Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)Phase 3SKYSCRAPER-03NCT04513925
A Study of Atezolizumab and Tiragolumab Compared With Durvalumab in Participants With Locally Advanced, Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Phase 3 study testing Atezolizumab, Tiragolumab and Durvalumab in people with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 189 sites in 26 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab in combination with tiragolumab compared with durvalumab in participants with locally advanced, unresectable Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have received at least two cycles of concurrent platinum-based chemoradiotherapy… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
- What is being tested?
- Atezolizumab, Tiragolumab and Durvalumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 829 participants
- Where
- 189 sitesin 26 countries
- Study dates
- 24 Aug 2020to 31 Jul 2025
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1
- Histologically or cytologically documented NSCLC with locally advanced, unresectable Stage III NSCLC of either squamous or non-squamous histology
- Whole-body Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT) scan, performed prior and within 42 days of the first dose of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT)
- At least two prior cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy administered concurrently with radiotherapy (RT), which must be completed within 1 to 42 days prior to randomization in the study (one cycle of cCRT is defined as 21 or 28 days)
- The radiotherapy (RT) component in the cCRT must have been at a total dose of radiation of 60 (±10 percent [%]) gray (Gy) (54 Gy to 66 Gy) administered by intensity modulated RT (preferred) or 3D-conforming technique
- No progression during or following concurrent platinum-based CRT
Show all 12Show fewer
- A known PD-L1 result
- Life expectancy >/= 12 weeks
- Adequate hematologic and end-organ function
- Female participants must be willing to avoid pregnancy for 90 days after the final dose of tiragolumab and 5 months after the final dose of atezolizumab, or for 3 months after the final dose of durvalumab
- Male participants must remain abstinent or use a condom during the treatment period and for 90 days after the final dose of tiragolumab
- Male participants must not donate sperm during the treatment period and for 90 days after the final dose of tiragolumab
Who cannot join
- Any history of prior NSCLC and/or any history of prior treatment for NSCLC (participants must be newly diagnosed with unresectable Stage III disease)
- NSCLC known to have a mutation in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene or an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion oncogene
- Any evidence of Stage IV disease
- Treatment with sequential CRT for locally advanced NSCLC
- Participants with locally advanced NSCLC who have progressed during or after the definitive cCRT prior to randomization
- Any Grade >2 unresolved toxicity from previous CRT
Show all 17Show fewer
- Grade >= 2 pneumonitis from prior CRT
- Active or history of autoimmune disease or immune deficiency
- History of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, organizing pneumonia, drug-induced pneumonitis, or idiopathic pneumonitis or evidence of active pneumonitis
- History of malignancy other than NSCLC within 5 years prior to screening with the exception of malignancies with a negligible risk of metastasis or death
- Prior allogeneic stem cell or solid organ transplantation
- Active Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection or known or suspected chronic active EBV infection at screening
- Treatment with investigational therapy within 28 days prior to initiation of study treatment
- Prior treatment with CD137 agonists or immune checkpoint blockade therapies, including anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4, anti-T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (anti-TIGIT), anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1
- Any prior Grade >/= 3 immune-mediated adverse event or any unresolved Grade > 1 immune-mediated adverse event while receiving any previous immunotherapy agent other than immune checkpoint blockade agents
- Treatment with systemic immunosuppressive medication
- Women who are pregnant, or breastfeeding
Trial locations and contacts
189 sites in 26 countries.
189 sites in 26 countries
United States25 sites
New York Oncology Hematology,P.C.-Albany
Albany, New York, 12208
New England Cancer Specialists
Brunswick, Maine, 04011
Tennessee Oncology Chattanooga
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37403
Titan Health Partners LLC, d/b/a Astera Cancer Care
East Brunswick, New Jersey, 08816
Virginia Cancer Specialists
Fairfax, Virginia, 22031
Southcoast Health System
Fairhaven, Massachusetts, 02719
San Juan Oncology Associates
Farmington, New Mexico, 87401
Florida Cancer Specialists
Fort Myers, Florida, 33901-8101
Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center
Greeley, Colorado, 80631
Prisma Health ? Upstate
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615
HCA Midwest Health
Kansas City, Missouri, 64132
Optum Health Care
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89128
Northwest Georgia Oncology Centers PC - Marietta
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Minnesota Oncology Hematology
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55404
Sarah Cannon Research Institute / Tennessee Oncology
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, 10029
Virginia Oncology Associates
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502
Cancer Care Centers of Brevard
Palm Bay, Florida, 32901
Stanford University
Palo Alto, California, 94305
Woodlands Medical Specialists, P.A.
