Healthy PopulationNCT04582994
The Role of Beta Oscillation in Mental Time Travel
An observational study of Healthy Population, run by Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The project aims to study the neural basis of Mental Time Travel (MTT), i.e. the ability to travel back and forth in time. It has been proposed that the self-projection in time is similar to the self-projection in space, emphasizing the role of spatial navigation in MTT. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 33 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy Population
- What is being tested?
- Beta tACS and Alfa tACS
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2019to 26 Mar 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 33 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Study population: Two groups of healthy partcipants. Age between 20-30 for the first group and age between 60-80 for the second group
Who may be able to join
- age between 20-30 for the first group and age between 60-80 for the second group
Who cannot join
- • generalized cognitive impairment (score lower than 24 at the Mini Mental State Examination)
- psychiatric disorders
- additional neurological disorders
- abusive use of alcohol or illicit drugs
- Personal or familiar history of epileptic fits
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site
Center for study and reaserch in Cognitive Neuroscience
Cesena, ITA, 47521
About this study
Official title: The Role of Beta Oscillation in Mental Time Travel: a tACS Study in Healthy Subjects
The project aims to study the neural basis of Mental Time Travel (MTT), i.e. the ability to travel back and forth in time. It has been proposed that the self-projection in time is similar to the self-projection in space, emphasizing the role of spatial navigation in MTT. Indeed, the posterior parietal cortex, a key region for visual imagery in space-related tasks, and the temporo-parietal junction, a key region for mental projection, are both recruited by self-projection in time and space. However, the specific neural computation of the two processes remains unclear. One way to address this is by investigating the brain oscillations that may modulate MTT. One plausible candidate for MTT processing are beta oscillations because of their role in the production and perception of short temporal intervals, as opposed to alpha oscillations which correlate with illusory changes in self location in space. Thus, the present project investigates the hypothesis that MTT may rely on posterior parietal cortex's beta oscillations to self-project in time. Moreover, cause previous studies showed a different performance in time processing between young and elderly health population, we want to investigate also if there is a difference between these two populations in the capacity to travel mentally in time.
Read the detailed description
A characteristic of human conscious experience is the ability to mentally project oneself to a new time location, either in the past or in the future, i.e. the so-called Mental Time Travel (MTT). The aim of the present project is to study the neural basis of MTT.
It has been proposed that the self-projection in time is similar to the self-projection in space, emphasizing the role of spatial navigation in MTT. Indeed, the posterior parietal cortex, a key region for visual imagery in space-related tasks, and the temporo-parietal junction, a key region for mental projection, are both recruited by self-projection in time and space. However, the specific neural computation of the two processes remains unclear. One way to address this is by investigating the brain oscillations that may modulate MTT. One plausible candidate for MTT processing are beta oscillations because of their role in the production and perception of short temporal intervals, as opposed to alpha oscillations which correlate with illusory changes in self location in space. Thus, we hypothesize that the MTT may rely on posterior parietal cortex's beta oscillations to self-project in time. Moreover, because previous studies showed a different performance in time processing between young and elderly health population, we want to investigate also if there is a differences between these two populations in the MTT.
To assess the MTT we developed a new task in which participants see stimulus faces of different ages, one at a time. Each face is presented with a short phrase describing a particular life event, commonly happening in middle age. Participants perform a 2-alternative forced choice: in the 'Past Projection', they indicate if it is likely or unlikely that the stimulus person has lived the life event 10 years ago; in the 'Future projection' that the stimulus person will live the event 10 years in the future. We use transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to test within subjects the role of target (Beta) and control oscillations (Alpha), in addition to a control non-stimulation condition (Sham). To rule out that tACS may simply affect age perception, participants are also asked to report the age of each stimulus face (Age Estimation task). Moreover, to investigate if there is any correlation between the MTT and the perception of short temporal interval, participants perform a time reproduction task before the brain stimulation and the MTT task. In the Time Reproduction task, a blue square is presented with a variable duration (encoding phase). Immediately after the encoding phase, a red square of the same size and position is presented. Subjects press a response button when they considered that the same of the previously studied time interval has elapsed.
A pilot study from 11 participants shows that beta-tACS corresponds to a shift in the psychometric curve towards a younger age in the 'Past condition', and towards an older age in the 'Future condition'. Thus, participants indicated a younger face as more likely to have lived an event 10 years ago and an older face as more likely to live an event 10 years in the future. This suggests that beta-tACS leads to an under-estimation of time relative to sham and alpha-tACS. Crucially, there were no significant differences in estimating the veridical ages of the stimulus faces. Thus, beta oscillation may modulate self-projection in time, since these data are consistent with an under-estimation of time.
