months after treatment initiation
Two-minute walk
Two-minute walk test is done with the measurement of total meters walk after 2 minutes during the six-minute walk. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Measured: 12 months after ended treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Dec 2020
- Study start7 Jan 2021
- Primary completion30 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (35)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pediatric CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Copenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The intervention is a parallel model where the participants are randomized to either the intervention group or standard care.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Danish Cancer Society, Danish Child Cancer Foundation, University of Copenhagen
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hanne Baekgaard Larsen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
- Investigators
- Hanne B Larsen, Principal investigator, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04672681
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RePlay-2020
- Acronym
- RePlay
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 3 Dec 2020
- Last updated
- 8 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Bjorklund DF, Brown RD. Physical play and cognitive development: integrating activity, cognition, and education. Child Dev. 1998 Jun;69(3):604-6.
PubMed 9680673Bellows LL, Davies PL, Anderson J, Kennedy C. Effectiveness of a physical activity intervention for Head Start preschoolers: a randomized intervention study. Am J Occup Ther. 2013 Jan-Feb;67(1):28-36. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2013.005777.
PubMed 23245780Faigenbaum AD, Rebullido TR, MacDonald JP. Pediatric Inactivity Triad: A Risky PIT. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2018 Feb;17(2):45-47. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000450. No abstract available.
PubMed 29420346Gatta G, Zigon G, Capocaccia R, Coebergh JW, Desandes E, Kaatsch P, Pastore G, Peris-Bonet R, Stiller CA; EUROCARE Working Group. Survival of European children and young adults with cancer diagnosed 1995-2002. Eur J Cancer. 2009 Apr;45(6):992-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.042. Epub 2009 Feb 21.
PubMed 19231160Smith MA, Seibel NL, Altekruse SF, Ries LA, Melbert DL, O'Leary M, Smith FO, Reaman GH. Outcomes for children and adolescents with cancer: challenges for the twenty-first century. J Clin Oncol. 2010 May 20;28(15):2625-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.0421. Epub 2010 Apr 19.
PubMed 20404250Gibson TM, Mostoufi-Moab S, Stratton KL, Leisenring WM, Barnea D, Chow EJ, Donaldson SS, Howell RM, Hudson MM, Mahajan A, Nathan PC, Ness KK, Sklar CA, Tonorezos ES, Weldon CB, Wells EM, Yasui Y, Armstrong GT, Robison LL, Oeffinger KC. Temporal patterns in the risk of chronic health conditions in survivors of childhood cancer diagnosed 1970-99: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Dec;19(12):1590-1601. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30537-0. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
PubMed 30416076Ness KK, Kaste SC, Zhu L, Pui CH, Jeha S, Nathan PC, Inaba H, Wasilewski-Masker K, Shah D, Wells RJ, Karlage RE, Robison LL, Cox CL. Skeletal, neuromuscular and fitness impairments among children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2015 Apr;56(4):1004-11. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2014.944519. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
PubMed 25030039Thorsteinsson T, Larsen HB, Schmiegelow K, Thing LF, Krustrup P, Pedersen MT, Christensen KB, Mogensen PR, Helms AS, Andersen LB. Cardiorespiratory fitness and physical function in children with cancer from diagnosis throughout treatment. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2017 May 12;3(1):e000179. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2016-000179. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 28761697Darcy L, Enskar K, Bjork M. Young children's experiences of living an everyday life with cancer - A three year interview study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Apr;39:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.12.007. Epub 2018 Dec 23.
PubMed 30850132Hildenbrand AK, Clawson KJ, Alderfer MA, Marsac ML. Coping with pediatric cancer: strategies employed by children and their parents to manage cancer-related stressors during treatment. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2011 Nov-Dec;28(6):344-54. doi: 10.1177/1043454211430823.
PubMed 22194147Bjork M, Nordstrom B, Hallstrom I. Needs of young children with cancer during their initial hospitalization: an observational study. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2006 Jul-Aug;23(4):210-9. doi: 10.1177/1043454206289737.
PubMed 16766686Gibson F, Aldiss S, Horstman M, Kumpunen S, Richardson A. Children and young people's experiences of cancer care: a qualitative research study using participatory methods. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Nov;47(11):1397-407. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.03.019. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
PubMed 20430388Vannatta K, Gerhardt CA, Wells RJ, Noll RB. Intensity of CNS treatment for pediatric cancer: prediction of social outcomes in survivors. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007 Oct 15;49(5):716-22. doi: 10.1002/pbc.21062.
