AzTrials
AzTrials

Cerebral PalsyI-C-FUNNCT04598711

Ischemic Conditioning to Enhance Function (I-C-FUN) in Children With Cerebral Palsy

A study testing RLIC, Muscle Power training and Balance training in people with Cerebral Palsy, run by East Carolina University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this research study is to determine if remote limb ischemic conditioning (RLIC) can increase skeletal muscle power, enhance learning of motor (dynamic balance) task, and improve walking performance in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 16 years
Conditions the study is for
Cerebral Palsy
What is being tested?
RLIC, Muscle Power training and Balance training
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
24 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
15 Jun 2021to 30 Dec 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 16 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Children diagnosed with unilateral or diplegia cerebral palsy (CP)
  • Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I-III

Who cannot join

  • Children with other developmental disabilities such as autism, developmental coordination disorders, etc.
  • Children with cognitive deficits or communication problem
  • Children with balance disorders such as vestibular disorders, posterior fossa tumors etc.
  • Children with known cardiorespiratory dysfunctions
  • Children who are receiving other adjunct therapies such as TMS, tDCS, vagal nerve stimulation
  • Presence of lower extremity condition, injury, or surgery which could compromise conditioning and training
  • Children with sickle cell disease

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • East Carolina University

    Greenville, North Carolina, 27834

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Effects of Remote Limb Ischemic Conditioning to Enhance Muscle Power, Dynamic Balance, and Walking Performance in Children With Cerebral Palsy

The purpose of this research study is to determine if remote limb ischemic conditioning (RLIC) can increase skeletal muscle power, enhance learning of motor (dynamic balance) task, and improve walking performance in children with cerebral palsy (CP).

Read the detailed description

Ischemic conditioning is a phenomenon in which an organ exposed to a controlled, short-term, local, sublethal ischemia protects from subsequent ischemia. Remote ischemic conditioning is another more practical approach where transient ischemia and reperfusion applied to a remote organ or tissue, protects other organs or tissues from further episodes of lethal ischemia/reperfusion injury. Remote limb ischemic conditioning (RLIC) is a clinically feasible way of performing remote ischemic conditioning where alternating, brief ischemia and reperfusion is delivered with cyclic inflation and deflation of a blood pressure cuff on the arm or leg.

The overall goal of this research is to use ischemic conditioning to enhance muscle power, motor leaning, and mobility in children with CP. Our previous work demonstrated that when paired with strength training, RLIC improved muscle strength and activation in healthy, young adults and motor learning in healthy older adults. The current study extends that work to determine if RLIC enhances muscle power, dynamic balance, and walking performance in children with CP. This Phase II study will yield the necessary information to design and execute subsequent randomized controlled trials in children with CP as well as other neurological conditions.

Conditions
Cerebral Palsy
Being tested
RLIC, Sham Conditioning, Muscle Power training, Balance training, Treadmill Training
Medical subject headings
Cerebral Palsy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RLICBehavioural

    Also called Remote Limb Ischemic Conditioning

    See descriptions under arm/group descriptions. RLIC is delivered for 14 visits. Visits 1-3 occur on consecutive work days and visits 4-14 occur on alternating week days.

  • Sham ConditioningBehavioural

    Also called Sham

    See descriptions under arm/group descriptions. Sham conditioning is delivered for 14 visits. Visits 1-3 occur on consecutive work days and visits 4-14 occur on alternating week days.

  • Muscle Power trainingBehavioural

    Also called Quadriceps power training

    All participants undergo power training of the quadriceps muscles using unilateral and bilateral leg presses (Total Gym GTS, San Diego, CA), 3 times/week for 4 consecutive weeks (12 sessions). Power training will follow standard American College of Sports Medicine guidelines for frequency, intensity, progression etc. Power training is provided at visits 3-14.

  • Balance trainingBehavioural

    Also called Dynamic Stability Platform Training

    All participants undergo training on a balance board, learning to hold the board level with equal weight on each leg. Participants perform the balance task for 15, 30-second trials per day at visits 3-14.

  • Treadmill TrainingBehavioural

    Also called Gait training

    All participants will undergo short burst interval treadmill training using self-selected and fast walking speeds.

