AzTrials
AzTrials

Extreme PrematurityNCT04527601

Extremely Premature Births During the Peak of the COVID-19 Pandemic: an International Study of the Active SafeBoosC III Departments

An observational study of Extreme Prematurity and Covid19, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a retrospective, observational study based on the consortium of the SafeBoosC-III randomised clinical trial. This study will evaluate if the number of admitted extremely preterm infants has decreased in the SafeBoosC-III departments during the global lockdown, and whether there is an association between the… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 22 to 28 weeks
Conditions the study is for
Extreme Prematurity, Covid19
How many people
885 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
21 Aug 2020to 13 Sep 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 22 to 28 weeks
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Study population: Extremely premature infants (GA<28)

Who may be able to join

  • Extremely low gestational age neonates admitted to participating NICUs

Who cannot join

  • -

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Neonatalklinikken, Rigshospitalet

    Copenhagen

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

This is a retrospective, observational study based on the consortium of the SafeBoosC-III randomised clinical trial. This study will evaluate if the number of admitted extremely preterm infants has decreased in the SafeBoosC-III departments during the global lockdown, and whether there is an association between the level of lockdown restrictions and change in the number of ELGAN admissions.

Read the detailed description

On the 11th of March 2020, COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organisation, which led to an almost worldwide lockdown (1). During the lockdown, reductions in preterm birth rates and very low birth weight infants have been reported in both Danish and Irish studies. Within the SafeBoosC-III investigator group, several neonatologists concurrently observed that the number of extremely low gestational age neonates (ELGAN) (gestational age below 28 weeks) admitted to their respective departments, had declined during the pandemic, while others observed no difference in the number of admitted ELGAN (oral communication). Furthermore, despite a 60% increase in the number of hospitals open for randomisation in the SafeBoosC-III trial from January to May, the randomisation rate has not increased as expected. Investigators are therefore curious to evaluate if the number of admitted extremely preterm infants has decreased in the SafeBoosC-III departments during the global lockdown, and whether there is an association between the level of lockdown restrictions and change in the number of ELGAN admissions. Investigators hope that this study will contribute further to the knowledge of the COVID-19 pandemics' effect on ELGAN birth as well as its effect on international randomised clinical trials.

This is a retrospective, observational study based on the consortium of the SafeBoosC-III randomised clinical trial. The SafeBoosC-III trial investigates the benefit and harms of treatment guided by cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy monitoring compared with treatment and monitoring as usual in extremely preterm infants. All 79 neonatal intensive care units (NICU) that are active in the consortium will be invited to participate in this study. Primary investigators will be contacted and asked to provide the number of extremely low gestational age neonates (ELGAN) admitted to their NICU within the most rigorous three months of the COVID-19 pandemic as well as the number of ELGAN admitted within the same period in 2019. The most rigorous three months of the COVID-19 pandemic will be a subjective definition by the local investigator, based on when the lockdown restrictions were strictest. Investigators will be asked to clarify how and where the information has been obtained from. Furthermore, investigators will be asked to classify the level of restrictions imposed upon the public, during the lockdown period, in a Likert scale format from 1-5. Additionally, investigators will be asked to categorize the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on the everyday life of a pregnant woman.

The number of ELGAN admissions during the three peak months in total, during the same months in 2019, within each region and within each level of lockdown restriction, will be reported as numbers. The primary outcome and the secondary outcome regarding the difference in the number of ELGAN admissions between years and regions will be analysed by using Fisher's Exact test for 1x2 tables. To analyse the correlation between the level of lockdown restrictions and the change in number of ELGAN admissions, investigators will use simple linear regression. The exploratory outcome investigating if lockdown restrictions could lead to non-admittance of ELGAN will not undergo statistical analysis but will be reported and discussed. For the primary outcome, an alfa level of 5% is chosen as a threshold for significance. To correct for multiple testing in the secondary outcomes, investigators have chosen an alfa level of 1%

In a previous funding application for the SafeBoosC-III trial, investigators estimated that the 93 departments taking part in the application, had a total of 3000 ELGAN admissions per year. Therefore, investigators expect participating departments on average to have had approximately 30 admissions in 2019, i.e. approximately seven admissions in a three months period. Therefore, if half of the NICUs (i.e. 40 departments) participate, investigators would expect a total of 280 EP infant admissions within the 40 departments in 2019. Thus, a 16.5% change in the primary outcome is needed to show a statistical significance at a 5% alfa level.

