AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiovascular DiseasesNeovasvsDCBNCT04565561

Bioabsorbable Scaffold vs Drug-coated Balloon for Coronary de Novo Lesions in STEMI: Prospective Observational Trial

An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases, run by Shenzhen People's Hospital at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

a prospective, single center, observational clinical trail. Aim to to compare the efficacy and safety of the Bioabsorbable scaffold (BRS) Neovas BRS and Drug-coating balloon (DCB) in the treatment of STEMI patients with coronary artery disease and to further evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the two new… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cardiovascular Diseases
What is being tested?
Neovas BRS or DCB
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Oct 2020to 1 Dec 2022
How long will I take part?
1 Year
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: STEMI patients undergoing PPCI

Who may be able to join

  • 1) Age > 18 years old (2) STEMI patients suitable for PPCI operation. Chest pain for more than 20 minutes; At least 2 leads ST-T segment elevation > 1 mm, or new LBBB, or myocardial infarction confirmed by echocardiography; It is expected that the reperfusion treatment can be successfully implemented within 12 hours after the occurrence of acute myocardial infarction.
  • Target vessels are suitable for PPCI and Single vessel disease (non culprit vessel stenosis < 50%). It is a primary coronary lesion; Reference vessel diameter > 2.5mm and < 4mm, lesion length < 20mm; There is no obvious calcification at the lesion site; After thrombus aspiration or pre dilation balloon pretreatment, the residual stenosis < 30% has no blood flow restrictive dissection.
  • Patients refused to accept drug-eluting stent implantation, voluntarily participated and signed informed consent, accepted and was willing to cooperate with follow-up, and was willing to cooperate with standard secondary prevention and treatment of coronary heart disease.

Who cannot join

  • The age is less than 18 years old; Previous history of myocardial infarction or post coronary stent operation; Left main disease; It is known that it is contraindications or resistance to the following drugs: bevaludine, low molecular heparin, common heparin, aspirin, clopidogrel / tegrelol; Participate in other clinical studies and interfere with the study; It is uncertain whether there is any neurological injury: for example, after resuscitation; It needs tracheal intubation / artificial ventilation; There was cardiogenic shock before grouping; It is known that there are intracranial diseases: occupying position, aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation, hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accident, ischemic cerebrovascular accident; Internal bleeding such as gastrointestinal bleeding before selection; It is planned to perform major surgical treatment within 6 weeks; Serious infectious disease, malignant tumor disease, serious blood disease and autoimmune disease; in recent March, there has been a history of large-dose use of immunosuppressant; Non coronary vasculitis and thrombotic diseases (vasculitis, aortic dissection, abdominal aneurysm); Serious mental illness patients; The life expectancy is less than 1 year; No consent to participate in the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Shenzhen People's Hospital

    Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518020

    yaowang lin, Master, +86-20-22943200, linyw012@hotmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Neovas Versus DCB for Coronary de Novo Lesions in Patients With STEMI: a Prospective Observational Clinical Trial

a prospective, single center, observational clinical trail. Aim to to compare the efficacy and safety of the Bioabsorbable scaffold (BRS) Neovas BRS and Drug-coating balloon (DCB) in the treatment of STEMI patients with coronary artery disease and to further evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the two new interventional methods in STEMI intervention, so as to better guide clinical practice.

Read the detailed description
  1. To study the advantages and disadvantages of Neovas BRS and DCB in interventional treatment of de novo lesions in STEMI patients, in order to better guide the clinical.
  2. To explore the safety of Neovas BRS in interventional treatment of ide novo lesions in STEMI patients.
  3. To explore the safety of DCB in interventional treatment of de novo lesions in STEMI patients.
Being tested
Neovas BRS or DCB
Keywords
Neovas BRS, DCB, DES, STEMI
Medical subject headings
Cardiovascular Diseases, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Neovas BRS or DCBDevice

    Also called DES

    All STEMI patients were predilated (including predilated balloon or cutting balloon) before randomization. Thrombus aspiration was determined by the surgeon according to the specific situation.

    Sufficient predilation criteria: the following two conditions must be met: A. residual stenosis < 30%; B. no flow limiting dissection or TIMI grade 2-3.

Study groups in NCT04565561
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Neovas BRS groupNeovas BRS group, n=20
Receives: Device: Neovas BRS or DCB
DCB groupDCB group, n=20
Receives: Device: Neovas BRS or DCB

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. late lumen loss (LLL)

    The primary endpoint in-segment is late lumen loss (LLL) with follow-up of 1 year.

    Measured: 1-year

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. target lesion revascularization (TLR)

    The secondary endpoint is target lesion revascularization (TLR) with follow-up of 1 year.

    Measured: 1-year

  2. cardiac death

    The secondary endpoint is cardiac death with follow-up of 1 year.

    Measured: 1-year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Sep 2020
  2. Study start1 Oct 2020 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
Target duration
1 Year
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04565561
Sponsor's protocol ID
KY-LL-2020099-02
Acronym
NeovasvsDCB
Status last verified
Sep 2020
First submitted
23 Sep 2020
Last updated
25 Sep 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases, run by Shenzhen People's Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

late lumen loss (LLL) (time frame: 1-year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Sep 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in