Pensacola, Florida, 32503
Illinois Cancer Care
Peoria, Illinois, 61615
Cox Health Systems
Springfield, Missouri, 65807
Florida Cancer Specialist, North Region
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33705
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10461
China21 sites
Beijing Cancer Center
Beijing, 100142
Beijing Chest Hospital
Beijing, 101149
Jilin Cancer Hospital
Changchun, 132013
Xiangya Hospital Central South University
Changsha, 410008
Sichuan Provincial Cancer Hospital
Chengdu, 610041
Chongqing Cancer Hospital
Chongqing, 400030
Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
Fujian, 350001
Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital
Fuzhou, 350014
Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University of Medical Sciences
Guangzhou, 510060
Hangzhou Cancer Hospital
Hangzhou, 310002
Shandong Cancer Hospital
Jinan, 250117
Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University
Nanjing, 210009
The affiliated hospital of Qingdao university
Qingdao, 266042
Shanghai Chest Hospital
Shanghai, 200000
Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College
Shantou, 515041
Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital
Taiyuan, 030013
Tianjin Cancer Hospital
Tianjin, 300060
The 2nd School of Medicine, WMU
Wenzhou, 325000
The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University
Xiamen, 361003
The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical College
Xuzhou, 221000
Henan Cancer Hospital
Zhengzhou, 450008
South Korea15 sites
Chungbuk National University Hospital
Cheongju-si, 28644
Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital
Daegu, 41404
National Cancer Center
Gyeonggi-do, 10408
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Gyeonggi-do, 13620
St. Vincent's Hospital
Gyeonggi-do, 16247
Ajou University Medical Center
Gyeonggi-do, 16499
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
Gyeongsangnam-do, 50612
Gachon University Gil Medical Center
Incheon, 21565
Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital
Jeollanam-do, 58128
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, 03080
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, 05505
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 06351
Seoul St Mary's Hospital
Seoul, 06591
Korea University Guro Hospital
Seoul, 08308
Ulsan University Hosiptal
Ulsan, 44033
Japan13 sites
Aichi Cancer Center
Aichi, 464-8681
National Cancer Center East
Chiba, 277-8577
National Hospital Organization Himeji Medical Center
Hyōgo, 670-8520
Kitasato University Hospital
Kanagawa, 252-0375
Kyoto University Hospital
Kyoto, 606-8507
Sendai Kousei Hospital
Miyagi, 981-0914
Niigata Cancer Center Hospital
Niigata, 951-8566
Kindai University Hospital
Osaka, 589-8511
Saitama Cancer Center
Saitama, 362-0806
Shizuoka Cancer Center
Shizuoka, 411-8777
National Cancer Center Hospital
Tokyo, 104-0045
The Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR
Tokyo, 135-8550
Wakayama Medical University Hospital
Wakayama, 641-8510
Italy11 sites
A.O. Spedali Civili Di Brescia-P.O. Spedali Civili
Brescia, Lombardy, 25123
IRCCS AOU San Martino - IST
Genoa, Liguria, 16132
IRST Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo Per Lo Studio E Cura Dei Tumori, Sede Meldola
Meldola, Emilia-Romagna, 47014
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Niguarda (Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda)
Milan, Lombardy, DUMMY_VALUE
Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale
Naples, Campania, 80131
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Parma
Parma, Emilia-Romagna, 43100
Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo
Pavia, Lombardy, 27100
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana - Ospedale Cisanello
Pisa, Tuscany, 56124
Policlinico Universitario Campus Biomedico
Rome, Lazio, 00128
IRCCS Istituto Regina Elena (IFO)
Rome, Lazio, 00144
Azienda ULSS 8 Berica
Vicenza, Veneto, 36100
Spain11 sites
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña (CHUAC)
A Coruña, 15006
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol
Badalona, Barcelona, 08916
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, 08035
Hospital Provincial de Castellon
Castellon, Castellon, 12002
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
Madrid, 28009
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid, 28041
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, 28046
Hospital Regional Universitario Carlos Haya
Málaga, 29010
Hospital Son Llatzer
Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, 07198
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
Seville, 41013
Hospital Univ. Nuestra Señora de Valme
Seville, 41014
Turkey (Türkiye)10 sites
