AzTrials
AzTrials

NeoplasmsPhase 3NCT04607421

A Study of Encorafenib Plus Cetuximab With or Without Chemotherapy in People With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

A Phase 3 study testing Encorafenib, Cetuximab and Oxaliplatin in people with Neoplasms, run by Pfizer at 274 sites in 29 countries.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate two study medicines (encorafenib plus cetuximab) taken alone or together with standard chemotherapy for the potential treatment of colorectal cancer that: has spread to other parts of the body (metastatic); has a certain type of abnormal gene called "BRAF"; and has not received… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Neoplasms
What is being tested?
Encorafenib, Cetuximab and Oxaliplatin
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
841 participants
Where
274 sitesin 29 countries
Study dates
21 Dec 2020to 29 Jul 2027
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Safety Lead-In = Male/female ≥ 18 years old
  • Phase 3 and Cohort 3: Male/female ≥ 16 years old (where permitted locally)
  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed Stage IV CRC that contains BRAF V600E mutation
  • Prior systemic treatment in metastatic setting: 0-1 regimens for Safety Lead In; none for Phase 3 and Cohort 3. (Note: Prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy considered metastatic treatment if relapse/metastasis < 6 month from end of adj/neoadjuvant treatment )
  • Measurable disease (Phase 3 and Cohort 3)/ Measurable or evaluable disease (Safety Lead-in)
  • ECOG PS 0-1
  • Adequate organ function

Who cannot join

  • Tumors that are locally confirmed or unknown MSI-H or dMMR unless participant is ineligible to receive immune checkpoint inhibitors due to a pre-existing medical condition
  • Active bacterial or viral infections in 2 weeks prior to starting dosing
  • Symptomatic brain metastases

Trial locations and contacts

274 sites in 29 countries.

274 sites in 29 countries

United States63 sites
  • Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aventura

    Aventura, Florida, 33180

  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center - Basking Ridge

    Basking Ridge, New Jersey, 07920

  • Summit Medical Group

    Berkeley Heights, New Jersey, 07922

  • UChicago Medicine - River East

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • University of Chicago Medical Center

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637

  • Siteman Cancer Center - St Peters

    City of Saint Peters, Missouri, 63376

  • Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center Investigational Pharmacy

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • The Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210

  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Investigational Drug Services

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210

  • Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Cancer

    Columbus, Ohio, 43212

  • Martha Morehouse Medical Plaza

    Columbus, Ohio, 43221

  • The James Outpatient Care West Campus

    Columbus, Ohio, 43221

  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Commack

    Commack, New York, 11725

  • Siteman Cancer Center - West County

    Creve Coeur, Missouri, 63141

  • Summit Medical Group

    Florham Park, New Jersey, 07932

  • Siteman Cancer Center - North County

    Florissant, Missouri, 63031

  • UChicago Medicine at Ingalls - Flossmoor

    Flossmoor, Illinois, 60422

  • The West Clinic. PLLC. dba West Cancer Center

    Germantown, Tennessee, 38138

  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center - Westchester

    Harrison, New York, 10604

  • UChicago Medicine Ingalls Memorial

    Harvey, Illinois, 60426

  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Keck Hospital of USC

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

  • LAC & USC Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

  • USC / Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

  • USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center/Investigational Drug Services

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

  • USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

  • University of Wisconsin Clinical Science Center

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53792

  • Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center

    Miami Beach, Florida, 33140

  • Mount Sinai Medical Center

    Miami Beach, Florida, 33140

  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center- Monmouth

    Middletown, New Jersey, 07748

  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center- Bergen

    Montvale, New Jersey, 07645

  • Henry-Joyce Cancer Clinic

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232

  • Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232

  • University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center at Silver Cross Hospital

    New Lenox, Illinois, 60451

  • Ochsner Clinic Foundation

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121

  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

    New York, New York, 10022

  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center - Main Campus

    New York, New York, 10065

  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, OU Health Stephenson Cancer Center

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104

  • Oncology Hematology West PC dba Nebraska Cancer Specialists

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68114

  • Oncology Hematology West PC dba Nebraska Cancer Specialists

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68124

  • Oncology Hematology West PC dba Nebraska Cancer Specialists

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68130

  • The University of Chicago Medicine Center for Advanced Care Orland Park

    Orland Park, Illinois, 60462

  • Oncology Hematology West PC dba Nebraska Cancer Specialists

    Papillion, Nebraska, 68046

  • Keck Hospital of USC Pasadena

    Pasadena, California, 91105

  • Mayo Clinic Hospital

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85054

  • UPMC Hillman Cancer Center

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232

  • BRCR Global

    Plantation, Florida, 33322

  • BRCR Medical Center Inc.

    Plantation, Florida, 33322

  • Providence Cancer Institute Franz Clinic

    Portland, Oregon, 97213

  • Providence Portland Medical Center

    Portland, Oregon, 97213

  • Providence Onc and Heme Care Clinic - Westside

    Portland, Oregon, 97225

  • Providence St Vincent Medical Center

    Portland, Oregon, 97225

  • Virginia Commonwealth University

    Richmond, Virginia, 23219

  • Mayo Clinic Rochester

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

  • Mayo Clinic in Arizona - Scottsdale

    Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259

  • Seattle Cancer Care Alliance

    Seattle, Washington, 98109

  • University of Washington Medical Center

    Seattle, Washington, 98195

  • Barnes- Jewish Hospital

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Washington University School of Medicine

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Siteman Cancer Center - South County

    St Louis, Missouri, 63129

  • UChicago Medicine at Ingalls - Tinley Park

    Tinley Park, Illinois, 60477

  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center- Nassau

    Uniondale, New York, 11553

Other trials in United States

China21 sites
  • Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Science

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100021

  • Peking University First Hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100034

  • Beijing Cancer hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100142

  • Beijing Hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730

  • The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

    Changsha, Hunan, 410011

  • The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

    Changsha, Hunan, 410013

  • Sichuan Province Cancer Hospital

    Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041

  • Chongqing University Cancer Hospital

    Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, 400030

  • Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

    Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001

  • The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510655

  • The second Affiliated Hospital of College of Medicine, Zhejiang University

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000

  • Shandong province cancer hospital

    Jinan, Shandong, 250117

  • Yunnan Cancer Hospital(The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University)

    Kunming, Yunnan, 650118

  • Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School

    Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210008

  • Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University

    Nanning, Guangxi, 530200

  • Shanghai General Hospital

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200080

  • Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 201800

  • Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center

    Shanghai, 201321

  • Shengjing Hospital Of China Medical University

    Shenyang, Liaoning, 110022

  • Tianjin Union Medical Center

    Tianjin, 300000

  • Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology

    Wuhan, Hubei, 430030

Other trials in China

Japan19 sites
  • Chiba cancer center

    Chiba, Chiba, 260-8717

  • National Cancer Center Hospital

    Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045

  • National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center

    Fukuoka, 811-1395

  • Saitama Medical University International Medical Center

    Hidaka, Saitama, 350-1298

  • Saitama Prefectural Cancer Center

    Ina-machi, Saitama, 362-0806

  • Kanazawa University Hospital

    Kanazawa, Ishikawa-ken, 920-8641

  • National Cancer Center Hospital East

    Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577

  • St. Marianna University Hospital

    Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511

  • The Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR

    Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550

  • Aichi Cancer Center Hospital

    Nagoya, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681

  • Shizuoka Cancer Center

    Nakatogari, Shizuoka, 411-8777

  • Osaka Prefectural Hospital Organization Osaka International Cancer Institute

    Osaka, Osaka, 5418567

  • National Hospital Organization - Osaka National Hospital - Institute For Clinical Research

    Osaka, 540-0006

  • Hokkaido University Hospital

    Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8648

  • Kindai University Hospital

    Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511

  • Keio university hospital

    Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582

  • Osaka University Hospital

    Suita, Osaka, 565-0871

  • Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital

    Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686

  • Kanagawa cancer center

    Yokohama, Kanagawa, 2418515

Other trials in Japan

Germany13 sites
  • Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Kurfuerstendamm

    Berlin, 10707

  • HELIOS Klinikum Berlin Buch GmbH

    Berlin, 13125

  • Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch

    Berlin, 13125

  • Radiologie Berlin

    Charlottenburg, 10719

  • Technische Universität Dresden, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus

    Dresden, 01307

  • Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden

    Dresden, 01307

  • Institut für Klinisch Onkologische Forschung

    Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60488

  • Facharztzentrum Eppendorf

    Hamburg, 20249

  • Israelitisches Krankenhaus IK

    Hamburg, 22297

  • Radiologie im Israelitischen Krankenhaus

    Hamburg, 22297

  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover

    Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30625

  • Universitätsklinikum Leipzig

    Leipzig, Saxony, 04103

  • Muenchen Klinik Neuperlach, Klinik fuer Haematologie und Onkologie

    Munich, Bavaria, 81737

Other trials in Germany

Australia12 sites
  • Central Adelaide Local Health Network Incorporated

    Adelaide, South Australia, 5000

  • The Queen Elizabeth Hospital

    Adelaide, South Australia, 5011

  • Chris O'Brien Lifehouse

    Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050

  • Monash Health

    Clayton, Victoria, 3168

  • Austin Health

    Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084

  • Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital

    Herston, Queensland, 4029

  • Liverpool Hospital

    Liverpool, New South Wales, 2170

  • Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3000

  • Alfred Health

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3004

  • GenesisCare - North Shore

    St Leonards, New South Wales, 2065

  • GenesisCare North Shore

    St Leonards, New South Wales, 2065

  • Princess Alexandra Hospital

    Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102

Other trials in Australia

Russia12 sites
  • GBUZ

    Chelyabinsk, 454087

  • Kaluga Regional Clinical Oncology Center

    Kaluga, 248007

  • FSAEI HE I.M Sechenov First MSMU MoH Russia (Sechenovskiy University),

    Moscow, 119991

  • BHI of Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Dispensary"

