Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationNCT04548934
Effect of Wearing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) on CPR Quality in Times of the COVID-19-pandemic
A study testing Personal protective equipment (PPE) and No Personal protective equipment (PPE) in people with Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Personal Protective Equipment, run by Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Background The significant risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to healthcare staff mandated changes to Basic and Advanced Life Support (BLS and ALS) guidelines. As advised by the European Resuscitation Council (ERC), healthcare staff should put on airborne-precaution personal protective equipment (PPE) before starting… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Personal Protective Equipment
- What is being tested?
- Personal protective equipment (PPE) and No Personal protective equipment (PPE)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 34 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 13 Sep 2020to 31 Jan 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Member of the rescue organization "Croce Bianca"
- Aged 18-60
- Certified in basic life support (BLS)
- No current COVID-19 symptoms, not being tested positive for COVID-19, no COVID-19 symptoms in the 4 weeks before the tests, no quarantine or unprotected contacts with COVID positive patients in the last 4 weeks, body temperature ≤ 37.5°on test days.
- Obtained informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Age <16 or >60 years,
- No informed consent
- Current COVID-19 symptoms, being tested positive for COVID 19 or symptoms in the 4 weeks before the tests, quarantine or unprotected contacts with COVID-19 positive patients in the last 4 weeks, body temperature ≥ 37.5°on test days.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Background The significant risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to healthcare staff mandated changes to Basic and Advanced Life Support (BLS and ALS) guidelines. As advised by the European Resuscitation Council (ERC), healthcare staff should put on airborne-precaution personal protective equipment (PPE) before starting chest compressions and/or airway interventions, as a minimum an FFP3 mask (FFP2 or N95 if FFP3 not available), eye and face protection and long-sleeved gown. However, wearing FFP3 masks has been shown to highly impair cardiopulmonary exercise capacity and the effect of wearing PPE on the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation is not known. The aim of this project is therefore to to investigate whether wearing PPE has an effect on the quality of chest compressions.
Methods The study forsees a simulated CPR scenario on manikins. Study participants are lay rescuers and members of the rescue organization Croce Bianca. Each participant will perform 5 sequences consisting of 2 min of chest compressions altered by 2 min of no chest compressions (break), as recommended by the current ERC guidelines. The participants will perform the described CPR sequence two times in a cross-over design with randomized order, once while wearing PPE and once without wearing PPE. Between the two CPR sequences (i.e. with and without PPE) a break of 60 min for recovery will be given. During both CPR sequences, the quality of chest compressions will be measured.
- Being tested
- Personal protective equipment (PPE), No Personal protective equipment (PPE)
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Personal protective equipment (PPE)Device
Wearing of PPE (FFP3 mask, gloves, eye protection, long-sleeved gown)
No Personal protective equipment (PPE)Device
Standard CPR without wearing PPE
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| No PPE | Active comparator | Cardiopulmonary resuscitation without wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) Receives: Device: No Personal protective equipment (PPE) |
| PPE | Experimental | Cardiopulmonary resuscitation while wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) Receives: Device: Personal protective equipment (PPE) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Depth of chest compression
Difference in chest compression depth during a simulated cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on manikins when performed with and without wearing personal protective equipment (PPE).
Measured: 20 minutes of CPR
Secondary outcomes (2)
Chest compression rate
Difference in chest compression rate during a simulated cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on manikins when performed with and without wearing personal protective equipment (PPE).
Measured: 20 minutes of CPR
Relaxation
Difference in the percentage of compressions with incomplete release during a simulated cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on manikins when performed with and without wearing personal protective equipment (PPE).
