Acupuncture, EarBFANCT04615299
Battlefield Acupuncture and Its Use In Multimodal Perioperative Anesthesia Care
A study testing Auricular acupuncture in people with Acupuncture, Ear, run by Anesthesiology WSU/DMC-NorthStar at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The study hypothesis is that perioperative Auricular (battlefield) acupuncture for general surgery and urology cases undergoing general anesthesia will decrease opioid requirements, postoperative pain, the incidence of PONV, and the incidence of perioperative anxiety in comparison to simulated (placebo) perioperative… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Acupuncture, Ear
- What is being tested?
- Auricular acupuncture
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 72 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 6 Jun 2018to 6 Jun 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 1- Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification of 1 to 4 2 - Patients aged between 18 and 100 scheduled to undergo scheduled suitable inpatient/outpatient cases under anesthesia.
- 3 - Patients must be willing and fit to give written informed consent 4 - Inpatient stay required
Who cannot join
- - Coagulopathies
- - Patients with continuous epidural
- - Uncooperative patient
- - Psychiatric disorders and language deficiencies that may interfere with the assessment of pain
- - Insufficient understanding of the pain scoring system.
- - Outpatient stay
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
John D. Dingell VA Medical Center
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
About this study
The study hypothesis is that perioperative Auricular (battlefield) acupuncture for general surgery and urology cases undergoing general anesthesia will decrease opioid requirements, postoperative pain, the incidence of PONV, and the incidence of perioperative anxiety in comparison to simulated (placebo) perioperative battlefield acupuncture.
Read the detailed description
INTRODUCTION:
Battlefield acupuncture is an auricular therapy that has been used for centuries, with roots tied to Eastern Asian medicine. Ease of application, low cost, and minimal side effects make battlefield acupuncture a perioperative modality that has been linked to decreased morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgical procedures and anesthesia (1). In the United States, there is pressure by the government and the medical community to decrease opioid use, especially in the perioperative time period. Opiate use due to postoperative pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), perioperative anxiety have all been linked to an increased hospital stay, increased morbidity, and mortality, and ultimately higher healthcare costs (2). Anesthesia providers can be trained in the application of acupuncture in the perioperative time period. Through analysis of rates of postoperative opioid use, postoperative nausea and vomiting and perioperative anxiety, the efficacy, and utility of battlefield acupuncture will be realized as an effective adjunct to multimodal anesthesia care.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS:
This will be a prospective randomized study to compare auricular battlefield acupuncture to sham auricular battlefield acupuncture in patients undergoing general surgery and urology cases with general anesthesia. Participants in the study will be randomly assigned to either receive auricular battlefield acupuncture (treatment group) or simulated (placebo; control group) auricular battlefield acupuncture. Battlefield acupuncture needles will be utilized in the test arm and blunt needle pressing and covering with acupuncture stickers will be utilized in the control arm as a sham treatment. Location of needles and stickers will be placed according to 5 VA approved BFA auricular acupuncture points associated with PONV, pain, and anxiety respectively (Figure 1; 3). In both arms, the treatment ear will be covered after treatment so as to blind the patient. Both battlefield acupuncture and control groups will receive small band aids on the battlefield acupuncture needle sites. Both the evaluators for post procedure assessment along with the patient will be blinded in regards to what group they are in.
Inclusion Criteria:
1- Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification of 1 to 4 2 - Patients aged between 18 and 100 scheduled to undergo scheduled suitable inpatient/outpatient cases under anesthesia.
3 - Patients must be willing and fit to give written informed consent 4 - Inpatient stay required
Exclusion Criteria:
- - Coagulopathies
- - Patients with continuous epidural
- - Uncooperative patient
- - Psychiatric disorders and language deficiencies that may interfere with the assessment of pain
- - Insufficient understanding of the pain scoring system.
- - Outpatient stay
This study will be performed at the John D. Dingell VA Medical Center. Only a trained MD anesthesiologist will recruit patient in the preoperative period, where informed consent will be obtained. Computerized randomization will take place at the time the patient presents for surgery. Consent will be taken preoperatively.
Anesthetic Plan:
The anesthetic management will be general anesthesia with the provision of intravenous opioids intraoperatively and during recovery. Fentanyl will be the sole intra operative opioid. No other alterations of anesthetic management will take place pre or intra operatively. The battlefield acupuncture or sham battlefield acupuncture will be placed in the postoperative care unit (PACU).
