AzTrials
AzTrials

C3GPhase 2NOBLENCT04572854

Study Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Pegcetacoplan in Post-Transplant Recurrence of C3G or IC-MPGN

A Phase 2 study testing Pegcetacoplan in people with C3G and IC-MPGN, run by Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 25 sites in 11 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a Phase 2, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pegcetacoplan in patients who have post-transplant recurrence of C3G or IC-MPGN. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
C3G, IC-MPGN, Renal Transplant
What is being tested?
Pegcetacoplan
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
13 participants
Where
25 sitesin 11 countries
Study dates
7 Sep 2021to 20 Jan 2026
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • At least 18 years of age at screening
  • Must have clinical and pathologic evidence of recurrent C3G or IC-MPGN
  • Stable (not improving) or worsening disease, in the opinion of the investigator, in the 2 months preceding the first dose of pegcetacoplan
  • eGFR ≥15 mL/min/1.73 m2, calculated by the Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine equation for adults
  • No more than 50% glomerulosclerosis or interstitial fibrosis on the screening renal allograft biopsy
  • Stable regimen for recurrent C3G/IC-MPGN for at least 4 weeks prior to the screening renal allograft biopsy and from the time of the screening renal allograft biopsy until randomization
  • Have received required vaccinations against N. meningitidis, S. pneumoniae, and H. influenzae (type B) or agree to receive vaccinations, if applicable vaccination records are not available. Vaccination is mandatory unless documented evidence exists that subjects are non-responders to vaccination.

Who cannot join

  • Absolute neutrophil count <1000 cells/mm3 during screening
  • Previous treatment with pegcetacoplan
  • Evidence of rejection on the screening renal allograft biopsy that requires treatment
  • Diagnosis or history of HIV, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C infection or positive serology at screening indicative of infection with any of these viruses
  • Weight more than 100 kg at screening
  • Hypersensitivity to pegcetacoplan or any of the excipients
Show all 14Show fewer
  • History of meningococcal disease
  • Malignancy, except for the following:
  • Cured basal or squamous cell skin cancer
  • Curatively treated in situ disease
  • Malignancy free and off treatment for ≥5 years
  • Significant renal disease in the renal allograft secondary to another condition (eg, infection, malignancy, monoclonal gammopathy, rejection, or a medication) that would, in the opinion of the investigator, confound interpretation of the study results
  • Participation in any other investigational drug trial or exposure to other investigational agent, device, or procedure within 30 days or 5 half-lives from the last dose of the investigational agent (whichever is longer) prior to screening
  • Known or suspected hereditary fructose intolerance.

Trial locations and contacts

25 sites in 11 countries.

25 sites in 11 countries

United States7 sites
  • Children's Hospital Colorado

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California

    Los Angeles, California, 900033

  • NYU Langone Health Transplant Insitute

    New York, New York, 10016

  • CUIMC

    New York, New York, 10032

  • Mayo Clinic Arizona

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85054

  • Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

  • Washington University, St.Louis

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

Other trials in United States

Brazil4 sites
  • Santa Casa de Misericordia de Belo Horizonte

    Belo Horizonte, CEP 30150-221

  • UPECLIN - Unidade de Pesquisa Clínica da Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu - FMB/UNESP

    Botucatu, São Paulo, 18618-686

  • Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericordia de Porto Alegre

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90020-090

  • Clinical Research Center, Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

    São Paulo, 05403-000

Other trials in Brazil

France3 sites
  • Lille Regional University Hospital Center, Claude Huriez Hospital, Department of Nephrology

    Lille, 59000

  • Hopital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon

    Lyon, 69437

  • Center Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier

    Montpellier, 34295 CEDEX 5

Other trials in France

Argentina2 sites
  • Hospital Universitario Fundacion Favaloro

    Buenos Aires, C1093AAS

  • Hospital de Alta Complejidad en Red El Cruce Dr. Nestor Carlos Kirchner

    San Juan Bautista, Buenos Aires, B1888AAE

Other trials in Argentina

Australia2 sites
  • Monash Medical Centre

    Clayton, 3168

  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital

    Parkville, Victoria, 3050

Other trials in Australia

United Kingdom2 sites
  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

    London, W12 0HS

  • Freeman Hospital

    Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN

Other trials in United Kingdom

Austria1 site
  • Medical University of Vienna

    Vienna, 1090

Other trials in Austria

Italy1 site
  • Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS

    Ranica, 24020

Other trials in Italy

Netherlands1 site
  • Radbound University Medical Center

    Nijmegen, 6500 HB

Other trials in Netherlands

Spain1 site
  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Nephrology Department

    Madrid, 28041

Other trials in Spain

Switzerland1 site
  • CHUV

    Lausanne, 1005

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: An Open-Label, Randomized, Controlled, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Pegcetacoplan in the Treatment of Post-Transplant Recurrence of C3G or IC-MPGN

This is a Phase 2, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pegcetacoplan in patients who have post-transplant recurrence of C3G or IC-MPGN.

