Acute PancreatitisNCT04615702
Evidence Based Management of Acute Biliary Pancreatitis
An observational study of Acute Pancreatitis, run by Zagazig University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
This study aims to assess the outcome of standardized evidence-based care to all patients with acute biliary pancreatitis treated at surgery department, Zagazig University hospitals during the period from may, 2017 to may 2019. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Pancreatitis
- What is being tested?
- serum lipase or amylase, ultrasound and CT
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 15 May 2017to 15 May 2019
- How long will I take part?
- 6 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: All cases with acute biliary pancreatitis admitted to surgery department in the study period were included in the study
Who may be able to join
- all cases with acute biliary pancreatitis
Who cannot join
- all cases with non biliary pancreatitis
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This study aims to assess the outcome of standardized evidence-based care to all patients with acute biliary pancreatitis treated at surgery department, Zagazig University hospitals during the period from may, 2017 to may 2019.
Read the detailed description
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is one of the most important gastrointestinal disorders causing emotional and physical human burden . The annual incidence worldwide for AP is 4.9-73.4 cases per 100,000 people and the overall mortality rate is 4 to 8%, which increases to 33% in patients with infected necrosis. AP is diagnosed when two of three criteria are fulfilled: typical abdominal pain of AP, more than three times elevated serum amylase/lipase level and signs of AP on imaging.
It is necessary to clarify the etiology of AP promptly. The diagnosis of gallstones, as the leading cause for AP, should have the top priority as that will direct the treatment policy. Long standing alcohol consumption and gallstones disease incriminated in the majority of cases with AP. Small common bile duct stones, in particular, are the cause of AP in approximately 32 to 40% of cases. In 10-30% of cases, the cause is unknown, so studies have suggested that up to 70% of cases of idiopathic pancreatitis are secondary to biliary microlithiasis.
The pathogenesis of biliary AP has been intensively investigated. Many theories explain how gallstones can trigger AP. The predominant theories include common pathway theory and gallstone migration theory. In general, AP occurs when intracellular protective mechanisms fail to prevent trypsinogen activation or reduce trypsin activity.
It is important that management of such potentially life threatening condition to be guided by an evidence-based approach. After comparing the Japanese (JPN) Guidelines 2015 and its former edition 2010 with the other two guidelines, International Association of Pancreatology/American Pancreas Association guidelines (IAP/APA), 2013 and American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), 2013, the JPN Guidelines, 2015 proved to be the highest quality regarding its systematic literature review prepared by the meta-analysis team, including the grading of recommendations and providing pancreatitis bundles.
- Conditions
- Acute Pancreatitis
- Being tested
- serum lipase or amylase, ultrasound, CT, Liver enzymes (Bilirubin, alanine transferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase, (AST) and alkaline phosphatase). Calcium. Triglycerides., EUS /Secretin-stimulated magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP)
- Keywords
- acute pancreatitis guidelines, acute biliary pancreatitis
- Medical subject headings
- Pancreatitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
serum lipase or amylaseDiagnostic test
Laboratory ( elevated serum lipase or amylase at least 3 times above the normal limits) is helpful in diagnosis
Acute pancreatitis is diagnosed when two of three criteria are present including:
- Clinically (abdominal pain consistent with acute pancreatitis),
- Laboratory ( elevated serum lipase or amylase at least 3 times above the normal limits)
- Imaging criteria of acute pancreatitis
ultrasoundDevice
helpful in diagnosis of acute pancreatitis and its etiology (Gallstones)
CTDevice
helpful in diagnosis of acute pancreatitis and its etiology . assist in detection of type and severity of acute pancreatitis
Liver enzymes (Bilirubin, alanine transferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase, (AST) and alkaline phosphatase). Calcium. Triglycerides.Diagnostic test
help in diagnosis of the etiology of acute pancreatitis elevated Bilirubin, ALT, AST and alkaline phosphatase suggest biliary pancreatitis
EUS /Secretin-stimulated magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP)Device
helpful in idiopathic acute pancreatitis diagnosis
Ringer lactateDrug
Also called hartmann's solution
The initial infusion rate for mild cases :
- For patients without dehydration is (130-150mL/h).