Acupuncture Plan:
Typically acupuncture needles which are semi-permanent needles have the characteristics of remaining in the ear acupoints for up to 3-4 days before being pushed out toward to the surface by the previous flattened epidermis. The test arm (treatment group) will received actual acupuncture needles, while the control arm will received sham or placebo acupuncture via pressing of a blunt needle on the specified BFA locations and then application of adhesive stickers. In the control group simulating acupuncture, the needles will never enter the patients' skin and will give the impression to the patient that the procedure has taken place. The ear treated will be covered with a bandage via non-skin sensitive tape so as to blind the patient to which treatment group they are in.
Statistical Analysis:
An unpaired students-t-test procedure (two-sample assuming equal variances, two-tail significance p<0.05, 95% confidence interval) was performed to examine mean differences between the two study groups on all continuously scaled variables. A Repeated measures ANOVA will be used to measured differences between time for continuous variables at the 2 measured time points (1 hour and 24 hours). Assumptions of normality and/or homogeneity of variance will be checked and verified. Comparisons between study groups on proportional differences will be examined using a non-parametric Fisher's Exact Chi-square test, when applied to 2x2 tables. Statistical significance will be set at a p-value ≤0.05. All continuous data will be expressed as the mean with 95% upper and lower confidence intervals or Mean ± Standard deviation.
A binary outcome, superiority power analysis based on a rate of 33% reduction of opioid consumption in the auricular battlefield acupuncture group compared to controls (sham auricular battlefield acupuncture) concluded 72 participants (36 patients per group) would be necessary to achieve 80% power with a p<0.05.
- Conditions
- Acupuncture, Ear
- Being tested
- Auricular acupuncture
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Auricular acupunctureDevice
Auricular or Battlefield acupuncture is an auricular therapy which has been in existence for centuries, with roots tied to Eastern Asian medicine.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Auricular acupuncture | Active comparator | Auricular (Battlefield) acupuncture needles will be utilized in the test arm, location of needles and stickers will be placed according to 5 VA approved BFA auricular acupuncture points associated with PONV, pain, and anxiety respectively Receives: Device: Auricular acupuncture |
| Sham acupuncture | Sham comparator | The control arm will receive sham or placebo acupuncture via pressing of a blunt needle on the specified BFA locations and then application of adhesive stickers. In the control group simulating acupuncture, the needles will never enter the patients' skin and will give the impression to the patient that the procedure has taken place. Receives: Device: Auricular acupuncture |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Postoperative Opioid Consumption
Patient opioid consumption in the 24 hrs post surgery
Measured: 24 hours
Pain Score Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 6 Hours Post Surgery
Pain score on an 11-point (0 - no pain to 10 - worst imaginable pain) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at rest
Measured: 6 hours
Pain Score Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 12 Hours Post Surgery
Pain score on an 11-point (0 - no pain to 10 - worst imaginable pain) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at rest
Measured: 12 hours
Pain Score Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 18 Hours Post Surgery
Pain score on an 11-point (0 - no pain to 10 - worst imaginable pain) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at rest
Measured: 18 hours
Pain Score Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 24 Hours Post Surgery
Pain score on an 11-point (0 - no pain to 10 - worst imaginable pain) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at rest
Measured: 24 hours
Secondary outcomes (5)
Occurrence of Postoperative Vomiting
Any patient incidence of vomiting within the 24 hour period post-surgery
Measured: 24 hours
Occurrence of Postoperative Nausea
Any reported patient incidence of nausea within the 24 hour period post-surgery
Measured: 24 hours
Occurrence of Postoperative Anxiety
Any patient incidence of postoperative anxiety within the 24 hr period post-surgery
Measured: 24 hours
Patient Satisfaction
Patient satisfaction of analgesia scoring from a range of (0% -very unsatisfied to 100% -extremely satisfied)
Measured: 24 hours
Occurrence of Any Adverse Reactions
Any occurrence of acupuncture site infection, acupuncture site bleeding, allergic reaction to acupuncture needles, or scar tissue formation at site of acupuncture needle within the 24-hr period post-surgery
Measured: 24 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Nov 2020
- Study start6 Jun 2018
- Primary completion6 Jun 2019
- Study completion6 Jun 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acupuncture, EarStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The treatment group (Group 1) will receive postoperative auricular battlefield acupuncture. The control group (Group 2) will receive sham (placebo) postoperative auricular battlefield acupuncture.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Anesthesiology WSU/DMC-NorthStar
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- John D. Dingell VA Medical Center
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Padmavathi Patel, MD, Principal investigator, Wayne State University, John D. Dingell VA Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04615299
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 060117M1F(V)
- Acronym
- BFA
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 29 Oct 2020
- Last updated
- 18 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lu Z, Dong H, Wang Q, Xiong L. Perioperative acupuncture modulation: more than anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Aug;115(2):183-93. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev227.
