Breast Cancer FemaleeMOUVOIRNCT04536584
Impact of Personalized and Remote Support Centered on Exercise and Physical Activity for Breast Cancer Patients
A study testing Personalized Coaching (Arm A) and Standard supportive approach (Arm B) in people with Breast Cancer Female, run by Centre Oscar Lambret at 22 sites in France.
Trial summary
A study that evaluates the benefits of a personalized remote exercise and physical activity coaching compared with the standard supportive approach in terms of health-related quality of life at 12 months in breast cancer survivors treated in an adjuvant setting. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer Female
- What is being tested?
- Personalized Coaching (Arm A) and Standard supportive approach (Arm B)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 824 participants
- Where
- 22 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 18 Dec 2020to 26 Jun 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient ≥18;
- Diagnosis of invasive non-metastatic breast cancer;
- 5 months (+/- 3 months) after the end of the treatment by surgery and/or radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy and/or other "short-term" systemic treatment : immunotherapy, PARP inhibitor, trastuzumab or TDM1 ; the continuation of hormonotherapy (more or less associated with an anti-CDK4/6), trastuzumab or TDM1 is possible during the study period;
- SF-36 filled in completely
- Medical certificate for sports practice delivered by a healthcare professional or oncologist. Neither the previous sports practice, nor the motivation for the proposed program is necessary to participate in the program.
- Agreement for follow-ups during the study period lasting 12 months;
Show all 9Show fewer
- Ability to understand, read and write French;
- Patient covered by the French "Social Security" regime;
- Signed informed consent for the participation in the study, including the randomization with a 50%/50% chance of being allocated to one or the other group.
Who cannot join
- Relapse of invasive breast cancer (loco-regional relapse, contralateral relapse)
- Inability to exercise because of a severe handicap or vulnerability. These contraindications are left to the discretion of the healthcare professional assessing capacity (ex : severe malnutrition, pregnancy …);
- Metastatic cancer;
- Expressed preference for one arm;
- Inability to comply with follow-up (4 and 12 months) of the trial (geographical, social, medical or psychological reasons);
- Person under guardianship or curatorship.
Trial locations and contacts
22 sites in 1 country.
22 sites in 1 country
France22 sites
Centre Marie Curie
Arras, Hauts-de-France, 62000
Sainte Catherine Institut du Cancer Avignon Provence
Avignon, France, 84918
Centre Pierre Curie
Beuvry, Hauts-de-France, 62660
Institut Bergonié
Bordeaux, New Aquitaine, 33076
Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine
Bordeaux, New Aquitaine, 33077
CH de Boulogne-sur-Mer
Boulogne-sur-Mer, Hauts-de-France, 62321
Centre de radiothérapie Amethyst
Compiègne, Hauts-de-France, 60200
Institut André Dutreix
Dunkirk, Hauts-de-France, 59240
Centre Hospitalier Eure-Seine - Hôpital d'Evreux
Évreux, Normandy, 27015
Centre Oscar Lambret
Lille, Hauts-de-France, 59020
Groupe Hospitalier Bretagne Sud
Lorient, Brittany Region, 56100
Centre Léon Bérard
Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, 69379
Centre Gray-Amethyst Radiothérapie
Maubeuge, Hauts-de-France, 59600
Hôpital Privé du Confluent
Nantes, Pays de la Loire Region, 44277
CARIO Hôpital Privé des Côtes d'Armor
Plérin, Brittany Region, 22190
Centre Eugène marquis
Rennes, Brittany Region, 35042
CH de Roubaix
Roubaix, Hauts-de-France, 59056
Centre d'oncologie et radiothérapie Saint-Jean
Saint-Doulchard, Centre-Val de Loire, 18230
Centre Joliot Curie
Saint-Martin-Boulogne, Hauts-de-France, 62280
Centre de cancérologie Les Dentellières
Valenciennes, Hauts-de-France, 59300
CH de Valenciennes
Valenciennes, Hauts-de-France, 59322
Institut Gustave Roussy
Villejuif, Île-de-France Region, 94800
About this study
Official title: Randomized Study Estimating the Impact of a Personalized and Remote Support Centered on Exercise and Physical Activity for Patients After Breast Cancer
A study that evaluates the benefits of a personalized remote exercise and physical activity coaching compared with the standard supportive approach in terms of health-related quality of life at 12 months in breast cancer survivors treated in an adjuvant setting.
