AzTrials
AzTrials

Glioblastoma MultiformeGLIORADNCT04610229

Safety of IMRT Treatment With Inhomogeneous Dose in Patients With Relapsed High-grade Gliomas.

A study testing Hypofractionation guioded by dose painting in people with Glioblastoma Multiforme and Glioblastoma, run by Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Relapsed GBMs have a life expectancy of a few months and re-radiation has proven to be safe in terms of toxicity and effective in increasing OS. One of our studies [Ciammella P, 2013, 8:222] reported a median survival of 9.5 months in patients with recurrent GBM and treated with stereotactic radiotherapy with a total… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Hypofractionation guioded by dose painting
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
12 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
1 Feb 2016to 26 Aug 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • relapsed GBM after standard surgery-radio-chemotherapy treatment or other therapeutic lines or GBM secondary to anaplastic astrocytomas previously treated with RT and chemotherapy or recurrent anaplastic astrocytomas
  • ECOG Performance Status 0-2, Performance Karnofsky Score> 60.
  • Written informed consent.
  • Life expectancy> 3 months.
  • Availability of the patient to be followed for all the phases of the chemotherapy treatment and for the subsequent follow-up.-

Who cannot join

  • Patients with KPS <70%.
  • Participation in other studies that involve the administration of experimental drugs or explicitly exclude the possibility of participating in other studies in general or in studies whose features include aspects of this study.
  • Any concurrent medical or psychological condition that may prevent participation in the study or compromise the ability to provide informed consent.
  • Pregnant and lactating patients

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Radiotherapy Unit Ausl Irccs Reggio Emilia

    Reggio Emilia, 42123

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Safety of Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy Treatment With Inhomogeneous Dose Distribution in Patients With Relapsed High-grade Gliomas.

Relapsed GBMs have a life expectancy of a few months and re-radiation has proven to be safe in terms of toxicity and effective in increasing OS. One of our studies [Ciammella P, 2013, 8:222] reported a median survival of 9.5 months in patients with recurrent GBM and treated with stereotactic radiotherapy with a total dose of 25 Gy in 5 consecutive sessions, in which the dose was prescribed to 70% isodose with a homogeneous gradient towards the center of the target volume. The identification with functional imaging of specific areas with higher tumor cell density, and the possibility of delivering precisely, thanks to the most advanced therapy units, different doses to the different sub-volumes, can lead to an increase in the maximum dose that can be delivered at the expense of the most aggressive areas (with a greater effect on the tumor), compared to smaller doses in areas with lower signal alteration. This selectivity of the doses should allow an increase in the efficacy of the therapy and therefore a hypothetical increase in local control, compared to a radio-induced toxicity on the surrounding healthy tissues almost comparable to that achieved with the previous hypofractionated treatments [Ciammella P, 2013]. In fact, delivering many high doses to the entire volume would result in an excess of radio-induced necrosis within the irradiated regions with high dose, as well as the impossibility of minimizing the doses on healthy areas and / or on non-neoplastic critical areas keeping them at internal dose ranges related to minimal and acceptable toxicity levels. Since there are no studies providing clear indications on the acute and late toxicity of irradiated healthy tissues that have already been the subject of a first course of radiotherapy (STUPP), the choice of safety is the primary objective of the study.

Read the detailed description

It is an exploratory, prospective, experimental, monocentric study. Having identified a main safety endpoint (toxicity of radiotherapy treatment) and in the absence of data currently available from previous studies and useful for sizing the sample, the sample is defined according to opportunity and feasibility criteria, (12 cases), with a drawing (3 cases + 3 cases + 6 cases) which provides for two intermediate safety assessment steps one month after the end of the third and sixth patient treatment. The study will be continued only in case of positive evaluation of both steps. For each individual patient the treatment is considered completed if: a) the experimental radiotherapy treatment has been completed; b) the first follow-up radiological assessment (NMR) was performed; c) the study treatment was prematurely interrupted due to lack of efficacy (documented disease progression) or unacceptable toxicity.