PubMed 26170347Fleckenstein J, Baeumler PI, Gurschler C, Weissenbacher T, Simang M, Annecke T, Geisenberger T, Irnich D. Acupuncture for post anaesthetic recovery and postoperative pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Jul 21;15:292. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-292.
PubMed 25047046
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Battlefield Acupuncture and Its Use In Multimodal Perioperative Anesthesia Care
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04615299
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BFA / 060117M1F(V)
- Conditions
- Acupuncture, Ear
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Anesthesiology WSU/DMC-NorthStarUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- John D. Dingell VA Medical Center
- Study start
- 6 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 6 Jun 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 18 Mar 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study hypothesis is that perioperative Auricular (battlefield) acupuncture for general surgery and urology cases undergoing general anesthesia will decrease opioid requirements, postoperative pain, the incidence of PONV, and the incidence of perioperative anxiety in comparison to simulated (placebo) perioperative battlefield acupuncture.
Detailed description
INTRODUCTION:
Battlefield acupuncture is an auricular therapy that has been used for centuries, with roots tied to Eastern Asian medicine. Ease of application, low cost, and minimal side effects make battlefield acupuncture a perioperative modality that has been linked to decreased morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgical procedures and anesthesia (1). In the United States, there is pressure by the government and the medical community to decrease opioid use, especially in the perioperative time period. Opiate use due to postoperative pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), perioperative anxiety have all been linked to an increased hospital stay, increased morbidity, and mortality, and ultimately higher healthcare costs (2). Anesthesia providers can be trained in the application of acupuncture in the perioperative time period. Through analysis of rates of postoperative opioid use, postoperative nausea and vomiting and perioperative anxiety, the efficacy, and utility of battlefield acupuncture will be realized as an effective adjunct to multimodal anesthesia care.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS:
This will be a prospective randomized study to compare auricular battlefield acupuncture to sham auricular battlefield acupuncture in patients undergoing general surgery and urology cases with general anesthesia. Participants in the study will be randomly assigned to either receive auricular battlefield acupuncture (treatment group) or simulated (placebo; control group) auricular battlefield acupuncture. Battlefield acupuncture needles will be utilized in the test arm and blunt needle pressing and covering with acupuncture stickers will be utilized in the control arm as a sham treatment. Location of needles and stickers will be placed according to 5 VA approved BFA auricular acupuncture points associated with PONV, pain, and anxiety respectively (Figure 1; 3). In both arms, the treatment ear will be covered after treatment so as to blind the patient. Both battlefield acupuncture and control groups will receive small band aids on the battlefield acupuncture needle sites. Both the evaluators for post procedure assessment along with the patient will be blinded in regards to what group they are in.
Inclusion Criteria:
1- Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification of 1 to 4 2 - Patients aged between 18 and 100 scheduled to undergo scheduled suitable inpatient/outpatient cases under anesthesia.
3 - Patients must be willing and fit to give written informed consent 4 - Inpatient stay required
Exclusion Criteria:
- - Coagulopathies
- - Patients with continuous epidural
- - Uncooperative patient
- - Psychiatric disorders and language deficiencies that may interfere with the assessment of pain
- - Insufficient understanding of the pain scoring system.
- - Outpatient stay
This study will be performed at the John D. Dingell VA Medical Center. Only a trained MD anesthesiologist will recruit patient in the preoperative period, where informed consent will be obtained. Computerized randomization will take place at the time the patient presents for surgery. Consent will be taken preoperatively.
Anesthetic Plan:
The anesthetic management will be general anesthesia with the provision of intravenous opioids intraoperatively and during recovery. Fentanyl will be the sole intra operative opioid. No other alterations of anesthetic management will take place pre or intra operatively. The battlefield acupuncture or sham battlefield acupuncture will be placed in the postoperative care unit (PACU).
Acupuncture Plan:
Typically acupuncture needles which are semi-permanent needles have the characteristics of remaining in the ear acupoints for up to 3-4 days before being pushed out toward to the surface by the previous flattened epidermis. The test arm (treatment group) will received actual acupuncture needles, while the control arm will received sham or placebo acupuncture via pressing of a blunt needle on the specified BFA locations and then application of adhesive stickers. In the control group simulating acupuncture, the needles will never enter the patients' skin and will give the impression to the patient that the procedure has taken place. The ear treated will be covered with a bandage via non-skin sensitive tape so as to blind the patient to which treatment group they are in.
Statistical Analysis:
An unpaired students-t-test procedure (two-sample assuming equal variances, two-tail significance p<0.05, 95% confidence interval) was performed to examine mean differences between the two study groups on all continuously scaled variables. A Repeated measures ANOVA will be used to measured differences between time for continuous variables at the 2 measured time points (1 hour and 24 hours). Assumptions of normality and/or homogeneity of variance will be checked and verified. Comparisons between study groups on proportional differences will be examined using a non-parametric Fisher's Exact Chi-square test, when applied to 2x2 tables. Statistical significance will be set at a p-value ≤0.05. All continuous data will be expressed as the mean with 95% upper and lower confidence intervals or Mean ± Standard deviation.