    Omsk, 644013

  • BHI of Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Dispensary"

    Omsk, 644046

  • Private Medical Institution "Euromedservice"

    Pushkin, Sankt-Peterburg, 196603

  • LLC "Medicina Severnoy Stolitsy"

    Saint Petersburg, 191025

  • LLC "Severo-Zapadny Medical Center"

    Saint Petersburg, 192007

  • Private Healthcare Institution "Clinical Hospital "RZD-Medicine" of St. Petersburg

    Saint Petersburg, 195271

  • LLC "EuroCityClinic"

    Saint Petersburg, 197022

  • FSBI "Russian Scientific Center For Radiology and Surgical Technologies n.a. Academician A.M. Granov

    Saint Petersburg, 197758

  • SHI YR Regional Clinical Oncology Hospital

    Yaroslavl, 150054

Other trials in Russia

Spain12 sites
  • Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron

    Barcelona, 08035

  • Hospital Clinic Barcelona

    Barcelona, 08036

  • Hospital General Universitario de Elche

    Elche, Alicante, 03203

  • ICO L'Hospitalet (Hospital Duran i Reynals)

    L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08908

  • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon

    Madrid, 28007

  • Hospital Universitario Ramon Y Cajal

    Madrid, 28034

  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre

    Madrid, 28041

  • Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, 15706

  • Hospital Universitario Virgen Del Rocio

    Seville, 41013

  • Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia

    Valencia, 46010

  • Hospital General Universitario de Valencia

    Valencia, 46014

  • Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet

    Zaragoza, 50009

Other trials in Spain

Italy10 sites
  • Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero

    Brescia, 25124

  • Fondazione del Piemonte per l'Oncologia - Istituto di Candiolo IRCCS

    Candiolo, Torino, 10060

  • ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda

    Milan, Milano, 20162

  • Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS

    Milan, 20141

  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Cagliari - Presidio Policlinico Universitario "D.Casula"

    Monserrato (CA), Cagliari, 09042

  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria dell'Università "Luigi Vanvitelli" di Napoli

    Naples, 80131

  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Luigi Gonzaga

    Orbassano, Torino, 10043

  • IRCCS Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IOV)

    Padova, 35128

  • Azienda USL - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia - Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova

    Reggio Emilia, 42123

  • IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza

    San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, 71013

Other trials in Italy

Brazil9 sites
  • Fundação Pio XII - Hospital de Câncer de Barretos

    Barretos, São Paulo, 14.780-070

  • Fundação Pio XII - Hospital de Câncer de Barretos

    Barretos, São Paulo, 14784400

  • Reichow - Centro de Ensino e Pesquisa

    Blumenau, Santa Catarina, 89010-340

  • Clínica de Neoplasias Litoral

    Itajaí, Santa Catarina, 88301-220

  • Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-903

  • Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva - INCA

    Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 20230-130

  • CEPHO - Centro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Hematologia e Oncologia - Faculdade de Medicina do ABC

    Santo André, São Paulo, 09060-650

  • FUNDAÇÃO DO ABC - Faculdade de Medicina do ABC - Centro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Hematologia e Onco

    Santo André, São Paulo, 09060-870

  • Fundação Faculdade Regional de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto

    São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, 15090000

Other trials in Brazil

South Korea9 sites
  • Dong-A University Hospital

    Busan, 49201

  • Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital

    Daegu, 41404

  • National Cancer Center

    Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 10408

  • Gachon University Gil Medical Center

    Incheon, 21565

  • Korea University Anam Hospital

    Seoul, 02841

  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul, 03080

  • Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System

    Seoul, 03722

  • Asan Medical Center

    Seoul, 05505

  • Samsung Medical Center

    Seoul, 06351

Other trials in South Korea

Belgium8 sites
  • ZNA Middelheim

    Antwerp, 2020

  • Université Libre de Bruxelles - Hôpital Erasme

    Brussels, Bruxelles-capitale, Région de, 1070

  • Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc

    Brussels, Bruxelles-capitale, Région de, 1200

  • Grand Hôpital de Charleroi

    Charleroi, Hainaut, 6060

  • AZ Groeninge Campus Kennedylaan

    Kortrijk, West-vlaanderen, 8500

  • UZ Leuven

    Leuven, 3000

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - Domaine Universitaire du Sart Tilman

    Liège, 4000

  • ZAS Augustinus

    Wilrijk, 2610

Other trials in Belgium

Finland8 sites
  • Docrates Syöpäsairaala

    Helsinki, Uusimaa, 00180

  • Helsinki University Central Hospital

    Helsinki, Uusimaa, 00290

  • Oulu University Hospital

    Oulu, 90220

  • Satakunnan Keskussairaala

    Pori, 28500

  • Tampereen yliopistollinen sairaala

    Tampere, 33520

  • Tampereen yliopistollinen sairaala

    Tampere, 33521

  • Turku University Hospital

    Turku, Southwest Finland, 20520

  • Turku University Hospital

    Turku, 20520

Other trials in Finland

Taiwan8 sites
  • Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital

    Kaohsiung City, 807

  • China Medical University Hospital

    Taichung, 404

  • National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

    Tainan, 704

  • Chi Mei Hospital, Liouying

    Tainan, 73657

  • National Taiwan University Hospital

    Taipei, 100

  • Taipei Medical University Hospital

    Taipei, 11031

  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital

    Taipei, 112

  • Chang Gung Medical Foundation-Linkou Branch

    Taoyuan, 333

Other trials in Taiwan

Bulgaria7 sites
  • MHAT "Dr. Tota Venkova" AD

    Gabrovo, 5300

  • MHAT Uni Hospital OOD

    Panagyurishte, Pazardzhik, 4500

  • MHAT Central Onco Hospital OOD

    Plovdiv, 4000

  • Complex Oncology Center - Plovdiv EOOD

    Plovdiv, 4004

  • Medical Center Nadezhda Clinical EOOD

    Sofia, 1303

  • Acibadem City Clinic MHAT Tokuda

    Sofia, 1407

  • University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Sofiamed

    Sofia, 1750

Other trials in Bulgaria

Canada7 sites
  • Alberta Health Services - Cancer Care, Tom Baker Cancer Centre

    Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2

  • Arthur J.E. Child Comprehensive Cancer Centre

    Calgary, Alberta, T3N 4N1

  • Cross Cancer Institute

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2

  • Alberta Health Services and The Governors of The University of Alberta

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2C8

  • London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre

    London, Ontario, N6A 5W9

  • Jewish General Hospital

    Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2

  • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

    Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5

Other trials in Canada

Denmark6 sites
  • Aalborg Universitetshospital, Syd

    Aalborg, North Denmark, 9000

  • Rigshospitalet

    Copenhagen, 2100

  • Herlev and Gentofte Hospital

    Herlev, 2730

  • Odense University Hospital

    Odense C, 5000

  • Vejle Hospital-Sygehus Lillebaelt

    Vejle, Region Syddanmark, 7100

  • Vejle Sygehus

    Vejle, Region Syddanmark, 7100

Other trials in Denmark

India6 sites
  • Sawai Man Singh Medical College Hospital (SMS Hospital)

    Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302004

  • Tata Memorial Hospital

    Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012

  • Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute And Research Centre

    New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110085

  • Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital & Research Centre

    Pune, Maharashtra, 411 004

  • Sahyadri Speciality Hospital

    Pune, Maharashtra, 411 004

  • Bhakti Vedanta Hospital and Research Institute

    Thane, Maharashtra, 401107

Other trials in India

United Kingdom6 sites
  • Heartlands Hospital

    Birmingham, B9 5SS

  • Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

    London, W12 0HS

  • Hammersmith Hospital

    London, W6 8RF

  • Freeman Hospital

    Newcastle upon Tyne, HIGH Heaton, NE7 7DN

  • Churchill Hospital - Oncology

    Oxford, OX3 7LE

  • Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

    Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT

Other trials in United Kingdom

Czechia5 sites
  • Fakultní nemocnice Brno Bohunice

    Brno, Brno-město, 625 00

  • Fakultni nemocnice Hradec Kralove

    Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, 500 05

  • Fakultni nemocnice Olomouc

    Olomouc, 779 00

  • Fakultni Thomayerova nemocnice

    Prague, Praha 4, 14059

  • Fakultni nemocnice Bulovka

    Prague, 180 81

Other trials in Czechia

Poland5 sites
  • Szpital Specjalistyczny W Brzozowie, Podkarpacki Osrodek Onkologiczny Im.Ks.B.Markiewicza

