AzTrials
AzTrials

CannabisFOCUSNCT04567238

Impact of Reduced Cannabis Use on Functional Outcomes (R33 Phase)

A study testing Mobile contingency management in people with Cannabis and Cannabis Use, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Nearly 20 million Americans report use of cannabis in the past month, and heavy cannabis use has increased by nearly 60% in the U.S. since 2007. Heavy cannabis use is associated with lower educational attainment, reduced physical activity, increased rates of addiction and unemployment, and neuropsychological deficits. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Cannabis, Cannabis Use
What is being tested?
Mobile contingency management
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
19 Mar 2021to 22 Nov 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Report 40 or more days of cannabis use (other than ingested cannabis, i.e., edibles) in past 90 days
  • Can speak and write fluent conversational English
  • Are between 18 and 80 years of age
  • Are willing to attempt to reduce frequency of cannabis use
  • Complete at least 10 of the 14 nightly diaries during the ad lib phase of the study procedures.

Who cannot join

  • Are expected to have an unstable medication regimen during the study
  • Are currently receiving non-study treatment for cannabis use disorder
  • Are pregnant or become pregnant
  • Meet criteria for a serious mental illness (e.g., bipolar disorder, schizophrenia)
  • Meet criteria for a substance use disorder other than nicotine or cannabis use disorders
  • Are currently imprisoned or in psychiatric hospitalization or become imprisoned or in psychiatric hospitalization
  • Report imminent risk for suicide or homicide
  • Meet criteria for bio-verified sustained abstinence (i.e., all of their saliva tests are negative during the 6-week experimental phase of the study)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Duke University Medical Center

    Durham, North Carolina, 27706

Other trials in United States

About this study

Nearly 20 million Americans report use of cannabis in the past month, and heavy cannabis use has increased by nearly 60% in the U.S. since 2007. Heavy cannabis use is associated with lower educational attainment, reduced physical activity, increased rates of addiction and unemployment, and neuropsychological deficits. Studies suggest that cannabis use is also associated with increased mental health symptoms, drugged driving, and traffic accidents. While there is evidence that sustained abstinence can lead to improvements in the functional outcomes of former users, the degree to which reductions alone (i.e., not sustained abstinence) in cannabis use might be associated with positive changes in functional outcomes is unknown. This is a critical gap in the literature, as many interventions for cannabis and other drugs are associated with decreases in frequency and quantity of use, but fail to achieve an effect on overall abstinence rates. The objective of the present research is to use ecological momentary assessment (EMA), a real-time, naturalistic data collection method, to prospectively study the impact of reduced cannabis use on functional outcomes in heavy cannabis users. Contingency management (CM) will be used to promote reductions in frequency and quantity of cannabis use. CM is an intensive behavioral therapy that is highly effective at producing short-term reductions in illicit drug use. We have recently developed a novel approach that leverages mobile technology and recent developments in cannabis testing. We have pilot-tested this approach with heavy cannabis users and found that it is an acceptable and feasible method. The present research will use this technology in conjunction with EMA methods to study the impact of reduced cannabis use on key functional outcomes. Our central hypothesis is that reductions in frequency and quantity of cannabis use will lead to positive changes in cannabis users' mental health, self-efficacy, physical activity, working memory, health-related quality of life, and driving behavior. The rationale for this research is that it will provide the first and only real-time data concerning the potential impact of reductions in cannabis use on functional outcomes. As such, the findings from the present research will directly inform ongoing efforts to include reductions in illicit drug use as a valid, clinically-meaningful outcome measure in clinical trials of pharmacotherapies for the treatment of substance use disorders.

Being tested
Mobile contingency management
Medical subject headings
Marijuana Abuse

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Mobile contingency managementBehavioural

    Also called mCM

    Mobile contingency management is a mobile-phone based behavioral therapy that provides positive reinforcement (i.e., money) for abstinence that is highly effective at reducing substance use.