A binary outcome, superiority power analysis based on a rate of 33% reduction of opioid consumption in the auricular battlefield acupuncture group compared to controls (sham auricular battlefield acupuncture) concluded 72 participants (36 patients per group) would be necessary to achieve 80% power with a p<0.05.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The treatment group (Group 1) will receive postoperative auricular battlefield acupuncture. The control group (Group 2) will receive sham (placebo) postoperative auricular battlefield acupuncture.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Auricular acupuncture | Active comparator | Device: Auricular acupunctureAuricular (Battlefield) acupuncture needles will be utilized in the test arm, location of needles and stickers will be placed according to 5 VA approved BFA auricular acupuncture points associated with PONV, pain, and anxiety respectively |
| Sham acupuncture | Sham comparator | Device: Auricular acupunctureThe control arm will receive sham or placebo acupuncture via pressing of a blunt needle on the specified BFA locations and then application of adhesive stickers. In the control group simulating acupuncture, the needles will never enter the patients' skin and will give the impression to the patient that the procedure has taken place. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- 1- Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification of 1 to 4 2 - Patients aged between 18 and 100 scheduled to undergo scheduled suitable inpatient/outpatient cases under anesthesia.
- 3 - Patients must be willing and fit to give written informed consent 4 - Inpatient stay required
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- - Coagulopathies
- - Patients with continuous epidural
- - Uncooperative patient
- - Psychiatric disorders and language deficiencies that may interfere with the assessment of pain
- - Insufficient understanding of the pain scoring system.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Auricular acupunctureAuricular or Battlefield acupuncture is an auricular therapy which has been in existence for centuries, with roots tied to Eastern Asian medicine. | Device | Auricular acupuncture, Sham acupuncture |
Primary outcome
Postoperative Opioid Consumption
Time frame: 24 hours
Patient opioid consumption in the 24 hrs post surgery
Pain Score Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 6 Hours Post Surgery
Time frame: 6 hours
Pain score on an 11-point (0 - no pain to 10 - worst imaginable pain) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at rest
Pain Score Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 12 Hours Post Surgery
Time frame: 12 hours
Pain score on an 11-point (0 - no pain to 10 - worst imaginable pain) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at rest
Pain Score Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 18 Hours Post Surgery
Time frame: 18 hours
Pain score on an 11-point (0 - no pain to 10 - worst imaginable pain) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at rest
Pain Score Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 24 Hours Post Surgery
Time frame: 24 hours
Pain score on an 11-point (0 - no pain to 10 - worst imaginable pain) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at rest
5 secondary outcomes
Occurrence of Postoperative Vomiting
Time frame: 24 hours
Occurrence of Postoperative Nausea
Time frame: 24 hours
Occurrence of Postoperative Anxiety
Time frame: 24 hours
Patient Satisfaction
Time frame: 24 hours
Occurrence of Any Adverse Reactions
Time frame: 24 hours
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Mar 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 26170347Lu Z, Dong H, Wang Q, Xiong L. Perioperative acupuncture modulation: more than anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Aug;115(2):183-93. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev227.
- Background: PubMed 25047046Fleckenstein J, Baeumler PI, Gurschler C, Weissenbacher T, Simang M, Annecke T, Geisenberger T, Irnich D. Acupuncture for post anaesthetic recovery and postoperative pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Jul 21;15:292. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-292.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Acupuncture, Ear
Recruiting
Auricular Acupuncture for Autonomic Balance and Pain in Fibromyalgia
Fibromyalgia Syndrome
Not yet recruiting
Auricular Indwelling Needles Added to Diosmin/Hesperidin for Grade I-II Internal Hemorrhoids With Heat-Toxin Syndrome
Internal Haemorrhoids
Active, not recruiting
PEACE: Comparing Chronic Pain Treatment Options
Chronic Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain
Not yet recruiting
Ear-Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Body Acupuncture for Gut Motility in Elderly ICU Patients
Gastrointestinal Dysfunction, Critical Illness
Not yet recruiting
Acupuncture Versus Sham Acupuncture for Tinnitus
Tinnitus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Padmavathi Patel, MD principal investigator
Wayne State University, John D. Dingell VA Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Auricular acupuncture in people with Acupuncture, Ear, run by Anesthesiology WSU/DMC-NorthStar at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Mar 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Postoperative Opioid Consumption (time frame: 24 hours). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04615299, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Mar 2022.