AzTrials
AzTrials

Nasopharyngeal CarcinomaPhase 2NCT04517214

Comparing Chemotherapy With/Without Toripalimab For Primary Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

A Phase 2 study testing Toripalimab, IMRT to the nasopharynx and neck and Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Chemotherapy in people with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, run by Fudan University at 1 site in China.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of Toripalimab Combined with GP Regimen Chemotherapy Versus GP Regimen Chemotherapy for Primary Metastatic NPC. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
What is being tested?
Toripalimab, IMRT to the nasopharynx and neck and Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Nov 2020to 31 Dec 2026
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Sign an informed consent;
  • Age older than 18 years old and younger than 70 years old;
  • Patients with newly histologically confirmed primary metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma;
  • At least one metastatic site that fulfills the criteria of "Evaluable Disease" per RECIST 1.1 Criteria;
  • Anticipated overall survival more than 3 months;
  • Satisfactory performance status: ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) scale 0-1;
Show all 12Show fewer
  • No primary treatment of radiation, surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immune therapy post diagnosis of NPC;
  • Neutrophil ≥ 1.5×109 /L and PLT ≥100×109 /L and HGB ≥90 g/L;
  • With normal liver function test (ALT、AST ≤ 3×ULN, TBIL≤ 1.5×ULN, Albumin≥2.8g/dL );
  • With normal renal function test (Creatinine ≤ 1.5 ×ULN and creatinine clearance ≥60 ml/min);
  • HBV DNA<500 IU/mL(or 2500 copies/mL)and HCV RNA negative ;
  • Male and no pregnant female, able to adapt birth control methods during treatment.

Who cannot join

  • Hypersensitivity to Toripalimab, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin and Capecitabine;
  • Symptomatic spinal cord compression, or high-risk to develop pathological fracture that requires urgent surgery or radiation;
  • Necrotic disease, high-risk of massive nasal bleeding;
  • Suffered from malignant tumors, except cervical carcinoma in situ, papillary thyroid carcinoma, or skin cancer (non- melanoma) within five years;
  • Receive vaccine or live vaccine within 30 days prior to signing the informed consent;
  • Equivalent dose more than prednisone 10mg/d or other immunosuppressive treatments within 28 days prior to signing the informed consent;
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Severe, uncontrolled medical conditions and infections;
  • Active, known or suspected autoimmune disease; Type I Diabetes, hypothyroidism those only need hormone replacement therapy; vitiligo or inactive asthma who don't need systemic therapy can recruit;
  • History of interstitial lung disease;
  • HIV positive;
  • Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive and HBV-DNA ≥500IU/ml, or 2500cps/ml; Positive HCV RNA;
  • Other diseases which may influence the safety or compliance of the clinical trial, such as heart failure with symptom, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, active infections those need systemic therapy, mental illness, or their family and society factors;
  • Women of child-bearing potential who are pregnant or breastfeeding.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Xiaomin Ou

    Shanghai, 200032

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Phase II Study of Comparing Toripalimab Combined With GP Regimen Chemotherapy Versus GP Regimen Chemotherapy for Primary Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of Toripalimab Combined with GP Regimen Chemotherapy Versus GP Regimen Chemotherapy for Primary Metastatic NPC.

Read the detailed description

About 4-10% of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) have metastatic disease at diagnosis. The treatment recommendation of primary metastatic NPC is systemic chemotherapy. However, the optimal regimen is yet to determine due to lack of prospective randomized trial for this unique group of patients. Generally, GP regimen is used as the first-line treatment of primary metastatic NPC. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of Toripalimab Combined with GP Regimen Chemotherapy Versus GP Regimen Chemotherapy for Primary Metastatic NPC.

Being tested
Toripalimab, IMRT to the nasopharynx and neck, Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Chemotherapy, Adjuvant chemotherapy with Capecitabine
Keywords
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Primary metastatic, de novo metastatic, Toripalimab, PD-1, Immune checkpoint inhibitor, Chemotherapy
Medical subject headings
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ToripalimabDrug

    Also called JS001

    PD-1 inhibitor

  • IMRT to the nasopharynx and neckRadiation

    Also called RT to the nasopharynx and neck

    IMRT to the nasopharynx and neck

  • Gemcitabine and Cisplatin ChemotherapyDrug

    Also called GP regimen chemotherapy

    Systemic chemotherapy

  • Adjuvant chemotherapy with CapecitabineDrug

    Also called Xeloda

    Adjuvant chemotherapy after radiation

Study groups in NCT04517214
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Toripalimab Combined with GP ArmExperimentalSystemic chemotherapy for 6 cycles: Toripalimab 240mg d1+Gemcitabine 1.0g/m2 d1, Cisplatin 80mg/m2 d1, q3w; Followed by Radiotherapy to the nasopharynx and neck; Then maintenance therapy of Toripalimab with Capecitabine: Toripalimab 240mg d1+Capecitabine 1000mg/m2 bid d1-14, q3w
Receives: Drug: Toripalimab; Radiation: IMRT to the nasopharynx and neck; Drug: Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Chemotherapy; Drug: Adjuvant chemotherapy with Capecitabine
GP ArmActive comparatorSystemic chemotherapy for 6 cycles: Gemcitabine 1.0g/m2 d1, Cisplatin 80mg/m2 d1, q3w; Followed by Radiotherapy to the nasopharynx and neck; Then maintenance therapy of Capecitabine: Capecitabine 1000mg/m2 bid d1-14, q3w
Receives: Radiation: IMRT to the nasopharynx and neck; Drug: Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Chemotherapy; Drug: Adjuvant chemotherapy with Capecitabine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Progression-free survival

    PFS, defined as the time from randomization to the first documented objective tumor progression or death from any cause

    Measured: 5 year

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Objective Response Rate of Systemic chemotherapy

    ORR according to RECIST 1.1 Criteria

    Measured: At the end of Cycle 6 of chemotherapy (each cycle is 21 days)

  2. Disease Control Rate of Systemic chemotherapy

    DCR according to RECIST 1.1 Criteria

    Measured: At the end of Cycle 6 of chemotherapy (each cycle is 21days)

  3. The proportion of patients received radiotherapy to nasopharynx

    Only patients with disease control after systemic chemotherapy will receive radiotherapy

    Measured: 2 year

  4. Overall Survival

    Defined from date of randomization to date of first documentation of death from Defined from date of randomization to date of first documentation of death from any cause or censored at the date of the last follow-up.