PubMed 17096410Almqvist L, Hellnas P, Stefansson M, Granlund M. 'I can play!' young children's perceptions of health. Pediatr Rehabil. 2006 Jul-Sep;9(3):275-84. doi: 10.1080/13638490500521303.
PubMed 17050405van Brussel M, Takken T, van der Net J, Engelbert RH, Bierings M, Schoenmakers MA, Helders PJ. Physical function and fitness in long-term survivors of childhood leukaemia. Pediatr Rehabil. 2006 Jul-Sep;9(3):267-74. doi: 10.1080/13638490500523150.
PubMed 17050404
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Rehabilitation Including Structured Active Play for Preschoolers With Cancer.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04672681
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RePlay / RePlay-2020
- Conditions
- Pediatric Cancer
- Keywords
- physical activity, preschool, cancer, play, social development, gross motor function
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Danish Cancer Society, Danish Child Cancer Foundation, University of Copenhagen
- Study start
- 7 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Treatment for childhood cancer causes treatment-related acute adverse events such as muscle weakness and physical incompetence. With long admissions, isolation, and long-term bed rest, this means reduced physical activity and, ultimately, gross motor functioning development is affected. Furthermore, the children participate less in sport and leisure activities, inhibiting social skills, and the children feel isolated from peers. The above makes it difficult for children to return to everyday activities. Physical activity in the form of play and movement activities is essential for preschool children's gross motor, social, and personal development- a development where parents play a crucial role.
Replay is a randomized controlled trial that will include 84 children with cancer aged 1-5 years at the University Hospital Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet. The children are included at the treatment initiation and are randomized to either the intervention group or the control group. The intervention consists of six months of daily structured play-based physical activity, including daily parent administered play and movement and three weekly group-based play and movement sessions at the hospital during admissions. Gross motor and physical function is measured with 1) Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition (PDMS-2), Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI), Handgrip strength, and a six-minute walk test. The assessment time points are baseline (initiated timepoint), 3- and 6 months (endpoint) after initiated treatment. The intervention group will be observed and invited to participate in qualitative interviews. The control group will receive usual care and specific physiotherapy if needed.
Detailed description
Aim
Project RePlay aims to investigate the effectiveness of a play-based physical activity intervention on gross motor functioning measured by Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition (PDMS-2) with the primary end-point six months after diagnosis in children with newly diagnosed cancer aged 1-5 years old. The investigators hypothesize that the intervention will reduce short- and long-term physical and psychosocial consequences, including reduced gross motor function and lack of social interaction.
- Background Physical play and movement activities are essential for preschool children's gross motor, social, and personal development. Through play and movement, children develop motor skills crucial for participation in physical and social activities throughout life. A study showed that an 18-week play intervention among healthy preschool children significantly improved (p<.0005) gross motor function in the intervention group compared with the control group. Play is also the children's first arena for socializing, and these interactions have an immense role in developing emotional, personal, and social skills. Physical play and movement activities are more than just physical exercise; it is social teamwork, emotions, and learning. Reduced physical activity or inactivity in children is highly dependent on three factors; 1) reduced dynapenia (muscle strength and power), 2) exercise deficit disorder (physical inactivity), and 3) physical illiteracy (reduced competence, confidence, and knowledge in movement). Due to more intensive treatment with chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery, children with cancer experience acute adverse events such as myopathy and neuropathy, resulting in muscle weakness, physical incompetence, and inactivity. Furthermore, treatment-related complications such as infections can cause extended periods of hospitalization, periods of isolation, and long-term bed rest. Thus, many children with cancer experience several physical side effects as impaired motor skills, physical capacity, and decreased motivation to engage in physical activity. The cancer treatment has a significant impact on the children's physical development and socialization as the lack of motor development leads to inactivity and less participation in sport and leisure activities. This leads to a reduced understanding of the social playing field in joint activities, and the children feel more isolated from peers. Children with cancer experiences challenges in all three factors leading to physical inactivity. Compared with siblings and the general population, these social and physical challenges persist for the rest of their lives. Hence, children diagnosed with cancer have lower school performance, lower education level, higher unemployment, and increased socioeconomic challenges. Thus, the investigators hypothesize that early initiated rehabilitation programs during initial treatment, focusing on maintaining a typical physical activity level, are crucial for continuing everyday activities during and after treatment. The rehabilitation, including social and physical activity and education in children and teenagers with cancer (RESPECT) study for children with cancer aged 6-18 years, showed that it is feasible to carry out physical tests and motivate them to participate in physical activities. Physical activity maintained the hospitalized children's physical fitness and gross motor function during treatment compared with hospitalized children who did not receive physical