- In case of dehydration: (150-600mL/h) with close monitoring of patients with comorbidities such as cardiac problems or renal failure to avoid volume overload.
The initial infusion rate for both severe cases :
- For patients without dehydration is (130-150mL/h).
- In case of dehydration/ shock: (150-600mL/h) with close monitoring of patients with comorbidities such as cardiac problems or renal failure to avoid volume overload d. The target
- A mean arterial pressure of 65mmHg or more,
- Urine output of 0.5mL/kg per hour or more When these parameters achieved, the infusion rate decreased to the level that maintain these parameters.
NSAID / paracetamol +/- opiates+/- epidural analgesiaCombination product
Also called NSAID (Diclofenac sodium) paracetamol (perfalgan drip) Opiates (Pethidine)
Pain control (Modified World Health organization (WHO) analgesia ladder) Step1: NSAID / paracetamol Paracetamol 1gm IV infusion /8h + Diclofenac sodium 75mg /12h.
Step 2: Opiates +/- NSAID/ paracetamol Pethidine 25 mg IV/4h
Step 3: Interventional treatment (epidural analgesia) +/- opiates +/- NSAID/ paracetamol In case of severe pain not responding to the above analgesia
Quinolones + Metronidazole /Carbapenems ± MetronidazoleCombination product
Also called Quinolones (ciprofloxacin) Metronidazole (flagyl) Carbapenems (Imipenem)
- Mild attack: no antibiotic prophylaxis administered.
- Severe attack:
- Timing: Antibiotic prophylaxis administered to cases presented early within 72 hrs of disease onset.
- Duration: Not more than 2 weeks
- Antibiotics given:
- Quinolones + Metronidazole ( the 1st choice in ward) Ciprofloxacin 400mg IV /12 h + metronidazole 500mg IV/8h
- Carbapenems ± Metronidazole (the 1st choice in ICU patients and in case of sensitivity to quinolones) Imipenem .5gm IV/6h + metronidazole 500mg IV/8h
- Therapeutic (in cases with pancreatic or extrapancreatic infections)
- In case of pancreatic infection, Carbapenems ± metronidazole were given.
Fresubin 2Kcal fiber drinkDietary supplement
Also called polymeric feeding formula
Severe cases Timing: Within at least 48 hrs of admission provided that there are no intestinal complications.
Route: Nasogastric tube Nutrients: Polymeric feeding formula
- Nutrient: Fresubin 2Kcal fiber drink 200ml (2Kcal/ml)
- Total caloric requirements ꞊ body weight (kg) X 30Kcal/day Pattern : Continuous infusion
- The nutrition started with small amount and increased gradually over 16hrs
- Infusion rate ꞊ Total caloric requirements / 16hrs
nasogastric tubeDevice
in case of ileus or vomiting
retroperitoneal necrosectomyProcedure or surgery
- General anesthesia , Supine position with 30 degree tilt towards the right side
- A left subcostal 5 cm incision is performed one finger below the left costal margin over the midaxillary line and the muscles were divided sequentially
- Then, aspiration is done from the possible collection.
- After confirmation that it was the site of the collection, the fibrotic thick wall was opened by a scissor, as the collection is opened, pus drained spontaneously.
- At first, a wide suction was introduced in the cavity and the friable loose necrotic tissue was aspirated. Then, a circuit of flushing saline was created in the residual cavity by injection of saline through the previously placed PCD followed by aspiration of the saline and detached loose necrotic tissue fragments by the wide suction tube
- After completion of the procedure, large bore surgical drain was placed into the collection. The fascia was closed over the drains. The skin closed by interrupted sutures
open necrosectomyProcedure or surgery
Open necrosectomy was done after failure of the minimally invasive techniques. The procedure was done under general anesthesia under the coverage of Tienam (.5gm/6h IV) following the results of culture and sensitivity of the percutaneous drain effluent Surgical exploration of the peritoneal cavity was done through midline exploratory incision, there were 2 large pus collections extending from the Rt. and Lt. Lumber regions deep down into the pelvis, the intervening septa were divided and the pus was aspirated by a wide suction drain.