If confirmed, results will allow us to specify that self-projection in time relies on the posterior parietal regions and beta oscillations. Moreover, if supported by our future experiments involving space processing, this result may also shed a new light on the distinction between self-projection in space, which is known to rely on alpha, and self-projection in time that relies on beta. Overall, these data may point to the fact that beta oscillations are critical for processing long durations, in addition to their well-known role in supporting short durations. This may be because beta oscillation may serve as a memory standard to which different durations are compared.
- Conditions
- Healthy Population
- Being tested
- Beta tACS, Alfa tACS, Sham
- Keywords
- Time Perception; Mental Time Travel; tACS; Brain Stimulation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Beta tACSBehavioural
participants perform the Mental Time Travel task (duration 20 minutes), while tACS stimulation is delivered at Beta frequencies (22 Hz)
Alfa tACSBehavioural
participants perform the Mental Time Travel task (duration 20 minutes), while tACS stimulation is delivered at Alfa frequencies (10 Hz)
ShamBehavioural
participants perform the Mental Time Travel task (duration 20 minutes), while Sham tACS stimulation is delivered
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Young participants | 30 young participants will perform the Mental Time Travel task while tACS stimulation is delivered at three different frequencies on the posterior parietal cortex. Interventions are administered in three different sessions in a pseudo-randomized order as described below:
1. Day 1. Beta tACS (22Hz)
2. Day 2. Alpha tACS (10 Hz)
3. Day 3. Sham tACS Receives: Behavioral: Beta tACS; Behavioral: Alfa tACS; Behavioral: Sham | |
| Old participants | 30 old participants will perform the Mental Time Travel task while tACS stimulation is delivered at three different frequencies on the posterior parietal cortex. Interventions are administered in three different sessions in a pseudo-randomized order as described below:
1. Day 1. Beta tACS (22Hz)
2. Day 2. Alpha tACS (10 Hz)
3. Day 3. Sham tACS Receives: Behavioral: Beta tACS; Behavioral: Alfa tACS; Behavioral: Sham |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Mental Time Travel Task.
Participants see 420 stimulus faces of different ages, one at a time. Each face is presented with a short phrase describing a particular life event, commonly happening in middle age. Participants perform a 2-alternative forced choice: in the 'Past Projection condition', they indicate if it is "likely" or "unlikely" that the stimulus person has lived the life event 10 years ago, in the 'Future projection condition' that the stimulus person will live the event 10 years in the future. A psychometric curve will be computed on the proportions of Likely responses, both in the "Future-projection" and in the "Past-projection" condition. We will assess the change in performance between Alpha , Beta and Sham tACS stimulation. Beta-Alpha and Sham tACS stimulation will be delivered in a randomized order in three different days.
Measured: at day 1, day 2 and day 3
Secondary outcomes (2)
Time Reproduction Task
In the Time Reproduction task, a blue square is presented with a variable duration (encoding phase) around a standard interval of 2000 ms (1600, 1800, 2000, 2200 and 2400 ms). Immediately after the encoding phase, a red square of the same size and position was presented. Subjects had to press a response button when they considered that the same (reproduction task) of the previously studied time interval had elapsed.
Measured: at day 1
Change in Age Estimation task
Faces stimuli are presented one at time. Participants are asked to guess the age of the persons depicted on the screen. This is a control task to rule out the possibility that Brain stimulation may simply affect age perception. Thus we will assess the change in performance between the different sessions of tACS stimulation (at day 1, 2 and 3)
Measured: at day 1, day 2, day 3
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Oct 2020
- Study start1 Feb 2019
- Primary completion31 Jan 2021
- Study completion26 Mar 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Healthy PopulationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpAThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Goldsmiths, University of London
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04582994
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EC 1199
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 4 Oct 2020
- Last updated
- 29 Sep 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Anelli F, Avanzi S, Arzy S, Mancuso M, Frassinetti F. Effects of spatial attention on mental time travel in patients with neglect. Cortex. 2018 Apr;101:192-205. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
PubMed 29482017Arzy S, Collette S, Ionta S, Fornari E, Blanke O. Subjective mental time: the functional architecture of projecting the self to past and future. Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Nov;30(10):2009-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06974.x. Epub 2009 Nov 11.
PubMed 19912333Wiener M, Parikh A, Krakow A, Coslett HB. An Intrinsic Role of Beta Oscillations in Memory for Time Estimation. Sci Rep. 2018 May 22;8(1):7992. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26385-6.
PubMed 29789611Lenggenhager B, Halje P, Blanke O. Alpha band oscillations correlate with illusory self-location induced by virtual reality. Eur J Neurosci. 2011 May;33(10):1935-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07647.x. Epub 2011 Mar 13.
