Acute CholecystitisPhase 4NCT04624841
Indocyanine Green to Visualize Critical View of Safety During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
A Phase 4 study testing Indocyanine Green in people with Acute Cholecystitis and Acute; Cholecystitis, Choledocholithiasis, run by Hamad Medical Corporation at 1 site in Qatar.
Trial summary
The purpose of this prospective randomized trial is to study the role of Indocyanine green (ICG) to visualize the Critical View of Safety during emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for patients with Acute Cholecystitis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Cholecystitis, Acute; Cholecystitis, Choledocholithiasis, Acute Cholecystitis With Obstruction
- What is being tested?
- Indocyanine Green
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteQatar
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2021to 15 Jan 2022
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient scheduled for emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
- Patient age ≥ 18 years.
- Patients who consent to take part in the study
Who cannot join
- Preoperative planned for Open Cholecystectomy
- Allergy towards iodine, iohexol or ICG
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Renal insufficiency
- Legally incompetent for any reason
- Withdrawal of inclusion consent at any time
- Prisoners
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Role of Indocyanine Green in Visualizing Critical View of Safety During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
The purpose of this prospective randomized trial is to study the role of Indocyanine green (ICG) to visualize the Critical View of Safety during emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for patients with Acute Cholecystitis.
Read the detailed description
After informing about the study and obtaining consent to participate, patients who are diagnosed with Acute Cholecystitis and posted for emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy will be randomly assigned to receive either ICG or not as a method to identify the Critical View of Safety during the operation.
The primary outcome is whether there was a precise and satisfactory visualization of the junction between the cystic duct, the common hepatic duct, and the common bile duct by indocyanine green compared to the control group. The time taken to achieve this will be measured in minutes from video recordings of the laparoscopic surgery. The process will be further assessed by a surgeons' satisfaction score.
The expected duration of the study will be 12 months involving a total of 80 patients randomized into two groups- 40 patients in the intervention group and 40 patients in the control group.
The expected outcome of the study is that ICG is more effective than the control group in providing precise and satisfactory visualization of Critical View of Safety and takes less time. We predict the surgeons to be equally or more satisfied with ICG compared to control.
- Conditions
- Acute Cholecystitis, Acute; Cholecystitis, Choledocholithiasis, Acute Cholecystitis With Obstruction
- Being tested
- Indocyanine Green
- Keywords
- acute cholecystitis, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, critical view of safety, safe cholecystectomy, indocyanine green, operative cholangiogram, fluorescent imaging, near-infrared imaging
- Medical subject headings
- Cholecystitis, Acute, Cholecystitis, Choledocholithiasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Indocyanine GreenDrug
Also called ICG, fluorescent Imaging
2.5-7.5 mg (0.05 mg/kg) injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ICG group | Experimental | Participants receive an intravenous injection of 0.05 mg/kg of ICG 45 minutes preoperatively.
A Pinpoint Endoscopic Fluorescence System (Novadac Technologies Inc., Canada) for ICG Fluorescence Observation with the easy switchable white light-fluorescent mode is used.
Before dividing any tubular structure, the fluorescence imaging mode is routinely used again, and fluorescent angiography is performed by re-injecting the same dose of ICG as initially used.
After the division of the cystic duct and artery, the fluorescence imaging mode is applied again to check for bile leakage. Receives: Drug: Indocyanine Green |
| No ICG Group | No intervention | No ICG is administered after randomization of the patient to a control group and hence will not produce any enhancement of the image on A Pinpoint Endoscopic Fluorescence System for ICG Fluorescence Observation. This will continue as a routine Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without fluorescent imaging enhancement. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of surgeries in which Critical View of Safety was achieved
Percentage of surgeries where there was complete visualization of Critical View of Safety by intraoperative fluorescent cholangiography compared to the control group with no fluorescent imaging. Complete visualization of the Critical View of Safety is defined by the SAGS guidelines.
The laparoscopic procedure is recorded \& assessed individually \& separately by two consultant surgeons who are not the operating surgeon whether the Critical View of Safety was achieved prior to clipping of Cystic Duct \& Cystic Artery.
Failure of identification of Critical View of Safety is defined as the need for further conventional intraoperative cholangiography or open conversion due to inability to accurately identify the biliary anatomy to complete the cholecystectomy safely.
Measured: Prior to clipping of the Cystic Duct and Cystic Artery or decision to perform conventional intraoperative cholangiography or convert to open.
