AzTrials
AzTrials

Small Cell Lung CarcinomaPhase 3SKYSCRAPER-02CNCT04665856

Study of Atezolizumab Plus Carboplatin and Etoposide With or Without Tiragolumab in Participants With Untreated Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

A Phase 3 study testing Tiragolumab, Atezolizumab and Carboplatin in people with Small Cell Lung Carcinoma, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 16 sites in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this multicenter study in China is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tiragolumab plus atezolizumab and carboplatin and etoposide (CE) compared with placebo plus atezolizumab and CE in participants with untreated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
What is being tested?
Tiragolumab, Atezolizumab and Carboplatin
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
123 participants
Where
16 sitesChina
Study dates
21 Dec 2020to 17 Nov 2025
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1
  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) per the modified Veterans Administration Lung Study Group (VALG) staging system
  • No prior systemic treatment for ES-SCLC
  • For participants who have received prior chemoradiotherapy for limited-stage SCLC must have had treatment with curative intent and a treatment-free interval of at least 6 months between the last dose/cycle of chemotherapy, thoracic radiotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy and the diagnosis of ES-SCLC
  • Measurable diseases as defined by RECIST v1.1
  • Submission of a pre-treatment tumor tissue sample
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Adequate hematologic and end-organ function
  • Participants not receiving therapeutic anticoagulation with International Normalized Ratio (INR) and Activated Clotting Time (aPTT) </= 1.5 x ULN
  • Participants receiving therapeutic anticoagulation: stable anticoagulant regimen
  • Negative Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) test at screening
  • Negative hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) test at screening
  • Positive hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) test at screening, or negative HBsAb at screening accompanied by either of the following: negative total hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) and/or positive total HBcAb test followed by a negative hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA test
  • Negative hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody test at screening, or positive HCV antibody test followed by a negative HCV RNA test
  • Negative Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) viral capsid antigen (VCA) IgM test or negative EBV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test at screening
  • For women of childbearing potential: agreement to remain abstinent (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or use contraception, and agreement to refrain from donating eggs
  • For men: agreement to remain abstinent (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or use contraceptive methods, and agreement to refrain from donating sperm.

Who cannot join

  • Symptomatic or actively progressing central nervous system (CNS) metastases
  • Spinal cord compression
  • Leptomeningeal disease
  • Uncontrolled pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, or ascites
  • Uncontrolled or symptomatic hypercalcemia
  • Known clinically significant liver disease, including active viral, alcoholic, or other hepatitis, cirrhosis, and inherited liver disease, or current alcohol abuse
Show all 24Show fewer
  • Malignancies other than SCLC within 5 years prior to randomization
  • Active or history of autoimmune disease or immune deficiencies
  • History of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, organizing pneumonia, drug-induced pneumonitis, or idiopathic pneumonitis, or evidence of active pneumonitis on screening chest Computer Tomography (CT) scan
  • Known active tuberculosis, Current treatment with anti-viral therapy for HBV or HCV
  • Severe chronic or active infection
  • Treatment with therapeutic oral or IV antibiotics
  • Significant cardiovascular disease
  • Major surgical procedure other than for diagnosis
  • Prior allogeneic bone marrow transplantation or solid organ transplant
  • Any other diseases, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding, or clinical laboratory finding giving reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition
  • Administration of a live, attenuated vaccine
  • Prior treatment with CD137 agonists, T-cell co-stimulating, or immune checkpoint blockade therapies
  • Treatment with systemic immunostimulatory agents
  • Treatment with systemic immunosuppressive medications
  • History of severe allergic anaphylactic reactions to chimeric or humanized antibodies or fusion proteins
  • Known hypersensitivity to Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cell products or to any component of the tiragolumab or atezolizumab formulations
  • History of allergic reactions to carboplatin or etoposide
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding, or intention of becoming pregnant during study treatment or within 5 months after the final dose of atezolizumab or within 90 days after the final dose of tiragolumab or for 6 months after the final dose of carboplatin or etoposide.

Trial locations and contacts

16 sites in 1 country.