Study groups in NCT04598711
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Remote Limb Ischemic Conditioning (RLIC)ExperimentalRLIC is achieved via blood pressure cuff inflation to at least 20 mmHg above systolic blood pressure to 200 mmHg on the more involved thigh. RLIC involves 5 cycles of 5 minutes blood pressure cuff inflation followed by alternating 5 minutes of cuff deflation and requires 45 minutes. RLIC is performed on visits 1-14. Interventions: * Behavioral: RLIC * Behavioral: Muscle power training * Behavioral: Balance training * Behavioral: Treadmill training
Receives: Behavioral: RLIC; Behavioral: Muscle Power training; Behavioral: Balance training; Behavioral: Treadmill Training
Sham ConditioningSham comparatorSham conditioning is achieved via blood pressure cuff inflation to 25 mmHg on the more involved thigh. Sham involves 5 cycles of 5 minutes blood pressure cuff inflation followed by alternating 5 minutes of cuff deflation and requires 45 minutes. Sham conditioning is performed on visits 1-14. Interventions: * Behavioral: RLIC * Behavioral: Muscle power training * Behavioral: Balance training * Behavioral: Treadmill training
Receives: Behavioral: Sham Conditioning; Behavioral: Muscle Power training; Behavioral: Balance training; Behavioral: Treadmill Training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Peak knee extension power

    Power is defined as the ability to exert a maximum force in short amount of time (speed) while performing knee extension. Bilateral quadriceps power will be measured using Humac Norm Isokinetic testing device (Computer Sports Medicine Inc, Stoughton, MA).

    Measured: Pre-intervention to 1 month post-intervention follow-up

  2. Change in Balance Score

    The average amount of time in seconds that a participant maintains the stability platform within ±5° of horizontal position during 15 trials of 30 seconds each. The total score will range between 0-30 seconds. Higher balance score indicates better balance performance.

    Measured: Pre-intervention to 1 month post-intervention follow-up

  3. Change in Walking Speed

    Self-selected and fast walking speeds will be measured using 10-meter walk test.

    Measured: Pre-intervention to 1 month post-intervention follow-up

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Quadriceps Electromyography

    While performing the isokinetic power testing, the electromyography (EMG) data will be recorded simultaneously. The EMG data will be used to quantify the electrical amplitude of quadriceps muscle.

    Measured: Pre-intervention to 1 month post-intervention follow-up

  2. Gait Analysis

    Lower extremity walking kinematics and kinetics will be measured using 10-camera motion analysis system (Qualisys Inc., Gothenburg, Sweden). Specific kinematic variables are hip, knee, and ankle joint torques. Kinetic variables are peak hip, knee, and ankle sagittal plane joint moments.

    Measured: Pre-intervention to 1 month post-intervention follow-up

  3. Lower limb activity

    Lower extremity activity will be measured using accelerometers (Actigraphs) worn on bilateral ankles for 24 hours. Specific accelerometry variable will be number of steps.

    Measured: Pre-intervention to 1 month post-intervention follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Oct 2020
  2. Study start15 Jun 2021
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2022
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Double blinded, randomized controlled trial
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
24 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04598711
Sponsor's protocol ID
19-003232
Acronym
I-C-FUN
Status last verified
Mar 2023
First submitted
1 Oct 2020
Last updated
13 Mar 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: After completion of the study, all of the individual participant data after de-identification will be submitted to East Carolina University data repository.

Publications

  • Gidday JM. Cerebral preconditioning and ischaemic tolerance. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Jun;7(6):437-48. doi: 10.1038/nrn1927.

    PubMed 16715053
  • Saxena P, Newman MA, Shehatha JS, Redington AN, Konstantinov IE. Remote ischemic conditioning: evolution of the concept, mechanisms, and clinical application. J Card Surg. 2010 Jan-Feb;25(1):127-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2009.00820.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.

    PubMed 19549044
  • Kharbanda RK, Nielsen TT, Redington AN. Translation of remote ischaemic preconditioning into clinical practice. Lancet. 2009 Oct 31;374(9700):1557-65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61421-5.

    PubMed 19880021
  • Hausenloy DJ, Mwamure PK, Venugopal V, Harris J, Barnard M, Grundy E, Ashley E, Vichare S, Di Salvo C, Kolvekar S, Hayward M, Keogh B, MacAllister RJ, Yellon DM. Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial injury in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007 Aug 18;370(9587):575-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61296-3.

