Prosthesis-Related InfectionsNCT04622280
Prospectively Observational Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes in Two-stage Revision for Periprosthetic Knee Infection
An observational study of Prosthesis-Related Infections, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) infection is a complication requiring multiple hospitalizations, operations, and outpatient visits placing a significant burden on both patient and treating surgeons. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Prosthesis-Related Infections
- How many people
- 13 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- Mar 2011to Jun 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The investigators collected cases of infected TKAs treated with two-stage reimplantation procedure since 2011 in National Taiwan University Hospital.
Who may be able to join
- Patients received primary total knee arthroplasty with acute prosthetic joint infection who were failed to antibiotics treatment or chronic prosthetic joint infection of knee AND
- Documented prosthetic joint infection by pathology findings or cultures from either bone tissue, joint effusion, synovial fluid, or purulent discharge from aseptic operation technique
- Patient age ≧ 20 years old
Who cannot join
- Culture result shown Candida, mycobacterium or slow growing pathogens (e.g. nocardia)
- Patients with severe systemic diseases can not received second stage operation
- Pregnancy, terminal stage patients, inmates, aboriginal patients, student, mental disorder patients and other vulnerable patients will be excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Prospectively Observational Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes in Two-stage Reimplantation for Infected Knee Arthroplasty Patients
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) infection is a complication requiring multiple hospitalizations, operations, and outpatient visits placing a significant burden on both patient and treating surgeons. When revision surgery is needed, two kinds of treatment can be applied----one-stage and two-stage reimplantation procedure. The two-stage reimplantation procedure is considered the gold standard for treatment of subacute and chronic deep periprosthetic infections. Placement of antibiotic-loaded spacer is a standard procedure for eradication of peri-prosthetic joint infection. For better patient outcome, the purpose of this study was to determine the success rate of total knee infection patients treating with two-stage reimplantation procedure.
Read the detailed description
*Background and study aims: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) infection is a devastating complication requiring multiple hospitalizations, operations, and outpatient visits placing a significant burden on both patients and treating surgeons. The incidence of prosthetic joint infection after primary hip or knee arthroplasty is about 2% among the Medicare population. When revision surgery is needed, two kinds of treatment include one-stage and two-stage re-implantation procedure can be applied. Bengtsonet al., in an earlier report, evaluated 107 patients with a 75.7% success rate after one-stage revision. In the case of two-stage TKA revision success rates of 89% to 100% are noted with follow-up periods of 2 to 7.5 years. Delayed re-implantation after administration of intravenous antibiotics appears to offer better success rates than direct-exchange techniques. Therefore, the two-stage re-implantation procedure is considered the gold standard for treatment of subacute and chronic deep prosthetic joint infections (PJI). However, the protocols of the antibiotic therapy after resection arthroplasty have varied in different reports. The purpose of this study will be to evaluate the clinical outcomes of two-stage re-implantation for infected knee arthroplasty using the standardized protocol of combined parenteral and oral antibiotic therapy and the criterion for re-implantation.
*Study participants
Study period: from March 2011 to June 2019.
*Procedures and operations
-The first stage The first stage consisted of the removal of the prosthesis and all hardware, debridement of all infected and devitalized tissues, removal of all biofilms, and aqueous povidone iodine irrigation. For primary joint arthroplasty with cement, all the bone cement was removed. Samples for culture and histology were performed at the time of removal of prosthesis (ROP). The Long-leg splint was applied to the limb until the next replacement procedure. The first stage was using antibiotic-impregnated bone cement as a static spacer block. The types of antibiotic regimens were determined according to the results of cultures form the preoperative joint aspirations. In this study, 1 to 2 g of vancomycin (for gram-positive bacteria) and/or 1 to 2 g of ceftazidime (for gram-negative bacteria) per 40g package of cement would be hand-mixed according to the previous culture. Any past history of adverse events of the antibiotics used in the cement would be clarified to avoid any possible allergic reactions to the antibiotic-loaded cement. If the patient had allergic reactions to vancomycin or ceftazidime, daptomycin or gentamicin 1 to 2 g will be used for alternative antibiotic cement.
All patients received at least two weeks of intravenous antibiotics after first stage operation, and then additional 2 to 4 weeks of oral antibiotic therapy according to the laboratory and culture results performed preoperatively or at the time of the first-stage procedure. If the cultures revealed certain drug-resistant pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (especially when the vancomycin MIC≧1 mg/L) or vancomycin-resistant enterococci, daptomycin or linezolid would be selected as the therapy option. Intravenous antibiotic therapy would be continued until the serum CRP decreased to normal range (less than 1 mg/dL). When the CRP levels remained normal (< 1 mg/dL), no pathogens were identified from aspirations, and there were no signs of active infection clinically, the re-implantation surgery would be scheduled.