Adana Baskent University Medical Faculty
Adana, 01220
Ankara University Medical Faculty
Ankara, 06100
Hacettepe Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Hastanesi
Ankara, 06100
Gazi University Medical Faculty, Oncology Hospital
Ankara, 06500
Ege University Medical Faculty
Bornova, ?zm?r, 35100
Dicle University Faculty of Medicine
Diyarbakır, 21280
Trakya Universitesi Tip Fakultesi, Medikal Onkoloji Bilim Dali, Balkan Yerleskesi
Edirne, 22030
Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine
Istanbul, 34098
Medipol University Medical Faculty
Istanbul, 34214
Inonu University Faculty of Medicine Turgut Ozal Medical Center
Malatya, 44280
United Kingdom8 sites
Birmingham Heartlands Hospital
Birmingham, B9 5SS
Addenbrooke's NHS Trust
Cambridge, CB2 0QQ
Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre
Glasgow, G12 0YN
Calderdale & Huddersfield Nhs Trust
Huddersfield, HD3 3EA
Leicester Royal Infirmary
Leicester, LE1 5WW
Maidstone & Tonbridge Wells Hospital
Maidstone, ME16 9QQ
Christie Foundation Trust
Manchester, M20 4BX
Weston Park Hospital
Sheffield, S10 2SJ
Brazil7 sites
Hospital de Cancer de Barretos
Barretos, São Paulo, 14784-400
Centro Integrado de Oncologia de Curitiba
Curitiba, Paraná, 80810-050
Crio - Centro Regional Integrado de Oncologia
Fortaleza, Ceará, 60336-550
Oncosite - Centro de Pesquisa Clinica Em Oncologia Ltda
Ijuí, Rio Grande do Sul, 98700-000
Hospital Sao Lucas - PUCRS
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90610-000
Hospital de Base de Sao Jose do Rio Preto
São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, 15090-000
Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo - ICESP
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01246-000
Australia6 sites
Flinders Medical Centre
Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042
Blacktown Hospital
Blacktown, New South Wales, 2148
Fiona Stanley Hospital
Bull Creek, Western Australia, 6149
Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre
Campbelltown, New South Wales, 2560
St George Hospital
Kogarah, New South Wales, 2217
Monash Health Translational Precinct
Victoria, Victoria, 3168
France6 sites
CHU Angers
Angers, 49933
Centre Francois Baclesse
Caen, 14000
Hopital Nord AP-HM
Marseille, 13015
Clinique Clémentville
Montpellier, 34070
Hopital Robert Schuman
Vantoux, 57070
Institut Gustave Roussy
Villejuif, 94805
Germany6 sites
Klinikum Braunschweig
Braunschweig, 38114
Klinikum Koeln-Merheim
Cologne, 51109
Universitaetsmedizin Goettingen
Göttingen, 37075
Thoraxklinik Heidelberg gGmbH
Heidelberg, 69126
Klinikum Bogenhausen
München, 81925
Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
Regensburg, 93053
Canada5 sites
BC Cancer ? Abbotsford
Abbotsford British Columbia, British Columbia, V2S 0C2
Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre
Barrie, Ontario, L4M 6M2
William Osler Health System Brampton Civic Hospital
Brampton, Ontario, L6R 3J7
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6
BC Cancer - Victoria
Victoria, British Columbia, V8R 6V5
Hong Kong5 sites
Princess Margaret Hospital, Oncology
Hong Kong, DUMMY_VALUE
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Hong Kong, DUMMY_VALUE
Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital
Hong Kong
Tuen Mun Hospital
Hong Kong
Queen Mary Hospital
Pokfulam, DUMMY_VALUE
Poland5 sites
Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne
Gda?sk, 80-214
Szpital Kliniczny MSWiA z Warmi?sko-Mazurskim Centrum Onkologii
Olsztyn, 10-228
Mazowieckie Centrum Leczenia Chorob Pluc I Gruzlicy
Otwock, 05-400
Narod.Inst.Onkol. im. M.Sklodowskiej - Curie-Panst.Inst.Bad
Warsaw, 02-781
Dolnoslaskie Centrum Onkologii, Pulmonologii i Hematologii
Wroc?aw, 53-413
Argentina4 sites
CEMIC
Buenos Aires, C1431FWO
Hospital Britanico de Buenos Aires
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1284AEB
Clinica Universitaria Reina Fabiola
Córdoba, X5004FHP
Sanatorio Parque S.A.
Rosario, S2000QGB
Israel4 sites
Soroka Medical Center
Beersheba, 8410100
Rambam Medical Center
Haifa, 3109601
Shaare Zedek Medical Center
Jerusalem, 9103102
Rabin Medical Center
Petah Tikva, 4941492
Netherlands4 sites
Meander Medisch Centrum
Amersfoort, 3813 TZ
Amphia Ziekenhuis
Breda, 4819 EV
Medisch Centrum Haaglanden, locatie Antoniushove
Leidschendam, 2262 BA
Zuyderland Medisch Centrum - Sittard Geleen
Sittard-Geleen, 6162 BG
Portugal4 sites
IPO de Coimbra
Coimbra, 3000-075
Hospital da Luz
Lisbon, 1500-650
Hospital CUF Porto
Porto, 4100-180
IPO do Porto
Porto, 4200-072
Thailand4 sites
Vajira Hospital
Bangkok, 10300
Rajavithi Hospital
Bangkok, 10400
Ramathibodi Hospital;Medicine/Oncology
Bangkok, 10400
Songklanagarind Hospital
Songkhla, 90110
Austria3 sites
Tiroler Landeskrankenanstalten Ges.M.B.H.