PubMed 21395867D'Angelo M, Frassinetti F, Cappelletti M. The Role of Beta Oscillations in Mental Time Travel. Psychol Sci. 2023 Apr;34(4):490-500. doi: 10.1177/09567976221147259. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
PubMed 37067986
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Sep 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Role of Beta Oscillation in Mental Time Travel: a tACS Study in Healthy Subjects
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04582994
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EC 1199
- Conditions
- Healthy Population
- Keywords
- Time Perception; Mental Time Travel; tACS; Brain Stimulation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpAUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Goldsmiths, University of London
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Mar 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The project aims to study the neural basis of Mental Time Travel (MTT), i.e. the ability to travel back and forth in time. It has been proposed that the self-projection in time is similar to the self-projection in space, emphasizing the role of spatial navigation in MTT. Indeed, the posterior parietal cortex, a key region for visual imagery in space-related tasks, and the temporo-parietal junction, a key region for mental projection, are both recruited by self-projection in time and space. However, the specific neural computation of the two processes remains unclear. One way to address this is by investigating the brain oscillations that may modulate MTT. One plausible candidate for MTT processing are beta oscillations because of their role in the production and perception of short temporal intervals, as opposed to alpha oscillations which correlate with illusory changes in self location in space. Thus, the present project investigates the hypothesis that MTT may rely on posterior parietal cortex's beta oscillations to self-project in time. Moreover, cause previous studies showed a different performance in time processing between young and elderly health population, we want to investigate also if there is a difference between these two populations in the capacity to travel mentally in time.
Detailed description
A characteristic of human conscious experience is the ability to mentally project oneself to a new time location, either in the past or in the future, i.e. the so-called Mental Time Travel (MTT). The aim of the present project is to study the neural basis of MTT.
It has been proposed that the self-projection in time is similar to the self-projection in space, emphasizing the role of spatial navigation in MTT. Indeed, the posterior parietal cortex, a key region for visual imagery in space-related tasks, and the temporo-parietal junction, a key region for mental projection, are both recruited by self-projection in time and space. However, the specific neural computation of the two processes remains unclear. One way to address this is by investigating the brain oscillations that may modulate MTT. One plausible candidate for MTT processing are beta oscillations because of their role in the production and perception of short temporal intervals, as opposed to alpha oscillations which correlate with illusory changes in self location in space. Thus, we hypothesize that the MTT may rely on posterior parietal cortex's beta oscillations to self-project in time. Moreover, because previous studies showed a different performance in time processing between young and elderly health population, we want to investigate also if there is a differences between these two populations in the MTT.
To assess the MTT we developed a new task in which participants see stimulus faces of different ages, one at a time. Each face is presented with a short phrase describing a particular life event, commonly happening in middle age. Participants perform a 2-alternative forced choice: in the 'Past Projection', they indicate if it is likely or unlikely that the stimulus person has lived the life event 10 years ago; in the 'Future projection' that the stimulus person will live the event 10 years in the future. We use transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to test within subjects the role of target (Beta) and control oscillations (Alpha), in addition to a control non-stimulation condition (Sham). To rule out that tACS may simply affect age perception, participants are also asked to report the age of each stimulus face (Age Estimation task). Moreover, to investigate if there is any correlation between the MTT and the perception of short temporal interval, participants perform a time reproduction task before the brain stimulation and the MTT task. In the Time Reproduction task, a blue square is presented with a variable duration (encoding phase). Immediately after the encoding phase, a red square of the same size and position is presented. Subjects press a response button when they considered that the same of the previously studied time interval has elapsed.
A pilot study from 11 participants shows that beta-tACS corresponds to a shift in the psychometric curve towards a younger age in the 'Past condition', and towards an older age in the 'Future condition'. Thus, participants indicated a younger face as more likely to have lived an event 10 years ago and an older face as more likely to live an event 10 years in the future. This suggests that beta-tACS leads to an under-estimation of time relative to sham and alpha-tACS. Crucially, there were no significant differences in estimating the veridical ages of the stimulus faces. Thus, beta oscillation may modulate self-projection in time, since these data are consistent with an under-estimation of time.