    Brzozów, 36-200

  • Wojewodzki Szpital Specjalistyczny Nr 4 w Bytomiu Oddzial Onkologii

    Bytom, 41-902

  • COPERNICUS PL sp. z. o. o. Wojewodzkie Centrum Onkologii w Gdansku Ambulatoryjna

    Gdansk, 80-219

  • COPERNICUS Podmiot Leczniczy Sp. z o.o. Wojewodzkie Centrum Onkologii

    Gdansk, 80-219

  • Przychodnia Lekarska KOMED

    Konin, Greater Poland Voivodeship, 62-500

Other trials in Poland

Sweden5 sites
  • Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset

    Gothenburg, Västra Götalands LÄN [se14], 413 45

  • Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset Solna

    Solna, Stockholms LÄN [se-01], 171 64

  • Department of Pelvic cancer, colorecta section, Karolinska University Hospital

    Stockholm, 171 76

  • Norrlands universitetssjukhus

    Umeå, Västerbottens LÄN [se-24], 90185

  • Akademiska sjukhuset

    Uppsala, Uppsala LÄN [se-03], 751 85

Other trials in Sweden

Argentina4 sites
  • Instituto Médico Especializado Alexander Fleming

    Buenos Aires, 1426

  • Clinica Universitaria Reina Fabiola

    Córdoba, X5004FHP

  • Hospital Privado Centro Médico de Córdoba

    Córdoba, X5016KEH

  • Centro Medico San Roque

    San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, 4000

Other trials in Argentina

Norway4 sites
  • Sørlandet Sykehus Kristiansand

    Kristiansand, Vest-agder, N-4615

  • Oslo universitetssykehus, Radiumhospitalet

    Oslo, 0379

  • Oslo Universitetssykehus Ullevål

    Oslo, 0450

  • St. Olavs hospital

    Trondheim, Sør-trøndelag, 7030

Other trials in Norway

Ukraine4 sites
  • Municipal Non-profit Enterprise "City Clinical Hospital #4" of Dnipro City Council

    Dnipro, 49102

  • Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University

    Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018

  • MNPE "Prykarpatski Clinical Oncological Center" of Ivano-Frankivsk Regional Council"

    Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018

  • Communal enterprise "Kryvyi Rih Oncology Dispensary" of Dnipropetrovsk Regional Council

    Kryvyi Rih, 50048

Other trials in Ukraine

Netherlands3 sites
  • Nederlands Kanker Instituut - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AVL)

    Amsterdam, North Holland, 1066 CX

  • Catharina Ziekenhuis

    Eindhoven, North Brabant, 5623 EJ

  • Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht

    Utrecht, 3584 CX

Other trials in Netherlands

South Africa3 sites
  • Wits Health Consortium (Pty) Ltd

    Johannesburg, 2193

  • Cancercare Langenhoven Drive Oncology Centre

    Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape, 6045

  • Cancercare Rondebosch Oncology

    Rondebosch, CAPE TOWN, 7700

Other trials in South Africa

Mexico2 sites
  • Accelerium, S. de R.L. de C.V.

    Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64000

  • Centro de Investigacion Clinica de Oaxaca

    Oaxaca City, 68020

Other trials in Mexico

Slovakia2 sites
  • Narodny Onkologicky Ustav

    Bratislava, 833 10

  • Vychodoslovensky onkologicky ustav, a.s.

    Košice, 04191

Other trials in Slovakia

New Zealand1 site
  • Auckland City Hospital

    Auckland, 1023

Other trials in New Zealand

About this study

Official title: AN OPEN-LABEL, MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED PHASE 3 STUDY OF FIRST-LINE ENCORAFENIB PLUS CETUXIMAB WITH OR WITHOUT CHEMOTHERAPY VERSUS STANDARD OF CARE THERAPY WITH A SAFETY LEAD-IN OF ENCORAFENIB AND CETUXIMAB PLUS CHEMOTHERAPY IN PARTICIPANTS WITH METASTATIC BRAF V600E-MUTANT COLORECTAL CANCER

The purpose of this study is to evaluate two study medicines (encorafenib plus cetuximab) taken alone or together with standard chemotherapy for the potential treatment of colorectal cancer that:

  • has spread to other parts of the body (metastatic);
  • has a certain type of abnormal gene called "BRAF"; and
  • has not received prior treatment.
Read more

Participants in this study will receive one of the following study treatments:

  • Encorafenib plus cetuximab: These participants will receive encorafenib by mouth at home every day and cetuximab once every two weeks by intravenous (IV) infusion (an injection into the vein) at the study clinic.
  • Encorafenib plus cetuximab with chemotherapy: These participants will receive encorafenib and cetuximab in the way described in the bullet above. Additionally, they will receive standard chemotherapy by IV infusion and oral treatment at home.
  • Chemotherapy alone: These participants will receive chemotherapy, the standard treatment for this condition, by IV infusion at the study clinics and oral treatment at home.

This study is currently enrolling participants who will receive either encorafenib plus cetuximab with chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone.

The study team will monitor how each participant responds to the study treatment for up to about 3 years.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of the study is to evaluate whether encorafenib plus cetuximab (EC), alone or in combination with chemotherapy, can improve clinical outcomes relative to current standard of-care chemotherapy in participants with previously untreated BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC. Since encorafenib has not previously been combined with chemotherapy, the tolerability and PK of EC in combination with mFOLFOX6 and in combination with FOLFIRI will be evaluated in separate cohorts in the safety lead-in portion of the trial in order to identify which chemotherapy combination is to be used in the Phase 3 portion of the study.

Conditions
Neoplasms
Being tested
Encorafenib, Cetuximab, Oxaliplatin, Irinotecan, Leucovorin
Keywords
Colorectal cancer, Colon cancer, Rectal cancer, Colorectal Neoplasms, Intestinal cancer, Intestinal Neoplasms, Gastrointestinal cancer, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms, Digestive system cancer, Digestive System Neoplasms, Digestive System Diseases, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Colonic Diseases, Intestinal Diseases, Rectal Diseases, BREAKWATER Study
Medical subject headings
Neoplasms, Colorectal Neoplasms, Colonic Neoplasms, Rectal Neoplasms, Intestinal Neoplasms, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms, Digestive System Neoplasms, Digestive System Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EncorafenibDrug

    Also called Braftovi, PF-07263896, LGX818, ONO-7702

    75 mg capsules

  • CetuximabDrug

    Also called Erbitux

    Injection for intravenous use 100 mg/vial, 200 mg/vial, or 500 mg/vial

  • OxaliplatinDrug

    Also called Eloxatin

    Powder for solution for intravenous use 50 mg/vial, 100 mg/vial, or 200 mg/vial

  • IrinotecanDrug

    Also called Campostar

    Solution for intravenous infusion 40 mg/vial, 100 mg/vial, or 300 mg/vial

  • LeucovorinDrug

    Also called Wellcovorin, Fusilev, Khapzory

    Injection 50 mg/vial, 100 mg/vial, 200 mg/vial, or 350 mg/vial

  • 5-FUDrug

    Also called Fluorouracil

    Injection for intravenous use 250 mg/vial, 500 mg/vial, or 1000 mg/vial

  • CapecitabineDrug

    Also called Xeloda

    150 mg or 500 mg Tablet

  • BevacizumabDrug

    Also called Zirabev

    Optional Injection for intravenous use 100 mg/vial or 400 mg/vial

Study groups in NCT04607421
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Safety Lead-in Cohort 1ExperimentalEncorafenib 300 mg orally once daily Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 (120-minute IV infusion) every two weeks Irinotecan 180 mg/m2 (90-minute IV infusion) every two weeks Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 (120-minute IV infusion) every two weeks 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus, then 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 continuous IV infusion over 46-48 hours every two weeks
Receives: Drug: Encorafenib; Drug: Cetuximab; Drug: Irinotecan; Drug: Leucovorin; Drug: 5-FU
Safety Lead-in Cohort 2ExperimentalEncorafenib 300 mg orally once daily Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 (120 minute IV infusion) every two weeks Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 (120-minute IV infusion) every two weeks Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 (120-minute IV infusion) every two weeks 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus, then 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 continuous IV infusion over 46-48 hours every two weeks
Receives: Drug: Encorafenib; Drug: Cetuximab; Drug: Oxaliplatin; Drug: Leucovorin; Drug: 5-FU
Phase 3 Arm AExperimentalEncorafenib 300 mg orally once daily Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 (120-minute IV infusion) every two weeks
Receives: Drug: Encorafenib; Drug: Cetuximab
Phase 3 Arm BExperimentalEncorafenib 300 mg orally once daily Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 (120 minute IV infusion) every two weeks Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 (120-minute IV infusion) every two weeks Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 (120-minute IV infusion) every two weeks 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus, then 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 continuous IV infusion over 46-48 hours every two weeks
Receives: Drug: Encorafenib; Drug: Cetuximab; Drug: Oxaliplatin; Drug: Leucovorin; Drug: 5-FU
Phase 3 Arm CActive comparatorEvery two weeks: Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 (120-minute IV infusion) Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 (120-minute IV infusion) 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus, then 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 continuous IV infusion over 46-48 hours Bevacizumab (optional; given per prescribing instructions) -OR- Every two weeks: Irinotecan 165 mg/m2 (90-minute IV infusion) Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 (120-minute IV infusion) Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 (120-minute IV infusion) 5-FU 2400 or 3200 mg/m2 continuous IV infusion over 46 48 hours Bevacizumab (optional; given per prescribing instructions) -OR- Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 (120-minute IV infusion) every 3 weeks Capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 oral tablet twice daily on Days 1-14 Bevacizumab (optional; given per prescribing instructions)
Receives: Drug: Oxaliplatin; Drug: Irinotecan; Drug: Leucovorin; Drug: 5-FU; Drug: Capecitabine; Drug: Bevacizumab
Cohort 3 Arm DExperimentalEncorafenib 300 mg orally once daily Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 (120-minute IV infusion) every two weeks Irinotecan 180 mg/m2 (90-minute IV infusion) every two weeks Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 (120-minute IV infusion) every two weeks 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus, then 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 continuous IV infusion over 46-48 hours every two weeks
Receives: Drug: Encorafenib; Drug: Cetuximab; Drug: Irinotecan; Drug: Leucovorin; Drug: 5-FU
Cohort 3 Arm EActive comparatorIrinotecan 180 mg/m2 (90-minute IV infusion) every 2 weeks, Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 (120-minute IV infusion) every 2 weeks, 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus, then 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 continuous IV infusion over 46-48 hours every two weeks, Bevacizumab (optional; given per prescribing instructions)
Receives: Drug: Irinotecan; Drug: Leucovorin; Drug: 5-FU; Drug: Bevacizumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. SLI: Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLTs)