The lesser sac was opened and necrosectomy was done The previously placed PCD repositioned in the site of necrosectomy as a port for continuous irrigation while a wide tube drain was placed in the lesser sac for drainage. Another 2 tube drains were placed in the pelvis.
Endoscopic transmural cystogastrostomyProcedure or surgery
for pancreatic pseudocyst Antibiotic prophylaxis with Ciprofloxacin 400mg IV /12 hour was administered before the procedure and continued for 5 days after the procedure At first the cyst morphology was evaluated by EUS and color Doppler ultrasound is used to identify nearby vessels The puncture was performed using a 19-gauge needle, which was introduced into the pseudocyst via a therapeutic linear array echoendoscope. Then, a 0.035-inch guidewire was introduced through the needle and coiled within the pseudocyst under fluoroscopic guidance.
The needle was removed and a 10F cystotome was advanced over the guidewire and the tract was dilated by the cystotome, after dilatation, a 10F double-pigtail stent was placed and a sample of the aspirate is sent for chemical and microbiological analysis
open cystogastrostomyProcedure or surgery
for pancreatic pseudocyst general anesthesia, 1 gm of cefotax was given IV at the induction of anaesthesia, supine position over the operating table A transverse supraumbilical incision was performed. A 5 cm horizontal anterior gastrotomy was performed (Image 23a). Hemostasis of the submucosal vessels was performed before the incision of the gastric mucosa.
First, the cyst was punctured followed by an incision of 5 cm at the posterior gastric wall. Aspiration of the cyst content was done for chemical and microbiological analysis The wall of the pseudocyst is hemmed to the gastric wall with continuous sutures made of a vicryl 2/0 alongside the entire circumference of the orifice Nasogastric tube was placed in the stomach. The procedure was completed by suturing the anterior gastrotomy with a vicryl 2/0 continous sutures in 2 layers A tube drain was inserted at the pelvis with closure of the abdominal wound in a standard way.
percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) for infected necrosisProcedure or surgery
PCD
- The percutaneous drainage catheter placed through peritoneal approach under US guidance, the drain size was 12 F.
- After placement of the percutaneous catheter, aspirate was sent for microbiological assessment
- The PCD was flushed with 50 ml saline, three times daily to keep the drain open and improve lavage of the collection
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided aspiration for infected necrosisProcedure or surgery
endoscopic approach it was done to one patient in the form of EUS guided aspiration of pus in a case with infected necrosis followed by percutaneous US guided aspiration of the residual
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| application of recent guidelines in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis | all patients subjected to the following: Confirmation of the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, Diagnosis of the cause either biliary or not, Severity scoring and Evidence based management regarding Initial management, Intervention as indicated, Prevention of recurrence and Follow up Receives: Diagnostic Test: serum lipase or amylase; Device: ultrasound; Device: CT; Diagnostic Test: Liver enzymes (Bilirubin, alanine transferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase, (AST) and alkaline phosphatase). Calcium. Triglycerides.; Device: EUS /Secretin-stimulated magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP); Drug: Ringer lactate; Combination Product: NSAID / paracetamol +/- opiates+/- epidural analgesia; Combination Product: Quinolones + Metronidazole /Carbapenems ± Metronidazole; Dietary Supplement: Fresubin 2Kcal fiber drink; Device: nasogastric tube; Procedure: retroperitoneal necrosectomy; Procedure: open necrosectomy; Procedure: Endoscopic transmural cystogastrostomy; Procedure: open cystogastrostomy; Procedure: percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) for infected necrosis; Procedure: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided aspiration for infected necrosis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
success rate of minimally invasive techniques (percutaneaous catheter drainage, endoscopic approach and retroperitoneal approach) in cases with infected walled off necrosis
Data were tabulated and statistically analyzed in terms of percentages Success of the intervention means patient condition improves [clinical (vital signs) , laboratory (CBC, kidney and liver function tests) and radiological improvement (no residual collection in CT)] and that there is no need for further intervention to control the disease till patient discharge
Measured: immediately following intervention to 6 weeks following intervention
rate of complications of minimally invasive techniques used in the management of cases with infected walled off necrosis including bleeding, fistula, wound infection, incisional hernia