Innsbruck, 6020
Kepler Universitätskliniken GmbH - Med Campus III
Linz, 4020
Klinik Penzing
Vienna, 1140
Belgium3 sites
GHdC Site Les Viviers
Charleroi, 6000
AZ Maria Middelares
Ghent, 9000
Jessa Zkh (Campus Virga Jesse)
Hasselt, 3500
Greece3 sites
General Hospital "G.Papanikolaou"
Asvestochóri, 570 10
Sotiria Hospital
Athens, 11527
Agioi Anargyroi Cancer Hospital
Kifissia, 145 64
Hungary3 sites
Pécsi Tudományegyetem
Pécs, 7623
Szent Borbala Korhaz
Tatabánya, 2800
Tudogyogyintezet Torokbalint
Törökbálint, 2045
Taiwan2 sites
China Medical University Hospital
Taichung, 40447
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Taipei, 112
New Zealand1 site
Auckland City Hospital, Cancer and Blood Research
Auckland, 1023
About this study
Official title: A Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized Study of Atezolizumab and Tiragolumab Compared With Durvalumab in Patients With Locally Advanced, Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Not Progressed After Concurrent Platinum-Based Chemoradiation
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab in combination with tiragolumab compared with durvalumab in participants with locally advanced, unresectable Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have received at least two cycles of concurrent platinum-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and have not had radiographic disease progression.
- Conditions
- Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
- Being tested
- Atezolizumab, Tiragolumab, Durvalumab
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AtezolizumabDrug
Also called Tecentriq; RO5541267
Atezolizumab 1680 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) will be administered IV on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle.
TiragolumabDrug
Also called MTIG7192A; RO7092284
Tiragolumab 840 mg Q4W will be administered IV on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle.
DurvalumabDrug
Durvalumab will be administered based on weight at 10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks (Q2W) on Days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle, or will be administered at a fixed dose of 1500 mg IV every 4 weeks (Q4W) (for participants whose weight >/= 30 kg) on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab | Experimental | Participants will receive atezolizumab administered intravenously (IV) on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle followed by tiragolumab administered IV on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle for a maximum of 13 cycles. Receives: Drug: Atezolizumab; Drug: Tiragolumab |
| Durvalumab | Active comparator | Participants will receive durvalumab administered IV during each 28-day cycle for a maximum of 13 cycles. Receives: Drug: Durvalumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by an Independent Review Facility (IRF) in Programmed Death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) Positive Analysis Set (PPAS)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as determined by an IRF according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1), or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). Additionally, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 millimeters (mm) or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method was used to estimate median PFS.
Measured: From randomization to first occurrence of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 57 months)
PFS, as Assessed by an IRF in FAS
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as determined by an IRF according to RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). Additionally, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. K-M method was used to estimate median PFS.
Measured: From randomization to first occurrence of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 57 months)
Secondary outcomes (32)
Overall Survival (OS) in PPAS
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. K-M method was used to estimate median OS.
Measured: From randomization to death from any cause (up to approximately 57 months)
PFS, as Assessed by the Investigator in PPAS
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). Additionally, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. K-M method was used to estimate median PFS.
Measured: From randomization to first occurrence of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 57 months)
Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR), as Assessed by an IRF in PPAS
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved an objective response (OR), characterized by a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on two consecutive occasions ≥ 4 weeks apart, as determined by an IRF according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesion \& normalization of tumor marker level. Additionally, any lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. Percentages have been rounded off.
Measured: Up to approximately 57 months
Confirmed ORR, as Assessed by the Investigator in PPAS
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved an OR, characterized by CR or PR on two consecutive occasions ≥ 4 weeks apart, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions \& normalization of tumor marker level. Additionally, any lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. Percentages have been rounded off.
Measured: Up to approximately 57 months
Duration of Response (DOR), as Assessed by an IRF in PPAS
DOR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a confirmed OR, characterized by CR or PR, until the first date of PD, as determined by an IRF according to RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions \& normalization of tumor marker level. Additionally, any lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). Additionally, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Median DOR was estimated using the K-M method.
Measured: From first occurrence of a confirmed OR until the first date of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 57 months)
DOR, as Assessed by the Investigator in PPAS
DOR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a confirmed OR, characterized by CR or PR, until the first date of PD, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, normalization of tumor marker level. Additionally, any lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). Additionally, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Median DOR was estimated using the K-M method.
Measured: From first occurrence of a confirmed OR until the first date of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 57 months)
Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) in Cough, as Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-LC13) in PPAS
TTCD=time from randomization until first confirmed clinically meaningful deterioration (CCMD) on each respective score. EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer-specific instrument consisting of 13 questions: one multiple-item scale assessing dyspnoea (3 items), and 10 single items assessing cough, hemoptysis, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, pain in chest, pain in arm or shoulder, pain in other parts, pain medication. Cough scored on a 4-point scale: 1=Not at all, 2=A little, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much. Scores were linearly transformed to score range of 0-100. High symptom score=high level of symptom severity. CCMD=increase from baseline (≥10 points) in a symptom score, held for at least two consecutive assessments or an initial clinically meaningful increase above baseline followed by death from any cause within 6 weeks. K-M method was used to estimate median TTCD.