activity intervention. A systematic review covering international studies show similar findings; that physical activities positively affect mobility, physical fitness, muscle strength, and quality of life in children with cancer. Additionally, children with cancer who participate in structured physical activities during treatment have fewer admission days than children who received standard care, corresponding to a 17% reduction in hospitalization's total economic cost. Most studies focusing on physical activity as part of an early initiated rehabilitation program designed interventions for school children aged 6-18. Only a few of the studies include children under the age of 6 years. Each year 200 children and adolescents aged 0-18 years are diagnosed with cancer in Denmark. Of these, approximately one-third is diagnosed before the age of 5. None of the published studies on physical activity in pediatric oncology designed interventions for preschool children (1-5 years old). Thus, there is a lack of studies with an intervention designed for preschool children with cancer focusing on physical and social rehabilitation. Improvements in cure-rates of childhood cancer mean that today's 5-year survival is 85%. Thus, more research into the best strategies for physical activity and rehabilitation for all age groups of children with cancer is needed. A single study of parent-controlled physical activity at home included children with cancer from age 1-17. The intervention didn't improve the children's motor function compared with the control group, mainly due to poor adherence to the intervention. Project RESPECT shows that motivation and adherence to physical activity interventions are dependent on the support from "significant others" such as parents and exercise professionals. Parents are an essential resource for children with cancer. The parents follow the child's treatment closely, and the parents' support throughout the treatment is crucial for the child's need for presence and support so the child can feel safe and in control. Furthermore, the focus on home-based care is increasing to minimize hospital visits. Consequently, parents play an essential role in physical activity and rehabilitation for children with cancer. For preschool children, the parents' role is even more essential. When small children and parents play together, it creates a unique and safe environment where the children can be challenged physically and socially. Children's development is dependent on parents, and parents of a child with cancer must acquire the necessary skills concerning play and movement for the child. With project RePlay, the aim is to develop prophylactic strategies by investigating a play-based physical activity intervention for children with cancer aged 1-5 years to ensure the retention of natural motor and social development and participation in everyday activities. The hypothesis is that individual and social play and movement activities, with parents as resources, can reduce gross motor and social development impairments. Thus, the objectives of RePlay are:
- To investigate the effects of a six-month play-based physical activity intervention in children with cancer, aged 1-5 years on gross motor function compared with a control group receiving usual care.
- To investigate the children with cancer and the parents' experiences with a play-based physical activity intervention during treatment and the influence on the children's social and personal development.
- Research plan
Design:
The randomized controlled trial study takes place at the Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology at Rigshospitalet. RePlay will include 84 children aged 1-5 years diagnosed with cancer. The children are randomized to either the intervention- or control group after the children have performed the baseline testing. The children will be stratified by age at inclusion (respectively, over and under three years old) and treatment group (hematologic malignancy, solid tumors, CNS-tumors). The intervention group will participate in a six-month play-based physical activity intervention starting from initiated treatment. The study will be an open-ended cohort where newly diagnosed patients are included on an ongoing basis.
The intervention will consist of 45 min daily play-based physical activities inspired by Mighty Moves from the study of Bellows et al. [5], where the activities are playful and focus on gross motor skills. The intervention combines hospital and home-based physical activity. Three days a week, there will be 45 minutes of group-based physical activity at the hospital for the children, siblings, and parents during admissions or appointments at the outpatient clinic. An exercise professional or pediatric physiotherapist administers the group-based sessions at the hospital. Children isolated in the hospital room are offered individual sessions as a substitute for the group-based sessions.
During the other four days a week or on days where the family is at home, the parents administer the play-based physical activity. The parents receive education and supervision on conducting play-based physical activity with their child in the hospital room or at home. The parents will receive inspiration material containing numerous different plays, games, and activities in different intensities, ensuring that their child is physically active every day with different intensity. The material is designed to engage the child in choosing what activities to do.
Due to age-specific development and movement, the children in the intervention group are split into two groups for the group-based sessions:
- Tumble: 1-2 years old • Tumble turbo: 3-5 years old
An example of a weekly schedule:
Monday: parent administered play
Tuesday: parents administered play OR group-based session at the hospital
Wednesday: parent administered play
Thursday: parents administered play OR group-based session at the hospital
Friday: parents administered play OR group-based session at the hospital
Saturday: parents administered play
Sunday: parents administered play
The control group will receive standard treatment and physiotherapy if needed. After six months of treatment, the child and parents will receive a status on the child's motor development and be invited to receive individual instructions and invited to participate in the social sessions.