Read the detailed description
A multicentric, phase III, randomized open-labelled study with two parallel groups which evaluates the benefits of a personalized remote exercise and physical activity coaching compared with the standard supportive approach in terms of health-related quality of life at 12 months in breast cancer survivors treated in an adjuvant setting.
Other objectives include:
- To evaluate the impact of the intervention on each dimension of the SF-36 at 12 months
- To evaluate the impact of the program on the health-related quality of life over time
- To evaluate the impact of the program on the practice of exercise and physical activity (EPA) at the recommended intensity (30min of moderate EPA, 5 days/week)
- To evaluate the impact of the program on:
- fatigue, pain, depression, sleep, motivation for the practice, self-respect, biometric measures (including fat mass and lean mass), physical capacities, patient's satisfaction regarding the assigned program, occurrence of Adverse Events (AE) related to the treatment, professional life for patients who worked before the announcement of getting cancer and psychotropic and analgesic drug intake
- To evaluate the compliance to the program through the engagement score during the first 4 months (in the experimental group).
- To evaluate the impact of the program in terms of disease-free survival
Additional objectives on health economics include:
- To evaluate the efficiency of the personalized remote exercise and physical activity coaching compared with the standard supportive approach in BC survivors treated in an adjuvant setting.
- To characterize the health-state utility of BC survivors over time; assessing the association of change in health-utility with changes in other variables such as exercise and physical activity.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer Female
- Being tested
- Personalized Coaching (Arm A), Standard supportive approach (Arm B)
- Keywords
- Non metastatic breast cancer, Post breast cancer support, Physical activities
- Medical subject headings
- Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Personalized Coaching (Arm A)Other
Patients will receive personalized physical activity coaching with an online digital platform to take online educational workshops and interact with other peers of the cohort with a online private forum. They will also have a connected watch that will measure several physical activity metrics.
Standard supportive approach (Arm B)Other
Patients will receive the standard recommendations during their visits with the oncologist. The exercise recommendations include strength training and aerobic activities.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: personalized coaching for physical activities | Experimental | This arm consists of providing patients with a personalized coaching focused on exercise and physical activity, with or without connected watch. Receives: Other: Personalized Coaching (Arm A) |
| Arm B: standard supportive approach | Active comparator | The standard supportive approach will consist in recommendations made during visits with the oncologist. The delivery of post-treatment care by oncologists and their team systematically provide exercise advice patients including recommendations for strength training and aerobic activity. Receives: Other: Standard supportive approach (Arm B) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quality of Life (QoL): SF 36 PCS
This study will evaluate, in each randomized group, the difference between the baseline score and the 12-month score of summary score of this questionnaire: PCS (Physical Component Summary)
Measured: 1 year from the inclusion
Quality of Life (QoL): SF 36 MCS
This study will evaluate, in each randomized group, the difference between the baseline score and the 12-month score of summary score of this questionnaire: MCS (Mental Component Summary)
Measured: 1 year from the inclusion
Secondary outcomes (14)
Success/Failure score
For each summary score (PCS and MCS) separately, the success or failure score will be calculated :
- For patients with an intermediate or good QoL at baseline (summary score≥50), failure is defined as a score decrease ≥ 5 points whereas a stable measure (difference of less than 5 points) and improvement of ≥ 5 points will be classified as a success.
- For patients with a relatively poor QoL at baseline (summary score <50), success is defined as a score increase of 5 points or more at 12 months. All other cases are classified as a failure.
Measured: at 12 months after start of the program
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
The HRQoL evaluated with the Short-Form-36 questionnaire. We chose the SF-36 generic questionnaire to assess HRQoL of these patients instead of a cancer-specific HRQoL questionnaire such as the EORTC QLQ-C30. In fact, the QLQ-C30 as well as majority of cancer-specific questionnaires is focused on symptoms and side effects such as nausea and vomiting, which are not relevant for cancer survivorship. Thus, patients will not concerned by these items. The creation of an EORTC cancer survivorship questionnaire is ongoing, but this questionnaire is not validated yet at the time of the start of this study. Thus, a generic questionnaire, the SF-36, was considered as more relevant and sensitive to change for these patients.
