Urinary IncontinenceNCT04584359
Effects of Osteopathic Manipulations and Muscle Training on the Myoelectric Activity of the Pelvic Floor
A study testing HVLA, global osteopathic protocol and pelvic floor muscle training in people with Urinary Incontinence, run by Giselle Notini Arcanjo at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
The objective of this study was to compare the effects of four different interventions on pelvic floor muscle electromyographic activity in women with stress urinary incontinece: i) a global osteopathic protocol (myofascial, visceral, and articular techniques), ii) one manipulation technique (high velocity, low… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 60 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Urinary Incontinence
- What is being tested?
- HVLA, global osteopathic protocol and pelvic floor muscle training
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 20 Jan 2018to 20 Sep 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 60 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- symptoms of urine loss due to exertion in the last six months.
Who cannot join
- urgent or mixed urinary incontinency
- overactive bladder
- neurological disorder
- urinary or anal infection
- urogenital atrophy
- pelvic organ prolapse grade 3 or 4
- sensory pathways and motor not intact
- spine fracture
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparasion of the Effects of Osteopathic Manipulations and Muscle Training on the Myoelectric Activity of the Pelvic Floor in Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence: a Randomized Controlled Trial.
The objective of this study was to compare the effects of four different interventions on pelvic floor muscle electromyographic activity in women with stress urinary incontinece: i) a global osteopathic protocol (myofascial, visceral, and articular techniques), ii) one manipulation technique (high velocity, low amplitude (HVLA)/thrust) of the sacroiliac joint and T10-L2, iii) Pelvic Floor Muscle training, and iv) a control group with no intervention. The hypothesis is that the global osteopathic protocol and HVLA technique can increase pelvic floor muscle electromyographic activity to a level greater than or equal to the standard care established in the literature (pelvic floor muscle training).
Read the detailed description
Participants represented a convenience sample and were recruited from hospitals, urogynecology doctors' clinics, invitations via social networks, gyms, clubs, and sports consultants. Women had to be between 30 and 60 years old and report symptoms of urine loss due to exertion in the last six months.The participants were randomly allocated into four groups (G1 = intervention using an HVLA/thrust technique for the sacroiliac and T10-L2 joints, G2 = global osteopathic protocol, G3 = PFT, and G4 = control) by a blinded researcher with a spreadsheet of random numbers.The primary outcome measure was surface electromyography (EMG) performed at five different times: before the intervention and immediately, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and four weeks after. This evaluation was performed by a physiotherapist with ten years of experience in urogynecology and expertise in PFM electromyographic evaluation who was blinded to the group allocation.
- Conditions
- Urinary Incontinence
- Being tested
- HVLA, global osteopathic protocol, pelvic floor muscle training
- Keywords
- pelvic floor training, osteopathy, urinary incontinence
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Incontinence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HVLAOther
Also called thrust
High velocity, low amplitude manipulation for the sacroiliac joint and T10-L2. The interventions were performed once a week for four weeks by a physiotherapist with a degree in in osteopathy and ten years of clinical experience. Each visit lasted about 5 minutes.
global osteopathic protocolOther
Myofascial, visceral, and articular techniques. Complete treatment in order to restore and rebalance internal tensions and improve the visceral mobility: muscle inhibition techniques for the psoas muscle; deep massage in the obturator foramen; stretching for the greater omentum; lift of the uterus, ovary, and bladder ; abdominal maneuver; and thrust of sacroiliac joint and T12-L1. The interventions were performed once a week for four weeks by a physiotherapist with a degree in in osteopathy and ten years of clinical experience. Each visit lasted about 15 minutes.
pelvic floor muscle trainingOther
Pelvic floor muscle training for four weeks, with a weekly face-to-face visit lasting 10-20 minutes. In this intervention, participants were instructed to perform three sequences of exercises: contractions and relaxations (three seconds of sustained contractions and six seconds of rest), ten sustained contractions (ten seconds of sustained contractions and 20 seconds of rest), and five contractions associated with a cough. These exercises were performed in the standing, sitting, and lying positions
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| HVLA techiniques (G1) | Experimental | Performed with thrust (also known as HVLA) in the sacroiliac joint and T10-L2 level Receives: Other: HVLA; Other: global osteopathic protocol |
| Global osteopathic protocol (G2) | Experimental | Several elements were emphasized - myofascial, bone, and visceral. Receives: Other: global osteopathic protocol |
| Pelvic floor muscle training (G3) | Experimental | Muscle Training for four weeks, with a weekly face-to-face visit lasting 10-20 minutes. Receives: Other: pelvic floor muscle training |
| Control group (G4) | No intervention | No intervention and was simply evaluated and re-evaluated. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
electromyographic activity
The primary outcome measure will be the RMS (root means square) collected by surface. First, the basal tonus activity of PFM was recorded for 20 seconds; participants were instructed to avoid any body movements or speech. Next, the participants performed two fast and consecutive contractions (three seconds each) and relaxed for ten seconds (test for phasic fibers). Third, participants were told to sustain the contraction for ten seconds, followed by a ten-second rest (test for tonic fibers). Finally, the myoelectrical activity was captured during a cough to assess PFM reflex contraction.