Measured: Up to approximately 57 months
TTCD in Dyspnoea, as Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-LC13 in PPAS
TTCD=time from randomization until first CCMD on each respective score. EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer-specific instrument consisting of 13 questions: one multiple-item scale assessing dyspnoea (3 items), and 10 single items assessing cough, hemoptysis, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, pain in chest, pain in arm or shoulder, pain in other parts, pain medication. Dyspnoea was scored on a 4-point scale: 1=Not at all, 2=A little, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much. Scores were linearly transformed to score range of 0-100. High symptom score=high level of symptom severity. CCMD=increase from baseline (≥10 points) in a symptom score, held for at least two consecutive assessments or an initial clinically meaningful increase above baseline followed by death from any cause within 6 weeks. K-M method was used to estimate median TTCD.
Measured: Up to approximately 57 months
TTCD in Chest Pain, as Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-LC13 in PPAS
TTCD=time from randomization until first CCMD on each respective score. EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer-specific instrument consisting of 13 questions: one multiple-item scale assessing dyspnoea (3 items), and 10 single items assessing cough, hemoptysis, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, pain in chest, pain in arm or shoulder, pain in other parts, pain medication. Chest pain was scored on a 4-point scale: 1=Not at all, 2=A little, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much. Scores were linearly transformed to score range of 0-100. High symptom score=high level of symptom severity. CCMD=increase from baseline (≥10 points) in a symptom score, held for at least two consecutive assessments or an initial clinically meaningful increase above baseline followed by death from any cause within 6 weeks. K-M method was used to estimate median TTCD.
Measured: Up to approximately 57 months
TTCD in Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality-of-life (QoL), as Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) in PPAS
TTCD=time from randomization until first CCMD on each respective score. EORTC QLQ-C30 is cancer-specific instrument consisting of 30 questions to evaluate 5 aspects of participant functioning (physical, emotional, role, cognitive, \& social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea, vomiting, \& pain), GHS/QoL, \& 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea \& financial difficulties). GHS/QoL questions were scored on 7-point scale with scores ranging from 1=Very poor to 7=Excellent. Scores were linearly transformed to a score range of 0-100. High score for GHS/QoL scale=better health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL). CCMD=decrease from baseline (≥10 points) in GHS/QoL scale score, held for at least 2 consecutive assessments/initial clinically meaningful decrease above baseline followed by death within 6 weeks. K-M method was used to estimate median TTCD.
Measured: Up to approximately 57 months
TTCD in Physical Functioning (PF), as Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-C30 in PPAS
TTCD=time from randomization until first CCMD on each respective score. EORTC QLQ-C30 is cancer-specific instrument consisting of 30 questions to evaluate 5 aspects of participant functioning (physical, emotional, role, cognitive, \& social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea, vomiting, \& pain), GHS/QoL, and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea \& financial difficulties). PF was scored on a 4-point scale: 1=Not at all, 2=A little, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much. Scores were linearly transformed to a score range of 0-100. High score for PF=high/healthy level of functioning. CCMD=decrease from baseline (≥10 points) in PF score, held for at least 2 consecutive assessments or initial clinically meaningful decrease above baseline followed by death within 6 weeks. K-M method was used to estimate median TTCD.
Measured: Up to approximately 57 months
OS in FAS
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. K-M method was used to estimate median OS.
Measured: From randomization to death from any cause (up to approximately 57 months)
PFS, as Assessed by the Investigator in FAS
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). Additionally, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. K-M method was used to estimate median PFS.
Measured: From randomization to first occurrence of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 57 months)
Confirmed ORR, as Assessed by an IRF in FAS
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved an OR, characterized by CR or PR on two consecutive occasions ≥ 4 weeks apart, as determined by an IRF according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, normalization of tumor marker level. Additionally, any lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. Percentages have been rounded off.
Measured: Up to approximately 57 months
Confirmed ORR, as Assessed by the Investigator in FAS
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved an OR, characterized by a CR or PR on two consecutive occasions ≥ 4 weeks apart, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, normalization of tumor marker level. Additionally, any lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. Percentages have been rounded off.
Measured: Up to approximately 57 months
DOR, as Assessed by an IRF in FAS
DOR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a confirmed OR, characterized by CR or PR, until the first date of PD, as determined by an IRF according to RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, normalization of tumor marker level. Additionally, any lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). Additionally, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Median DOR was estimated using the K-M method.
Measured: From first occurrence of a confirmed OR until the first date of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 57 months)
DOR, as Assessed by the Investigator in FAS
DOR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a confirmed OR, characterized by CR or PR, until the first date of PD, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, normalization of tumor marker level. Additionally, any lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). Additionally, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Median DOR was estimated using the K-M method.
Measured: From first occurrence of a confirmed OR until the first date of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 57 months)
TTCD in Cough, as Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-LC13 in FAS
TTCD=time from randomization until first CCMD on each respective score. EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer-specific instrument consisting of 13 questions: one multiple-item scale assessing dyspnoea (3 items), and 10 single items assessing cough, hemoptysis, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, pain in chest, pain in arm or shoulder, pain in other parts, pain medication. Cough was scored on a 4-point scale: 1=Not at all, 2=A little, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much. Scores were linearly transformed to score range of 0-100. High symptom score=high level of symptom severity. CCMD=increase from baseline (≥10 points) in a symptom score, held for at least two consecutive assessments or an initial clinically meaningful increase above baseline followed by death from any cause within 6 weeks. K-M method was used to estimate median TTCD.