Measured: at the baseline, 4 months, 8 months and 12 months.
Practice of Exercise and Physical Activities (EPA)
The EPA will be evaluated with the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire for the patient's subjective measure and with the connected watch in the experimental arm for the objective measure.
The Global Physical Activity Questionnaire is an instrument to assess physical activity. It was developed under the auspices of the WHO in 2002. GPAQ comprises 19 questions grouped to capture physical activity undertaken in different behavioral domains, these are work, transport and discretionary (also known as leisure or recreation). Within the work and discretionary domains, questions assess the frequency and duration of 2 differents categories of activity defined by the energy requirement or intensity. In the transport domain, the frequency and duration of all walking and cycling is captured but no attempt is made to differentiate between these activities. One additional item collected time spent in sedentary activities.
Measured: at the baseline, 4 months, 8 months and 12 months.
Fatigue
Will be evaluated with the Brief Fatigue Inventory auto-questionnaire The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is a questionnaire uses an 11-point scale (0 to 10) to measure the specific symptom of cancer-related fatigue in a single dimension. Nine items ask patients to rate the severity of their fatigue at its "worst," "usual," and "now" during the past 24 hours, with 0 = "no fatigue" and 10 = "fatigue". Cut points for fatigue severity are defined in two categories: a "fatigue worst" rating of 7 or greater indicates "severe" and 0 to 6 indicates "non-severe." Six additional items describe how much fatigue has interfered with different aspects of the patient's life during the past 24 hours. These items include general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work (includes both work outside the home and housework), relationships with other people, and enjoyment life.
Measured: at the baseline, and 12 months.
Pain level
Will be evaluated with the Brief Pain Inventory-SF (Brief Pain Inventory-short form) auto-questionnaire The Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-sf) is used to evaluate the severity of a patient's pain and the impact of this pain on the patient's daily functioning. It is a 9 item self-administered questionnaire. The patient is asked to rate their worst, least, average, and current pain intensity, list current treatments and their perceived effectiveness, and rate the degree that pain interferes with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other persons, sleep, and enjoyment of life on a 10 point scale.
Measured: at the baseline, and 12 months.
Depression
Will be evaluated with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale auto-questionnaire The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-administrated questionnaire to detect anxiety and depressive disorders, validated in French with a general population and suffering from cancer. It has 14 items with 4 answers proposed and each correspond to a score between 0 to 3. Seven questions relate to anxiety and seven others to depressive dimension, thus allowing two scores to be obtained (maximum score of each score = 21). For subscales, a score of 0 to 7 is an absence of disorders (anxiety or depressive, depending on the subscale), 8 to 10 to a suspected disorder and 11 to 21 to a proven disorder.
Measured: at the baseline, and 12 months.
Sleep
Sleep will be evaluated in both arms using the Pittsburgh Sleep ≥Index (PSQI). In the experimental group, the number of hours of light and deep sleep will also be collected (connected watch).
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is designed to measure sleep quality over a onemonth interval. It includes 19 self-rated questions that generate seven component scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction. Component scores (range 0 to 3) are summed to provide a global sleep quality score (range 0 to 21); a score greater than five indicates poor sleep quality.
Measured: at the baseline, and 12 months.
Biometric measures (impedance)
Will be evaluated with the weight, BMI, fat mass, lean mass, waist size and hip size.
These multiple measurements will be aggregated to arrive at one reported value, for exemple BMI.
Measured: at the baseline, 4 months, 8 months and 12 months.
Physical capacities
Will be evaluated through differents physical exercices, for exemple:
- Chair test (resistance test of lower limbs)
- Weight test (resistance test of upper limbs)
- Hand grip test (gripping force)
- Goniometer test (flexibility of upper limbs)
- Test of unipodal support (balance)
- 6-min walking test
- Heart rate by telemetry (Beating per minute - cardiac rhythm)
- Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale And these multiple measurements will be aggregated to arrive at one reported value.
Measured: at the baseline, 4 months, 8 months and 12 months.