Being tested
Pegcetacoplan
Medical subject headings
Glomerulonephritis, Membranoproliferative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PegcetacoplanDrug

    Complement (C3) Inhibitor

Study groups in NCT04572854
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1ExperimentalPegcetacoplan treatment of 1080 mg (sub-cutaneous infusion) twice weekly will be given throughout the entire study.
Receives: Drug: Pegcetacoplan
Group 2OtherNo intervention given during the randomized controlled portion of the study (through week 12). After week 12, subjects will receive pegcetacoplan treatment.
Receives: Drug: Pegcetacoplan

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Subjects With Reduction in C3c Staining on Renal Biopsy at Week 12

    C3c staining intensity is semi quantitatively graded on a scale of 0 to 3, in which negative, 1+, 2+ and 3+ staining corresponds to scores of 0 to 3, with 0 being absent and 3 being the highest intensity seen on immunofluorescence. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Reduction in C3c staining was defined as decrease of at least 2 orders of magnitude of intensity from baseline. Baseline was defined as the most recent non-missing measurement prior to first administration of study drug for Group 1 subjects or randomization for Group 2 subjects.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Percentage of Subjects With Reduction in C3c Staining on Renal Biopsy at Week 52

    C3c staining intensity is semi quantitatively graded on a scale of 0 to 3, in which negative, 1+, 2+ and 3+ staining corresponds to scores of 0 to 3, with 0 being absent and 3 being the highest intensity seen on immunofluorescence. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Reduction in C3c staining was defined as decrease of at least 2 orders of magnitude of intensity from baseline. Baseline was defined as the most recent non-missing measurement prior to first administration of study drug for Group 1 subjects or randomization for Group 2 subjects.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

  2. Number of Subjects With Shift of C3c Staining From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 52

    C3c staining intensity is semi quantitatively graded on a scale of 0 to 3, in which negative, 1+, 2+ and 3+ staining corresponds to scores of 0 to 3, with 0 being absent and 3 being the highest intensity seen on immunofluorescence. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Baseline was defined as the most recent non-missing measurement prior to first administration of study drug for Group 1 subjects or randomization for Group 2 subjects. Number of subjects who demonstrated a shift of C3c staining from baseline to Week 12 and baseline to Week 52 are presented.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12 and Week 52

  3. Percentage of Subjects With Stabilization or Improvement in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at Week 52

    eGFR was calculated by using Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine equation. Stabilization or improvement in eGFR was defined as no more than a 25% decrease relative to baseline. Baseline was defined as the most recent non-missing measurement prior to first administration of study drug for Group 1 subjects or randomization for Group 2 subjects.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

  4. Percentage of Subjects With Stabilization or Improvement of Serum Creatinine Concentration at Week 52

    Stabilization or improvement in serum creatinine was defined as no increase or an increase of no more than 25% from baseline. Baseline was defined as the most recent non-missing measurement prior to first administration of study drug for Group 1 subjects or randomization for Group 2 subjects.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

  5. Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for analysis of eGFR which was calculated by using CKD-EPI creatinine equation. Baseline was defined as the most recent non-missing measurement prior to first administration of study drug for Group 1 subjects or randomization for Group 2 subjects.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

  6. Percentage Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for analysis of eGFR which was calculated by using CKD-EPI creatinine equation. Baseline was defined as the most recent non-missing measurement prior to first administration of study drug for Group 1 subjects or randomization for Group 2 subjects.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

  7. Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine Concentration at Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for analysis of serum creatinine concentration. Baseline was defined as the most recent non-missing measurement prior to first administration of study drug for Group 1 subjects or randomization for Group 2 subjects.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

  8. Percentage Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine Concentration at Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for analysis of serum creatinine concentration. Baseline was defined as the most recent non-missing measurement prior to first administration of study drug for Group 1 subjects or randomization for Group 2 subjects.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Oct 2020
  2. Study start7 Sep 2021
  3. Primary completion27 Feb 2023
  4. Study completion20 Jan 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
13 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04572854
Sponsor's protocol ID
APL2-C3G-204
Acronym
NOBLE
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
29 Sep 2020
Last updated
21 Apr 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Pegcetacoplan in people with C3G and IC-MPGN, run by Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 25 sites in 11 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 25 sites in United States, Brazil, France, Argentina, Australia and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Feb 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Subjects With Reduction in C3c Staining on Renal Biopsy at Week 12 (time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in