    DLT: Any AE/lab value during first 28 days (D) of treatment that met at least 1 criteria: AE/lab value unrelated to underlying disease,PD,intercurrent illness,concomitant medications resulting in inability to tolerate atleast 75% of planned dose intensity of study drug,fatigue grade (G)3>14 consecutive D, interstitial lung disease G>=2,rash,hand foot skin reaction G3>14 consecutive D or G4,diarrhea G3 >=48 hours or G4,nausea/vomiting G3>=48 hours or G4,mucositis G>=3,total bilirubin G>=3, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase G>=3 in conjunction with total bilirubin G>=2 or G3 >7 consecutive D or G4,Serum creatinine G>=3,absolute neutrophil count G4 >7 consecutive D, >=G3 febrile neutropenia,G3 platelet count decreased with signs of bleeding,platelet count G4,ECG QTcF prolonged >=G3,G>=3 uveitis >21 consecutive D,G4 confirmed by ophthalmic examination,paresthesia/dysesthesias G>=3,other G>=3 hematologic/nonhematologic toxicity except lymphocyte count decreased G>=3.

    Measured: Cycle 1 (28 days)

  2. Phase 3: Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) for Arm B vs Arm C - FAS

    PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to earliest documented disease progression (PD) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 or death due to any cause as assessed by BICR. PD: 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed, with minimum absolute increase of 5 millimeter (mm) for target disease or unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions for non-target disease or any new lesion. Censoring details: no adequate baseline assessment, including no disease at baseline: participants were censored to randomization date; no PD, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, PD or death >12 (or 16) weeks after the last adequate tumor assessment, and start of new anticancer treatment: participants were censored to last adequate tumor assessment documenting no PD prior to new anticancer therapy, or missed assessments. Analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier method.

    Measured: From date of randomization to earliest documentation of PD by BICR or death or censoring date, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 37.25 months)

  3. Phase 3: Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by BICR for Arm B vs Arm C - FAS ORR Subset

    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved best overall response (BOR) of confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST v 1.1 as assessed by BICR. CR: complete disappearance of all target lesions (with the exception of nodal disease) and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR: >=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. PD: 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed, with minimum absolute increase of 5 mm for target disease or unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions for non-target disease or any new lesion.

    Measured: From date of randomization to until documented PD by BICR, or start of subsequent anticancer therapy or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 24.71 months)

  4. Cohort 3: ORR as Assessed by BICR for Arm D vs Arm E - FAS

    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved BOR of confirmed CR or PR according to RECIST v 1.1 as assessed by BICR. CR: complete disappearance of all target lesions (with the exception of nodal disease) and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR: >=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. PD: 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed, with minimum absolute increase of 5 mm for target disease or unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions for non-target disease or any new lesion.

    Measured: From date of randomization until documented PD by BICR, or start of subsequent anticancer therapy or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 14.1 months)

Secondary outcomes (82)
  1. SLI: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in clinical study participant temporally associated with use of study intervention, whether/ not considered related to study intervention. An Serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, met one or more of the following criteria - resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or other important medical event. AEs included both SAEs and all non-SAEs.

    Measured: Through end of the study

  2. SLI: Number of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 AEs and Grade 5 AEs

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in clinical study participant temporally associated with use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to study intervention. AEs were graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version (v) 4.03 where grade 1= mild, grade 2= moderate, grade 3= severe, grade 4= life-threatening and grade 5= death related to AE. In this outcome measure, number of participants with grade 3 or 4 AEs and grade 5 AEs were reported.

    Measured: Through end of the study

  3. SLI: Number of Participants With Shift From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade >=3 Post-Baseline in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters

    The following hematology and coagulation parameters were assessed: activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged, anemia, hemoglobin increased, international normalized ratio (INR) increased, leukocytosis, neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased, and white blood cell decreased. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to NCI CTCAE version 4.03 where grade 1= mild, grade 2= moderate, grade 3= severe, grade 4= life-threatening event due to AE, and grade 5= death. Only those hematology and coagulation parameters in which at least 1 participant in any of the reporting arm had any shift from grade <=2 at baseline to grade >=3 post-baseline are reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Through end of the study

  4. SLI: Number of Participants With Shift From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade >=3 Post-Baseline in Chemistry Parameters

    The following chemistry parameters were assessed: alanine aminotransferase increased, alkaline phosphatase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, blood bilirubin increased, creatinine increased, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypernatremia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hyponatremia, and lipase increased. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to NCI CTCAE v4.03 where grade 1= mild, grade 2= moderate, grade 3= severe, grade 4= life-threatening, and grade 5= death related to AE. Only those chemistry parameters in which at least 1 participant in any of the reporting arm had any shift from grade <=2 at baseline to grade >=3 post-baseline are reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Through end of the study

  5. SLI: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data

    The criteria for vital signs included: Systolic blood pressure (millimeters of mercury [mmHg]): value <= 90 mmHg and decrease from baseline >= 20 mmHg, and value >= 160 mmHg and increase from baseline >= 20 mmHg. Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg): value <= 50 mmHg and decrease from baseline >= 15 mmHg, and value >= 100 mmHg and increase from baseline >= 15 mmHg. Pulse rate (beats per minute [bpm]): value <= 50 bpm and decrease from baseline >= 15 bpm, and value >= 120 bpm and increase from baseline >= 15 bpm. Weight (kilograms [kg]): change >= 20 % decrease from baseline, and change >=10% increase from baseline. Temperature (degree Celsius): value <=36 degree Celsius, and value >=37.5 degree Celsius. Only those criteria in which at least 1 participant in any of the reporting arm had any vital signs data are reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Through end of the study

  6. SLI: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECGs) Findings

    ECG criteria included: ECG mean heart rate (beats per minute [bpm]): increase from baseline >25% and to a value >100 bpm; decrease from baseline >25% and to a value <50 bpm, PR interval not otherwise specified (milliseconds [msec]): new >280 msec, QRS interval not otherwise specified (msec): new >120 msec, QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) not otherwise specified: new >450 msec; new >480 msec; new >500 msec; increase from baseline >30 msec and increase from baseline >60 msec. Only those criteria in which at least 1 participant in any of the reporting arm had any ECG findings are reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Through end of the study

  7. SLI: Number of Participants With Dose Modification of Any Study Intervention Due to AEs

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in clinical study participant temporally associated with use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to study intervention. Dose interruption: for encorafenib = 0 mg dose administered for >=1 days; for cetuximab, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, fluorouracil, irinotecan: >20 days between successive start dates with non-zero actual doses. Dose reduction: decrease in dose of at least 10%, from the protocol-planned dose and a decrease from the previous non-zero dose; for encorafenib to qualify as a dose reduction, it should have lasted for >=2 days. Dose modifications included both dose interruptions and reduction.

    Measured: Through end of the study

  8. SLI: Number of Participants With Dose Discontinuation of Any Study Intervention Due to AEs

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in clinical study participant temporally associated with use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to study intervention. Number of participants with dose discontinuation due to AEs were reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Through end of the study

  9. SLI: ORR as Assessed by Investigator According to Line of Therapy - FAS

    ORR: percentage of participants who achieved BOR of confirmed CR/PR per RECIST v1.1 as assessed by response reported by investigator on eCRF. CR: complete disappearance of all target lesions (with exception of nodal disease) and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis <10 mm. PR: >=30% decrease under baseline of sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. PD: 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed, with minimum absolute increase of 5 mm for target disease or unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions for non-target disease or any new lesion. Percentage of participants with ORR for first line (no prior treatment) and second line (participant received prior treatment viz. advanced/metastatic or locoregional disease or maintenance or if neoadjuvant/adjuvant with a disease recurrence occurred during or within 6 months of last therapy dose) is presented.

