Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 3RESET-RANCT04539964
Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis
A Phase 3 study testing Implant Procedure, Conventional Synthetic DMARD and Active stimulation in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by SetPoint Medical Corporation at 42 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The RESET-RA study will assess the safety and efficacy of the SetPoint System (study device) for the treatment of adult patients with active, moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response or intolerance to biologic or targeted synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 22 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Implant Procedure, Conventional Synthetic DMARD and Active stimulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 243 participants
- Where
- 42 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 11 Jan 2021to Oct 2027
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 22 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 22-75 years of age at screening
- Active moderate or severe RA, defined as at least 4/28 tender and 4/28 swollen joints
- Demonstrated an inadequate response, loss of response, or intolerance to 1 or more approved for rheumatoid arthritis biologic or targeted synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs), including Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi)
- Receiving treatment with at least 1 conventional synthetic DMARD for at least 12 weeks and on a continuous non-changing dose and route of administration for at least 4 weeks prior to Screening and able to continue the same stable dose through Week 12
Who cannot join
- Untreated or poorly controlled psychiatric illness or history of substance abuse
- Significant immunodeficiency due to underlying illness
- History of stroke or transient ischemic attack, or diagnosis of cerebrovascular fibromuscular dysplasia
- Clinically significant cardiovascular disease
- Neurological syndromes, including multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, or Parkinson's disease
- Uncontrolled fibromyalgia
Show all 11Show fewer
- History of left or right carotid surgery
- History of unilateral or bilateral vagotomy, partial or complete splenectomy
- Recurrent vasovagal syncope episodes
- Current, regular use of tobacco products
- Hypersensitivity/allergy to MRI contrast agents and/or unable to perform MRI
Trial locations and contacts
42 sites in 1 country.
42 sites in 1 country
United States42 sites
Albuquerque Center for Rheumatology
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102
Arthritis & Rheumatology Research Institute, PLLC
Allen, Texas, 75013
Lehigh Valley Health Network
Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18103
Augusta University
Augusta, Georgia, 30912
Austin Regional Clinic
Austin, Texas, 78717
Tekton Research
Austin, Texas, 78745
Central Texas Rheumatology Associates
Austin, Texas, 78746
Arthritis & Rheumatic Disease Specialties
Aventura, Florida, 33180
HARAC Research Corporation
Avon Park, Florida, 33825
Long Island Regional Arthritis & Osteoporosis Care
Babylon, New York, 11702
Massachusetts General Hospital Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Sound Clinical Research, LLC
Bothell, Washington, 98021
RecioMed Clinical Research Network, Inc.
Boynton Beach, Florida, 33472
Arthritis & Osteoporosis Consultants Of The Carolinas
Charleston, North Carolina, 28202
DJL Clinical Research
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Bay Area Rheumatology
Clearwater, Florida, 33765
Precision Comprehensive Clinical Research Solutions
Colleyville, Texas, 76034
Medvin Clinical Research
Covina, California, 91722
Saint Paul Rheumatology, P.A.