Measured: Up to approximately 57 months
TTCD in Dyspnoea, as Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-LC13 in FAS
TTCD=time from randomization until first CCMD on each respective score. EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer-specific instrument consisting of 13 questions: one multiple-item scale assessing dyspnoea (3 items), and 10 single items assessing cough, hemoptysis, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, pain in chest, pain in arm or shoulder, pain in other parts, pain medication. Dyspnoea was scored on a 4-point scale: 1=Not at all, 2=A little, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much. Scores were linearly transformed to score range of 0-100. High symptom score=high level of symptom severity. CCMD=increase from baseline (≥10 points) in a symptom score, held for at least two consecutive assessments or an initial clinically meaningful increase above baseline followed by death from any cause within 6 weeks. K-M method was used to estimate median TTCD.
Measured: Up to approximately 57 months
TTCD in Chest Pain, as Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-LC13 in FAS
TTCD=time from randomization until first CCMD on each respective score. EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer-specific instrument consisting of 13 questions: one multiple-item scale assessing dyspnoea (3 items), and 10 single items assessing cough, hemoptysis, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, pain in chest, pain in arm or shoulder, pain in other parts, pain medication. Chest pain was scored on a 4-point scale: 1=Not at all, 2=A little, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much. Scores were linearly transformed to score range of 0-100. High symptom score=high level of symptom severity. CCMD=increase from baseline (≥10 points) in a symptom score, held for at least two consecutive assessments or an initial clinically meaningful increase above baseline followed by death from any cause within 6 weeks. K-M method was used to estimate median TTCD.
Measured: Up to approximately 57 months
TTCD in GHS/QoL, as Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-C30 in FAS
TTCD=time from randomization until first CCMD on each respective score. EORTC QLQ-C30 is cancer-specific instrument consisting of 30 questions to evaluate 5 aspects of participant functioning (physical, emotional, role, cognitive, \& social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea, vomiting, \& pain), GHS/QoL, and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea \& financial difficulties). GHS/QoL questions were scored on 7-point scale with scores ranging from 1=Very poor to 7=Excellent. Scores were linearly transformed to a score range of 0-100. High score for GHS/QoL scale=better HRQoL. CCMD=decrease from baseline (≥10 points) in GHS/QoL scale score, held for at least 2 consecutive assessments or initial clinically meaningful decrease above baseline followed by death within 6 weeks. K-M method was used to estimate median TTCD.
Measured: Up to approximately 57 months
TTCD in PF, as Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-C30 in FAS
TTCD=time from randomization until first CCMD on each respective score. EORTC QLQ-C30 is cancer-specific instrument consisting of 30 questions to evaluate 5 aspects of participant functioning (physical, emotional, role, cognitive, \& social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea, vomiting, \& pain), GHS/QoL, and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea \& financial difficulties). PF was scored on a 4-point scale: 1=Not at all, 2=A little, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much. Scores were linearly transformed to a score range of 0-100. High score for PF=high/healthy level of functioning. CCMD=decrease from baseline (≥10 points) in PF score, held for at least 2 consecutive assessments or initial clinically meaningful decrease above baseline followed by death within 6 weeks. K-M method was used to estimate median TTCD.
Measured: Up to approximately 57 months
PFS Rate at 12, 18, and 24 Months, as Assessed by an IRF in PPAS
PFS rate at 12, 18, and 24 months was defined as the percentage of participants who did not experience PD or death from any cause, as determined by an IRF, at 12, 18, and 24 months. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as determined by an IRF according to RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). Additionally, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. K-M method was used to estimate median PFS rate. Percentages have been rounded off.
Measured: At Months 12, 18, and 24
PFS Rate at 12, 18, and 24 Months, as Assessed by the Investigator in PPAS
PFS rate at 12, 18, and 24 months was defined as the percentage of participants who did not experience PD or death from any cause, as determined by the investigator, at 12, 18, and 24 months. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). Additionally, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. K-M method was used to estimate median PFS rate. Percentages have been rounded off.
Measured: At Months 12, 18, and 24
OS Rate at 12, 24, 36, and 48 Months in PPAS
OS rate at months 12, 24, 36 and 48 was defined as percentage of participants who did not experience death from any cause at the specified timepoints. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. K-M method was used to estimate OS rate. Percentages have been rounded off.
Measured: At Months 12, 24, 36, and 48
Time-to-distant Metastasis (TTDM), as Assessed by the Investigator in PPAS
TTDM was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of first documented distant metastasis, as assessed by investigator according to RECIST v1.1, or death, whichever occurred first. Distant metastasis was defined as any new lesion that was outside of the radiation field. K-M method was used to estimate median TTDM.