    Measured: From date of randomization until documented PD, or start of subsequent anticancer therapy or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 33.9 months)

  10. SLI: Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by Investigator According to Line of Therapy - FAS

    DOR: time from date of first radiographic evidence of response (CR/PR) to earliest documented PD per RECIST v1.1 as assessed by response reported by investigator on eCRF, or death by any cause. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis <10 mm. PR: >=30% decrease under baseline of sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. PD: 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed, with minimum absolute increase of 5 mm for target disease or unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions for non-target disease or any new lesion. DOR for first line and second line is presented. Analysis performed by Kaplan Meier method.

    Measured: From date of first radiographic evidence of response (CR or PR) to earliest documented PD or death due to any cause whichever occurred first (maximum up to 33.9 months)

  11. SLI: PFS as Assessed by Investigator According to Line of Therapy - FAS

    PFS: time from date of randomization to earliest documented PD per RECIST version 1.1 or death due to any cause as assessed by response reported by investigator on eCRF. PD: 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed, with minimum absolute increase of 5 mm for target disease or unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions for non-target disease or any new lesion. Censoring details: no adequate baseline assessment, including no disease at baseline: participants were censored to randomization date; no PD, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, PD or death >12 (or 16) weeks after the last adequate tumor assessment, and start of new anticancer treatment: participants were censored to last adequate tumor assessment documenting no PD prior to new anticancer therapy, or missed assessments. Participants with PFS for first line and second line were presented. Analysis performed using Kaplan Meier method.

    Measured: From date of randomization to earliest documentation of PD or death or censoring date, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 33.9 months)

  12. SLI: Time to Response (TTR) as Assessed by Investigator According to Line of Therapy - FAS

    TTR was defined as the time from the date of first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (CR or PR) per RECIST v1.1 as assessed by response reported by investigator on eCRF. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR: >= 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. In this outcome measure, TTR for first line (no prior treatment) and second line (participant received a prior treatment defined as advanced/metastatic or locoregional disease or maintenance or if neoadjuvant/adjuvant with a disease recurrence occurred during or within 6 months of the last dose of therapy) were reported.

    Measured: From date of first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (CR or PR) (maximum up to 33.9 months [147.3 weeks])

  13. SLI: Overall Survival (OS) According to Line of Therapy - FAS

    OS was defined as the time from the date of first dose to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died at the time of the cutoff for analysis, then OS was censored at the date of last contact. In this outcome measure, OS for first line (no prior treatment) and second line (participant received a prior treatment defined as advanced/metastatic or locoregional disease or maintenance or if neoadjuvant/adjuvant with a disease recurrence occurred during or within 6 months of the last dose of therapy) was presented. Analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier method.

    Measured: From date of first dose to death due to any cause or censoring date, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 33.9 months)

  14. SLI: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Encorafenib and Its Metabolite LHY746

    Cmax was observed directly from data. LHY746 is a metabolite of Encorafenib.

    Measured: Cohort 1: Pre-dose (0 hour [hr]), 0.75, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, and 48 hrs post-dose on Day 15 of Cycle 1; Cohort 2: Pre-dose (0 hr), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 48 hrs post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

  15. SLI: Area Under the Concentration Time Profile From Time Zero to 6 Hours (AUC6) for Encorafenib and Its Metabolite LHY746

    The AUC was estimated from time 0 to 6 hours post dose. AUC6 was computed using the Linear/Log trapezoidal method. LHY746 is a metabolite of Encorafenib.

    Measured: Cohort 1: Pre-dose (0 hr), 0.75, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 5.5, and 6 hrs post-dose on Day 15 of Cycle 1; Cohort 2: Predose (0 hr), 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 hrs post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

  16. SLI: Area Under the Concentration-time Profile From Time Zero to the Time Tau (AUCtau) of Encorafenib and Its Metabolite LHY746

    AUCtau was area under the concentration-time profile from time zero to time tau, the dosing interval. tau = 24 hrs for QD dosing of encorafenib. LHY746 is a metabolite of encorafenib. AUCtau can be calculated directly from the data using 24 hrs (tau) sample or can be approximately calculated by kel, where kel is the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve.

    Measured: Cohort 1: Pre-dose (0 hr), 0.75, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, and 48 hrs post-dose on Day 15 of Cycle 1; Cohort 2: Pre-dose (0 hr), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 48 hrs post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

  17. SLI: Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Encorafenib and Its Metabolite LHY746

    Tmax: time (hours) to Cmax. LHY746 is a metabolite of Encorafenib.

    Measured: Cohort 1: Pre-dose (0 hr), 0.75, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, and 48 hrs post-dose on Day 15 of Cycle 1; Cohort 2: Pre-dose (0 hr), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 48 hrs post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

  18. SLI: Apparent Total Clearance (CL/F) of Encorafenib

    Clearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. CL/F was calculated as Dose/AUCinf where dose is the dose administered divided by area under the concentration curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time (AUCinf). AUCinf was calculated as AUClast + (Clast*/kel), where Clast is last plasma concentration from the log-linear regression analysis, and kel is the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve.

    Measured: Cohort 1: Pre-dose (0 hr), 0.75, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, and 48 hrs post-dose on Day 15 of Cycle 1; Cohort 2: Pre-dose (0 hr), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 48 hrs post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

  19. SLI, Cohort 1: Cmax of Irinotecan and Its Metabolite SN-38

    Cmax was observed directly from data. SN-38 is a metabolite of Irinotecan.

    Measured: Cohort 1: Pre-dose (0 hr), 0.75, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, and 48 hrs post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

  20. SLI, Cohort 1: AUClast of Irinotecan and Its Metabolite SN-38

    AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration. AUClast was calculated using linear/log trapezoidal method. SN-38 is a metabolite of Irinotecan.

    Measured: Cohort 1: Pre-dose (0 hr), 0.75, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, and 48 hrs post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

  21. SLI, Cohort 1: Apparent Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) of Irinotecan and Its Metabolite SN-38

    t1/2 was the time measured for the drug concentration to decrease by one half. t1/2 was determined by Loge (2)/kel, where kel is the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve. SN-38 is a metabolite of Irinotecan.

    Measured: Cohort 1: Pre-dose (0 hr), 0.75, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, and 48 hrs post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

  22. SLI, Cohort 1: CL/F of Irinotecan

    Clearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. CL/F was calculated as dose administered divided by area under the concentration curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time (AUCinf). AUCinf was calculated as AUClast + (Clast*/kel), where Clast is the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point from the log-linear regression analysis, and kel is the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the loglinear concentration-time curve.

    Measured: Cohort 1: Pre-dose (0 hr), 0.75, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, and 48 hrs post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

  23. SLI, Cohort 2: Cmax of Oxaliplatin

    Cmax was observed directly from data. Oxaliplatin was evaluated as total platinum in plasma and platinum in plasma ultrafiltrate.

    Measured: Cohort 2: Pre-dose (0 hr), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 48 hrs post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

  24. SLI, Cohort 2: AUClast of Oxaliplatin

    AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration. AUClast was calculated using linear/log trapezoidal method. Oxaliplatin was evaluated as total platinum in plasma and platinum in plasma ultrafiltrate.

    Measured: Cohort 2: Pre-dose (0 hr), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 48 hrs post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

  25. SLI, Cohort 2: CL/F of Oxaliplatin

    Clearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. CL/F was calculated as dose administered divided by area under the concentration curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time (AUCinf). AUCinf was calculated as AUClast + (Clast*/kel), where Clast is the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point from the log-linear regression analysis, and kel is the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the loglinear concentration-time curve. Oxaliplatin consisted of platinum of plasma and platinum in plasma-ultrafiltrate. The clearance of platinum-ultrafiltrate has been presented in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Cohort 2: Pre-dose (0 hr), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 48 hrs post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

  26. SLI, Cohort 1: Ratio of AUCinf on Cycle 1 Day 15 as Compared to Cycle 1 Day 1 for Irinotecan and Its Metabolite SN-38

    AUCinf was calculated as AUClast + (Clast*/kel), where Clast was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point from the log-linear regression analysis, and kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the loglinear concentration-time curve. The ratio between geometric least square (LS) mean (within Cohort 1) for AUCinf on Cycle 1 Day 15 and geometric LS mean (within Cohort 1) for AUCinf on Cycle 1 Day 1 for irinotecan and its metabolite SN-38 has been presented in this outcome measure, which explains the data reported for this outcome measure using measure type as "Number".

    Measured: Cohort 1: Pre-dose (0 hr), 0.75, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, and 48 hrs post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

  27. SLI, Cohort 1: Ratio of AUClast on Cycle 1 Day 15 as Compared to Cycle 1 Day 1 for Irinotecan and Its Metabolite SN-38

    AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration. AUClast was calculated using linear/log trapezoidal method. The ratio between geometric LS mean (within Cohort 1) for AUClast on Cycle 1 Day 15 and geometric LS mean (within Cohort 1) for AUClast on Cycle 1 Day 1 for irinotecan and its metabolite SN-38 has been presented in this outcome measure, which explains the data reported for this outcome measure using measure type as "Number".