Sample size:
Since there is no evidence on the potential effect of gross motor function in children with cancer, the sample size is estimated based on Bellows et al.'s (2013). The study objective was to research the potential of a play intervention on gross motor function in healthy preschool children measured by Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition (PDMS-2). The sample size is estimated with an Alpha = 0,05 and Power = 80%. Based on a mean (SD) in the interventions group = 99,31 (9,07) and a mean (SD) in the control group = 93,24, n=70 (35 intervention group; 35 control group) are to be included. Assuming a 20% dropout rate, RePlay will include 84 children.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The intervention is a parallel model where the participants are randomized to either the intervention group or standard care.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Behavioral: Play-based physical activity interventionThe intervention group will receive a 6-month play-based physical activity intervention with daily play and movement activities starting from treatment initiation. |
| Standard care | No intervention | –The control group will receive standard treatment and physiotherapy if needed. For ethical reasons, after the primary study end-point at six months, the participants and parents allocated to this group will be offered the same inspirational material and the possibility to participate in the group-based physical activity as the participants and parents allocated to the intervention group, but they will not receive education and supervision play-based physical activity with their child in the hospital room. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 months to 5 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Children diagnosed with cancer or benign disorders and are being treated with chemotherapy and/or radiation and are admitted to the Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology at University Hospital Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet.
- Children at the age of 1-5,9 years at diagnosis.
- Children whose parents can communicate in Danish.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Children with mental disabilities that complicates the ability to follow instructions.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Play-based physical activity interventionThe intervention group will participate in a six-month play-based physical activity intervention starting from their initiated treatment. The intervention combines hospital and home-based physical activity. Three days a week, there will be 45 minutes of group-based physical activity at the hospital during admissions or appointments at the outpatient clinic, supervised by an exercise professional or pediatric physiotherapist. Children who are isolated during treatment are offered supervised individual 45 min. training sessions 3 times a week as a substitute. During the other four days a week, or on days where the family is at home, the parents administer the play-based physical activity. At inclusion, the parents receive education and supervision on conducting play-based physical activity with their child in the hospital room or at home. They will receive inspiration material containing numerous different plays, games, and activities in different intensities. | Behavioural | Intervention group |
Primary outcome
Gross Motor Function
Time frame: Baseline (treatment initiation)
Gross Motor Function is measured with the gross motor function subscale of Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition (PDMS-2). PDMS-2 gives a gross motor standard score summed by the standard score from the three gross motor domians; stationary, locomotion and object manipulation. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Gross Motor Function
Time frame: 3 months after treatment initiation
Gross Motor Function is measured with the gross motor function subscale of Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition (PDMS-2). PDMS-2 gives a gross motor standard score summed by the standard score from the three gross motor domians; stationary, locomotion and object manipulation. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Gross Motor Function
Time frame: 6 months after treatment initiation (primary endpoint)
Gross Motor Function is measured with the gross motor function subscale of Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition (PDMS-2). PDMS-2 gives a gross motor standard score summed by the standard score from the three gross motor domians; stationary, locomotion and object manipulation. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Gross Motor Function
Time frame: 12 months after treatment initiation
Gross Motor Function is measured with the gross motor function subscale of Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition (PDMS-2). PDMS-2 gives a gross motor standard score summed by the standard score from the three gross motor domians; stationary, locomotion and object manipulation. The primary endpoint is after six months.
Gross Motor Function
Time frame: 12 months after ended treatment
Gross Motor Function is measured with the gross motor function subscale of Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition (PDMS-2). PDMS-2 gives a gross motor standard score summed by the standard score from the three gross motor domians; stationary, locomotion and object manipulation. The primary endpoint is after six months.
20 secondary outcomes
Level of child's function in everyday life
Time frame: Baseline (treatment initiation)
Level of child's function in everyday life
Time frame: 3 months after treatment initiation
Level of child's function in everyday life
Time frame: 6 months after treatment initiation (primary endpoint)
Level of child's function in everyday life
Time frame: 12 months after treatment initiation
Level of child's function in everyday life
Time frame: 12 months after ended treatment
Handgrip strength
Time frame: Baseline (treatment initiation)
Handgrip strength
Time frame: 3 months after treatment initiation
Handgrip strength
Time frame: 6 months after treatment initiation (primary endpoint)
Handgrip strength
Time frame: 12 months after treatment initiation
Handgrip strength
Time frame: 12 months after ended treatment
Six-minute walk
Time frame: Baseline (treatment initiation)
Six-minute walk
Time frame: 3 months after treatment initiation
Six-minute walk
Time frame: 6 months after treatment initiation (primary endpoint)
Six-minute walk
Time frame: 12 months after treatment initiation
Six-minute walk
Time frame: 12 months after ended treatment
Two-minute walk
Time frame: Baseline (treatment initiation)
Two-minute walk
Time frame: 3 months after treatment initiation
Two-minute walk
Time frame: 6 months after treatment initiation (primary endpoint)
Two-minute walk
Time frame: 12 months after treatment initiation
Two-minute walk
Time frame: 12 months after ended treatment
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jun 2025.