  • Treatment: the treatment foreseen by the protocol foresees the planning and the execution of a hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) treatment, administered in 5 daily sessions, with intensity modulated technique and inhomogeneous distribution of the dose guided by the diffusion images obtained with magnetic resonance (RM). The radiotherapy treatment must start within 7 days from the date of execution of the centering MRI which will include both the classic morphological sequences with administration of contrast medium and functional ones. In selected cases and according to clinical judgment it will be possible to request the revision of the anatomopathological and radiological findings.
  • Radiation technique: for each patient, a radiotherapy treatment plan will be performed with conformed techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with dose redistribution: dose-painting.
  • Positioning and immobilization of the patient: the patient must be treated in a supine position. The arms must be positioned along the body. The use of a knee support is recommended. The garment will be immobilized with a thermoplastic mask and corresponding neck rest supports.
  • TC and planning RM: the planning CT should be acquired possibly with reduced layer thickness that contains the entire volume of the skull and the upper part of the shoulders. This is done to allow the possibility of planning non-coplanar type treatments. The last follow-up MRI, or the radiotherapy centering RM, composed of standard and functional sequences, is used for planning, in addition to those that the neuroradiologist will have considered useful to better characterize the clinical case under examination. More details on this are described in the Technical Annex.
  • Target volume and organs at risk (OAR): the following target volumes must be identified: • Gross tumor volume (GTV): it is defined using and combining the conventional and advanced sequences of the NMR. • Planning target volume (PTV): it is represented by the GTV with three-dimensional expansion between 0 and 5 mm according to the problems highlighted during the tumor segmentation phase. See the Technical Annex in this regard.
  • The following risky organs (OAR) must be identified: • Optical nerves: the definition of the related planning risk volume is also suggested (PRV: organ at risk with three-dimensional expansion; this margin must be chosen taking into account the acquisition thickness of the centering TC and the chosen GTV-PTV expansion margin). • chiasm. We also suggest the definition of the relative PRV (organ at risk with three-dimensional expansion; this margin must be chosen taking into account the acquisition thickness of the centering CT and the chosen GTV-PTV expansion margin). • retinas. We also suggest the definition of the relative PRV (organ at risk with three-dimensional expansion; this margin must be chosen taking into account the acquisition thickness of the centering CT and the chosen GTV-PTV expansion margin). Alternatively the eye globes can be surrounded. • Encefalic trunk.
  • The following secondary OARs must be identified: • Lenses / Crystalline. We also suggest the definition of the relative PRV (organ at risk with three-dimensional expansion; this margin must be chosen taking into account the acquisition thickness of the centering CT and the chosen GTV-PTV expansion margin). • Healthy brain tissue. It is represented by the encephalon volume minus the PTV. • Screw. We also suggest the definition of the relative PRV (organ at risk with three-dimensional expansion; this margin must be chosen taking into account the acquisition thickness of the centering CT and the chosen GTV-PTV expansion margin).
  • Dose prescription: i) Dose to the target: the prescription dose foresees a minimum dose of 30 Gy (6 Gy per session) for the areas with the highest ADC with a gradual increase in the dose of the lower ADC areas. The maximum hypothesized dose is 50 Gy, with a dose of 10 Gy per session to no more than 1cc of the irradiated brain tissue. The treatment plan, however, will be processed in the following order of priority: 1. Compliance with dose limits for primary OARs. 2. PTV coverage. 3. Compliance with dose limits for secondary OARs.
  • Dose limits for primary risk organs: in the scientific literature there are various studies that indicate the dose limits of the organs at risk for brain radiation treatments.
Being tested
Hypofractionation guioded by dose painting
Keywords
dose painting, hypofractionation, recurrent glioblastoma, tumour, radiotherapy, retreatment, brain
Medical subject headings
Glioblastoma, Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Hypofractionation guioded by dose paintingRadiation

    1

Study groups in NCT04610229
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Treated with hypofractionationExperimental1
Receives: Radiation: Hypofractionation guioded by dose painting

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of adverse events occuring after treatment

    Evaluation of side effects in order to assess the risk / benefit ratio. Values greater than G3 according to the CTCAE v.4.0 scale will be considered adverse events.

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Local control according to the RANO criteria

    Evaluation of the response rate according to the RANO criteria

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Incidence of radionecrosis

    Incidence of treatment-related radionecrosis measured with advanced magnetic resonance sequences.