Eagan, Minnesota, 55121
Annapolis Rheumatology
Fairfax, Virginia, 22033
The Arthritis & Rheumatology Clinic of Northern Colorado
Fort Collins, Colorado, 80528
Biopharma Informatic
Houston, Texas, 77043
Kansas City Physician Partners
Kansas City, Missouri, 64151
June DO, PC
Lansing, Michigan, 48910
Parris and Associates Rheumatology
Lawrenceville, Georgia, 30044
Delaware Arthritis
Lewes, Delaware, 19958
Physician Research Collaboration, LLC
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68516
Arizona Arthritis ans Rheumatology Research, PPLC
Mesa, Arizona, 85210
Southwest Rheumatology Research LLC
Mesquite, Texas, 75150
West Virginia University
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506
Health Research of Oklahoma, PLLC
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103
University of Pennsylvania Medical Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Arizona Arthritis Rheumatology & Research, PLLC
Phoenix, Arizona, 85037
IRIS Research and Development
Plantation, Florida, 33324
Clinical Trials of Texas, Inc
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
West County Rheumatology
St Louis, Missouri, 63122
Stamford Therapeutics Consortium
Stamford, Connecticut, 06905
Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Research, PLLC
Tucson, Arizona, 85704
Inland Rheumatology Clinical Trials
Upland, California, 91786
Medvin Clinical Research
Whittier, California, 90602
Willow Rheumatology and Wellness PLLC
Willowbrook, Illinois, 60527
About this study
Official title: Vagus Nerve Stimulation Using the SetPoint System for Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: The RESET-RA Study
The RESET-RA study will assess the safety and efficacy of the SetPoint System (study device) for the treatment of adult patients with active, moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response or intolerance to biologic or targeted synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs). The study device contains a miniaturized stimulator (implant) that is surgically placed under general anesthesia on the vagus nerve through a small incision on the left side of the neck (implant procedure). The study will enroll up to 250 subjects at up to 45 sites. All eligible subjects will undergo the implant procedure. Half of the subjects will receive active stimulation (treatment) and the other half will receive non-active stimulation (control). After completing primary endpoint assessments at Week 12, there will be a one-way crossover of control subjects to active stimulation and a 252-week open-label follow-up with all subjects (treatment and control) receiving active stimulation to evaluate long-term safety.
Read the detailed description
The RESET-RA study is an operationally seamless, 2-stage, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicenter pivotal study enrolling up to 250 subjects at up to 45 study centers across the U.S. The study will assess the safety and efficacy of the SetPoint System (study device) for the treatment of adult patients with active, moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have had an inadequate response, loss of response or intolerance to biologic or targeted synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs). The study device contains a miniaturized stimulator (implant) that is surgically implanted inside the left side of the neck on the vagus nerve (implant procedure). The implant delivers a small amount of electricity (stimulation) to the nerve. All eligible subjects will undergo the surgery under general anesthesia. Half of the subjects will receive active stimulation (the treatment group) and the other half will receive non-active stimulation (the control group). Stimulation will be delivered for 1 min once per day for 12 weeks. After completing primary endpoint assessments at Week 12, there will be a one-way crossover of control subjects to active stimulation and a 252-week open-label follow-up with all subjects (treatment and control) receiving active stimulation to evaluate long-term safety. Blinding will be maintained until the last enrolled and randomized subject in Stage 2 completes Week 12 assessments, and the study database is locked.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- Implant Procedure, Conventional Synthetic DMARD, Active stimulation, Non-active stimulation
- Keywords
- Rheumatoid Arthritis, Vagus nerve, vagus nerve stimulating device, drug refractory, permanent implantable, implant
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Implant ProcedureProcedure or surgery
Also called Surgical placement of vagus nerve stimulator inside the neck
The SetPoint System (study device) contains a miniaturized stimulator (implant) that is surgically implanted inside the left side of the neck on the vagus nerve (implant procedure). All eligible subjects will undergo the surgery under general anesthesia in outpatient settings.
Conventional Synthetic DMARDDrug
Also called Background therapy with conventional synthetic DMARD
All subjects will continue to take at least one type of conventional synthetic DMARD at the same stable dose as for 4 weeks prior to consent
Active stimulationDevice
Active stimulation for 1 min once per day
Non-active stimulationDevice
Non-active stimulation for 1 min once per day
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Experimental | Active stimulation for 1 min once per day Receives: Procedure: Implant Procedure; Drug: Conventional Synthetic DMARD; Device: Active stimulation |
| Control | Sham comparator | Non-active stimulation for 1 min once per day Receives: Procedure: Implant Procedure; Drug: Conventional Synthetic DMARD; Device: Non-active stimulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response
Response is defined as achieving at least 20% improvement from baseline to Week 12 in tender and swollen joint counts of 28 joints (scale 0=best to 28=worst) and 3 out of the following 5 measures: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score (scale 0=no difficulty to 3=unable to do), subject global assessment (0=best to 10=worst), subject pain (0=no pain to 10=worst), evaluator's global assessment (0=best to 10=worst), or high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) concentration (mg/L).