16 sites in 1 country

China16 sites
  • Beijing Cancer Hospital

    Beijing, 100142

  • Beijing Chest Hospital

    Beijing, 101149

  • the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College

    Bengbu, 233000

  • the First Hospital of Jilin University

    Changchun, 130021

  • Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital

    Fuzhou, 350014

  • Cancer Center of Guangzhou Medical University

    Guangzhou, 510000

  • Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

    Hangzhou, 310016

  • Zhejiang Cancer Hospital

    Hangzhou, 310022

  • Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital

    Harbin, 150081

  • The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Unversity

    Nanchang, 330006

  • Shanghai Chest Hospital

    Shanghai, 200000

  • Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University

    Shanghai, 200032

  • Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center

    Shanghai, 200120

  • Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College

    Shantou, 515041

  • Wuhan Union Hospital Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

    Wuhan, 430022

  • Henan Cancer Hospital

    Zhengzhou, 450008

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Atezolizumab Plus Carboplatin and Etoposide With or Without Tiragolumab in Patients With Untreated Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

The purpose of this multicenter study in China is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tiragolumab plus atezolizumab and carboplatin and etoposide (CE) compared with placebo plus atezolizumab and CE in participants with untreated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

Being tested
Tiragolumab, Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Etoposide, Tiragolumab Matching Placebo
Medical subject headings
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TiragolumabDrug

    Also called MTIG7192A

    Tiragolumab at a fixed dose of 600 milligrams (mg), administered by intravenous (IV) infusion, every 3 weeks (Q3W) on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.

  • AtezolizumabDrug

    Also called Tecentriq

    Atezolizumab at a fixed dose of 1200 mg, administered by IV infusion, Q3W on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.

  • CarboplatinDrug

    Carboplatin administered IV to achieve an initial target area under the concentration time curve (AUC) of 5 mg/mL/min, Q3W on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles.

  • EtoposideDrug

    Etoposide 100 mg/m^2, administered by IV infusion, Q3W on Day 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles.

  • Tiragolumab Matching PlaceboDrug

    Matching placebo, administered by IV infusion, Q3W on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.

Study groups in NCT04665856
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Tiragolumab + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin and EtoposideExperimentalInduction treatment with tiragolumab plus atezolizumab and CE will be administered on a 21-day cycle for 4 cycles. Following the induction phase, participants will continue maintenance therapy with tiragolumab plus atezolizumab for 21-day cycles.
Receives: Drug: Tiragolumab; Drug: Atezolizumab; Drug: Carboplatin; Drug: Etoposide
Placebo + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin and EtoposidePlacebo comparatorInduction treatment with placebo plus atezolizumab and CE will be administered on a 21-day cycle for 4 cycles. Following the induction phase, participants will continue maintenance therapy with placebo plus atezolizumab for 21-day cycles
Receives: Drug: Atezolizumab; Drug: Carboplatin; Drug: Etoposide; Drug: Tiragolumab Matching Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Investigator-assessed Progression-free Survival (PFS) in the Primary Analysis Set (PAS)

    PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as assessed by the investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1), or death from any cause, whichever occurred first in the PAS. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). Additionally, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 millimeters (mm) and unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Kalpan-Meier (K-M) method was used to estimate median PFS.

    Measured: From randomization to first occurrence of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 32.3 months)

  2. Overall Survival (OS) in the PAS

    OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause in the PAS. K-M method was used to estimate median OS.

    Measured: From randomization to death from any cause (up to approximately 32.3 months)

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Investigator-assessed PFS in the FAS

    PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first in the FAS. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). Additionally, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm and unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. K-M method was used to estimate median PFS.

    Measured: From randomization to first occurrence of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 32.3 months)

  2. OS in the FAS

    OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause in the FAS. K-M method was used to estimate median OS.

    Measured: From randomization to death from any cause (up to approximately 32.3 months)

  3. Investigator-assessed Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR) in the PAS

    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with an objective response (OR), characterized by a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on two consecutive occasions ≥4 weeks apart, as assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v.1.1 in the PAS. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions \& normalization of tumor marker level. Additionally, any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. Percentages have been rounded off.