    Measured: Cohort 1: Pre-dose (0 hr), 0.75, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, and 48 hrs post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

  28. SLI, Cohort 1: Ratio of Cmax on Cycle 1 Day 15 as Compared to Cycle 1 Day 1 for Irinotecan and Its Metabolite SN-38

    Cmax was observed directly from data. The ratio between geometric LS mean (within Cohort 1) for Cmax on Cycle 1 Day 15 and geometric LS mean (within Cohort 1) for Cmax on Cycle 1 Day 1 for irinotecan and its metabolite SN-38 has been presented in this outcome measure, which explains the data reported for this outcome measure using measure type as "Number".

    Measured: Cohort 1: Pre-dose (0 hr), 0.75, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, and 48 hrs post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

  29. SLI, Cohort 2: Ratio of AUClast on Cycle 1 Day 15 as Compared to Cycle 1 Day 1 for Oxaliplatin

    AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration. AUClast was calculated using linear/log trapezoidal method. Oxaliplatin was evaluated as total platinum in plasma and platinum in plasma ultrafiltrate. The ratio between geometric LS mean (within Cohort 2) for AUClast on Cycle 1 Day 15 and geometric LS mean (within Cohort 2) for AUClast on Cycle 1 Day 1 for Oxaliplatin has been presented in this outcome measure, which explains the data reported for this outcome measure using measure type as "Number".

    Measured: Cohort 2: Pre-dose (0 hr), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 48 hrs post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

  30. SLI, Cohort 2: Ratio of Cmax on Cycle 1 Day 15 as Compared to Cycle 1 Day 1 for Oxaliplatin

    Cmax was observed directly from data. Oxaliplatin was evaluated as total platinum in plasma and platinum in plasma ultrafiltrate. The ratio between geometric LS mean (within Cohort 2) for Cmax on Cycle 1 Day 15 and geometric LS mean (within Cohort 2) for Cmax on Cycle 1 Day 1 for Oxaliplatin has been presented in this outcome measure, which explains the data reported for this outcome measure using measure type as "Number".

    Measured: Cohort 2: Pre-dose (0 hr), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 48 hrs post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

  31. Phase 3: OS for Arm B vs Arm C - FAS

    OS was defined as the time from the date of first dose to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died at the time of the cutoff for analysis, then OS was censored at the date of last contact. Analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier method.

    Measured: From date of first dose to death due to any cause or censoring date, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 37.25 months)

  32. Phase 3: ORR by Derived Investigator Assessment for Arm B vs Arm C - FAS ORR Subset

    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved BOR of confirmed CR or PR according to RECIST v 1.1 by derived investigator assessment. CR: complete disappearance of all target lesions (with the exception of nodal disease) and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR: >=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. PD: 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed, with minimum absolute increase of 5 mm for target disease or unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions for non-target disease or any new lesion.

    Measured: From date of randomization until documented PD, or start of subsequent anticancer therapy, or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 24.71 months)

  33. Phase 3: ORR as Assessed by BICR - FAS

    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved BOR of confirmed CR or PR according to RECIST v 1.1 as assessed by BICR. CR: complete disappearance of all target lesions (with the exception of nodal disease) and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR: >=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. PD: 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed, with minimum absolute increase of 5 mm for target disease or unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions for non-target disease or any new lesion.

    Measured: From date of randomization until documented PD by BICR, or start of subsequent anticancer therapy, or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 37.25 months)

  34. Phase 3: DOR as Assessed by BICR for Arm B Versus Arm C - FAS ORR Subset

    DOR was defined as the time from the date of first radiographic evidence of response (CR or PR) to the earliest documented PD per RECIST v1.1 as assessed by BICR, or death due to any cause. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR: >= 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. PD: 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed, with minimum absolute increase of 5 mm for target disease or unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions for non-target disease or any new lesion. Analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier method.

    Measured: From date of first radiographic evidence of response (CR or PR) to earliest documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 24.71 months)

  35. Phase 3: DOR by Derived Investigator Assessment for Arm B Versus Arm C - FAS ORR Subset

    DOR was defined as the time from the date of first radiographic evidence of response (CR or PR) to the earliest documented PD per RECIST v1.1 by derived investigator assessment, or death due to any cause. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR: >= 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. PD: 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed, with minimum absolute increase of 5 mm for target disease or unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions for non-target disease or any new lesion. Analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier method.

    Measured: From date of first radiographic evidence of response (CR or PR) to earliest documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 24.71 months)

  36. Phase 3: PFS as Assessed by BICR - FAS

    PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to earliest documented PD per RECIST version 1.1 or death due to any cause as assessed by BICR. PD: 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed, with minimum absolute increase of 5 mm for target disease or unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions for non-target disease or any new lesion. Censoring details: no adequate baseline assessment, including no disease at baseline: participants were censored to randomization date; no PD, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, PD or death >12 (or 16) weeks after the last adequate tumor assessment, and start of new anticancer treatment: participants were censored to last adequate tumor assessment documenting no PD prior to new anticancer therapy, or missed assessments. Analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier method.

    Measured: From date of randomization to earliest documentation of PD or death or censoring date, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 37.25 months)

  37. Phase 3: OS - FAS

    OS was defined as the time from the date of first dose to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died at the time of the cutoff for analysis, then OS was censored at the date of last contact. Analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier method.

    Measured: From date of first dose to death due to any cause or censoring date, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 37.25 months)

  38. Phase 3: PFS by Derived Investigator Assessment - FAS

    PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to earliest documented PD per RECIST version 1.1 or death due to any cause by derived investigator assessment. PD: 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed, with minimum absolute increase of 5 mm for target disease or unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions for non-target disease or any new lesion. Censoring details: no adequate baseline assessment, including no disease at baseline: participants were censored to randomization date; no PD, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, PD or death >12 (or 16) weeks after the last adequate tumor assessment, and start of new anticancer treatment: participants were censored to last adequate tumor assessment documenting no PD prior to new anticancer therapy, or missed assessments. Analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier method.

    Measured: From date of first dose to death due to any cause or censoring date, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 37.25 months)

  39. Phase 3: TTR as Assessed by BICR for Arm B vs Arm C - FAS ORR Subset

    TTR was defined as the time from the date of first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (CR or PR) per RECIST v1.1 as assessed by BICR. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR: >= 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions.

    Measured: From date of first dose to CR or PR (maximum up to 24.71 months [107.37 weeks])

  40. Phase 3: TTR by Derived Investigator Assessment for Arm B vs Arm C - FAS ORR Subset

    TTR was defined as the time from the date of first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (CR or PR) per RECIST v1.1 by derived investigator assessment. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR: >= 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions.

    Measured: From date of first dose to CR or PR (maximum up to 24.71 months [107.37 weeks])

  41. Phase 3: Progression After Next Line of Treatment (PFS2) - FAS

    PFS2 was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of discontinuation of next-line treatment after first objective PD by investigator assessment, to second objective disease progression (PD2), or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD2: was progressive disease after the start of subsequent anticancer therapy based on investigator assessment. PFS2 was censored at start date of next-line anticancer treatment (NTX) if PD date > NTX start date and there was no death, at last contact date if withdrawal of consent date >= date of randomization or end of study or if participant lost to follow-up or if no prior conditions are met or PD and no NTX and there was no death.

    Measured: From date of randomization to date of discontinuation of next-line treatment after PD or PD2 or death or censoring date, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 37.25 months)

  42. Phase 3: Number of Participants With AEs

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in clinical study participant temporally associated with use of study intervention, whether/ not considered related to study intervention. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, met one or more of the following criteria - resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or other important medical event. AEs included both SAEs and all non-SAEs.

    Measured: Through end of the study

  43. Phase 3: Number of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 AEs and Grade 5 AEs

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in clinical study participant temporally associated with use of study intervention, whether/ not considered related to study intervention. AEs were graded according to NCI-CTCAE v4.03 where grade 1= mild, grade 2= moderate, grade 3= severe, grade 4= life-threatening and grade 5= death related to AE. In this outcome measure, number of participants with grade 3 or 4 AEs and grade 5 AEs were reported.