Measured: 20 minutes of CPR
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Sep 2020
- Study start13 Sep 2020
- Primary completion31 Oct 2020
- Study completion31 Jan 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Simon Rauch, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Eurac research, Institute of mountain emergency medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04548934
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CPR PPE
- Status last verified
- Sep 2020
- First submitted
- 2 Sep 2020
- Last updated
- 2 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Wearing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) on CPR Quality in Times of the COVID-19-pandemic
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04548934
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CPR PPE
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Institute of Mountain Emergency MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 13 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background The significant risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to healthcare staff mandated changes to Basic and Advanced Life Support (BLS and ALS) guidelines. As advised by the European Resuscitation Council (ERC), healthcare staff should put on airborne-precaution personal protective equipment (PPE) before starting chest compressions and/or airway interventions, as a minimum an FFP3 mask (FFP2 or N95 if FFP3 not available), eye and face protection and long-sleeved gown. However, wearing FFP3 masks has been shown to highly impair cardiopulmonary exercise capacity and the effect of wearing PPE on the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation is not known. The aim of this project is therefore to to investigate whether wearing PPE has an effect on the quality of chest compressions.
Methods The study forsees a simulated CPR scenario on manikins. Study participants are lay rescuers and members of the rescue organization Croce Bianca. Each participant will perform 5 sequences consisting of 2 min of chest compressions altered by 2 min of no chest compressions (break), as recommended by the current ERC guidelines. The participants will perform the described CPR sequence two times in a cross-over design with randomized order, once while wearing PPE and once without wearing PPE. Between the two CPR sequences (i.e. with and without PPE) a break of 60 min for recovery will be given. During both CPR sequences, the quality of chest compressions will be measured.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| No PPE | Active comparator | Device: No Personal protective equipment (PPE)Cardiopulmonary resuscitation without wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) |
| PPE | Experimental | Device: Personal protective equipment (PPE)Cardiopulmonary resuscitation while wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Member of the rescue organization "Croce Bianca"
- Aged 18-60
- Certified in basic life support (BLS)
- No current COVID-19 symptoms, not being tested positive for COVID-19, no COVID-19 symptoms in the 4 weeks before the tests, no quarantine or unprotected contacts with COVID positive patients in the last 4 weeks, body temperature ≤ 37.5°on test days.
- Obtained informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age <16 or >60 years,
- No informed consent
- Current COVID-19 symptoms, being tested positive for COVID 19 or symptoms in the 4 weeks before the tests, quarantine or unprotected contacts with COVID-19 positive patients in the last 4 weeks, body temperature ≥ 37.5°on test days.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Personal protective equipment (PPE)Wearing of PPE (FFP3 mask, gloves, eye protection, long-sleeved gown) | Device | PPE |
| No Personal protective equipment (PPE)Standard CPR without wearing PPE | Device | No PPE |
Primary outcome
Depth of chest compression
Time frame: 20 minutes of CPR
Difference in chest compression depth during a simulated cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on manikins when performed with and without wearing personal protective equipment (PPE).
2 secondary outcomes
Chest compression rate
Time frame: 20 minutes of CPR
Relaxation
Time frame: 20 minutes of CPR
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Feb 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Not yet recruiting
Compression-Only Versus Standard Basic Life Support Training in Nursing Students
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Not yet recruiting
Execution of Prehospital Transesophageal Echocardiography During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Patients With Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest
Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA)
Active, not recruiting
The REVIVE-PEEP Trial: Positive End-expiratory Pressure Versus Sham Valve/Zero End-expiratory Pressure in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation During Manual Ventilation to Improve Neurological Outcomes at Discharge in Adult Patients Suffering an Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest
Cardiac Arrest, Out-Of-Hospital
Active, not recruiting
RACE-CARS - RAndomized Cluster Evaluation of Cardiac ARrest Systems
Cardiac Arrest
RecruitingObservational study
Cardiac Arrest - Ultrasound Detection of Occult Perfusion
Cardiac Arrest, Out-Of-Hospital, Hypotension
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Simon Rauch, MD, PhD principal investigator
Eurac research, Institute of mountain emergency medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Personal protective equipment (PPE) and No Personal protective equipment (PPE) in people with Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Personal Protective Equipment, run by Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Depth of chest compression (time frame: 20 minutes of CPR). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Feb 2021.