- The second stage (reimplantation) In the second stage of reimplantation, four sets of bacterial cultures from different adjacent knee joint tissue (medial and lateral condyles, patella, and femur-tibia joint space) will be obtained. Prophylactic antibiotic will be used in the second stage. All patients will be examined clinically at 1st week, 2nd month, 6th month and one year postoperatively at the orthopedic department. Laboratory tests including complete blood counts (CBC) and differential counts (D/C), liver alanine aminotransferase (ALT), creatinine (Cre) and CRP will be performed at each visit. Free of recurrent infection will be defined when the clinical evaluation of the joint did not show any sign of infection and CRP will be less than 1 mg/dL. Antibiotic therapy, either intravenous or oral form, will be discontinued if cultures of debridement are sterile. If persistent infection is documented in the second-stage reimplantation procedure, the patients will be transferred to the medical ward for an additional 4 to 6 weeks of antibiotics (including intravenous form treatment at least for 2 weeks) until CRP sustained below 1 mg/dL.
- Antibiotic cement In this study, 1-2 g of vancomycin (for gram-positive bacteria) and/or 1-2 g of ceftazidime (for gram-negative bacteria) per 40-g package of cement will be hand-mixed according to the previous culture identified. Any past history of adverse events of the antibiotics used in the cement will be clarified to avoid any possible allergic reactions to the antibiotic-loaded cement. If patient had allergic reactions to vancomycin or ceftazidime, daptomycin or gentamicin 1-2 g will be used for alternative antibiotic cement.
- Follow-up Patients will be arranged to follow-up mainly at Orthopedic clinic regularly. Infectious Disease specialist will be consulted immediately during follow-up if necessary.
- Definition Recurrent and persisted infection Recurrent or persisted infection will be defined as swelling and pain of the joint with drainage, elevated CRP, persistent positive culture after two-stage of implantation during follow-up at clinic.
- Case record A standard case record form will be used to collect patients' information, including age, sex, underlying diseases, primary and secondary diagnoses, surgery, cultures, and the timing of replacement. Complete blood counts, differential counts, ALT, Creatinine and C-Reactive Protein will be recorded.
- Conditions
- Prosthesis-Related Infections
- Medical subject headings
- Prosthesis-Related Infections
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
infection eradication
without recurrent or persisted infection of the joint in one year
Measured: 2012-2019
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Nov 2020
- Study startMar 2011
- Primary completionJun 2018
- Study completionJun 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Prosthesis-Related InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Taiwan University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Statistical Center, NTUHCTC, National Taiwan University Hospital
- Investigators
- CHIN CHUAN JIANG, Professor, Study chair, NTUH
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04622280
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 201105021RC
- Status last verified
- Nov 2020
- First submitted
- 4 Nov 2020
- Last updated
- 12 Nov 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospectively Observational Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes in Two-stage Reimplantation for Infected Knee Arthroplasty Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04622280
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 201105021RC
- Conditions
- Prosthesis-Related Infections
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2011 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) infection is a complication requiring multiple hospitalizations, operations, and outpatient visits placing a significant burden on both patient and treating surgeons. When revision surgery is needed, two kinds of treatment can be applied----one-stage and two-stage reimplantation procedure. The two-stage reimplantation procedure is considered the gold standard for treatment of subacute and chronic deep periprosthetic infections. Placement of antibiotic-loaded spacer is a standard procedure for eradication of peri-prosthetic joint infection. For better patient outcome, the purpose of this study was to determine the success rate of total knee infection patients treating with two-stage reimplantation procedure.
Detailed description
*Background and study aims: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) infection is a devastating complication requiring multiple hospitalizations, operations, and outpatient visits placing a significant burden on both patients and treating surgeons. The incidence of prosthetic joint infection after primary hip or knee arthroplasty is about 2% among the Medicare population. When revision surgery is needed, two kinds of treatment include one-stage and two-stage re-implantation procedure can be applied. Bengtsonet al., in an earlier report, evaluated 107 patients with a 75.7% success rate after one-stage revision. In the case of two-stage TKA revision success rates of 89% to 100% are noted with follow-up periods of 2 to 7.5 years. Delayed re-implantation after administration of intravenous antibiotics appears to offer better success rates than direct-exchange techniques. Therefore, the two-stage re-implantation procedure is considered the gold standard for treatment of subacute and chronic deep prosthetic joint infections (PJI). However, the protocols of the antibiotic therapy after resection arthroplasty have varied in different reports. The purpose of this study will be to evaluate the clinical outcomes of two-stage re-implantation for infected knee arthroplasty using the standardized protocol of combined parenteral and oral antibiotic therapy and the criterion for re-implantation.
*Study participants
Study period: from March 2011 to June 2019.
*Procedures and operations
-The first stage The first stage consisted of the removal of the prosthesis and all hardware, debridement of all infected and devitalized tissues, removal of all biofilms, and aqueous povidone iodine irrigation. For primary joint arthroplasty with cement, all the bone cement was removed. Samples for culture and histology were performed at the time of removal of prosthesis (ROP). The Long-leg splint was applied to the limb until the next replacement procedure. The first stage was using antibiotic-impregnated bone cement as a static spacer block. The types of antibiotic regimens were determined according to the results of cultures form the preoperative joint aspirations. In this study, 1 to 2 g of vancomycin (for gram-positive bacteria) and/or 1 to 2 g of ceftazidime (for gram-negative bacteria) per 40g package of cement would be hand-mixed according to the previous culture. Any past history of adverse events of the antibiotics used in the cement would be clarified to avoid any possible allergic reactions to the antibiotic-loaded cement. If the patient had allergic reactions to vancomycin or ceftazidime, daptomycin or gentamicin 1 to 2 g will be used for alternative antibiotic cement.