If confirmed, results will allow us to specify that self-projection in time relies on the posterior parietal regions and beta oscillations. Moreover, if supported by our future experiments involving space processing, this result may also shed a new light on the distinction between self-projection in space, which is known to rely on alpha, and self-projection in time that relies on beta. Overall, these data may point to the fact that beta oscillations are critical for processing long durations, in addition to their well-known role in supporting short durations. This may be because beta oscillation may serve as a memory standard to which different durations are compared.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Young participants | – | Behavioral: Beta tACS, Behavioral: Alfa tACS, Behavioral: Sham30 young participants will perform the Mental Time Travel task while tACS stimulation is delivered at three different frequencies on the posterior parietal cortex. Interventions are administered in three different sessions in a pseudo-randomized order as described below: 1. Day 1. Beta tACS (22Hz) 2. Day 2. Alpha tACS (10 Hz) 3. Day 3. Sham tACS |
| Old participants | – | Behavioral: Beta tACS, Behavioral: Alfa tACS, Behavioral: Sham30 old participants will perform the Mental Time Travel task while tACS stimulation is delivered at three different frequencies on the posterior parietal cortex. Interventions are administered in three different sessions in a pseudo-randomized order as described below: 1. Day 1. Beta tACS (22Hz) 2. Day 2. Alpha tACS (10 Hz) 3. Day 3. Sham tACS |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 33 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- Two groups of healthy partcipants. Age between 20-30 for the first group and age between 60-80 for the second group
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- age between 20-30 for the first group and age between 60-80 for the second group
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- • generalized cognitive impairment (score lower than 24 at the Mini Mental State Examination)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Beta tACSparticipants perform the Mental Time Travel task (duration 20 minutes), while tACS stimulation is delivered at Beta frequencies (22 Hz) | Behavioural | Old participants, Young participants |
| Alfa tACSparticipants perform the Mental Time Travel task (duration 20 minutes), while tACS stimulation is delivered at Alfa frequencies (10 Hz) | Behavioural | Old participants, Young participants |
| Shamparticipants perform the Mental Time Travel task (duration 20 minutes), while Sham tACS stimulation is delivered | Behavioural | Old participants, Young participants |
Primary outcome
Change in Mental Time Travel Task.
Time frame: at day 1, day 2 and day 3
Participants see 420 stimulus faces of different ages, one at a time. Each face is presented with a short phrase describing a particular life event, commonly happening in middle age. Participants perform a 2-alternative forced choice: in the 'Past Projection condition', they indicate if it is "likely" or "unlikely" that the stimulus person has lived the life event 10 years ago, in the 'Future projection condition' that the stimulus person will live the event 10 years in the future. A psychometric curve will be computed on the proportions of Likely responses, both in the "Future-projection" and in the "Past-projection" condition. We will assess the change in performance between Alpha , Beta and Sham tACS stimulation. Beta-Alpha and Sham tACS stimulation will be delivered in a randomized order in three different days.
2 secondary outcomes
Time Reproduction Task
Time frame: at day 1
Change in Age Estimation task
Time frame: at day 1, day 2, day 3
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Sep 2023.
- Background: PubMed 29482017Anelli F, Avanzi S, Arzy S, Mancuso M, Frassinetti F. Effects of spatial attention on mental time travel in patients with neglect. Cortex. 2018 Apr;101:192-205. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
- Background: PubMed 19912333Arzy S, Collette S, Ionta S, Fornari E, Blanke O. Subjective mental time: the functional architecture of projecting the self to past and future. Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Nov;30(10):2009-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06974.x. Epub 2009 Nov 11.
- Background: PubMed 29789611Wiener M, Parikh A, Krakow A, Coslett HB. An Intrinsic Role of Beta Oscillations in Memory for Time Estimation. Sci Rep. 2018 May 22;8(1):7992. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26385-6.
- Background: PubMed 21395867Lenggenhager B, Halje P, Blanke O. Alpha band oscillations correlate with illusory self-location induced by virtual reality. Eur J Neurosci. 2011 May;33(10):1935-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07647.x. Epub 2011 Mar 13.
- Results publication: PubMed 37067986D'Angelo M, Frassinetti F, Cappelletti M. The Role of Beta Oscillations in Mental Time Travel. Psychol Sci. 2023 Apr;34(4):490-500. doi: 10.1177/09567976221147259. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
- D'Angelo M, Frassinetti F, Cappelletti M. The Role of Beta Oscillations in Mental Time Travel. Psychol Sci. 2023 Apr;34(4):490-500. doi: 10.1177/09567976221147259. Epub 2023 Feb 16.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Healthy Population
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Safety and Immunogenicity of Chimeric Hemagglutinin mRNA Vaccine Candidates
Influenza
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Clinical Trial of MK-6916 in Participants With Moderate and Severe Kidney Disease Compared to Healthy Controls (MK-6916-013)
Healthy, Renal Impairment
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn How Different Forms of the Study Medicine Called Berobenatide is Taken up Into the Blood in Adults With Overweight or Obesity
Overweight and/or Obesity, Healthy Participants
Recruiting
Developing a Support Application for Food Pantries (SAFPAS) to Improve Client Access to Healthy Foods & Enhance Emergency Preparedness
Improving Healthy Food Access in Food Insecurity Populations in Normal and Emergency Situations
Recruiting
Nutrition Outcomes Using a Randomized Intervention Via Smartphone on Dietary Habits
Healthy Adult Participants, Mindful Eating Intervention
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Healthy Population, run by Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Mental Time Travel Task. (time frame: at day 1, day 2 and day 3). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04582994, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Sep 2023.