Adverse Events
Adverse Events graded according to NCI-CTC-AE v5, considering all types of AE, related to the evaluated program or to concomitant/previous anti-cancer treatments
Measured: at the baseline, 4 months, 8 months and 12 months.
Professional activity status
Professional activity status before diagnosis and after anti-cancer treatment (temporary interruption, partial time work…).
At baseline and during the follow-up, record the professional staut of the patients to provide the statistical trend regarding the professional activities.
Measured: at the baseline, 4 months, 8 months and 12 months.
Drug intake
Will be evaluated with the frequency of psychotropic (including hypnotic) and analgesic intake
Measured: at the baseline, 4 months, 8 months and 12 months.
Disease-free survival
Disease-free survival defined as the time between randomization and relapse or death from any cause.
Measured: at the baseline, 4 months, 8 months and 12 months.
Health states descriptive system
Using EQ-5D and EQ VAS (study entry, M4, M8 and M12) and direct medical costs from inclusion up the M12.
The descriptive system comprises five dimensions. Each dimension has five levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The respondent is asked to indicate her health state by ticking in the box against the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number expressing the level selected for that dimension. The digits for five dimensions can be combined in a 5-digit number describing the respondent's health state (for instance, " 11111 " corresponding to the perfect health).
The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a 20 cm vertical (graduate 0 to 100), visual analogue scale with endpoints labeled 'the best health you can imagine' and 'the worst health you can imagine'.
Measured: at the baseline, 4 months, 8 months and 12 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Sep 2020
- Study start18 Dec 2020
- Primary completion26 Jun 2024
- Study completion26 Jun 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Breast Cancer FemaleStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 824 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Oscar Lambret
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Stimulab
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Laurence VANLEMMENS, MD, Principal investigator, Centre Oscar Lambret
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04536584
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- eMOUVOIR-1902
- Other IDs
- PHRC-K18-161, 2020-A00851-38
- Acronym
- eMOUVOIR
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 5 Jun 2019
- Last updated
- 18 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Study Estimating the Impact of a Personalized and Remote Support Centered on Exercise and Physical Activity for Patients After Breast Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04536584
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- eMOUVOIR / eMOUVOIR-1902
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer Female
- Keywords
- Non metastatic breast cancer, Post breast cancer support, Physical activities
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 824 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Oscar LambretUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Stimulab
- Study start
- 18 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Jun 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A study that evaluates the benefits of a personalized remote exercise and physical activity coaching compared with the standard supportive approach in terms of health-related quality of life at 12 months in breast cancer survivors treated in an adjuvant setting.
Detailed description
A multicentric, phase III, randomized open-labelled study with two parallel groups which evaluates the benefits of a personalized remote exercise and physical activity coaching compared with the standard supportive approach in terms of health-related quality of life at 12 months in breast cancer survivors treated in an adjuvant setting.
Other objectives include:
- To evaluate the impact of the intervention on each dimension of the SF-36 at 12 months
- To evaluate the impact of the program on the health-related quality of life over time
- To evaluate the impact of the program on the practice of exercise and physical activity (EPA) at the recommended intensity (30min of moderate EPA, 5 days/week)
- To evaluate the impact of the program on:
- fatigue, pain, depression, sleep, motivation for the practice, self-respect, biometric measures (including fat mass and lean mass), physical capacities, patient's satisfaction regarding the assigned program, occurrence of Adverse Events (AE) related to the treatment, professional life for patients who worked before the announcement of getting cancer and psychotropic and analgesic drug intake
- To evaluate the compliance to the program through the engagement score during the first 4 months (in the experimental group).
- To evaluate the impact of the program in terms of disease-free survival
Additional objectives on health economics include:
- To evaluate the efficiency of the personalized remote exercise and physical activity coaching compared with the standard supportive approach in BC survivors treated in an adjuvant setting.