Secondary outcomes (2)
Time taken to identify Critical View of Safety
Time taken by intraoperative fluorescent cholangiography or control group to identify Critical View of Safety. The laparoscopic procedure is recorded and Time taken is recorded by the Primary Investigator as the total time between successful introduction of the operative ports until the Critical View of Safety is achieved and Cystic Duct and Cystic Artery are clipped.
Measured: After securing working ports till Clipping of Cystic Duct or Artery.
Surgeon's Satisfaction Survey
Surgeon satisfaction survey will be completed by the operating surgeon intraoperatively by answering the question "Are you satisfied to proceed with the laparoscopic cholecystectomy without a conventional intraoperative cholangiography?". The answers will be a binary Yes or No.
Measured: Prior to clipping of the Cystic Duct and Cystic Artery or decision to perform conventional intraoperative cholangiography or convert to open.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Nov 2020
- Study start1 Jan 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Jan 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute CholecystitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hamad Medical CorporationThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Prospective randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hamad Medical Corporation
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr Zia Ahmed Aftab, MBBS,FRCS,FACS, Hamad Medical Corporation
- Investigators
- Zia Aftab, MBBS, FACS, Principal investigator, Hamad Medical Corporation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04624841
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRGC-05-NI-18-362
- Other IDs
- U1111-1256-1361
- Status last verified
- Dec 2020
- First submitted
- 30 Oct 2020
- Last updated
- 16 Dec 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ishizawa T, Bandai Y, Kokudo N. Fluorescent cholangiography using indocyanine green for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an initial experience. Arch Surg. 2009 Apr;144(4):381-2. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.9. No abstract available.
PubMed 19380655Daskalaki D, Fernandes E, Wang X, Bianco FM, Elli EF, Ayloo S, Masrur M, Milone L, Giulianotti PC. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescent cholangiography during robotic cholecystectomy: results of 184 consecutive cases in a single institution. Surg Innov. 2014 Dec;21(6):615-21. doi: 10.1177/1553350614524839. Epub 2014 Mar 9.
PubMed 24616013Dip F, Roy M, Lo Menzo E, Simpfendorfer C, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ. Routine use of fluorescent incisionless cholangiography as a new imaging modality during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2015 Jun;29(6):1621-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3853-7. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
PubMed 25277476Pesce A, Piccolo G, La Greca G, Puleo S. Utility of fluorescent cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul 7;21(25):7877-83. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i25.7877.
PubMed 26167088Overby DW, Apelgren KN, Richardson W, Fanelli R; Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery. Surg Endosc. 2010 Oct;24(10):2368-86. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1268-7. Epub 2010 Aug 13. No abstract available.
PubMed 20706739
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Dec 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Role of Indocyanine Green in Visualizing Critical View of Safety During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04624841
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRGC-05-NI-18-362
- Conditions
- Acute Cholecystitis, Acute; Cholecystitis, Choledocholithiasis, Acute Cholecystitis With Obstruction
- Keywords
- acute cholecystitis, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, critical view of safety, safe cholecystectomy, indocyanine green, operative cholangiogram, fluorescent imaging, near-infrared imaging
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hamad Medical CorporationIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Jan 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this prospective randomized trial is to study the role of Indocyanine green (ICG) to visualize the Critical View of Safety during emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for patients with Acute Cholecystitis.
Detailed description
After informing about the study and obtaining consent to participate, patients who are diagnosed with Acute Cholecystitis and posted for emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy will be randomly assigned to receive either ICG or not as a method to identify the Critical View of Safety during the operation.
The primary outcome is whether there was a precise and satisfactory visualization of the junction between the cystic duct, the common hepatic duct, and the common bile duct by indocyanine green compared to the control group. The time taken to achieve this will be measured in minutes from video recordings of the laparoscopic surgery. The process will be further assessed by a surgeons' satisfaction score.
The expected duration of the study will be 12 months involving a total of 80 patients randomized into two groups- 40 patients in the intervention group and 40 patients in the control group.
The expected outcome of the study is that ICG is more effective than the control group in providing precise and satisfactory visualization of Critical View of Safety and takes less time. We predict the surgeons to be equally or more satisfied with ICG compared to control.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Prospective randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ICG group | Experimental | Drug: Indocyanine GreenParticipants receive an intravenous injection of 0.05 mg/kg of ICG 45 minutes preoperatively. A Pinpoint Endoscopic Fluorescence System (Novadac Technologies Inc., Canada) for ICG Fluorescence Observation with the easy switchable white light-fluorescent mode is used. Before dividing any tubular structure, the fluorescence imaging mode is routinely used again, and fluorescent angiography is performed by re-injecting the same dose of ICG as initially used. After the division of the cystic duct and artery, the fluorescence imaging mode is applied again to check for bile leakage. |
| No ICG Group | No intervention | –No ICG is administered after randomization of the patient to a control group and hence will not produce any enhancement of the image on A Pinpoint Endoscopic Fluorescence System for ICG Fluorescence Observation. This will continue as a routine Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without fluorescent imaging enhancement. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patient scheduled for emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
- Patient age ≥ 18 years.