Study groups in NCT04567238
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Reduced Use ConditionExperimentalParticipants in the reduced use condition will be provided mobile contingency management, in which they are paid to provide marijuana saliva readings that suggest they have been abstinent from marijuana use.
Receives: Behavioral: Mobile contingency management
Control ConditionNo interventionParticipants in the control condition will be asked to provide marijuana saliva readings, but they are not paid for abstinent readings. Instead, their payments are yoked to the average amount of payment made by two participants in the reduced use condition.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Mental Health Symptoms

    Mental health symptoms will be measured by the 90-item Symptom Checklist (SCL-90). This measure has a scoring range of 0 to 360, with lower scores indicating lower distress related to mental health.

    Measured: Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)

  2. Change in Self-reported Self-efficacy

    Self-efficacy will be measured by the Marijuana Reduction Strategies Self-Efficacy Scale. This measure has a scoring range of 0 to 84, with higher scores indicating increased self-efficacy.

    Measured: Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)

  3. Change in Physical Activity as Measured by the Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire

    Physical activity will be measured using the Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 99, with higher scores indicating increased physical activity.

    Measured: Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)

  4. Change in Physical Activity as Measured by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire

    Physical activity will be measured using a continuous score on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. The score is calculated by multiplying metabolic equivalents times minutes per day times days per week; scores range from 0 to 13,440. Higher scores indicate increased physical activity.

    Measured: Time Frame: Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Change in Health-related Quality of Life, WHOQOL-BREF

    Health-related quality of life will be measured with the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief (WHOQOL-BREF). The measure has a scoring range of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a higher quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)

  2. Change in Visual Working Memory

    Visual working memory will be measured by the Visual Working Memory (VWM) Index of Wechsler Memory Scale, which is comprised of the Symbol Span and Spatial Addition subtests, whose scores are added together to create a VWM score. Although this scale has no minimum or maximum score, higher scores indicate better visual working memory.

    Measured: Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)

  3. Change in Auditory Working Memory

    Auditory working memory will be measured by the Auditory Working Memory (AWM) Index of Wechsler Memory Scale, which is comprised of the Digit Span and Letter-Number Sequencing subtests, whose scores are added together to create a AWM score. Although this scale has no minimum or maximum score, higher scores indicate better auditory working memory.

    Measured: Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)

  4. Change in Impulsivity as Measured by Delay Discounting (i.e., Iowa Gambling Task)

    Impulsivity will be measured with a delay discounting task called the Iowa Gambling Task. Scores range from -100 to 100. Higher scores indicate more advantageous choices (i.e., lower impulsivity).

    Measured: Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)

  5. Change in Impulsivity as Measured by the Balloon Analogue Risk Task

    Impulsivity will be measured with the Balloon Analogue Risk Task. Scores range from 0 to 128, and higher scores indicate higher impulsivity.

    Measured: Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)

  6. Change in Impulsivity as Measured by Self-report

    Self-reported impulsivity will be measured with the Urgency, Premeditation (lack of), Perserverance (lack of), Sensation Seeking, Positive Urgency, Impulsive Behavior Scale (UPPS-P). The measure has a score range of 59 to 236. Higher scores indicate higher impulsivity.

    Measured: Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)

  7. Change in Number of Days of Drugged Driving

    Number of days of drugged driving in the past month will be self-reported by participants using a Timeline Follow-Back Interview.

    Measured: Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Sep 2020
  2. Study start19 Mar 2021
  3. Primary completion22 Nov 2023
  4. Study completion22 Nov 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04567238
Sponsor's protocol ID
PRO00100100_1
Acronym
FOCUS
Status last verified
Nov 2024
First submitted
23 Sep 2020
Last updated
24 Dec 2024
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: There is no plan to share individual participant data.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Mobile contingency management in people with Cannabis and Cannabis Use, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Dec 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Mental Health Symptoms (time frame: Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Dec 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in