    Measured: Through end of the study

  44. Phase 3: Number of Participants With Shift From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade >=3 Post-Baseline in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters

    The following hematology and coagulation parameters were assessed: activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged, anemia, hemoglobin increased, INR increased, leukocytosis, neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased, and white blood cell decreased. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to NCI CTCAE v4.03 where grade 1= mild, grade 2= moderate, grade 3= severe, grade 4= life-threatening event due to AE, and grade 5= death. Only those hematology and coagulation parameters in which at least 1 participant in any of the reporting arm had any shift from grade <=2 at baseline to grade >=3 post-baseline are reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Through end of the study

  45. Phase 3: Number of Participants With Shift From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade >=3 Post-Baseline in Chemistry Parameters

    The following chemistry parameters were assessed: alanine aminotransferase increased, alkaline phosphatase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, blood bilirubin increased, creatinine increased, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypernatremia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hyponatremia, and lipase increased. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to NCI CTCAE v4.03 where grade 1= mild, grade 2= moderate, grade 3= severe, grade 4= life-threatening and grade 5= death related to AE. Only those chemistry parameters in which at least 1 participant in any of the reporting arm had any shift from grade <=2 at baseline to grade >=3 post-baseline are reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Through end of the study

  46. Phase 3: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data

    The criteria for vital signs included: Systolic blood pressure (mmHg): value <= 90 mmHg and decrease from baseline >= 20 mmHg, and value >= 160 mmHg and increase from baseline >= 20 mmHg. Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg): value <= 50 mmHg and decrease from baseline >= 15 mmHg, and value >= 100 mmHg and increase from baseline >= 15 mmHg. Pulse rate (bpm): value <= 50 bpm and decrease from baseline >= 15 bpm, and value >= 120 bpm and increase from baseline >= 15 bpm. Weight (kg): change >= 20 % decrease from baseline, and change >=10% increase from baseline. Temperature (degree Celsius): value <=36 degree Celsius, and value >=37.5 degree Celsius. Only those criteria in which at least 1 participant in any of the reporting arm had any vital signs data are reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Through end of the study

  47. Phase 3: Number of Participants According to Categorization of ECGs Findings

    ECG criteria included: ECG mean heart rate (bpm): increase from baseline >25% and to a value >100 bpm; decrease from baseline >25% and to a value <50 bpm, PR interval not otherwise specified (msec): new >280 msec, QRS interval not otherwise specified (msec): new >120 msec, QTcF not otherwise specified: new >450 msec; new >480 msec; new >500 msec; increase from baseline >30 msec and increase from baseline >60 msec. Only those criteria in which at least 1 participant in any of the reporting arm had any ECG findings are reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Through end of the study

  48. Phase 3: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Patients - 30 Item Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scores (QoL) at Baseline and Week 72

    EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items and is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These included five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact) and a global health status/QoL scale. Global health status/QoL scale ranged from 0 to 100; the higher score represents better level of functioning. In this outcome measure, global health status/QoL scores are presented.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 72

  49. Phase 3: EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Score (VAS) at Baseline and Week 72

    EQ-5D-5L is a standardized measure of health status. The EQ-5D-5L consisted of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ VAS. For EQ VAS participant rated their overall health status from 0 (worst imaginable) to 100 (best imaginable), higher scores indicating a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 72

  50. Phase 3: Number of Participants According to Response to Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) Assessment at Baseline and at Week 30

    PGIS is a single-item scale where participants rated the severity of colorectal cancer as follows: none, mild, moderate, severe and very severe.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 30

  51. Phase 3: Number of Participants According to Response to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Assessment at Week 30

    The PGIC is a single-item scale where participants rated the overall change in colorectal cancer since participant started taking the study medication as follows: much better, a little better, no change, a little worse, and much worse.

    Measured: Week 30

  52. Phase 3: Trough Plasma Concentration of Encorafenib and Its Metabolite LHY746

    Trough plasma concentration of encorafenib and its metabolite LHY746 was measured in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Predose on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1 and Cycle 6 Day 1

  53. Phase 3: Cmax of Encorafenib and Its Metabolite LHY746 in Mainland China Participants

    Cmax was observed directly from data. LHY746 is a metabolite of Encorafenib.

    Measured: Pre-dose (0 hr), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 24 hrs post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

  54. Phase 3: AUC6 of Encorafenib and Its Metabolite LHY746 in Mainland China Participants

    The AUC was estimated from time 0 to 6 hours post dose. AUC6 was computed using the Linear/Log trapezoidal method. LHY746 is a metabolite of Encorafenib.

    Measured: Pre-dose (0 hr), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 hrs post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

  55. Phase 3: AUCtau of Encorafenib and Its Metabolite LHY746 in Mainland China Participants

    AUCtau was area under the concentration-time profile from time zero to time tau, the dosing interval. tau = 24 hrs for QD dosing of encorafenib. LHY746 is a metabolite of encorafenib.

    Measured: Pre-dose (0 hr), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 24 hrs post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

  56. Phase 3: Tmax of Encorafenib and Its Metabolite LHY746 in Mainland China Participants

    Tmax: time (hours) to Cmax. LHY746 is a metabolite of Encorafenib.

    Measured: Pre-dose (0 hr), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 24 hrs post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

  57. Phase 3: CL/F of Encorafenib in Mainland China Participants

    Clearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. CL/F was calculated as dose administered divided by area under the concentration curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time (AUCinf). AUCinf was calculated as AUClast + (Clast*/kel), where Clast is the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point from the log-linear regression analysis, and kel is the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the loglinear concentration-time curve.

    Measured: Pre-dose (0 hr), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 24 hrs post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

  58. Phase 3: Number of Participants Classified According to Microsatellite Instability (MSI) Status as Determined by Retrospective Central Testing of Baseline Tumor Tissue

    MSI status was classified as follows; microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H): included participants with no negative test results and at least one positive test result, microsatellite stable (MSS): included participants with at least one negative test result and MSI-unknown: included participants with intermediate test results or not analyzed for MSI. The number of participants as per their MSI status (MSI-H, MSS, and MSI-unknown) have been reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Baseline

  59. Phase 3: Number of Participants According to Circulating Tumor Deoxyribonucleic Acid (ctDNA) Status

    ctDNA status was classified as follows; detected: overall variant allele frequency (VAF) was greater than zero, not detected: overall VAF equalled zero, and not evaluable: overall VAF could not be calculated. The VAF was defined as percentage of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) reads at a specific position that show a genetic variant instead of the normal (reference) sequence. The number of participants as per their ctDNA status (detected, not detected and not evaluable) have been reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 7 Day 1 and End of Treatment (anytime till maximum of 37.25 months)

  60. Phase 3: Number of Participants According to B-Raf Serine/Threonine-Protein Kinase (BRAF) Valine 600 (V600) Status From ctDNA

    BRAF V600 status from ctDNA was classified as follows; measurable: participants with detectable ctDNA had measurable BRAF V600 tumor biomarker alterations and not measurable: participants with detectable ctDNA did not have measurable BRAF V600 biomarker alterations or overall ctDNA was not detectable. The number of participants as per their BRAF V600 status from ctDNA (measurable and not measurable) have been reported in this outcome measure. In this outcome measure, data is presented for participants outside China and Mainland China participants.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 7 Day 1 and End of Treatment (anytime till maximum of 37.25 months)

  61. Cohort 3: PFS as Assessed by BICR - FAS

    PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to earliest documented PD per RECIST version 1.1 or death due to any cause as assessed by BICR. PD: 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed, with minimum absolute increase of 5 mm for target disease or unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions for non-target disease or any new lesion. Censoring details: no adequate baseline assessment, including no disease at baseline: participants were censored to randomization date; no PD, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, PD or death >12 (or 16) weeks after the last adequate tumor assessment, and start of new anticancer treatment: participants were censored to last adequate tumor assessment documenting no PD prior to new anticancer therapy, or missed assessments. Analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier method.

    Measured: From date of randomization to earliest documentation of PD by BICR or death or censoring date, whichever occurred first

  62. Cohort 3: ORR by Derived Investigator Assessment - FAS

    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved BOR of confirmed CR or PR according to RECIST v 1.1 by derived investigator assessment. CR: complete disappearance of all target lesions (with the exception of nodal disease) and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR: >=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. PD: 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed, with minimum absolute increase of 5 mm for target disease or unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions for non-target disease or any new lesion.

    Measured: From date of randomization until documented PD, or start of subsequent anticancer therapy, or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 14.1 months)

  63. Cohort 3: DOR as Assessed by BICR - FAS

    DOR was defined as the time from the date of first radiographic evidence of response (CR or PR) to the earliest documented PD per RECIST v1.1 as assessed by BICR, or death due to any cause. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR: >= 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. PD: 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed, with minimum absolute increase of 5 mm for target disease or unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions for non-target disease or any new lesion. Analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier method.

    Measured: From date of first radiographic evidence of response (CR or PR) to earliest documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 14.1 months)

  64. Cohort 3: DOR by Derived Investigator Assessment - FAS

    DOR was defined as the time from the date of first radiographic evidence of response (CR or PR) to the earliest documented PD per RECIST v1.1 by derived investigator assessment, or death due to any cause. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR: >= 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. PD: 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed, with minimum absolute increase of 5 mm for target disease or unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions for non-target disease or any new lesion. Analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier method.

    Measured: From date of first radiographic evidence of response (CR or PR) to earliest documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 14.1 months)

  65. Cohort 3: PFS by Derived Investigator Assessment - FAS

    PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to earliest documented PD per RECIST version 1.1 or death due to any cause by derived investigator assessment. PD: 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed, with minimum absolute increase of 5 mm for target disease or unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions for non-target disease or any new lesion. Censoring details: no adequate baseline assessment, including no disease at baseline: participants were censored to randomization date; no PD, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, PD or death >12 (or 16) weeks after the last adequate tumor assessment, and start of new anticancer treatment: participants were censored to last adequate tumor assessment documenting no PD prior to new anticancer therapy, or missed assessments. Analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier method.

    Measured: From date of randomization to earliest documentation of PD or death or censoring date, whichever occurred first

  66. Cohort 3: OS - FAS

    OS was defined as the time from the date of first dose to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died at the time of the cutoff for analysis, then OS was censored at the date of last contact. Analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier method.