- Patients who consent to take part in the study
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Preoperative planned for Open Cholecystectomy
- Allergy towards iodine, iohexol or ICG
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Renal insufficiency
- Legally incompetent for any reason
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Indocyanine GreenAlso: ICG, fluorescent Imaging2.5-7.5 mg (0.05 mg/kg) injection | Drug | ICG group |
Primary outcome
Percentage of surgeries in which Critical View of Safety was achieved
Time frame: Prior to clipping of the Cystic Duct and Cystic Artery or decision to perform conventional intraoperative cholangiography or convert to open.
Percentage of surgeries where there was complete visualization of Critical View of Safety by intraoperative fluorescent cholangiography compared to the control group with no fluorescent imaging. Complete visualization of the Critical View of Safety is defined by the SAGS guidelines. The laparoscopic procedure is recorded \& assessed individually \& separately by two consultant surgeons who are not the operating surgeon whether the Critical View of Safety was achieved prior to clipping of Cystic Duct \& Cystic Artery. Failure of identification of Critical View of Safety is defined as the need for further conventional intraoperative cholangiography or open conversion due to inability to accurately identify the biliary anatomy to complete the cholecystectomy safely.
2 secondary outcomes
Time taken to identify Critical View of Safety
Time frame: After securing working ports till Clipping of Cystic Duct or Artery.
Surgeon's Satisfaction Survey
Time frame: Prior to clipping of the Cystic Duct and Cystic Artery or decision to perform conventional intraoperative cholangiography or convert to open.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Dec 2020.
- Background: PubMed 19380655Ishizawa T, Bandai Y, Kokudo N. Fluorescent cholangiography using indocyanine green for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an initial experience. Arch Surg. 2009 Apr;144(4):381-2. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.9. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 24616013Daskalaki D, Fernandes E, Wang X, Bianco FM, Elli EF, Ayloo S, Masrur M, Milone L, Giulianotti PC. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescent cholangiography during robotic cholecystectomy: results of 184 consecutive cases in a single institution. Surg Innov. 2014 Dec;21(6):615-21. doi: 10.1177/1553350614524839. Epub 2014 Mar 9.
- Background: PubMed 25277476Dip F, Roy M, Lo Menzo E, Simpfendorfer C, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ. Routine use of fluorescent incisionless cholangiography as a new imaging modality during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2015 Jun;29(6):1621-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3853-7. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
- Background: PubMed 26167088Pesce A, Piccolo G, La Greca G, Puleo S. Utility of fluorescent cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul 7;21(25):7877-83. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i25.7877.
- Background: PubMed 20706739Overby DW, Apelgren KN, Richardson W, Fanelli R; Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery. Surg Endosc. 2010 Oct;24(10):2368-86. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1268-7. Epub 2010 Aug 13. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Acute Cholecystitis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
SnapChole: An International, Time-Bound Prospective Platform Study of Management Strategies and Outcomes in Acute Calculous Cholecystitis
Cholecystitis, Acute
Not yet recruiting
Percutaneous Drainage Versus EUS-guided Gallbladder Drainage in Poor Surgical Patients With Cholecystitis
Cholecystitis, Acute
RecruitingObservational study
Influence of Gut Microbiome in Gallstone Disease
Gall Stone, Gall Stones, Common Bile Duct
Recruiting
Repeat Biliary Point of Care Ultrasound for Detecting Early Acute Cholecystitis
Cholecystitis, Acute, Biliary Diseases
Not yet recruiting
Implementation of RICA (ERAS) Guidelines in Grade II Acute Cholecystitis Undergoing Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Cholecystitis, Acute, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Zia Aftab, MBBS, FACS principal investigator
Hamad Medical Corporation
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Indocyanine Green in people with Acute Cholecystitis and Acute; Cholecystitis, Choledocholithiasis, run by Hamad Medical Corporation at 1 site in Qatar.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Qatar. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Zia Aftab, MBBS, FACS (00974-66233904, zahmed5@hamad.qa), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of surgeries in which Critical View of Safety was achieved (time frame: Prior to clipping of the Cystic Duct and Cystic Artery or decision to perform conventional intraoperative cholangiography or convert to open.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04624841, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Dec 2020.