    Measured: Up to approximately 32.3 months

  4. Investigator-assessed Confirmed ORR in the FAS

    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with an OR, characterized by a confirmed CR or PR on two consecutive occasions ≥4 weeks apart, as assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v.1.1 in the FAS. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions \& normalization of tumor marker level. Additionally, any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. Percentages have been rounded off.

    Measured: Up to approximately 32.3 months

  5. Investigator-assessed Duration of Response (DOR) in the PAS

    DOR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented OR to PD, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurred first in the PAS. OR was defined as either a CR or a PR on 2 consecutive occasions ≥ 4 weeks apart. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions \& normalization of tumor marker level. Additionally, any lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). Additionally, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. K-M method was used to estimate the median DOR.

    Measured: From first occurrence of a documented OR to PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 32.3 months)

  6. Investigator-assessed DOR in the FAS

    DOR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented OR to PD, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurred first in the FAS. OR was defined as either a CR or a PR on 2 consecutive occasions ≥ 4 weeks apart. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions \& normalization of tumor marker level. Additionally, any lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). Additionally, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. K-M method was used to estimate the median DOR.

    Measured: From first occurrence of a documented OR to PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 32.3 months)

  7. Investigator-assessed PFS Rates at 6 Months and 12 Months in the PAS

    PFS rate at 6 months and 12 months was defined as the percentage of participants who did not experience PD as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause at Months 6 and 12 in the PAS. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first in the PAS. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). Additionally, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. K-M method was used to estimate the PFS rate. Percentages have been rounded off.

    Measured: At Months 6 and 12

  8. Investigator-assessed PFS Rates at 6 Months and 12 Months in the FAS

    PFS rate at 6 months and 12 months was defined as the percentage of participants who did not experience PD, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, at Months 6 and 12 in the FAS. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first in the FAS. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). Additionally, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. K-M method was used to estimate the PFS rate. Percentages have been rounded off.

    Measured: At Months 6 and 12

  9. OS Rate at 12 Months and 24 Months in the PAS

    OS rate at 12 months and 24 months was defined as the percentage of participants who did not experience death from any cause at the specified timepoints in the PAS. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause in the PAS. K-M method was used to estimate OS rate. Percentages have been rounded off.

    Measured: At Months 12 and 24

  10. OS Rates at 12 Months and 24 Months in the FAS

    OS rate at 12 months and 24 months was defined as the percentage of participants who did not experience death from any cause at the specified timepoints in the FAS. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause in the FAS. K-M method was used to estimate OS rate. Percentages have been rounded off.

    Measured: At Months 12 and 24

  11. Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) in Participant-reported Physical Functioning (PF) and Global Health Status (GHS), as Measured by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) in the PAS

    TTCD=time from randomization to first confirmed clinically meaningful deterioration (CCMD) in PAS. EORTC QLQ-C30=cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions to evaluate 5 aspects of participant functioning (physical, emotional, role, cognitive, social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea, vomiting, pain), GHS/quality-of-life (QoL), \& 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). PF was scored on 4-point scale: 1=Not at all to 4=Very much. GHS/QoL was scored on 7-point scale: 1=Very poor to 7=Excellent. Scores were linearly transformed to range of 0-100. High score for PF or GHS/QoL scale=high/healthy level of functioning/better health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL). CCMD= ≥ 10-point decrease from baseline in PF or GHS scale score held for at least 2 consecutive assessments or an initial clinically meaningful decrease from baseline followed by death from any cause within 3 weeks. K-M method was used to estimate median TTCD.

    Measured: Up to approximately 32.3 months

  12. TTCD in Participant-reported PF and GHS, as Measured by Respective Scales of EORTC QLQ-C30 in the FAS

    TTCD was defined as time from randomization to first CCMD in FAS. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions to evaluate 5 aspects of participant functioning (physical, emotional, role, cognitive, social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea, vomiting, pain), GHS/QoL, \& 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). PF was scored on 4-point scale: 1=Not at all to 4=Very much. GHS/QoL was scored on 7-point scale: 1=Very poor to 7=Excellent. Scores were linearly transformed to range of 0-100. High score for PF or GHS/QoL scale=high/healthy level of functioning/better HRQoL. CCMD was defined as ≥ 10-point decrease from baseline in PF or GHS scale score held for at least 2 consecutive assessments or an initial clinically meaningful decrease from baseline followed by death from any cause within 3 weeks. K-M method was used to estimate median TTCD.