Measured: Week 12
Secondary outcomes (4)
DAS28-CRP Good or Moderate Response as Defined by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)
The Disease Activity Score in 28 joints calculated with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) good or moderate response as defined by EULAR based on a composite score of 4 items: tender and swollen joint counts of 28 joints (scale 0=best to 28=worst), subject global assessment (0=best to 10=worst) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) concentration (mg/L). A total score ranges from 0 to 10 and is computed as follows:
DAS28-CRP = 0.56 * sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28 * sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36 * ln(CRP+1) + 0.014 * SGA + 0.96
A subject is considered having a moderate treatment response if:
- DAS28-CRP score improvement from baseline to Week 12 is > 0.6 and ≤ 1.2, and the DAS28-CRP score at Week 12 is ≤ 5.1; or
- DAS28-CRP score improvement from baseline to Week 12 is > 1.2, and the DAS28-CRP score at Week 12 is > 3.2.
A subject is considered having a good treatment response if:
- DAS28-CRP score improvement from baseline to Week 12 is > 1.2 and the DAS28-CRP score at Week 12 is ≤ 3.2
Measured: Week 12
DAS28-CRP Response (MCID -1.2) at Week 12
The Disease Activity Score in 28 joints calculated with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) response is based on the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of -1.2 from baseline.
DAS28-CRP is based on a composite score of 4 items: tender and swollen joint counts of 28 joints (scale 0=best to 28=worst), subject global assessment (0=best to 10=worst) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) concentration (mg/L). A total score ranges from 0 to 10 and is computed as follows:
DAS28-CRP = 0.56 * sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28 * sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36 * ln(CRP+1) + 0.014 * SGA + 0.96
Measured: Week 12
Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Response (MCID -0.22)
HAQ-DI response based on the MCID of -0.22 from baseline.
The HAQ-DI is a questionnaire validated for RA self-assessment by subjects that contains 20 questions in the following 8 functional areas:
- Dressing and grooming
- Arising
- Eating
- Walking
- Hygiene
- Reach
- Grip
- Common daily activities
Scoring within each functional area is from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). The total score is obtained by summing 8 area scores and dividing by 8. The total HAQ-DI score ranges from 0 to 3 and corresponds to the current degree of disability:
- 0 to < 1 Mild difficulties to moderate disability
- 1 to < 2 Moderate disability
- 2 to 3 Severe to very severe disability
Measured: Week 12
ACR20 Response at Week 12 From Day 0
Response is defined as achieving at least 20% improvement from Day 0 to Week 12 in tender and swollen joint counts of 28 joints (scale 0=best to 28=worst) and 3 out of the following 5 measures: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score (scale 0=no difficulty to 3=unable to do), subject global assessment (0=best to 10=worse), subject pain (0=no pain to 10=worst), evaluator's global assessment (0=best to 10=worst), or high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) concentration (mg/mL).
Measured: Week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Sep 2020
- Study start11 Jan 2021
- Primary completion16 May 2024
- Study completionOct 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- An operationally seamless, 2-stage, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicenter study. Subjects will be assigned randomly in a 1:1 ratio into either a treatment or control group. Subjects assigned to the treatment group will receive active stimulation for 1 min once per day, and those assigned to the control group will receive non-active stimulation for 1 min once per day.
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 243 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- SetPoint Medical Corporation
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- John Tesser, MD, Principal investigator, Arizona Arthritis and Rheumatology Research, P.C.Mark Richardson, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04539964
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SPM-020
- Acronym
- RESET-RA
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 31 Aug 2020
- Last updated
- 14 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No: No sharing data is planned.