All patients received at least two weeks of intravenous antibiotics after first stage operation, and then additional 2 to 4 weeks of oral antibiotic therapy according to the laboratory and culture results performed preoperatively or at the time of the first-stage procedure. If the cultures revealed certain drug-resistant pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (especially when the vancomycin MIC≧1 mg/L) or vancomycin-resistant enterococci, daptomycin or linezolid would be selected as the therapy option. Intravenous antibiotic therapy would be continued until the serum CRP decreased to normal range (less than 1 mg/dL). When the CRP levels remained normal (< 1 mg/dL), no pathogens were identified from aspirations, and there were no signs of active infection clinically, the re-implantation surgery would be scheduled.
- The second stage (reimplantation) In the second stage of reimplantation, four sets of bacterial cultures from different adjacent knee joint tissue (medial and lateral condyles, patella, and femur-tibia joint space) will be obtained. Prophylactic antibiotic will be used in the second stage. All patients will be examined clinically at 1st week, 2nd month, 6th month and one year postoperatively at the orthopedic department. Laboratory tests including complete blood counts (CBC) and differential counts (D/C), liver alanine aminotransferase (ALT), creatinine (Cre) and CRP will be performed at each visit. Free of recurrent infection will be defined when the clinical evaluation of the joint did not show any sign of infection and CRP will be less than 1 mg/dL. Antibiotic therapy, either intravenous or oral form, will be discontinued if cultures of debridement are sterile. If persistent infection is documented in the second-stage reimplantation procedure, the patients will be transferred to the medical ward for an additional 4 to 6 weeks of antibiotics (including intravenous form treatment at least for 2 weeks) until CRP sustained below 1 mg/dL.
- Antibiotic cement In this study, 1-2 g of vancomycin (for gram-positive bacteria) and/or 1-2 g of ceftazidime (for gram-negative bacteria) per 40-g package of cement will be hand-mixed according to the previous culture identified. Any past history of adverse events of the antibiotics used in the cement will be clarified to avoid any possible allergic reactions to the antibiotic-loaded cement. If patient had allergic reactions to vancomycin or ceftazidime, daptomycin or gentamicin 1-2 g will be used for alternative antibiotic cement.
- Follow-up Patients will be arranged to follow-up mainly at Orthopedic clinic regularly. Infectious Disease specialist will be consulted immediately during follow-up if necessary.
- Definition Recurrent and persisted infection Recurrent or persisted infection will be defined as swelling and pain of the joint with drainage, elevated CRP, persistent positive culture after two-stage of implantation during follow-up at clinic.
- Case record A standard case record form will be used to collect patients' information, including age, sex, underlying diseases, primary and secondary diagnoses, surgery, cultures, and the timing of replacement. Complete blood counts, differential counts, ALT, Creatinine and C-Reactive Protein will be recorded.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The investigators collected cases of infected TKAs treated with two-stage reimplantation procedure since 2011 in National Taiwan University Hospital.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients received primary total knee arthroplasty with acute prosthetic joint infection who were failed to antibiotics treatment or chronic prosthetic joint infection of knee AND
- Documented prosthetic joint infection by pathology findings or cultures from either bone tissue, joint effusion, synovial fluid, or purulent discharge from aseptic operation technique
- Patient age ≧ 20 years old
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Culture result shown Candida, mycobacterium or slow growing pathogens (e.g. nocardia)
- Patients with severe systemic diseases can not received second stage operation
- Pregnancy, terminal stage patients, inmates, aboriginal patients, student, mental disorder patients and other vulnerable patients will be excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
infection eradication
Time frame: 2012-2019
without recurrent or persisted infection of the joint in one year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Nov 2020.
Related trials for Prosthesis-Related Infections
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Emerging Indications for Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatment
Post-COVID-19 Condition, Ulcerative Colitis
RecruitingObservational study
Risk Factors for Mesh Infection After Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
Incisional Hernia, Ventral Hernia
Not yet recruiting
The IVCare Adaptive Platform Trial
Device Related Infection, Vascular Access Complication
RecruitingObservational study
Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF) Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Tıpmed™ Revision Hip Prosthesis System
Revision Hip Arthroplasty, Aseptic Loosening of Prosthetic Joint
Not yet recruiting
Chlorhexidine Caps for CLABSI Prevention in Hemodialysis: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Vascular Access Complication, Device Related Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
CHIN CHUAN JIANG, Professor study chair
NTUH
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Prosthesis-Related Infections, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
infection eradication (time frame: 2012-2019). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Nov 2020.