Measured: Up to approximately 57 months
PFS Rate at 12, 18, and 24 Months, as Assessed by an IRF in FAS
PFS rate at 12, 18, and 24 months was defined as the percentage of participants who did not experience PD or death from any cause, as determined by an IRF, at 12, 18, and 24 months. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as determined by an IRF according to RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). Additionally, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. K-M method was used to estimate PFS rate. Percentages have been rounded off.
Measured: At Months 12, 18, and 24
PFS Rate at 12, 18, and 24 Months, as Assessed by the Investigator in FAS
PFS rate at 12, 18, and 24 months was defined as the percentage of participants who did not experience PD or death from any cause, as determined by the investigator, at 12, 18, and 24 months. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). Additionally, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. K-M method was used to estimate PFS rate. Percentages have been rounded off.
Measured: At Months 12, 18, and 24
OS Rate at 12, 24, 36, and 48 Months in FAS
OS rate at months 12, 24, 36 and 48 was defined as percentage of participants who did not experience death from any cause at the specified timepoints. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. K-M method was used to estimate OS rate. Percentages have been rounded off.
Measured: At Months 12, 24, 36, and 48
TTDM, as Assessed by the Investigator in FAS
TTDM was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of first documented distant metastasis, as assessed by investigator according to RECIST v1.1, or death, whichever occurred first. Distant metastasis was defined as any new lesion that was outside of the radiation field. K-M method was used to estimate median TTDM.
Measured: Up to approximately 57 months
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product.
Measured: Up to approximately 24.7 months
Number of Participants With Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS)
CRS=supraphysiologic response following administration of any immune therapy that results in activation/engagement of endogenous or infused T cells and/or other immune effector cells. Symptoms may be progressive, including fever at onset, and may also include hypotension, capillary leak (hypoxia), and end-organ dysfunction.
Measured: Up to approximately 24.7 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Aug 2020
- Study start24 Aug 2020
- Primary completion27 May 2025
- Study completion31 Jul 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 829 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04513925
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GO41854
- Other IDs
- 2019-004773-29, 2019
- Acronym
- SKYSCRAPER-03
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 13 Aug 2020
- Last updated
- 3 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: For eligible studies, qualified researchers may request access to individual patient level clinical data. See Roche's commitment to transparency of clinical study information here: https://go.roche.com/data\_sharing
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized Study of Atezolizumab and Tiragolumab Compared With Durvalumab in Patients With Locally Advanced, Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Not Progressed After Concurrent Platinum-Based Chemoradiation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04513925
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SKYSCRAPER-03 / GO41854
- Conditions
- Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 829 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 24 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 May 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 3 Jun 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab in combination with tiragolumab compared with durvalumab in participants with locally advanced, unresectable Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have received at least two cycles of concurrent platinum-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and have not had radiographic disease progression.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab | Experimental | Drug: Atezolizumab, Drug: TiragolumabParticipants will receive atezolizumab administered intravenously (IV) on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle followed by tiragolumab administered IV on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle for a maximum of 13 cycles. |
| Durvalumab | Active comparator | Drug: DurvalumabParticipants will receive durvalumab administered IV during each 28-day cycle for a maximum of 13 cycles. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1
- Histologically or cytologically documented NSCLC with locally advanced, unresectable Stage III NSCLC of either squamous or non-squamous histology
- Whole-body Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT) scan, performed prior and within 42 days of the first dose of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT)
- At least two prior cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy administered concurrently with radiotherapy (RT), which must be completed within 1 to 42 days prior to randomization in the study (one cycle of cCRT is defined as 21 or 28 days)
- The radiotherapy (RT) component in the cCRT must have been at a total dose of radiation of 60 (±10 percent [%]) gray (Gy) (54 Gy to 66 Gy) administered by intensity modulated RT (preferred) or 3D-conforming technique
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Any history of prior NSCLC and/or any history of prior treatment for NSCLC (participants must be newly diagnosed with unresectable Stage III disease)
- NSCLC known to have a mutation in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene or an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion oncogene
- Any evidence of Stage IV disease
- Treatment with sequential CRT for locally advanced NSCLC
- Participants with locally advanced NSCLC who have progressed during or after the definitive cCRT prior to randomization
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AtezolizumabAlso: Tecentriq; RO5541267Atezolizumab 1680 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) will be administered IV on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle. | Drug | Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab |
| TiragolumabAlso: MTIG7192A; RO7092284Tiragolumab 840 mg Q4W will be administered IV on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle. | Drug | Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab |
| DurvalumabDurvalumab will be administered based on weight at 10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks (Q2W) on Days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle, or will be administered at a fixed dose of 1500 mg IV every 4 weeks (Q4W) (for participants whose weight >/= 30 kg) on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle. | Drug | Durvalumab |
Primary outcome
Progression-free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by an Independent Review Facility (IRF) in Programmed Death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) Positive Analysis Set (PPAS)
Time frame: From randomization to first occurrence of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 57 months)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as determined by an IRF according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1), or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). Additionally, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 millimeters (mm) or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method was used to estimate median PFS.