Measured: Change from baseline versus immediately post-intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Oct 2020
- Study start20 Jan 2018
- Primary completion20 Jan 2019
- Study completion20 Sep 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (25)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Urinary IncontinenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Model description
- This study randomized 40 women with symptoms of stress uriray incontinence who were divided into four intervention groups of ten women each (G1: only the high velocity, low amplitude manipulation for the sacroiliac joint and T10-L2; G2: global osteopathic protocol with myofascial, visceral, and articular techniques; G3: pelvic floor muscle training; and G4: control).
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Giselle Notini Arcanjo
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Giselle Notini Arcanjo, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro
- Investigators
- Giselle N Arcanjo, Principal investigator, Tras dos Montes Alto Douro University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04584359
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Utras1
- Status last verified
- Oct 2020
- First submitted
- 24 Aug 2020
- Last updated
- 19 Oct 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Abrams, P., Cardozo, L., Wagg, A., Wein, A. (Eds). (2017). Incontinence. 6th Edition. ICI-ICS. International Continence Society, Bristol UK.
Fernandes, W.V.B., Bicalho, E.S., Capote, A.E., Manffra E.F. (2016). Duration of the effects of spinal manipulation on pain intensity and electromyographic activity of paravertebral parts of individuals with chronic mechanical low back pain. Fisioterapia Pesquisa, 23(2),155-62
Felicíssimo, M.F., Carneiro, M.M., Souza, E.L.B.L. de, Alipio, V.G., Franco, M.R.C., Silva, R. G. O., Filho, A.L.S. (2016). Fatores limitadores à reabilitação da musculatura do assoalho pélvico em pacientes com incontinência urinária de esforço. Acta Fisiátrica, 14(4), 233-236
Franke H, Hoesele K. Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in women. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2013 Jan;17(1):11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 Jun 17.
PubMed 23294678Glazer, H. I.; Hacad, C. R. (2012). The Glazer Protocol: Evidence-Based Medicine Pelvic Floor Muscle (PFM) Surface Electromyography (SEMG). Biofeedback, 40(2), 75-79
Herzog W. The biomechanics of spinal manipulation. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2010 Jul;14(3):280-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.03.004.
PubMed 20538226Lopez, D. Osteopathy for Urologic and Pelvic Health. In: Chughtai, B.; Stein, A. Espinosa, G. (2017). Healing In Urology Clinical Guidebook to Herbal and alternative therapies, cap 10, pp. 209-221
Palma, P. C. R. (2009). Aplicações clínicas das técnicas fisioterapêuticas nas disfunções miccionais e do assoalho pélvico. Campinas, SP, Personal Link Comunicações
Resende, A. P. M., Nakamura, M. U., Ferreira, E. A. G., Petricelli, C. D., Alexandre, S. M., Zanetti, M. R. D. (2011). Evaluation of female pelvic floor muscles using surface electromyography: literature review. Fisioterapia e Pesquisa, 18(3), 292-297
de Andrade RL, Bo K, Antonio FI, Driusso P, Mateus-Vasconcelos ECL, Ramos S, Julio MP, Ferreira CHJ. An education program about pelvic floor muscles improved women's knowledge but not pelvic floor muscle function, urinary incontinence or sexual function: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2018 Apr;64(2):91-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
PubMed 29574170de Almeida BS, Sabatino JH, Giraldo PC. Effects of high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation on strength and the basal tonus of female pelvic floor muscles. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010 Feb;33(2):109-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.12.007.
PubMed 20170776Alves JO, Luz STD, Brandao S, Da Luz CM, Jorge RN, Da Roza T. Urinary Incontinence in Physically Active Young Women: Prevalence and Related Factors. Int J Sports Med. 2017 Nov;38(12):937-941. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-115736. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
PubMed 28950397Araujo MP, Sartori MGF, Girao MJBC. Athletic Incontinence: Proposal of a New Term for a New Woman. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2017 Sep;39(9):441-442. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1605370. Epub 2017 Jul 20. No abstract available.