- Background: PubMed 9680673Bjorklund DF, Brown RD. Physical play and cognitive development: integrating activity, cognition, and education. Child Dev. 1998 Jun;69(3):604-6.
- Background: PubMed 23245780Bellows LL, Davies PL, Anderson J, Kennedy C. Effectiveness of a physical activity intervention for Head Start preschoolers: a randomized intervention study. Am J Occup Ther. 2013 Jan-Feb;67(1):28-36. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2013.005777.
- Background: PubMed 29420346Faigenbaum AD, Rebullido TR, MacDonald JP. Pediatric Inactivity Triad: A Risky PIT. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2018 Feb;17(2):45-47. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000450. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 19231160Gatta G, Zigon G, Capocaccia R, Coebergh JW, Desandes E, Kaatsch P, Pastore G, Peris-Bonet R, Stiller CA; EUROCARE Working Group. Survival of European children and young adults with cancer diagnosed 1995-2002. Eur J Cancer. 2009 Apr;45(6):992-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.042. Epub 2009 Feb 21.
- Background: PubMed 20404250Smith MA, Seibel NL, Altekruse SF, Ries LA, Melbert DL, O'Leary M, Smith FO, Reaman GH. Outcomes for children and adolescents with cancer: challenges for the twenty-first century. J Clin Oncol. 2010 May 20;28(15):2625-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.0421. Epub 2010 Apr 19.
- Background: PubMed 30416076Gibson TM, Mostoufi-Moab S, Stratton KL, Leisenring WM, Barnea D, Chow EJ, Donaldson SS, Howell RM, Hudson MM, Mahajan A, Nathan PC, Ness KK, Sklar CA, Tonorezos ES, Weldon CB, Wells EM, Yasui Y, Armstrong GT, Robison LL, Oeffinger KC. Temporal patterns in the risk of chronic health conditions in survivors of childhood cancer diagnosed 1970-99: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Dec;19(12):1590-1601. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30537-0. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
- Background: PubMed 25030039Ness KK, Kaste SC, Zhu L, Pui CH, Jeha S, Nathan PC, Inaba H, Wasilewski-Masker K, Shah D, Wells RJ, Karlage RE, Robison LL, Cox CL. Skeletal, neuromuscular and fitness impairments among children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2015 Apr;56(4):1004-11. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2014.944519. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
- Background: PubMed 28761697Thorsteinsson T, Larsen HB, Schmiegelow K, Thing LF, Krustrup P, Pedersen MT, Christensen KB, Mogensen PR, Helms AS, Andersen LB. Cardiorespiratory fitness and physical function in children with cancer from diagnosis throughout treatment. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2017 May 12;3(1):e000179. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2016-000179. eCollection 2017.
- Background: PubMed 30850132Darcy L, Enskar K, Bjork M. Young children's experiences of living an everyday life with cancer - A three year interview study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Apr;39:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.12.007. Epub 2018 Dec 23.
- Background: PubMed 22194147Hildenbrand AK, Clawson KJ, Alderfer MA, Marsac ML. Coping with pediatric cancer: strategies employed by children and their parents to manage cancer-related stressors during treatment. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2011 Nov-Dec;28(6):344-54. doi: 10.1177/1043454211430823.
- Background: PubMed 16766686Bjork M, Nordstrom B, Hallstrom I. Needs of young children with cancer during their initial hospitalization: an observational study. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2006 Jul-Aug;23(4):210-9. doi: 10.1177/1043454206289737.
- Background: PubMed 20430388Gibson F, Aldiss S, Horstman M, Kumpunen S, Richardson A. Children and young people's experiences of cancer care: a qualitative research study using participatory methods. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Nov;47(11):1397-407. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.03.019. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pediatric Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingObservational study
Psychological Benefits of a Normalized Camping Experience for Children With Cancer
Pediatric Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
An Extension Study Evaluating 6-week Treatment Cycles of Rozanolixizumab in Pediatric Study Participants With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
RecruitingObservational study
The Decision To Enroll In Therapeutic Clinical Trials In A Pediatric Cancer Clinical Network
Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hanne B Larsen principal investigator
Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Play-based physical activity intervention in people with Pediatric Cancer, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Gross Motor Function (time frame: Baseline (treatment initiation)). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04672681, which also lists 35 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jun 2025.