Data were tabulated and statistically analyzed in terms of percentages
Measured: up to 6 months following intervention
Mortality rate of acute biliary pancreatitis in the study period
Data were tabulated and statistically analyzed in terms of percentages
Measured: from admission to 6 months following admission
length of hospital stay of mild and severe cases with acute biliary pancreatitis
Data were tabulated and statistically analyzed in terms of frequencies length of hospital stay in days
Measured: up to 6 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
age of cases with acute biliary pancreatitis in Sharqia in years
Data were tabulated and statistically analyzed in terms of mean
Measured: at admission
Sex of cases with acute biliary pancreatitis in Sharqia (Males and females)
Data were tabulated and statistically analyzed in terms of percentages
Measured: at admission
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Nov 2020
- Study start15 May 2017
- Primary completion15 May 2019
- Study completion15 May 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute PancreatitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Zagazig UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 6 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Zagazig University
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, yasmine Hany Hegab, Zagazig University
- Investigators
- yasmine Hegab, Principal investigator, zagazig university faculty of human medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04615702
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- acute panreatitis guidelines
- Status last verified
- Nov 2020
- First submitted
- 21 Oct 2020
- Last updated
- 5 Nov 2020
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, Tsiotos GG, Vege SS; Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013 Jan;62(1):102-11. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
PubMed 23100216Isaji S, Takada T, Mayumi T, Yoshida M, Wada K, Yokoe M, Itoi T, Gabata T. Revised Japanese guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis 2015: revised concepts and updated points. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015 Jun;22(6):433-45. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.260.
PubMed 25904407Tenner S, Baillie J, DeWitt J, Vege SS; American College of Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Sep;108(9):1400-15; 1416. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.218. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
PubMed 23896955Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2013 Jul-Aug;13(4 Suppl 2):e1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2013.07.063.
PubMed 24054878
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evidence Based Management of Acute Biliary Pancreatitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04615702
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- acute panreatitis guidelines
- Conditions
- Acute Pancreatitis
- Keywords
- acute pancreatitis guidelines, acute biliary pancreatitis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Zagazig UniversityOther government
- Study start
- 15 May 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 May 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 May 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to assess the outcome of standardized evidence-based care to all patients with acute biliary pancreatitis treated at surgery department, Zagazig University hospitals during the period from may, 2017 to may 2019.
Detailed description
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is one of the most important gastrointestinal disorders causing emotional and physical human burden . The annual incidence worldwide for AP is 4.9-73.4 cases per 100,000 people and the overall mortality rate is 4 to 8%, which increases to 33% in patients with infected necrosis. AP is diagnosed when two of three criteria are fulfilled: typical abdominal pain of AP, more than three times elevated serum amylase/lipase level and signs of AP on imaging.
It is necessary to clarify the etiology of AP promptly. The diagnosis of gallstones, as the leading cause for AP, should have the top priority as that will direct the treatment policy. Long standing alcohol consumption and gallstones disease incriminated in the majority of cases with AP. Small common bile duct stones, in particular, are the cause of AP in approximately 32 to 40% of cases. In 10-30% of cases, the cause is unknown, so studies have suggested that up to 70% of cases of idiopathic pancreatitis are secondary to biliary microlithiasis.
The pathogenesis of biliary AP has been intensively investigated. Many theories explain how gallstones can trigger AP. The predominant theories include common pathway theory and gallstone migration theory. In general, AP occurs when intracellular protective mechanisms fail to prevent trypsinogen activation or reduce trypsin activity.