PubMed 28728191Batista RL, Franco MM, Naldoni LM, Duarte G, Oliveira AS, Ferreira CH. Biofeedback and the electromyographic activity of pelvic floor muscles in pregnant women. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011 Sep-Oct;15(5):386-92. doi: 10.1590/s1413-35552011005000026. Epub 2011 Oct 14. English, Portuguese.
PubMed 22002190Bertotto A, Schvartzman R, Uchoa S, Wender MCO. Effect of electromyographic biofeedback as an add-on to pelvic floor muscle exercises on neuromuscular outcomes and quality of life in postmenopausal women with stress urinary incontinence: A randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Nov;36(8):2142-2147. doi: 10.1002/nau.23258. Epub 2017 May 16.
PubMed 28508398
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Oct 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparasion of the Effects of Osteopathic Manipulations and Muscle Training on the Myoelectric Activity of the Pelvic Floor in Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence: a Randomized Controlled Trial.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04584359
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Utras1
- Conditions
- Urinary Incontinence
- Keywords
- pelvic floor training, osteopathy, urinary incontinence
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Giselle Notini ArcanjoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Sep 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this study was to compare the effects of four different interventions on pelvic floor muscle electromyographic activity in women with stress urinary incontinece: i) a global osteopathic protocol (myofascial, visceral, and articular techniques), ii) one manipulation technique (high velocity, low amplitude (HVLA)/thrust) of the sacroiliac joint and T10-L2, iii) Pelvic Floor Muscle training, and iv) a control group with no intervention. The hypothesis is that the global osteopathic protocol and HVLA technique can increase pelvic floor muscle electromyographic activity to a level greater than or equal to the standard care established in the literature (pelvic floor muscle training).
Detailed description
Participants represented a convenience sample and were recruited from hospitals, urogynecology doctors' clinics, invitations via social networks, gyms, clubs, and sports consultants. Women had to be between 30 and 60 years old and report symptoms of urine loss due to exertion in the last six months.The participants were randomly allocated into four groups (G1 = intervention using an HVLA/thrust technique for the sacroiliac and T10-L2 joints, G2 = global osteopathic protocol, G3 = PFT, and G4 = control) by a blinded researcher with a spreadsheet of random numbers.The primary outcome measure was surface electromyography (EMG) performed at five different times: before the intervention and immediately, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and four weeks after. This evaluation was performed by a physiotherapist with ten years of experience in urogynecology and expertise in PFM electromyographic evaluation who was blinded to the group allocation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
- Model description
- This study randomized 40 women with symptoms of stress uriray incontinence who were divided into four intervention groups of ten women each (G1: only the high velocity, low amplitude manipulation for the sacroiliac joint and T10-L2; G2: global osteopathic protocol with myofascial, visceral, and articular techniques; G3: pelvic floor muscle training; and G4: control).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| HVLA techiniques (G1) | Experimental | Other: HVLA, Other: global osteopathic protocolPerformed with thrust (also known as HVLA) in the sacroiliac joint and T10-L2 level |
| Global osteopathic protocol (G2) | Experimental | Other: global osteopathic protocolSeveral elements were emphasized - myofascial, bone, and visceral. |
| Pelvic floor muscle training (G3) | Experimental | Other: pelvic floor muscle trainingMuscle Training for four weeks, with a weekly face-to-face visit lasting 10-20 minutes. |
| Control group (G4) | No intervention | –No intervention and was simply evaluated and re-evaluated. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 60 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- symptoms of urine loss due to exertion in the last six months.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- urgent or mixed urinary incontinency
- overactive bladder
- neurological disorder
- urinary or anal infection
- urogenital atrophy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HVLAAlso: thrustHigh velocity, low amplitude manipulation for the sacroiliac joint and T10-L2. The interventions were performed once a week for four weeks by a physiotherapist with a degree in in osteopathy and ten years of clinical experience. Each visit lasted about 5 minutes. | Other | HVLA techiniques (G1) |
| global osteopathic protocolMyofascial, visceral, and articular techniques. Complete treatment in order to restore and rebalance internal tensions and improve the visceral mobility: muscle inhibition techniques for the psoas muscle; deep massage in the obturator foramen; stretching for the greater omentum; lift of the uterus, ovary, and bladder ; abdominal maneuver; and thrust of sacroiliac joint and T12-L1. The interventions were performed once a week for four weeks by a physiotherapist with a degree in in osteopathy and ten years of clinical experience. Each visit lasted about 15 minutes. | Other | Global osteopathic protocol (G2), HVLA techiniques (G1) |
| pelvic floor muscle trainingPelvic floor muscle training for four weeks, with a weekly face-to-face visit lasting 10-20 minutes. In this intervention, participants were instructed to perform three sequences of exercises: contractions and relaxations (three seconds of sustained contractions and six seconds of rest), ten sustained contractions (ten seconds of sustained contractions and 20 seconds of rest), and five contractions associated with a cough. These exercises were performed in the standing, sitting, and lying positions | Other | Pelvic floor muscle training (G3) |
Primary outcome
electromyographic activity
Time frame: Change from baseline versus immediately post-intervention
The primary outcome measure will be the RMS (root means square) collected by surface. First, the basal tonus activity of PFM was recorded for 20 seconds; participants were instructed to avoid any body movements or speech. Next, the participants performed two fast and consecutive contractions (three seconds each) and relaxed for ten seconds (test for phasic fibers). Third, participants were told to sustain the contraction for ten seconds, followed by a ten-second rest (test for tonic fibers). Finally, the myoelectrical activity was captured during a cough to assess PFM reflex contraction.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Oct 2020.
