AzTrials
AzTrials

FIGO Grade 1 Endometrial Endometrioid AdenocarcinomaNCT04604613

Prediction of Recurrence Among Low Risk Endometrial Cancer Patients

An observational study of FIGO Grade 1 Endometrial Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma and FIGO Grade 2 Endometrial Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma, run by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study investigates whether molecular testing can help to predict the risk of endometrial cancer coming back (recurrence) after treatment in patients diagnosed with low risk endometrial cancer and scheduled to have surgery to remove the uterus and/or cervix (hysterectomy). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age, women only
What is being tested?
Bilateral Salpingectomy with Oophorectomy, Biospecimen Collection and Hysterectomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
518 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
8 Nov 2012to 31 Dec 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients diagnosed with low risk endometrial cancer who are scheduled to have a hysterectomy

Who may be able to join

  • Histologically confirmed low grade (grade 1-2) endometrioid type adenocarcinoma
  • Candidate for surgery
  • No evidence of deep invasion or peritoneal disease in patients that have undergone preoperative imaging
  • Patients may have had prior hormonal treatment for the treatment of early endometrial neoplasia. Patients may not have had prior radiation or chemotherapy for treatment of endometrial cancer
  • Patients must have a negative pregnancy if of childbearing potential

Who cannot join

  • Histologically confirmed high grade endometrioid or non-endometrioid type endometrial cancer (including serous, clear cell, carcinosarcoma or any mixed tumor containing these cell types)
  • Medical co-morbidities making surgery unsafe, as determined by the primary treating physician
  • Evidence of deep myometrial invasion, cervical involvement or peritoneal disease on preoperative imaging
  • Prior treatment with radiation or chemotherapy for endometrial cancer
  • Any contraindication to lymph node mapping

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • M D Anderson Cancer Center

    Houston, Texas, 77030

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Prediction of Recurrence Among Low Risk Endometrial Cancer Population

This study investigates whether molecular testing can help to predict the risk of endometrial cancer coming back (recurrence) after treatment in patients diagnosed with low risk endometrial cancer and scheduled to have surgery to remove the uterus and/or cervix (hysterectomy). Having sentinel lymph node mapping performed may help researchers to see if the cancer has spread in patients with low risk endometrial cancer.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

  1. Validate the use of a molecular panel of estrogen-induced genes to predict recurrence in low risk endometrial cancer.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

  1. Calculate the positive predictive value (PPV)/negative predictive value (NPV)/sensitivity (Sens)/specificity (Spec) of lymph node mapping to predict pelvic lymph node involvement.

II. Correlate CA125 and HE4 levels with recurrence and to explore the use of other serum biomarkers to predict recurrence.

III. Describe patterns of recurrence in a low risk patient population. IV. Determine if molecular panel can predict lymph node involvement in low risk endometrial cancer patients who undergo pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy.

  1. Compare performance of molecular panel to the Mayo low risk criteria for prediction of lymph node involvement.

VI. Compare performance of molecular panel to the high intermediate risk criteria from Gynecologic Oncology Group, trial 99 (GOG 99) for prediction of recurrence.

VII. Determine the feasibility of lymph node mapping in this patient population.

VIII. Determine the morbidity and mortality of lymph node dissection and mapping.

OUTLINE:

Patients undergo hysterectomy and sentinel lymph node mapping. Patients may also undergo bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the direction of the treating physician. If peritoneal disease or other contraindications to lymphatic mapping are detected at the time of surgery, mapping and sentinel node biopsy are performed at the surgeon's discretion. At the time of hysterectomy, patients undergo collection of tissue for molecular testing. Before and after surgery, patients also undergo collection of blood samples for tumor marker analysis.