    Measured: 3 months

  3. Proportion of patients alive 3 months after treatment

    Evaluation of survival in retreated patients

    Measured: 3 months

  4. Change in health related global quality of life (QOL)

    Health related QOL (HRQOL) evaluations using the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3) questionnaire. Raw scores will be transformed to a linear scale ranging from 0 to 100 (according to the standard EORTC) with a higher score representing a higher level for functioning or higher livel of symptomatology or problems.

    [N.W.Scott et al, Qual Life, 2009, 18:381-388]

    Measured: 3 months

  5. Change in health related quality of life (QOL) for brain cancer disease

    Brain cancer specific QOL evaluated by using the EORTC QLQ - BN20 questionnaire. Raw scores will be transformed to a linear scale ranging from 0 to 100 (according to the standard EORTC) with a higher score representing a higher level for functioning or higher livel of symptomatology or problems.

    [MJB Taphoorn et al, EJC, 2010, 46:1033-1040]

    Measured: 3 months

  6. Proportion of patients with disease progression 3 months after treatment

    Evaluation of disease progression in retreated patients

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Oct 2020
  2. Study start1 Feb 2016
  3. Primary completion12 Aug 2019
  4. Study completion26 Aug 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
12 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04610229
Sponsor's protocol ID
GLIORAD_15-18
Acronym
GLIORAD
Status last verified
Apr 2019
First submitted
25 Aug 2020
Last updated
12 Jun 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Ciammella P, Podgornii A, Galeandro M, D'Abbiero N, Pisanello A, Botti A, Cagni E, Iori M, Iotti C. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy for recurrent glioblastoma: single institutional experience. Radiat Oncol. 2013 Sep 25;8:222. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-222.

    PubMed 24066926
  • Franco P, De Bari B, Ciammella P, Fiorentino A, Chiesa S, Amelio D, Pinzi V, Bonomo P, Vagge S, Fiore M, Comito T, Cecconi A, Mortellaro G, Bruni A, Trovo M, Filippi AR, Greto D, Alongi F; AIRO Giovani Italian Association of Radiation Oncology, Young Members Working Group. The role of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in oncological and non-oncological clinical settings: highlights from the 7th Meeting of AIRO--Young Members Working Group (AIRO Giovani). Tumori. 2014 Nov-Dec;100(6):e214-9. doi: 10.1700/1778.19280.

    PubMed 25688503
  • Filippi AR, Ciammella P, Piva C, Ragona R, Botto B, Gavarotti P, Merli F, Vitolo U, Iotti C, Ricardi U. Involved-site image-guided intensity modulated versus 3D conformal radiation therapy in early stage supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin lymphoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jun 1;89(2):370-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.01.041. Epub 2014 Mar 7.

    PubMed 24613810
  • Navarria P, Minniti G, Clerici E, Tomatis S, Pinzi V, Ciammella P, Galaverni M, Amelio D, Scartoni D, Scoccianti S, Krengli M, Masini L, Draghini L, Maranzano E, Borzillo V, Muto P, Ferrarese F, Fariselli L, Livi L, Pasqualetti F, Fiorentino A, Alongi F, di Monale MB, Magrini S, Scorsetti M. Re-irradiation for recurrent glioma: outcome evaluation, toxicity and prognostic factors assessment. A multicenter study of the Radiation Oncology Italian Association (AIRO). J Neurooncol. 2019 Mar;142(1):59-67. doi: 10.1007/s11060-018-03059-x. Epub 2018 Dec 4.

    PubMed 30515706
  • Ciammella P, Galeandro M, D'Abbiero N, Podgornii A, Pisanello A, Botti A, Cagni E, Iori M, Iotti C. Hypo-fractionated IMRT for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: a 6 year single institutional experience. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Sep;115(9):1609-14. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Feb 26.

    PubMed 23453151
  • Orlandi M, Botti A, Sghedoni R, Cagni E, Ciammella P, Iotti C, Iori M. Feasibility of voxel-based Dose Painting for recurrent Glioblastoma guided by ADC values of Diffusion-Weighted MR imaging. Phys Med. 2016 Dec;32(12):1651-1658. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.11.106. Epub 2016 Dec 16.

    PubMed 27989415

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Hypofractionation guioded by dose painting in people with Glioblastoma Multiforme and Glioblastoma, run by Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of adverse events occuring after treatment (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04610229, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in