- BackgroundAbrams, P., Cardozo, L., Wagg, A., Wein, A. (Eds). (2017). Incontinence. 6th Edition. ICI-ICS. International Continence Society, Bristol UK.
- BackgroundFernandes, W.V.B., Bicalho, E.S., Capote, A.E., Manffra E.F. (2016). Duration of the effects of spinal manipulation on pain intensity and electromyographic activity of paravertebral parts of individuals with chronic mechanical low back pain. Fisioterapia Pesquisa, 23(2),155-62
- BackgroundFelicíssimo, M.F., Carneiro, M.M., Souza, E.L.B.L. de, Alipio, V.G., Franco, M.R.C., Silva, R. G. O., Filho, A.L.S. (2016). Fatores limitadores à reabilitação da musculatura do assoalho pélvico em pacientes com incontinência urinária de esforço. Acta Fisiátrica, 14(4), 233-236
- Background: PubMed 23294678Franke H, Hoesele K. Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in women. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2013 Jan;17(1):11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 Jun 17.
- BackgroundGlazer, H. I.; Hacad, C. R. (2012). The Glazer Protocol: Evidence-Based Medicine Pelvic Floor Muscle (PFM) Surface Electromyography (SEMG). Biofeedback, 40(2), 75-79
- Background: PubMed 20538226Herzog W. The biomechanics of spinal manipulation. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2010 Jul;14(3):280-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.03.004.
- BackgroundLopez, D. Osteopathy for Urologic and Pelvic Health. In: Chughtai, B.; Stein, A. Espinosa, G. (2017). Healing In Urology Clinical Guidebook to Herbal and alternative therapies, cap 10, pp. 209-221
- BackgroundPalma, P. C. R. (2009). Aplicações clínicas das técnicas fisioterapêuticas nas disfunções miccionais e do assoalho pélvico. Campinas, SP, Personal Link Comunicações
- BackgroundResende, A. P. M., Nakamura, M. U., Ferreira, E. A. G., Petricelli, C. D., Alexandre, S. M., Zanetti, M. R. D. (2011). Evaluation of female pelvic floor muscles using surface electromyography: literature review. Fisioterapia e Pesquisa, 18(3), 292-297
- Results publication: PubMed 29574170de Andrade RL, Bo K, Antonio FI, Driusso P, Mateus-Vasconcelos ECL, Ramos S, Julio MP, Ferreira CHJ. An education program about pelvic floor muscles improved women's knowledge but not pelvic floor muscle function, urinary incontinence or sexual function: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2018 Apr;64(2):91-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
- Results publication: PubMed 20170776de Almeida BS, Sabatino JH, Giraldo PC. Effects of high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation on strength and the basal tonus of female pelvic floor muscles. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010 Feb;33(2):109-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.12.007.
- Results publication: PubMed 28950397Alves JO, Luz STD, Brandao S, Da Luz CM, Jorge RN, Da Roza T. Urinary Incontinence in Physically Active Young Women: Prevalence and Related Factors. Int J Sports Med. 2017 Nov;38(12):937-941. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-115736. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Urinary Incontinence
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Examining the Effects of Intra-detrusor Botox at Time of HoLEP in Men With Overactive Bladder Symptoms
Urinary Incontinence, Overactive Bladder Syndrome
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Recruiting
UCon Treatment of Overactive Bladder (OAB) in Males
Urinary Incontinence, Urge Incontinence
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Overactive Bladder Symptoms and Urinary Incontinence In Women With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Giselle N Arcanjo principal investigator
Tras dos Montes Alto Douro University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing HVLA, global osteopathic protocol and pelvic floor muscle training in people with Urinary Incontinence, run by Giselle Notini Arcanjo at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
electromyographic activity (time frame: Change from baseline versus immediately post-intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04584359, which also lists 25 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Oct 2020.