AzTrials
AzTrials

Dysfunctional Uterine BleedingNCT04579965

Misotac vs Combined Oral Contraceptive Pill in the Treatment of Symptomatic Isthmocele

A study testing medical treatment of isthmocele in people with Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding, run by Mansoura University Hospital.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Isthmocele is a growing concern as a cause of abnormal uterine bleeding, especially post menstrual bleeding which may be present in up to 82% of these cases (Iannone et al 2019). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age, women only
Conditions the study is for
Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding
What is being tested?
medical treatment of isthmocele
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Oct 2020to 1 Dec 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Women with a previous cesarean section
  • who presented with postmenstrual spotting,
  • sonohysterography had shown a isthmocele

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy,
  • (suspected) malignancies,
  • use of any hormonal contraceptives,
  • fibroid,
  • infection in the genital tract

About this study

Isthmocele is a growing concern as a cause of abnormal uterine bleeding, especially post menstrual bleeding which may be present in up to 82% of these cases (Iannone et al 2019).

our trial is a randomized clinical trial in which women will be randomly allocated to either medical treatment by oral contraceptive or to medical treatment by misotac.

Read the detailed description

Isthmocele is a growing concern as a cause of abnormal uterine bleeding, especially post menstrual bleeding which may be present in up to 82% of these cases There is no universal standard definition of isthmocele but most of the authors agree that isthmocele as a myometrial discontinuity in the myometrium of the anterior uterine wall of >2mm at the site of a cesarean scar in non-pregnant women.

Treatment should be offered only to the symptomatic patient. Surgery, by hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, laparotomy, or vaginal routes, is the most common treatment of choice even in the small defect Surgery is not without complications and many women reject it as a treatment option so it is reasonable to look for medical methods of management.

The pathogenesis of AUB following the development of isthmocele remains unexplained. Oral contraceptive pills might represent a valid option due to a regulatory effect on the endometrium. Several authors describe the effectiveness of oral contraceptives in reducing bleeding disorders correlated to isthmocele.

Another theory of AUB following the development of isthmocele is that menstrual blood can be collected in the defect so that it seeps slowly over the days following menstruation. This mechanism is added by impaired uterine contractility at the scar area.

Misoprostol is a synthetic analog of prostaglandin E1, which increases myometrial contractions so it can be used for various other indications in obstetrics and gynecology the aim is to examine two different methods of medical treatment in cases of symptomatic isthmocele; first regulatory effect on the endometrium (Oral contraceptive pills) and second contraction of myometrium (misotac)

Patient and methods:

Women with a previous cesarean section who presented with postmenstrual spotting, and in whom sonohysterography had shown a isthmocele were eligible. A isthmocele was defined as an indentation in the anterior uterine wall at the site of the caesarean scar with at least 2 mm depth, measured during sonohysterography.

Postmenstrual spotting needed to be present for at least three consecutive months after the last cesarean section. Postmenstrual spotting was defined as two or more days of brownish discharge at the end of menstrual bleeding when the total period of menstrual bleeding exceeds 7 days

Exclusion criteria included any organic condition that will be the cause of that bleeding; Pregnancy, (suspected) malignancies, use of any hormonal contraceptives, fibroid, infection in the genital tract, etc.

Randomization After written informed consent was given, women were randomly allocated to either medical treatment by oral contraceptive or to medical treatment by misotac.

Being tested
medical treatment of isthmocele
Keywords
Postmenstrual bleeding, Isthmocele, Combined Oral Contraceptive Pill, Misotac
Medical subject headings
Metrorrhagia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • medical treatment of isthmoceleDrug

    comparison between different drugs

Study groups in NCT04579965
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
combined contraceptive pillsOthertreat patients with isthmocele with oral contraceptive pills
Receives: Drug: medical treatment of isthmocele
MisotacOthertreat patients with isthmocele with misotac.
Receives: Drug: medical treatment of isthmocele

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. postmenstrual spotting.

    the effect of the drugs on the number of days with postmenstrual spotting during a menstrual cycle.

    Measured: after one month of drug treatment

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Quality of life, Satisfaction assessed by the VAS

    the effect of the drugs on Quality of life, Satisfaction

    Measured: after one month of drug treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Oct 2020
  2. Study start1 Oct 2020 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04579965
Sponsor's protocol ID
1
Status last verified
Oct 2020
First submitted
28 Sep 2020
Last updated
8 Oct 2020
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Iannone P, Nencini G, Bonaccorsi G, Martinello R, Pontrelli G, Scioscia M, Nappi L, Greco P, Scutiero G. Isthmocele: From Risk Factors to Management. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2019 Jan;41(1):44-52. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676109. Epub 2019 Jan 15.

    PubMed 30646424
  • Kremer TG, Ghiorzi IB, Dibi RP. Isthmocele: an overview of diagnosis and treatment. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2019 Jun 3;65(5):714-721. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.65.5.714.

    PubMed 31166450
  • Zhang X, Yang M, Wang Q, Chen J, Ding J, Hua K. Prospective evaluation of five methods used to treat cesarean scar defects. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Sep;134(3):336-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 Jun 30.

    PubMed 27473332
  • Florio P, Gubbini G, Marra E, Dores D, Nascetti D, Bruni L, Battista R, Moncini I, Filippeschi M, Petraglia F. A retrospective case-control study comparing hysteroscopic resection versus hormonal modulation in treating menstrual disorders due to isthmocele. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2011 Jun;27(6):434-8. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2010.495431. Epub 2011 Jan 4.

    PubMed 21204608
  • Tahara M, Shimizu T, Shimoura H. Preliminary report of treatment with oral contraceptive pills for intermenstrual vaginal bleeding secondary to a cesarean section scar. Fertil Steril. 2006 Aug;86(2):477-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.01.020. Epub 2006 Jun 12.

    PubMed 16769058
  • Thurmond AS, Harvey WJ, Smith SA. Cesarean section scar as a cause of abnormal vaginal bleeding: diagnosis by sonohysterography. J Ultrasound Med. 1999 Jan;18(1):13-6; quiz 17-8. doi: 10.7863/jum.1999.18.1.13.

    PubMed 9952074
  • Wu HL, Marwah S, Wang P, Wang QM, Chen XW. Misoprostol for medical treatment of missed abortion: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017 May 10;7(1):1664. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01892-0.

    PubMed 28490770
  • Tower AM, Frishman GN. Cesarean scar defects: an underrecognized cause of abnormal uterine bleeding and other gynecologic complications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):562-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.03.008. Epub 2013 May 14.

    PubMed 23680518
  • Vervoort A, van der Voet LF, Hehenkamp W, Thurkow AL, van Kesteren P, Quartero H, Kuchenbecker W, Bongers M, Geomini P, de Vleeschouwer L, van Hooff M, van Vliet H, Veersema S, Renes WB, Oude Rengerink K, Zwolsman SE, Brolmann H, Mol B, Huirne J. Hysteroscopic resection of a uterine caesarean scar defect (niche) in women with postmenstrual spotting: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2018 Feb;125(3):326-334. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14733. Epub 2017 Jul 5.

    PubMed 28504857

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing medical treatment of isthmocele in people with Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding, run by Mansoura University Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

postmenstrual spotting. (time frame: after one month of drug treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04579965, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Oct 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in