It is important that management of such potentially life threatening condition to be guided by an evidence-based approach. After comparing the Japanese (JPN) Guidelines 2015 and its former edition 2010 with the other two guidelines, International Association of Pancreatology/American Pancreas Association guidelines (IAP/APA), 2013 and American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), 2013, the JPN Guidelines, 2015 proved to be the highest quality regarding its systematic literature review prepared by the meta-analysis team, including the grading of recommendations and providing pancreatitis bundles.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 6 Months
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| application of recent guidelines in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis | – | Diagnostic Test: serum lipase or amylase, Device: ultrasound, Device: CT, Diagnostic Test: Liver enzymes (Bilirubin, alanine transferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase, (AST) and alkaline phosphatase). Calcium. Triglycerides., Device: EUS /Secretin-stimulated magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), Drug: Ringer lactate, Combination Product: NSAID / paracetamol +/- opiates+/- epidural analgesia, Combination Product: Quinolones + Metronidazole /Carbapenems ± Metronidazole, Dietary Supplement: Fresubin 2Kcal fiber drink, Device: nasogastric tube, Procedure: retroperitoneal necrosectomy, Procedure: open necrosectomy, Procedure: Endoscopic transmural cystogastrostomy, Procedure: open cystogastrostomy, Procedure: percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) for infected necrosis, Procedure: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided aspiration for infected necrosisall patients subjected to the following: Confirmation of the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, Diagnosis of the cause either biliary or not, Severity scoring and Evidence based management regarding Initial management, Intervention as indicated, Prevention of recurrence and Follow up |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All cases with acute biliary pancreatitis admitted to surgery department in the study period were included in the study
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- all cases with acute biliary pancreatitis
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- all cases with non biliary pancreatitis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| serum lipase or amylaseLaboratory ( elevated serum lipase or amylase at least 3 times above the normal limits) is helpful in diagnosis Acute pancreatitis is diagnosed when two of three criteria are present including: 1. Clinically (abdominal pain consistent with acute pancreatitis), 2. Laboratory ( elevated serum lipase or amylase at least 3 times above the normal limits) 3. Imaging criteria of acute pancreatitis | Diagnostic test | application of recent guidelines in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis |
| ultrasoundhelpful in diagnosis of acute pancreatitis and its etiology (Gallstones) | Device | application of recent guidelines in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis |
| CThelpful in diagnosis of acute pancreatitis and its etiology . assist in detection of type and severity of acute pancreatitis | Device | application of recent guidelines in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis |
| Liver enzymes (Bilirubin, alanine transferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase, (AST) and alkaline phosphatase). Calcium. Triglycerides.help in diagnosis of the etiology of acute pancreatitis elevated Bilirubin, ALT, AST and alkaline phosphatase suggest biliary pancreatitis | Diagnostic test | application of recent guidelines in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis |
| EUS /Secretin-stimulated magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP)helpful in idiopathic acute pancreatitis diagnosis | Device | application of recent guidelines in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis |
| Ringer lactateAlso: hartmann's solutionThe initial infusion rate for mild cases : * For patients without dehydration is (130-150mL/h). * In case of dehydration: (150-600mL/h) with close monitoring of patients with comorbidities such as cardiac problems or renal failure to avoid volume overload. The initial infusion rate for both severe cases : * For patients without dehydration is (130-150mL/h). * In case of dehydration/ shock: (150-600mL/h) with close monitoring of patients with comorbidities such as cardiac problems or renal failure to avoid volume overload d. The target * A mean arterial pressure of 65mmHg or more, * Urine output of 0.5mL/kg per hour or more When these parameters achieved, the infusion rate decreased to the level that maintain these parameters. | Drug | application of recent guidelines in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis |
| NSAID / paracetamol +/- opiates+/- epidural analgesiaAlso: NSAID (Diclofenac sodium) paracetamol (perfalgan drip) Opiates (Pethidine)Pain control (Modified World Health organization (WHO) analgesia ladder) Step1: NSAID / paracetamol Paracetamol 1gm IV infusion /8h + Diclofenac sodium 75mg /12h. Step 2: Opiates +/- NSAID/ paracetamol Pethidine 25 mg IV/4h Step 3: Interventional treatment (epidural analgesia) +/- opiates +/- NSAID/ paracetamol In case of severe pain not responding to the above analgesia | Combination product | application of recent guidelines in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis |
| Quinolones + Metronidazole /Carbapenems ± MetronidazoleAlso: Quinolones (ciprofloxacin) Metronidazole (flagyl) Carbapenems (Imipenem)* Mild attack: no antibiotic prophylaxis administered. * Severe attack: * Timing: Antibiotic prophylaxis administered to cases presented early within 72 hrs of disease onset. * Duration: Not more than 2 weeks * Antibiotics given: * Quinolones + Metronidazole ( the 1st choice in ward) Ciprofloxacin 400mg IV /12 h + metronidazole 500mg IV/8h * Carbapenems ± Metronidazole (the 1st choice in ICU patients and in case of sensitivity to quinolones) Imipenem .5gm IV/6h + metronidazole 500mg IV/8h b. Therapeutic (in cases with pancreatic or extrapancreatic infections) * In case of pancreatic infection, Carbapenems ± metronidazole were given. | Combination product | application of recent guidelines in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis |
| Fresubin 2Kcal fiber drinkAlso: polymeric feeding formulaSevere cases Timing: Within at least 48 hrs of admission provided that there are no intestinal complications. Route: Nasogastric tube Nutrients: Polymeric feeding formula * Nutrient: Fresubin 2Kcal fiber drink 200ml (2Kcal/ml) * Total caloric requirements ꞊ body weight (kg) X 30Kcal/day Pattern : Continuous infusion * The nutrition started with small amount and increased gradually over 16hrs * Infusion rate ꞊ Total caloric requirements / 16hrs | Dietary supplement | application of recent guidelines in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis |
| nasogastric tubein case of ileus or vomiting | Device | application of recent guidelines in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis |
| retroperitoneal necrosectomy* General anesthesia , Supine position with 30 degree tilt towards the right side * A left subcostal 5 cm incision is performed one finger below the left costal margin over the midaxillary line and the muscles were divided sequentially * Then, aspiration is done from the possible collection. * After confirmation that it was the site of the collection, the fibrotic thick wall was opened by a scissor, as the collection is opened, pus drained spontaneously. * At first, a wide suction was introduced in the cavity and the friable loose necrotic tissue was aspirated. Then, a circuit of flushing saline was created in the residual cavity by injection of saline through the previously placed PCD followed by aspiration of the saline and detached loose necrotic tissue fragments by the wide suction tube * After completion of the procedure, large bore surgical drain was placed into the collection. The fascia was closed over the drains. The skin closed by interrupted sutures | Procedure or surgery | application of recent guidelines in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis |
| open necrosectomyOpen necrosectomy was done after failure of the minimally invasive techniques. The procedure was done under general anesthesia under the coverage of Tienam (.5gm/6h IV) following the results of culture and sensitivity of the percutaneous drain effluent Surgical exploration of the peritoneal cavity was done through midline exploratory incision, there were 2 large pus collections extending from the Rt. and Lt. Lumber regions deep down into the pelvis, the intervening septa were divided and the pus was aspirated by a wide suction drain. The lesser sac was opened and necrosectomy was done The previously placed PCD repositioned in the site of necrosectomy as a port for continuous irrigation while a wide tube drain was placed in the lesser sac for drainage. Another 2 tube drains were placed in the pelvis. | Procedure or surgery | application of recent guidelines in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis |
| Endoscopic transmural cystogastrostomyfor pancreatic pseudocyst Antibiotic prophylaxis with Ciprofloxacin 400mg IV /12 hour was administered before the procedure and continued for 5 days after the procedure At first the cyst morphology was evaluated by EUS and color Doppler ultrasound is used to identify nearby vessels The puncture was performed using a 19-gauge needle, which was introduced into the pseudocyst via a therapeutic linear array echoendoscope. Then, a 0.035-inch guidewire was introduced through the needle and coiled within the pseudocyst under fluoroscopic guidance. The needle was removed and a 10F cystotome was advanced over the guidewire and the tract was dilated by the cystotome, after dilatation, a 10F double-pigtail stent was placed and a sample of the aspirate is sent for chemical and microbiological analysis | Procedure or surgery | application of recent guidelines in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis |
| open cystogastrostomyfor pancreatic pseudocyst general anesthesia, 1 gm of cefotax was given IV at the induction of anaesthesia, supine position over the operating table A transverse supraumbilical incision was performed. A 5 cm horizontal anterior gastrotomy was performed (Image 23a). Hemostasis of the submucosal vessels was performed before the incision of the gastric mucosa. First, the cyst was punctured followed by an incision of 5 cm at the posterior gastric wall. Aspiration of the cyst content was done for chemical and microbiological analysis The wall of the pseudocyst is hemmed to the gastric wall with continuous sutures made of a vicryl 2/0 alongside the entire circumference of the orifice Nasogastric tube was placed in the stomach. The procedure was completed by suturing the anterior gastrotomy with a vicryl 2/0 continous sutures in 2 layers A tube drain was inserted at the pelvis with closure of the abdominal wound in a standard way. | Procedure or surgery | application of recent guidelines in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis |
| percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) for infected necrosisPCD * The percutaneous drainage catheter placed through peritoneal approach under US guidance, the drain size was 12 F. * After placement of the percutaneous catheter, aspirate was sent for microbiological assessment * The PCD was flushed with 50 ml saline, three times daily to keep the drain open and improve lavage of the collection | Procedure or surgery | application of recent guidelines in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis |
| Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided aspiration for infected necrosisendoscopic approach it was done to one patient in the form of EUS guided aspiration of pus in a case with infected necrosis followed by percutaneous US guided aspiration of the residual | Procedure or surgery | application of recent guidelines in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis |
Primary outcome
success rate of minimally invasive techniques (percutaneaous catheter drainage, endoscopic approach and retroperitoneal approach) in cases with infected walled off necrosis
Time frame: immediately following intervention to 6 weeks following intervention
Data were tabulated and statistically analyzed in terms of percentages Success of the intervention means patient condition improves [clinical (vital signs) , laboratory (CBC, kidney and liver function tests) and radiological improvement (no residual collection in CT)] and that there is no need for further intervention to control the disease till patient discharge
rate of complications of minimally invasive techniques used in the management of cases with infected walled off necrosis including bleeding, fistula, wound infection, incisional hernia
Time frame: up to 6 months following intervention
Data were tabulated and statistically analyzed in terms of percentages
Mortality rate of acute biliary pancreatitis in the study period
Time frame: from admission to 6 months following admission
Data were tabulated and statistically analyzed in terms of percentages
length of hospital stay of mild and severe cases with acute biliary pancreatitis
Time frame: up to 6 months
Data were tabulated and statistically analyzed in terms of frequencies length of hospital stay in days
2 secondary outcomes
age of cases with acute biliary pancreatitis in Sharqia in years
Time frame: at admission
Sex of cases with acute biliary pancreatitis in Sharqia (Males and females)
Time frame: at admission
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Nov 2020.
- Background: PubMed 23100216Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, Tsiotos GG, Vege SS; Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013 Jan;62(1):102-11. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
- Results publication: PubMed 25904407Isaji S, Takada T, Mayumi T, Yoshida M, Wada K, Yokoe M, Itoi T, Gabata T. Revised Japanese guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis 2015: revised concepts and updated points. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015 Jun;22(6):433-45. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.260.
- Results publication: PubMed 23896955Tenner S, Baillie J, DeWitt J, Vege SS; American College of Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Sep;108(9):1400-15; 1416. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.218. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 24054878Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2013 Jul-Aug;13(4 Suppl 2):e1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2013.07.063.
Related trials for Acute Pancreatitis
Recruiting
Efferon LPS Hemoadsorption in Patients With Acute Pancreatitis
Pancreatitis, Acute
Recruiting
Timing of CHolecystectomy In Severe PAncreatitis
Acute Pancreatitis, Cholelithiasis
Not yet recruiting
Cold Water Papillary Irrigation Plus Rectal NSAIDs vs Rectal NSAIDs Alone for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis (COLD)
Post ERCP Pancreatitis, Acute Pancreatitis (AP)
RecruitingObservational study
CytOSorb TreatMent Of Critically Ill PatientS Registry
Septic Shock, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Soy Tomato Juice to Improve Outcomes in Pancreatitis
Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis, Chronic Pancreatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
yasmine Hegab principal investigator
zagazig university faculty of human medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Acute Pancreatitis, run by Zagazig University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
success rate of minimally invasive techniques (percutaneaous catheter drainage, endoscopic approach and retroperitoneal approach) in cases with infected walled off necrosis (time frame: immediately following intervention to 6 weeks following intervention). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04615702, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Nov 2020.