PFS, as Assessed by an IRF in FAS
Time frame: From randomization to first occurrence of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 57 months)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as determined by an IRF according to RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). Additionally, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. K-M method was used to estimate median PFS.
32 secondary outcomes
Overall Survival (OS) in PPAS
Time frame: From randomization to death from any cause (up to approximately 57 months)
PFS, as Assessed by the Investigator in PPAS
Time frame: From randomization to first occurrence of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 57 months)
Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR), as Assessed by an IRF in PPAS
Time frame: Up to approximately 57 months
Confirmed ORR, as Assessed by the Investigator in PPAS
Time frame: Up to approximately 57 months
Duration of Response (DOR), as Assessed by an IRF in PPAS
Time frame: From first occurrence of a confirmed OR until the first date of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 57 months)
DOR, as Assessed by the Investigator in PPAS
Time frame: From first occurrence of a confirmed OR until the first date of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 57 months)
Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) in Cough, as Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-LC13) in PPAS
Time frame: Up to approximately 57 months
TTCD in Dyspnoea, as Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-LC13 in PPAS
Time frame: Up to approximately 57 months
TTCD in Chest Pain, as Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-LC13 in PPAS
Time frame: Up to approximately 57 months
TTCD in Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality-of-life (QoL), as Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) in PPAS
Time frame: Up to approximately 57 months
TTCD in Physical Functioning (PF), as Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-C30 in PPAS
Time frame: Up to approximately 57 months
OS in FAS
Time frame: From randomization to death from any cause (up to approximately 57 months)
PFS, as Assessed by the Investigator in FAS
Time frame: From randomization to first occurrence of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 57 months)
Confirmed ORR, as Assessed by an IRF in FAS
Time frame: Up to approximately 57 months
Confirmed ORR, as Assessed by the Investigator in FAS
Time frame: Up to approximately 57 months
DOR, as Assessed by an IRF in FAS
Time frame: From first occurrence of a confirmed OR until the first date of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 57 months)
DOR, as Assessed by the Investigator in FAS
Time frame: From first occurrence of a confirmed OR until the first date of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 57 months)
TTCD in Cough, as Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-LC13 in FAS
Time frame: Up to approximately 57 months
TTCD in Dyspnoea, as Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-LC13 in FAS
Time frame: Up to approximately 57 months
TTCD in Chest Pain, as Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-LC13 in FAS
Time frame: Up to approximately 57 months
TTCD in GHS/QoL, as Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-C30 in FAS
Time frame: Up to approximately 57 months
TTCD in PF, as Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-C30 in FAS
Time frame: Up to approximately 57 months
PFS Rate at 12, 18, and 24 Months, as Assessed by an IRF in PPAS
Time frame: At Months 12, 18, and 24
PFS Rate at 12, 18, and 24 Months, as Assessed by the Investigator in PPAS
Time frame: At Months 12, 18, and 24
OS Rate at 12, 24, 36, and 48 Months in PPAS
Time frame: At Months 12, 24, 36, and 48
Time-to-distant Metastasis (TTDM), as Assessed by the Investigator in PPAS
Time frame: Up to approximately 57 months
PFS Rate at 12, 18, and 24 Months, as Assessed by an IRF in FAS
Time frame: At Months 12, 18, and 24
PFS Rate at 12, 18, and 24 Months, as Assessed by the Investigator in FAS
Time frame: At Months 12, 18, and 24
OS Rate at 12, 24, 36, and 48 Months in FAS
Time frame: At Months 12, 24, 36, and 48
TTDM, as Assessed by the Investigator in FAS
Time frame: Up to approximately 57 months
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: Up to approximately 24.7 months
Number of Participants With Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS)
Time frame: Up to approximately 24.7 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Jun 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. For eligible studies, qualified researchers may request access to individual patient level clinical data. See Roche's commitment to transparency of clinical study information here: https://go.roche.com/data_sharing
Related trials for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity Between SB27 and Keytruda in Subjects With Metastatic Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IV
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Calderasib (MK-1084) Plus Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Participants With KRAS G12C Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) With Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) ≥50% (MK-1084-004/KANDLELIT-004)
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Testing the Timing of Pembrolizumab Alone or With Chemotherapy as First Line Treatment and Maintenance in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Lung Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Carcinoma, Stage IIIB Lung Cancer AJCC v8
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of ABSK112 in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing the Impact of an Anti-Cancer Drug, Atezolizumab, After Surgery to Prevent Early Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer From Returning, AASI-NSCLC Trial
Lung Non-Small Cell Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
189 sites in 26 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Atezolizumab, Tiragolumab and Durvalumab in people with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 189 sites in 26 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 189 sites in United States, China, South Korea, Japan, Italy and 21 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Jun 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by an Independent Review Facility (IRF) in Programmed Death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) Positive Analysis Set (PPAS) (time frame: From randomization to first occurrence of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 57 months)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jun 2026.