    Measured: From date of first dose to death due to any cause or censoring date, whichever occurred first

  67. Cohort 3: TTR as Assessed by BICR - FAS

    TTR was defined as the time from the date of first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (CR or PR) per RECIST v1.1 as assessed by BICR. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR: >= 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions.

    Measured: From date of first dose to CR or PR (maximum up to 14.1 months [61.29 weeks])

  68. Cohort 3: TTR by Derived Investigator Assessment - FAS

    TTR was defined as the time from the date of first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (CR or PR) per RECIST v1.1 by derived investigator assessment. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR: >= 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions.

    Measured: From date of first dose to CR or PR (maximum up to 14.1 months [61.29 weeks])

  69. Cohort 3: Number of Participants With AEs

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in clinical study participant temporally associated with use of study intervention, whether/ not considered related to study intervention. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, met one or more of the following criteria - resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or other important medical event. AEs included both SAEs and all non-SAEs.

    Measured: Through end of the study

  70. Cohort 3: Number of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 AEs and Grade 5 AEs

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in clinical study participant temporally associated with use of study intervention, whether/ not considered related to study intervention. AEs were graded according to NCI-CTCAE v4.03 where grade 1= mild, grade 2= moderate, grade 3= severe, grade 4= life-threatening and grade 5= death related to AE. In this outcome measure, number of participants with grade 3 or 4 AEs and grade 5 AEs were reported.

    Measured: Through end of the study

  71. Cohort 3: Number of Participants With Shift From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade >=3 Post-Baseline in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters

    The following hematology and coagulation parameters were assessed: activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged, anemia, hemoglobin increased, INR increased, leukocytosis, neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased, and white blood cell decreased. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to NCI CTCAE v4.03 where grade 1= mild, grade 2= moderate, grade 3= severe, grade 4= life-threatening event due to AE, and grade 5= death. Only those hematology and coagulation parameters in which at least 1 participant in any of the reporting arm had any shift from grade <=2 at baseline to grade >=3 post-baseline are reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Through end of the study

  72. Cohort 3: Number of Participants With Shift From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade >=3 Post-Baseline in Chemistry Parameters

    The following chemistry parameters were assessed: alanine aminotransferase increased, alkaline phosphatase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, blood bilirubin increased, creatinine increased, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypernatremia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hyponatremia, and lipase increased. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to NCI CTCAE v4.03 where grade 1= mild, grade 2= moderate, grade 3= severe, grade 4= life-threatening and grade 5= death related to AE. Only those chemistry parameters in which at least 1 participant in any of the reporting arm had any shift from grade <=2 at baseline to grade >=3 post-baseline are reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Through end of the study

  73. Cohort 3: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data

    The criteria for vital signs included: Systolic blood pressure (mmHg): value <= 90 mmHg and decrease from baseline >= 20 mmHg, and value >= 160 mmHg and increase from baseline >= 20 mmHg. Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg): value <= 50 mmHg and decrease from baseline >= 15 mmHg, and value >= 100 mmHg and increase from baseline >= 15 mmHg. Pulse rate (bpm): value <= 50 bpm and decrease from baseline >= 15 bpm, and value >= 120 bpm and increase from baseline >= 15 bpm. Weight (kg): change >= 20 % decrease from baseline, and change >=10% increase from baseline. Temperature (degree Celsius): value <=36 degree Celsius, and value >=37.5 degree Celsius. Only those criteria in which at least 1 participant in any of the reporting arm had any vital signs data are reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Through end of the study

  74. Cohort 3: Number of Participants According to Categorization of ECGs Findings

    ECG criteria included: ECG mean heart rate (bpm): increase from baseline >25% and to a value >100 bpm; decrease from baseline >25% and to a value <50 bpm, PR interval not otherwise specified (msec): new >280 msec, QRS interval not otherwise specified (msec): new >120 msec, QTcF not otherwise specified: new >450 msec; new >480 msec; new >500 msec; increase from baseline >30 msec and increase from baseline >60 msec. Only those criteria in which at least 1 participant in any of the reporting arm had any ECG findings are reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Through end of the study

  75. Cohort 3: EORTC QLQC30 Global Health Status/QoL

    EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items and is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These included five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact) and a global health status/QoL scale. Global health status/QoL scale ranged from 0 to 100; the higher score represents better level of functioning.

    Measured: Through end of the study

  76. Cohort 3: EQ-5D-5L VAS

    EQ-5D-5L is a standardized measure of health status. The EQ-5D-5L consisted of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ VAS. For EQ VAS participant rated their overall health status from 0 (worst imaginable) to 100 (best imaginable), higher scores indicating a better health state.

    Measured: Through end of the study

  77. Cohort 3: Number of Participants According to Response to PGIS Assessment

    PGIS is a single-item scale where participants rated the severity of colorectal cancer as follows: none, mild, moderate, severe and very severe.

    Measured: Through end of the study

  78. Cohort 3: Number of Participants According to Response to PGIC Assessment

    The PGIC is a single-item scale where participants rated the overall change in colorectal cancer since participant started taking the study medication as follows: much better, a little better, no change, a little worse, and much worse.

    Measured: Through end of the study

  79. Cohort 3: Trough Plasma Concentration of Encorafenib and Its Metabolite LHY746

    Trough plasma concentration of encorafenib and its metabolite LHY746 was measured in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Predose on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1 and Cycle 6 Day 1

  80. Cohort 3: Number of Participants Classified According to MSI Status as Determined by Retrospective Central Testing

    MSI status was classified as follows; MSI-H: included participants with no negative test results and at least one positive test result, MSS: included participants with at least one negative test result and MSI-unknown: included participants with intermediate test results or not analyzed for MSI. The number of participants as per their MSI status (MSI-H, MSS, and MSI-unknown) have been reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Through end of the study

  81. Cohort 3: Number of Participants According to ctDNA Status

    ctDNA status was classified as follows; detected: overall variant allele frequency (VAF) was greater than zero, not detected: overall VAF equalled zero, and not evaluable: overall VAF could not be calculated. The VAF was defined as percentage of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) reads at a specific position that show a genetic variant instead of the normal (reference) sequence. The number of participants as per their ctDNA status (detected, not detected and not evaluable) have been reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Through end of the study

  82. Cohort 3: Number of Participants According to BRAF V600 Status From ctDNA

    BRAF V600 status from ctDNA was classified as follows; measurable: participants with detectable ctDNA had measurable BRAF V600 tumor biomarker alterations and not measurable: participants with detectable ctDNA did not have measurable BRAF V600 biomarker alterations or overall ctDNA was not detectable. The number of participants as per their BRAF V600 status from ctDNA (measurable and not measurable) have been reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Through end of the study

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Oct 2020
  2. Study start21 Dec 2020
  3. Primary completion1 Mar 2025
  4. Study completion29 Jul 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
841 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04607421
Sponsor's protocol ID
C4221015
Other IDs
2023-509405-77-00, BREAKWATER, 2023
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
5 Oct 2020
Last updated
5 Nov 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.

Publications

  • Kopetz S, Tabernero J, Elez E. BREAKWATER Phase III: results for encorafenib and cetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 in first-line BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer. Future Oncol. 2025 Dec;21(28):3585-3588. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2025.2579882. Epub 2025 Nov 13.

    PubMed 41230651
  • Elez E, Yoshino T, Shen L, Lonardi S, Van Cutsem E, Eng C, Kim TW, Wasan HS, Desai J, Ciardiello F, Yaeger R, Maughan TS, Morris VK, Wu C, Usari T, Laliberte R, Dychter SS, Zhang X, Tabernero J, Kopetz S; BREAKWATER Trial Investigators. Encorafenib, Cetuximab, and mFOLFOX6 in BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2025 Jun 26;392(24):2425-2437. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2501912. Epub 2025 May 30.

    PubMed 40444708
  • Kopetz S, Yoshino T, Van Cutsem E, Eng C, Kim TW, Wasan HS, Desai J, Ciardiello F, Yaeger R, Maughan TS, Beyzarov E, Zhang X, Ferrier G, Zhang X, Tabernero J. Encorafenib, cetuximab and chemotherapy in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial. Nat Med. 2025 Mar;31(3):901-908. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03443-3. Epub 2025 Jan 25.

    PubMed 39863775
  • Van Cutsem E, Taieb J, Yaeger R, Yoshino T, Grothey A, Maiello E, Elez E, Dekervel J, Ross P, Ruiz-Casado A, Graham J, Kato T, Ruffinelli JC, Andre T, Carriere Roussel E, Klauck I, Groc M, Vedovato JC, Tabernero J. ANCHOR CRC: Results From a Single-Arm, Phase II Study of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib and Cetuximab in Previously Untreated BRAFV600E-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2023 May 10;41(14):2628-2637. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01693. Epub 2023 Feb 10.

    PubMed 36763936

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Encorafenib, Cetuximab and Oxaliplatin in people with Neoplasms, run by Pfizer at 274 sites in 29 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 274 sites in United States, China, Japan, Germany, Australia and 24 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Jun 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

SLI: Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLTs) (time frame: Cycle 1 (28 days)). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04607421, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in