Publications
Tesser JRP, Crowley AR, Box EJ, June JP, Wickersham PB, Valenzuela GJ, Gaylis NB, Lam GKW, Pacheco LA, Ridley DJ, Pinto-Patarroyo GP, Novack SN, Churchill MA, Kohler M, Lee EC, Pando JA, Parris GR, Peterson JR, Shah T, Singhal AK, Vuong V, Levine YA, Evangelista ML, Derosier AA, Curtis JR, Richardson RM, Chernoff D. Vagus nerve-mediated neuroimmune modulation for rheumatoid arthritis: a pivotal randomized controlled trial. Nat Med. 2026 Jan;32(1):369-378. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-04114-7. Epub 2025 Dec 22.
PubMed 41429981Peterson D, Van Poppel M, Boling W, Santos P, Schwalb J, Eisenberg H, Mehta A, Spader H, Botros J, Vrionis FD, Ko A, Adelson PD, Lega B, Konrad P, Calle G, Vale FL, Bucholz R, Richardson RM. Clinical safety and feasibility of a novel implantable neuroimmune modulation device for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: initial results from the randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled RESET-RA study. Bioelectron Med. 2024 Mar 13;10(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s42234-023-00138-x.
PubMed 38475923
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Vagus Nerve Stimulation Using the SetPoint System for Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: The RESET-RA Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04539964
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RESET-RA / SPM-020
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Keywords
- Rheumatoid Arthritis, Vagus nerve, vagus nerve stimulating device, drug refractory, permanent implantable, implant
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 243 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SetPoint Medical CorporationIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 11 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 May 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 19 Dec 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The RESET-RA study will assess the safety and efficacy of the SetPoint System (study device) for the treatment of adult patients with active, moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response or intolerance to biologic or targeted synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs). The study device contains a miniaturized stimulator (implant) that is surgically placed under general anesthesia on the vagus nerve through a small incision on the left side of the neck (implant procedure). The study will enroll up to 250 subjects at up to 45 sites. All eligible subjects will undergo the implant procedure. Half of the subjects will receive active stimulation (treatment) and the other half will receive non-active stimulation (control). After completing primary endpoint assessments at Week 12, there will be a one-way crossover of control subjects to active stimulation and a 252-week open-label follow-up with all subjects (treatment and control) receiving active stimulation to evaluate long-term safety.
Detailed description
The RESET-RA study is an operationally seamless, 2-stage, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicenter pivotal study enrolling up to 250 subjects at up to 45 study centers across the U.S. The study will assess the safety and efficacy of the SetPoint System (study device) for the treatment of adult patients with active, moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have had an inadequate response, loss of response or intolerance to biologic or targeted synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs). The study device contains a miniaturized stimulator (implant) that is surgically implanted inside the left side of the neck on the vagus nerve (implant procedure). The implant delivers a small amount of electricity (stimulation) to the nerve. All eligible subjects will undergo the surgery under general anesthesia. Half of the subjects will receive active stimulation (the treatment group) and the other half will receive non-active stimulation (the control group). Stimulation will be delivered for 1 min once per day for 12 weeks. After completing primary endpoint assessments at Week 12, there will be a one-way crossover of control subjects to active stimulation and a 252-week open-label follow-up with all subjects (treatment and control) receiving active stimulation to evaluate long-term safety. Blinding will be maintained until the last enrolled and randomized subject in Stage 2 completes Week 12 assessments, and the study database is locked.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- An operationally seamless, 2-stage, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicenter study. Subjects will be assigned randomly in a 1:1 ratio into either a treatment or control group. Subjects assigned to the treatment group will receive active stimulation for 1 min once per day, and those assigned to the control group will receive non-active stimulation for 1 min once per day.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Experimental | Procedure: Implant Procedure, Drug: Conventional Synthetic DMARD, Device: Active stimulationActive stimulation for 1 min once per day |
