AzTrials
AzTrials

Bulimia NervosaNCT04661410

Reward Re-Training: A New Treatment to Address Reward Imbalance During the COVID-19 Pandemic

A study testing Reward Re-Training and Supportive Therapy in people with Bulimia Nervosa and Bulimia; Atypical, run by Drexel University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In the current study, the investigators will revise our existing 10-session group RRT treatment manual to specifically address the challenges in building social support and enhancing both momentary and sustained reward during the COVID-19 pandemic (Preliminary Aim 1). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Bulimia Nervosa, Bulimia; Atypical, Binge Eating
What is being tested?
Reward Re-Training and Supportive Therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
59 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Dec 2020to 15 Sep 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Have experienced 12 or more loss of control episodes within the previous 3 months
  • Have a BMI above 18.5
  • Are located in the US and willing/able to participate in remote treatment and assessments
  • Are able to give consent

Who cannot join

  • Are unable to fluently speak, write and read English
  • Have a BMI below 18.5
  • Are receiving treatment for an eating disorder
  • Require immediate treatment for medical complications as a result of eating disorder symptoms
  • Have a mental handicap, or are experiencing other severe psychopathology that would limit the participants' ability to comply with the demands of the current study (e.g. severe depression with suicidal intent, active psychotic disorder)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Drexel University, Stratton Hall

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

Other trials in United States

About this study

In the current study, the investigators will revise our existing 10-session group RRT treatment manual to specifically address the challenges in building social support and enhancing both momentary and sustained reward during the COVID-19 pandemic (Preliminary Aim 1). In months 2-18, the investigators will conduct a small pilot RCT that will randomize individuals to receive either 10-sessions of RRT (n=30) or supportive therapy (n=30), both delivered as group-treatments via videoconferencing software. The specific aims of the current study are to confirm the feasibility and acceptability of RRT for EDs (Primary Aim 1), evaluate the ability of RRT to engage critical targets including reward to day-to-day life activities, reward to palatable foods, social isolation, and loneliness (Primary Aim 2), and provide preliminary estimates of efficacy in reducing ED symptoms at both post-treatment and a 3-month follow-up (Primary Aim 3). the investigators will also evaluate the impact of RRT on secondary outcome variables including depression, substance use, and quality of life (Secondary Aim 1).

Being tested
Reward Re-Training, Supportive Therapy
Keywords
Eating Disorders, Bulimia Nervosa, Binge Eating Disorder, Binge Eating, Reward Re-training, Supportive Psychotherapy
Medical subject headings
Bulimia Nervosa, Bulimia, Binge-Eating Disorder, Feeding and Eating Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Reward Re-TrainingBehavioural

    A brief, 10-session group-based behavioral treatment that is designed to indirectly change binge eating by directly focusing on building a more rewarding life. RRT hypothesizes that reductions in binge eating will occur as life becomes more rewarding because individuals will no longer need to rely on binge eating as a primary source of momentary reward. RRT notes that in order to live a satisfying life, individuals need to experience an adequate amount of reward in two overlapping yet distinguishable domains: momentary reward (i.e., the active experience of pleasure in the moment) and sustained reward (i.e., a deeper and more long-lasting sense of fulfillment and meaning that arises from building a personally valued life). A key aspect of RRT is an emphasize on building lasting and meaningful social relationships given the clear evidence that social connectedness can enhance both momentary reward and sustained reward.

  • Supportive TherapyBehavioural

    A brief, 10-session group-based treatment that is designed to instill hope and optimism and to increase social connection and support through a non-directive group leader that allows the patients to determine the focus of each session. The group leader will act as an empathetic provider by using reflective listening, eliciting and validating affect, and offering empathic comments.

Study groups in NCT04661410
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Reward Re-TrainingExperimental10 weekly sessions of Reward Re-Training Group Therapy.
Receives: Behavioral: Reward Re-Training
Supportive TherapyActive comparator10 weekly sessions of Supportive Group Therapy.
Receives: Behavioral: Supportive Therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Binge Eating Frequency Assessed by the Eating Disorder Examination

    Frequency (number of instances) of binge eating over the past 28 days assessed by the Eating Disorder Examination

    Measured: Each assessment time point throughout treatment (Pretreatment (Baseline), Mid-treatment (Week 5), Posttreatment (Week 10)) and a 3-month post-treatment follow-up assessment.