    Measured: 5 year

  5. Progression-free Survival Rate

    Defined from date of randomization to date of first documentation of progression or death due to any cause.

    Measured: 1 year, 2 year rates

  6. Overall Survival Rate

    Defined from date of randomization to date of first documentation of death from Defined from date of randomization to date of first documentation of death from any cause or censored at the date of the last follow-up.

    Measured: 1 year, 2 year rates

  7. the Incidence of Adverse Effect

    According to CTCAE 4.0.03

    Measured: 1 year

  8. Changes of Quality of life, according to EORTC QLQ-C30

    According to EORTC QLQ-C30

    Measured: 1 year

  9. Changes of Quality of life, according to EORTC QLQ-H&N35

    According to EORTC QLQ-H\&N35

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Aug 2020
  2. Study start1 Nov 2020
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04517214
Sponsor's protocol ID
TRANSFORM
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
31 Jul 2020
Last updated
2 Apr 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Jiang F, Jin T, Feng XL, Jin QF, Chen XZ. Long-term outcomes and failure patterns of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma staged by magnetic resonance imaging in intensity-modulated radiotherapy era: The Zhejiang Cancer Hospital's experience. J Cancer Res Ther. 2015 Oct;11 Suppl 2:C179-84. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.168181.

    PubMed 26506872
  • Ou X, Zhou X, Shi Q, Xing X, Yang Y, Xu T, Shen C, Wang X, He X, Kong L, Ying H, Hu C. Treatment outcomes and late toxicities of 869 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with definitive intensity modulated radiation therapy: new insight into the value of total dose of cisplatin and radiation boost. Oncotarget. 2015 Nov 10;6(35):38381-97. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5420.

    PubMed 26485757
  • Lee AW, Ng WT, Chan LL, Hung WM, Chan CC, Sze HC, Chan OS, Chang AT, Yeung RM. Evolution of treatment for nasopharyngeal cancer--success and setback in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era. Radiother Oncol. 2014 Mar;110(3):377-84. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Mar 11.

    PubMed 24630534
  • Lang J, Gao L, Guo Y, Zhao C, Zhang C; Society of Head & Neck Tumor Surgery; Society of Radiation Therapy; Chinese Anti-Cancer Association. Comprehensive treatment of squamous cell cancer of head and neck: Chinese expert consensus 2013. Future Oncol. 2014;10(9):1635-48. doi: 10.2217/fon.14.44. Epub 2014 Mar 17.

    PubMed 24635574
  • Chua MLK, Wee JTS, Hui EP, Chan ATC. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet. 2016 Mar 5;387(10022):1012-1024. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00055-0. Epub 2015 Aug 28.

    PubMed 26321262
  • Zou X, You R, Liu H, He YX, Xie GF, Xie ZH, Li JB, Jiang R, Liu LZ, Li L, Zhang MX, Liu YP, Hua YJ, Guo L, Qian CN, Mai HQ, Chen DP, Luo Y, Shen LF, Hong MH, Chen MY. Establishment and validation of M1 stage subdivisions for de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma to better predict prognosis and guide treatment. Eur J Cancer. 2017 May;77:117-126. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.02.029. Epub 2017 Apr 7.

    PubMed 28391025
  • Sun XS, Liu LT, Liu SL, Guo SS, Wen YF, Xie HJ, Tang QN, Liang YJ, Li XY, Yan JJ, Ma J, Chen QY, Tang LQ, Mai HQ. Identifying optimal candidates for local treatment of the primary tumor among patients with de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study based on Epstein-Barr virus DNA level and tumor response to palliative chemotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2019 Jan 21;19(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5281-5.

    PubMed 30665378
  • Chua DT, Sham JS, Au GK. A phase II study of docetaxel and cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2005 Jul;41(6):589-95. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.01.008. Epub 2005 Apr 14.

    PubMed 15975521
  • Zhang L, Huang Y, Hong S, Yang Y, Yu G, Jia J, Peng P, Wu X, Lin Q, Xi X, Peng J, Xu M, Chen D, Lu X, Wang R, Cao X, Chen X, Lin Z, Xiong J, Lin Q, Xie C, Li Z, Pan J, Li J, Wu S, Lian Y, Yang Q, Zhao C. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2016 Oct 15;388(10054):1883-1892. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31388-5. Epub 2016 Aug 23.

    PubMed 27567279
  • Fang W, Yang Y, Ma Y, Hong S, Lin L, He X, Xiong J, Li P, Zhao H, Huang Y, Zhang Y, Chen L, Zhou N, Zhao Y, Hou X, Yang Q, Zhang L. Camrelizumab (SHR-1210) alone or in combination with gemcitabine plus cisplatin for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: results from two single-arm, phase 1 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Oct;19(10):1338-1350. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30495-9. Epub 2018 Sep 10.

    PubMed 30213452

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Toripalimab, IMRT to the nasopharynx and neck and Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Chemotherapy in people with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, run by Fudan University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Progression-free survival (time frame: 5 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04517214, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in