- To characterize the health-state utility of BC survivors over time; assessing the association of change in health-utility with changes in other variables such as exercise and physical activity.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: personalized coaching for physical activities | Experimental | Other: Personalized Coaching (Arm A)This arm consists of providing patients with a personalized coaching focused on exercise and physical activity, with or without connected watch. |
| Arm B: standard supportive approach | Active comparator | Other: Standard supportive approach (Arm B)The standard supportive approach will consist in recommendations made during visits with the oncologist. The delivery of post-treatment care by oncologists and their team systematically provide exercise advice patients including recommendations for strength training and aerobic activity. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patient ≥18;
- Diagnosis of invasive non-metastatic breast cancer;
- 5 months (+/- 3 months) after the end of the treatment by surgery and/or radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy and/or other "short-term" systemic treatment : immunotherapy, PARP inhibitor, trastuzumab or TDM1 ; the continuation of hormonotherapy (more or less associated with an anti-CDK4/6), trastuzumab or TDM1 is possible during the study period;
- SF-36 filled in completely
- Medical certificate for sports practice delivered by a healthcare professional or oncologist. Neither the previous sports practice, nor the motivation for the proposed program is necessary to participate in the program.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Relapse of invasive breast cancer (loco-regional relapse, contralateral relapse)
- Inability to exercise because of a severe handicap or vulnerability. These contraindications are left to the discretion of the healthcare professional assessing capacity (ex : severe malnutrition, pregnancy …);
- Metastatic cancer;
- Expressed preference for one arm;
- Inability to comply with follow-up (4 and 12 months) of the trial (geographical, social, medical or psychological reasons);
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Personalized Coaching (Arm A)Patients will receive personalized physical activity coaching with an online digital platform to take online educational workshops and interact with other peers of the cohort with a online private forum. They will also have a connected watch that will measure several physical activity metrics. | Other | Arm A: personalized coaching for physical activities |
| Standard supportive approach (Arm B)Patients will receive the standard recommendations during their visits with the oncologist. The exercise recommendations include strength training and aerobic activities. | Other | Arm B: standard supportive approach |
Primary outcome
Quality of Life (QoL): SF 36 PCS
Time frame: 1 year from the inclusion
This study will evaluate, in each randomized group, the difference between the baseline score and the 12-month score of summary score of this questionnaire: PCS (Physical Component Summary)
Quality of Life (QoL): SF 36 MCS
Time frame: 1 year from the inclusion
This study will evaluate, in each randomized group, the difference between the baseline score and the 12-month score of summary score of this questionnaire: MCS (Mental Component Summary)
14 secondary outcomes
Success/Failure score
Time frame: at 12 months after start of the program
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
Time frame: at the baseline, 4 months, 8 months and 12 months.
Practice of Exercise and Physical Activities (EPA)
Time frame: at the baseline, 4 months, 8 months and 12 months.
Fatigue
Time frame: at the baseline, and 12 months.
Pain level
Time frame: at the baseline, and 12 months.
Depression
Time frame: at the baseline, and 12 months.
Sleep
Time frame: at the baseline, and 12 months.
Biometric measures (impedance)
Time frame: at the baseline, 4 months, 8 months and 12 months.
Physical capacities
Time frame: at the baseline, 4 months, 8 months and 12 months.
Adverse Events
Time frame: at the baseline, 4 months, 8 months and 12 months.
Professional activity status
Time frame: at the baseline, 4 months, 8 months and 12 months.
Drug intake
Time frame: at the baseline, 4 months, 8 months and 12 months.
Disease-free survival
Time frame: at the baseline, 4 months, 8 months and 12 months.
Health states descriptive system
Time frame: at the baseline, 4 months, 8 months and 12 months.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Mar 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Breast Cancer Female
Recruiting
Decision Support for Chemoprevention
Breast Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Geriatric Oncology Assessment and Coping Skills Training for Older Women on Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy
Breast Cancer, Hormone Receptor Positive, Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Arthralgia
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1 Study of XL309 (ISM3091) Alone and in Combination in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of CG-7321 Monotherapy or Combination Therapy in Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced Solid Tumors, Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Laurence VANLEMMENS, MD principal investigator
Centre Oscar Lambret
22 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Personalized Coaching (Arm A) and Standard supportive approach (Arm B) in people with Breast Cancer Female, run by Centre Oscar Lambret at 22 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 22 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quality of Life (QoL): SF 36 PCS (time frame: 1 year from the inclusion). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Mar 2026.