    Measured: Up to approximately 32.3 months

  13. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE was therefore any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. 1 participant randomized to the tiragolumab arm did not receive any dose of tiragolumab and was moved to the placebo arm for safety analysis.

    Measured: Up to approximately 57 months

  14. Number of Participants With Cytokine-release Syndrome (CRS), With Severity Determined by the American Society for Transplantation and Cell Therapy (ASTCT) Consensus Grading Scale

    CRS was defined as supraphysiologic response following administration of any immune therapy that results in activation/engagement of endogenous or infused T cells and/or other immune effector cells. Symptoms may be progressive, including fever at onset, and may also include hypotension, capillary leak (hypoxia), and end-organ dysfunction. Severity of CRS was determined per ASTCT Consensus Grading Criteria, which categorizes CRS into 5 grades: Grade 1: Fever (≥38◦Celsius), with/without constitutional symptoms, in absence of hypotension \& hypoxia; Grade 2: Fever with hypotension not requiring vasopressors and/or hypoxia requiring low-flow oxygen; Grade 3: Fever with hypotension requiring one vasopressor, with/without vasopressin, and/or hypoxia requiring high-flow oxygen; Grade 4: Fever accompanied by hypotension requiring multiple vasopressors (excluding vasopressin) and/or hypoxia requiring positive-pressure ventilation; Grade 5: death due to CRS.

    Measured: Up to approximately 57 months

  15. Serum Concentration of Tiragolumab at Specified Timepoints

    Measured: Pre-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16; 30 minutes-end of infusion (EOI) on Day 1 of Cycle 1; Treatment discontinuation visit(TDV) (up to approximately 32.3 months) (1 Cycle=21 days)

  16. Serum Concentration of Atezolizumab at Specified Timepoints

    Measured: Pre-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16; 30 minutes-EOI on Day 1 of Cycle 1; TDV (up to approximately 32.3 months) (1 Cycle=21 days)

  17. Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Tiragolumab

    Only sparse pharmacokinetic samples were collected in this study. With the focus on only Cmax and Cmin, there are no additional PK timepoints not reported.

    Measured: 30 mins-EOI on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (1 Cycle=21 days)

  18. Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of Tiragolumab

    Measured: Pre-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16 (1 Cycle=21 days)

  19. Cmax of Atezolizumab

    Measured: 30 mins-EOI on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (1 Cycle= 21 days)

  20. Cmin of Atezolizumab

    Measured: Pre-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16 (1 Cycle=21 days)

  21. Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Tiragolumab

    Participants were considered to be ADA positive if they were ADA negative at baseline but developed an ADA response following tiragolumab administration (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples was greater than the titer of the baseline sample by a scientifically reasonable margin such as at least 0.60 titer unit (t.u.) greater than the baseline titer result (treatment-enhanced ADA response). Participants with a positive post-baseline sample have been reported here.

    Measured: Up to approximately 32.3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Dec 2020
  2. Study start21 Dec 2020
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2023
  4. Study completion17 Nov 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
123 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04665856
Sponsor's protocol ID
YO42373
Acronym
SKYSCRAPER-02C
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
7 Dec 2020
Last updated
18 Sep 2026
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: For eligible studies, qualified researchers may request access to individual patient level clinical data. See Roche's commitment to transparency of clinical study information here: https://go.roche.com/data\_sharing

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Tiragolumab, Atezolizumab and Carboplatin in people with Small Cell Lung Carcinoma, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 16 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 16 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Oct 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Investigator-assessed Progression-free Survival (PFS) in the Primary Analysis Set (PAS) (time frame: From randomization to first occurrence of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 32.3 months)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in