  2. Global Eating Pathology

    The Eating Disorder Examination is a semi-structured interview that measures eating. pathology. The EDE yields a total eating pathology score that will be used as an outcome variable. Global eating pathology is on a 0-6 point scale with higher scores indicating more significant eating pathology.

    Measured: Each assessment time point throughout treatment (Pretreatment (Baseline), Mid-treatment (Week 5), Posttreatment (Week 10)) and a 3-month post-treatment follow-up assessment.

  3. Remission Status

    A participant is considered to be in remission if they had no loss of control eating episodes or compensatory behaviors in the past 28 days, as well as an EDE global score less than 1.74 (which is within one standard deviation of community norms).

    Measured: Each assessment time point after treatment completion (Posttreatment (Week 10) and a 3-month post-treatment follow-up assessment).

  4. Compensatory Behavior Frequency Assessed by the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE)

    Frequency ( number of instances) of compensatory behaviors assessed by the Eating Disorder Examination

    Measured: Each assessment time point throughout treatment (Pretreatment (Baseline), Mid-treatment (Week 5), Posttreatment (Week 10)) and a 3-month post-treatment follow-up assessment.

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory-II

    Assesses the type (description of certain feelings or attitudes) and intensity (how often or how much the feelings and attitudes are present) of various depressive symptoms using a total score. The scale ranges from 0-63 with higher scores indicating worse depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Each assessment time point throughout treatment (Pretreatment (Baseline), Mid-treatment (Week 5), Posttreatment (Week 10)) and a 3-month post-treatment follow-up assessment.

  2. Substance Use Assessed by the NIDA-Modified ASSIST

    Frequency of substance use (number of days/month) assessed by the Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST).

    Measured: Each assessment time point throughout treatment (Pretreatment (Baseline), Mid-treatment (Week 5), Posttreatment (Week 10)) and a 3-month post-treatment follow-up assessment.

  3. Quality of Life Assessed by the Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI)

    Assesses the importance of 16 given life domains have on influencing happiness and current satisfaction level regarding these 16 life domains. Scores range from 1-77 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

    Measured: Each assessment time point throughout treatment (Pretreatment (Baseline), Mid-treatment (Week 5), Posttreatment (Week 10)) and a 3-month post-treatment follow-up assessment.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Dec 2020
  2. Study start1 Dec 2020
  3. Primary completion15 Sep 2021
  4. Study completion15 Sep 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
59 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04661410
Sponsor's protocol ID
2009008088
Other IDs
R01MH122392-01S1
Status last verified
Mar 2024
First submitted
7 Dec 2020
Last updated
21 Mar 2024
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • LaFata EM, Worwag K, Derrigo K, Hessler C, Allison KC, Juarascio AS, Gearhardt AN. Development of the Food Addiction Symptom Inventory: The first clinical interview to assess ultra-processed food addiction. Psychol Assess. 2024 Nov;36(11):654-664. doi: 10.1037/pas0001340. Epub 2024 Aug 5.

    PubMed 39101915
  • Juarascio AS, Michael ML, Srivastava P, Manasse SM, Drexler S, Felonis CR. The Reward Re-Training protocol: A novel intervention approach designed to alter the reward imbalance contributing to binge eating during COVID-19. Int J Eat Disord. 2021 Jul;54(7):1316-1322. doi: 10.1002/eat.23528. Epub 2021 Apr 28.

    PubMed 33908655

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Reward Re-Training and Supportive Therapy in people with Bulimia Nervosa and Bulimia; Atypical, run by Drexel University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Mar 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Binge Eating Frequency Assessed by the Eating Disorder Examination (time frame: Each assessment time point throughout treatment (Pretreatment (Baseline), Mid-treatment (Week 5), Posttreatment (Week 10)) and a 3-month post-treatment follow-up assessment.). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04661410, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Mar 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in