Keywords
extreme prematurity, safeboosc, RCT, COVID-19
Medical subject headings
COVID-19

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT04527601
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ELGAN admissions during peak three months of COVID-19 pandemicNot described
ELGAN admissions in the three corresponding months of 2019Not described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of ELGAN admissions during peak three months of COVID-19 compared to corresponding months in 2019

    The primary outcome will be the difference in the total number of ELGAN admissions in SafeBoosC-III departments during the peak three months of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 compared to the same three months period in 2019. The most rigorous three months of the COVID-19 pandemic will be a subjective definition by the local investigator, based on when the lockdown restrictions were strictest.

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Regional difference in ELGAN admissions during peak three months of COVID-19 compared to corresponding months in 2019

    The difference in the number of ELGAN admissions during the peak three months of the COVID-19 pandemic versus the same three months in 2019, within the following regions:

    North America: USA Northern Europe: Denmark, Norway Eastern Europe: Austria, Poland, Czech Republic, Ukraine, Turkey Western Europe: Germany, UK, Ireland, Switzerland, Belgium Southern Europe: Spain, Portugal, Italy, Greece Asia: India, China

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Correlation between the level of lockdown restrictions and number of ELGAN admissions during peak three months of COVID-19 compared to corresponding months in 2019

    Investigators will be asked to clarify how and where the information has been obtained from. Furthermore, investigators will be asked to classify the level of restrictions imposed upon the public, during the lockdown period, in a Likert scale format from 1-5.

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Aug 2020
  2. Study start21 Aug 2020
  3. Primary completion13 Sep 2020
  4. Study completion13 Sep 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
885 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04527601
Sponsor's protocol ID
SafeBoosC COVID-19 ELGAN study
Status last verified
Oct 2020
First submitted
25 Aug 2020
Last updated
8 Oct 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Hansen ML, Pellicer A, Gluud C, Dempsey E, Mintzer J, Hyttel-Sorensen S, Heuchan AM, Hagmann C, Ergenekon E, Dimitriou G, Pichler G, Naulaers G, Cheng G, Guimaraes H, Tkaczyk J, Kreutzer KB, Fumagalli M, Claris O, Lemmers P, Fredly S, Szczapa T, Austin T, Jakobsen JC, Greisen G. Cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy monitoring versus treatment as usual for extremely preterm infants: a protocol for the SafeBoosC randomised clinical phase III trial. Trials. 2019 Dec 30;20(1):811. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3955-6.

    PubMed 31888764
  • Rasmussen MI, Hansen ML, Pichler G, Dempsey E, Pellicer A, El-Khuffash A, A S, Piris-Borregas S, Alsina M, Cetinkaya M, Chalak L, Ozkan H, Baserga M, Sirc J, Fuchs H, Ergenekon E, Arruza L, Mathur A, Stocker M, Otero Vaccarello O, Szczapa T, Sarafidis K, Krolak-Olejnik B, Memisoglu A, Reigstad H, Rafinska-Wazny E, Hatzidaki E, Peng Z, Gkentzi D, Viellevoye R, De Buyst J, Mastretta E, Wang P, Hahn GH, Bender L, Cornette L, Tkaczyk J, Del Rio R, Fumagalli M, Papathoma E, Wilinska M, Naulaers G, Sadowska-Krawczenko I, Lecart C, Couce ML, Fredly S, Heuchan AM, Karen T, Greisen G. Extremely Preterm Infant Admissions Within the SafeBoosC-III Consortium During the COVID-19 Lockdown. Front Pediatr. 2021 Jul 12;9:647880. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.647880. eCollection 2021.

    PubMed 34322460

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Extreme Prematurity and Covid19, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of ELGAN admissions during peak three months of COVID-19 compared to corresponding months in 2019 (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04527601, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Oct 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in