AzTrials
AzTrials

Non-technical SkillsNTSNCT04503369

Observation of Non-technical Skills in the Pre-hospital Care in the Czech Republic

An observational study of Non-technical Skills, run by David Peran at 3 sites in Czechia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the study is to find out if the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) crews are using the non-technical skills (e.g. communication, decision making, situational awareness etc.) in the real practice and how well they use them. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Non-technical Skills
What is being tested?
Non-technical skills
How many people
359 participants
Where
3 sitesCzechia
Study dates
1 Jul 2019to 31 Dec 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: All patient of EMS in participated regions of the Czech Republic where the pre-hospital care is provided by 2 or more crews and the field supervisor is present.

Who may be able to join

  • EMS called
  • More than 2 crews on the scene
  • Field supervisor present

Who cannot join

  • TEAM tool not filled completely

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

Czechia3 sites
  • Emergency Medical Services of the Karlovy Vary region

    Karlovy Vary, 36006

  • Emergency Medical Services of the Pilsner region

    Pilsen, 30100

  • Prague Emergency Medical Services

    Prague, 10100

Other trials in Czechia

About this study

Official title: Observation of Non-technical Skills (e.g. Communication, Team Leader Skills, Teamwork, Situational Awareness Etc.) in the Pre-hospital Care in the Czech Republic

The aim of the study is to find out if the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) crews are using the non-technical skills (e.g. communication, decision making, situational awareness etc.) in the real practice and how well they use them.

Read the detailed description

The aim of the study is to find out if the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) crews are using the non-technical skills (teamwork and team leading, communication, decision making, situational awareness and task management) in the real practice and how well they use them. According to the observations of individual crews by field supervisors the use of non-technical skills will be compared between different groups (e.g. resuscitation, trauma, medical problems, non-emergency situations etc.). The comparison between the collaborators of the study is not the subject of the study.

Main hypothesis: The EMS crews are using all of the aspects of non-technical skills appropriately.

The field supervision is also the limitation of the study because it is done by different observers / supervisors, the observation therefore might by affected by subjective feelings. To minimise the subjective view of the situation all of the field supervisors undergo a uniform training of non-technical skills and how to observe and evaluate them.

Being tested
Non-technical skills
Keywords
non-technical skills, pre-hospital care, emergency medical services, communication, situational awareness, task management, decision making, teamwork, team leading
Medical subject headings
Communication

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Non-technical skillsBehavioural

    Teamwork The work of the team consists of information exchange and coordination of all activities performed. In-team communication is always calm and assertive, and team members support each other.

    Task management With the right planning and preparation of individual activities, the likelihood that all standards of care and best practices will be followed increases.

    Situational awareness Situational awareness refers primarily to the collection of information, its understanding and, on that basis, prediction of direction into which the situation will develop. Maintaining situational awareness is crucial in order to move towards the right goal.

    Decision-making With good situational awareness, one is able to keep in mind all information needed to make the correct decision at the right time. In some cases, it is advisable to consult with other team members or to verify their consent to the proposed procedure.

    Communication Communication is a vital tool when working in a team.

Study groups in NCT04503369
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
EMS crewsCrews of Emergency Medical Services
Receives: Behavioral: Non-technical skills

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. NTS incidence

    The measurement of non-technical skills usage will be evaluated according to the form developed and published by Cooper et al. (2010) as a Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) tool based on the Likert scale - Never/Hardly ever (0), Seldom (1), About as often as not (2), Often (3), Always/Nearly always (4).

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year and until 100 cases from each organization will be collected - 300 observations in total.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Aug 2020
  2. Study start1 Jul 2019
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2020
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Ecologic or community
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
359 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04503369
Sponsor's protocol ID
ZZSMHP_001_2020
Acronym
NTS
Status last verified
Feb 2021
First submitted
29 Jul 2020
Last updated
2 Feb 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Cooper SJ, Cant RP. Measuring non-technical skills of medical emergency teams: an update on the validity and reliability of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM). Resuscitation. 2014 Jan;85(1):31-3. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.08.276. Epub 2013 Sep 12.

    PubMed 24036193
  • Napier F, Davies RP, Baldock C, Stevens H, Lockey AS, Bullock I, Perkins GD. Validation for a scoring system of the ALS cardiac arrest simulation test (CASTest). Resuscitation. 2009 Sep;80(9):1034-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.04.043. Epub 2009 Jun 13.

    PubMed 19525052
  • PERAN, D., KUBALOVÁ, J..: Observation of non-technical skills during resuscitation (Sledování netechnických dovedností při resuscitaci) [article in Czech language]. Urgentní medicína: Časopis pro neodkladnou lékařskou péči. Mediprax CB s.r.o., 2017 (4). ISSN 1212-1924.

  • Peran D, Sykora R, Vidunova J, Krsova I, Pekara J, Renza M, Brizgalova N, Cmorej PC. Non-technical skills in pre-hospital care in the Czech Republic: a prospective multicentric observational study (NTS study). BMC Emerg Med. 2022 May 13;22(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00642-4.

    PubMed 35562664

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Non-technical Skills, run by David Peran at 3 sites in Czechia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

NTS incidence (time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year and until 100 cases from each organization will be collected - 300 observations in total.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04503369, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Feb 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in