AzTrials
AzTrials

HealthyNCT04669093

Individual Differences in Placebo Analgesic Effects

A study of Healthy, run by Trustees of Dartmouth College at 1 site in United States.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study examines the effects of placebo suggestions tailored to match or mismatch individual participants' motivational styles-an issue of person-situation 'fit' with important effects in public health settings, but which has been ignored in past research. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 55 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
30 Sep 2026to 31 Dec 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy participants
  • Dominant promotion focus or dominant prevention focus (based on our screening)

Who cannot join

  • Currently or recently suffered from chronic pain (based on screening)
  • Cannot tolerate heat pain applied to the forearm, based on a calibration task at the beginning of the experiment

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site
  • Dartmouth College

    Hanover, New Hampshire, 03755

    Bethany Hunt, BA, bethany.j.hunt@dartmouth.edu

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Person by Situation Interaction: Matching Suggestions to Participants' Motivational Styles

This study examines the effects of placebo suggestions tailored to match or mismatch individual participants' motivational styles-an issue of person-situation 'fit' with important effects in public health settings, but which has been ignored in past research.

Conditions
Healthy
Being tested
Placebo cream- "promotion" suggestion, Placebo cream- "prevention" suggestion, Control cream

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Placebo cream- "promotion" suggestionBehavioural

    Over-the-counter hand cream will be applied to participants' skin, but they will be told that they are given a highly efficient topical analgesic cream. The suggestion will be based on a "promotion" approach (promoting good feelings).

  • Placebo cream- "prevention" suggestionBehavioural

    Over-the-counter hand cream will be applied to participants' skin, but they will be told that they are given a highly efficient topical analgesic cream. The suggestion will be based on a "prevention" approach (preventing pain).

  • Control creamBehavioural

    In a control condition, with the same cream as in the placebo interventions, participants will be instructed that the cream is a control cream with no effects.

Study groups in NCT04669093
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PlaceboExperimentalAll participants will participate in two sessions, one with a placebo suggestion that matches the participant's motivational style, and one with placebo suggestion that does not match their motivational style, in a pseudo-random order.
Receives: Behavioral: Placebo cream- "promotion" suggestion; Behavioral: Placebo cream- "prevention" suggestion
ControlExperimentalEach session will also include a control phase, in which the same cream will be applied, and participants will be instructed that the cream has no analgesic effects.
Receives: Behavioral: Control cream

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Changes in subjective ratings of acute thermal pain

    Following each thermal stimulus, participants are asked to rate how painful it was, on a semi-circular computerized scale. Ratings are based on the angle (0-180), with higher angle representing higher pain ratings. We will average and compare the pain ratings within participant across interventions.

    Measured: Measured repeatedly, immediately after thermal stimuli on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.

  2. Changes in subjective ratings of pain expectations

    Before each thermal stimulus, participants are asked to rate how painful they expect the next stimulus to be, on a semi-circular computerized scale. Ratings are based on the angle (0-180), with higher angle representing higher expectations ratings. We will average and compare the expectation ratings within participant across interventions.

    Measured: Measured repeatedly, immediately before thermal stimuli on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Facial expressions

    We will obtain facial video recordings of participants with a video camera. We will analyze these data according to Facial Action Units (facial expressions) that are known to be related to pain, and compare them across interventions.

    Measured: Immediate response measured during painful stimulation on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.

  2. Thermal imaging of the face

    We will obtain thermal recordings of participant's face with an infrared camera, and compare the heat signature of the face (the temperature in different parts of the face) across interventions.

    Measured: Immediate response measured during painful stimulation on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.

  3. Changes in skin conductance response measured with a Biopac device

    Skin conductance will be measured. We will compare the skin conductance response to pain stimuli within participant across interventions.

    Measured: Immediate response measured during painful stimulation on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.

  4. Changes in heart rate measured with a Biopac device

    Heart rate will be measured. We will compare the heart rate in response to pain stimuli within participant across interventions.

    Measured: Immediate response measured during painful stimulation on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Dec 2020
  2. Study start30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
This is a within-participant design. Each participant will participate in two sessions. In both sessions, an over-the-counter hand cream will be applied to their skin, accompanied by a placebo suggestion that the cream is analgesic. In one session, the suggestion will match the participant's motivational style, and in the other session the suggestion will not match their motivational style. The order of sessions will be counterbalanced across participants. Each session will also include a control condition, in which participants will be told that the cream has no affect. The same over-the-counter hand cream will be used in all sessions.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04669093
Sponsor's protocol ID
230138
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
16 Nov 2020
Last updated
9 Dec 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: All de-identified data will be publicly shared via public online platforms such as the Open Science Framework (OSF) and Github, and the NIMH Data Archive (NDA), according to the terms and conditions outlined on their website (https://ndar.nih.gov/contribute\_data\_sharing\_regimen.html). Identifying information will not be released, including the facial videos, of which only non-identifiable features will be extracted and shared.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study of Healthy, run by Trustees of Dartmouth College at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Tor D Wager, PhD ((603)-646-2196, Tor.D.Wager@Dartmouth.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Changes in subjective ratings of acute thermal pain (time frame: Measured repeatedly, immediately after thermal stimuli on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Dec 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in