| Control | Sham comparator | Procedure: Implant Procedure, Drug: Conventional Synthetic DMARD, Device: Non-active stimulationNon-active stimulation for 1 min once per day |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 22 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- 22-75 years of age at screening
- Active moderate or severe RA, defined as at least 4/28 tender and 4/28 swollen joints
- Demonstrated an inadequate response, loss of response, or intolerance to 1 or more approved for rheumatoid arthritis biologic or targeted synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs), including Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi)
- Receiving treatment with at least 1 conventional synthetic DMARD for at least 12 weeks and on a continuous non-changing dose and route of administration for at least 4 weeks prior to Screening and able to continue the same stable dose through Week 12
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Untreated or poorly controlled psychiatric illness or history of substance abuse
- Significant immunodeficiency due to underlying illness
- History of stroke or transient ischemic attack, or diagnosis of cerebrovascular fibromuscular dysplasia
- Clinically significant cardiovascular disease
- Neurological syndromes, including multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, or Parkinson's disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Implant ProcedureAlso: Surgical placement of vagus nerve stimulator inside the neckThe SetPoint System (study device) contains a miniaturized stimulator (implant) that is surgically implanted inside the left side of the neck on the vagus nerve (implant procedure). All eligible subjects will undergo the surgery under general anesthesia in outpatient settings. | Procedure or surgery | Control, Treatment |
| Conventional Synthetic DMARDAlso: Background therapy with conventional synthetic DMARDAll subjects will continue to take at least one type of conventional synthetic DMARD at the same stable dose as for 4 weeks prior to consent | Drug | Control, Treatment |
| Active stimulationActive stimulation for 1 min once per day | Device | Treatment |
| Non-active stimulationNon-active stimulation for 1 min once per day | Device | Control |
Primary outcome
the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response
Time frame: Week 12
Response is defined as achieving at least 20% improvement from baseline to Week 12 in tender and swollen joint counts of 28 joints (scale 0=best to 28=worst) and 3 out of the following 5 measures: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score (scale 0=no difficulty to 3=unable to do), subject global assessment (0=best to 10=worst), subject pain (0=no pain to 10=worst), evaluator's global assessment (0=best to 10=worst), or high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) concentration (mg/L).
4 secondary outcomes
DAS28-CRP Good or Moderate Response as Defined by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)
Time frame: Week 12
DAS28-CRP Response (MCID -1.2) at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Response (MCID -0.22)
Time frame: Week 12
ACR20 Response at Week 12 From Day 0
Time frame: Week 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Apr 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41429981Tesser JRP, Crowley AR, Box EJ, June JP, Wickersham PB, Valenzuela GJ, Gaylis NB, Lam GKW, Pacheco LA, Ridley DJ, Pinto-Patarroyo GP, Novack SN, Churchill MA, Kohler M, Lee EC, Pando JA, Parris GR, Peterson JR, Shah T, Singhal AK, Vuong V, Levine YA, Evangelista ML, Derosier AA, Curtis JR, Richardson RM, Chernoff D. Vagus nerve-mediated neuroimmune modulation for rheumatoid arthritis: a pivotal randomized controlled trial. Nat Med. 2026 Jan;32(1):369-378. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-04114-7. Epub 2025 Dec 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38475923Peterson D, Van Poppel M, Boling W, Santos P, Schwalb J, Eisenberg H, Mehta A, Spader H, Botros J, Vrionis FD, Ko A, Adelson PD, Lega B, Konrad P, Calle G, Vale FL, Bucholz R, Richardson RM. Clinical safety and feasibility of a novel implantable neuroimmune modulation device for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: initial results from the randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled RESET-RA study. Bioelectron Med. 2024 Mar 13;10(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s42234-023-00138-x.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. No sharing data is planned.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John Tesser, MD principal investigator
Arizona Arthritis and Rheumatology Research, P.C.
Mark Richardson, MD PhD principal investigator
Massachusetts General Hospital
42 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Implant Procedure, Conventional Synthetic DMARD and Active stimulation in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by SetPoint Medical Corporation at 42 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 42 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Dec 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response (time frame: Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04539964, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Apr 2026.