    PubMed 17707752
  • Botker HE, Kharbanda R, Schmidt MR, Bottcher M, Kaltoft AK, Terkelsen CJ, Munk K, Andersen NH, Hansen TM, Trautner S, Lassen JF, Christiansen EH, Krusell LR, Kristensen SD, Thuesen L, Nielsen SS, Rehling M, Sorensen HT, Redington AN, Nielsen TT. Remote ischaemic conditioning before hospital admission, as a complement to angioplasty, and effect on myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010 Feb 27;375(9716):727-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62001-8.

    PubMed 20189026
  • Meng R, Asmaro K, Meng L, Liu Y, Ma C, Xi C, Li G, Ren C, Luo Y, Ling F, Jia J, Hua Y, Wang X, Ding Y, Lo EH, Ji X. Upper limb ischemic preconditioning prevents recurrent stroke in intracranial arterial stenosis. Neurology. 2012 Oct 30;79(18):1853-61. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318271f76a. Epub 2012 Oct 3.

    PubMed 23035060
  • Ali ZA, Callaghan CJ, Lim E, Ali AA, Nouraei SA, Akthar AM, Boyle JR, Varty K, Kharbanda RK, Dutka DP, Gaunt ME. Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces myocardial and renal injury after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a randomized controlled trial. Circulation. 2007 Sep 11;116(11 Suppl):I98-105. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.106.679167.

    PubMed 17846333
  • Liu ZJ, Chen C, Li XR, Ran YY, Xu T, Zhang Y, Geng XK, Zhang Y, Du HS, Leak RK, Ji XM, Hu XM. Remote Ischemic Preconditioning-Mediated Neuroprotection against Stroke is Associated with Significant Alterations in Peripheral Immune Responses. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2016 Jan;22(1):43-52. doi: 10.1111/cns.12448. Epub 2015 Sep 19.

    PubMed 26384716
  • Jean-St-Michel E, Manlhiot C, Li J, Tropak M, Michelsen MM, Schmidt MR, McCrindle BW, Wells GD, Redington AN. Remote preconditioning improves maximal performance in highly trained athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Jul;43(7):1280-6. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318206845d.

    PubMed 21131871
  • Kjeld T, Rasmussen MR, Jattu T, Nielsen HB, Secher NH. Ischemic preconditioning of one forearm enhances static and dynamic apnea. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014 Jan;46(1):151-5. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182a4090a.

    PubMed 23846166
  • de Groot PC, Thijssen DH, Sanchez M, Ellenkamp R, Hopman MT. Ischemic preconditioning improves maximal performance in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 Jan;108(1):141-6. doi: 10.1007/s00421-009-1195-2. Epub 2009 Sep 18.

    PubMed 19760432
  • Bailey TG, Jones H, Gregson W, Atkinson G, Cable NT, Thijssen DH. Effect of ischemic preconditioning on lactate accumulation and running performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Nov;44(11):2084-9. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318262cb17.

    PubMed 22843115
  • Surkar SM, Bland MD, Mattlage AE, Chen L, Gidday JM, Lee JM, Hershey T, Lang CE. Effects of remote limb ischemic conditioning on muscle strength in healthy young adults: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2020 Feb 4;15(2):e0227263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227263. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 32017777
  • Sutter EN, Mattlage AE, Bland MD, Cherry-Allen KM, Harrison E, Surkar SM, Gidday JM, Chen L, Hershey T, Lee JM, Lang CE. Remote Limb Ischemic Conditioning and Motor Learning: Evaluation of Factors Influencing Response in Older Adults. Transl Stroke Res. 2019 Aug;10(4):362-371. doi: 10.1007/s12975-018-0653-8. Epub 2018 Aug 7.

    PubMed 30088217
  • Damiano DL, Laws E, Carmines DV, Abel MF. Relationship of spasticity to knee angular velocity and motion during gait in cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2006 Jan;23(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.10.007. Epub 2005 Jan 7.

    PubMed 16311188

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing RLIC, Muscle Power training and Balance training in people with Cerebral Palsy, run by East Carolina University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Peak knee extension power (time frame: Pre-intervention to 1 month post-intervention follow-up). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04598711, which also lists 21 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2023.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in