Being tested
Bilateral Salpingectomy with Oophorectomy, Biospecimen Collection, Hysterectomy, Laboratory Biomarker Analysis, Lymph Node Mapping

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Bilateral Salpingectomy with OophorectomyProcedure or surgery

    Also called bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy

    Undergo standard of care bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy

  • Biospecimen CollectionProcedure or surgery

    Undergo collection of blood and tissue samples

  • HysterectomyProcedure or surgery

    Also called Hysterectomy NOS

    Undergo standard of care hysterectomy

  • Laboratory Biomarker AnalysisOther

    Correlative studies

  • Lymph Node MappingProcedure or surgery

    Also called lymphatic mapping

    Undergo sentinel lymph node mapping

  • Sentinel Lymph Node BiopsyProcedure or surgery

    Also called Sentinel Node Biopsy, Sentinel node biopsy alone, SLNB, SNB

    Undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy

Study groups in NCT04604613
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ancillary-Correlative (biospecimen collection, node mapping)Patients undergo hysterectomy and sentinel lymph node mapping. Patients may also undergo bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the direction of the treating physician. If peritoneal disease or other contraindications to lymphatic mapping are detected at the time of surgery, mapping and sentinel node biopsy are performed at the surgeon's discretion. At the time of hysterectomy, patients undergo collection of tissue for molecular testing. Before and after surgery, patients also undergo collection of blood samples for tumor marker analysis.
Receives: Procedure: Bilateral Salpingectomy with Oophorectomy; Procedure: Biospecimen Collection; Procedure: Hysterectomy; Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis; Procedure: Lymph Node Mapping; Procedure: Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 2-year recurrence

    Will validate a model's ability to predict 2-year recurrence in low-risk endometrial cancer patients.

    Measured: At 2 years

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Predictive ability of lymph node mapping in pelvic lymph node involvement

    Will calculate the sensitivity (true positive fraction [TPF]), specificity (1-false positive fraction [FPF]), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of lymph node mapping in predicting pelvic lymph node involvement, along with 2-sided 95% confidence intervals.

    Measured: Up to 2 years

  2. Feasibility of lymph node mapping

    Feasibility of lymph node mapping in this patient population will be determined after examining the TPF, FPF, PPV, and NPV.

    Measured: Up to 2 years

  3. Morbidity and mortality prevalence associated with lymph node dissection

    Morbidity and mortality prevalence associated with lymph node dissection and mapping will be calculated with 95% confidence intervals.

    Measured: Up to 2 years

  4. Patterns of recurrence

    Will determine which demographic and clinical traits are most associated with recurrence rate using proportional hazards models and with 2-year recurrence using logistic regression models. Will conduct univariate analyses using log-rank tests and Fisher's exact tests, in the case of categorical traits, and proportional hazards and logistic regression models, in the case of continuous traits. Will examine all traits for violations of the proportional hazards assumption (recurrence rate models), and will examine all continuous traits for functional form (recurrence and recurrence rate models). Will use the same methods to determine whether CA125 and HE4 is associated with recurrence and recurrence rate.

    Measured: Up to 2 years

  5. Predictive ability of molecular panel in lymph node involvement

    Will use Cartesian and Regression Tree Analysis and logistic regression to determine if the molecular panel can predict lymph node involvement. Will assess the use of the model by calculating sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV. Additionally, will examine how often the results of the molecular panel model concur with the Mayo low risk criteria for prediction of lymph node involvement. All agreement statistics will be presented with their 95% confidence intervals.

    Measured: Up to 2 years

  6. Predictive ability of marker panel in recurrence

    Will examine how well the predictive ability of the marker panel agrees with the predictive ability of the high intermediate risk criteria from Gynecologic Oncology Group, trial 99 using this patient population. 95% confidence intervals will be calculated for all concordance statistics.

    Measured: Up to 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Oct 2020
  2. Study start8 Nov 2012
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
518 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04604613
Sponsor's protocol ID
PA12-0550
Other IDs
NCI-2020-07548, PA12-0550
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
21 Oct 2020
Last updated
16 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of FIGO Grade 1 Endometrial Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma and FIGO Grade 2 Endometrial Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma, run by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

2-year recurrence (time frame: At 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in