AzTrials
AzTrials

Small Intestinal Bacterial OvergrowthNCT04499742

Comparative Assessment of Radioisotope Glucose and Breath Test

An observational study of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth, run by Augusta University at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a research study about improving our diagnostic method for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). Patients undergoing Standard of Care (SOC) Endoscopically assisted glucose breath test (EAGBT) will undergo upper endoscopy and glucose breath tests. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth
What is being tested?
Using Isotope (Tc99m-Sulfur Colloid) to label glucose and administer this directly into duodenum.
How many people
25 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
21 Jan 2019to 14 Dec 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients exhibiting SIBO symptoms.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with recent gas, bloating, distension, and suspected SIBO
  • Negative oral GBT
  • 18 years and older

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy
  • Diabetes
  • Previous abdominal surgery except cholecystectomy, appendectomy
  • Diet prep non-adherence
  • Smoking or exercise causing hyperventilation prior to exam

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Tennekoon Karunaratne, MD, PhD contact

7067211968

tkarunaratne@augusta.edu

Audrey Eubanks, BS contact

7067211968

aueubanks@augusta.edu

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Augusta University Digestive Health Research

    Augusta, Georgia, 30912

    Tennekoon Karunaratne, MD, PhD, 706-721-1968, tkarunaratne@augusta.edu

    Audrey Eubanks, BS, 7067211968, aueubanks@augusta.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Does Rise in Breath Hydrogen During Endoscopically Assisted Glucose Breath Test (EAGBT) Correlate With Radio-Isotope Location in Small Bowel: Improving Detection of Distal SIBO

This is a research study about improving our diagnostic method for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). Patients undergoing Standard of Care (SOC) Endoscopically assisted glucose breath test (EAGBT) will undergo upper endoscopy and glucose breath tests. In this study, investigators wish to utilize Nuclear Medicine techniques to locate where the glucose solution that is administered during EAGBT is being consumed by bacteria is in the small bowel when it detects SIBO.

Read the detailed description

Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is characterized by bloating, gas, distention, and diarrhea due to colonization and an excessive amount of bacteria in the small bowel. Distal SIBO is the presence of excessive amounts of bacteria in the distal jejunum and/or ileum. Diagnosis of SIBO requires either duodenal aspirate with culture analysis or more commonly with breath hydrogen/methane testing. Hydrogen breath testing often uses either oral glucose or lactulose solutions. If bacteria are present in the small bowel they will ferment glucose or lactulose, producing hydrogen or methane as a byproduct. These gases are absorbed into the bowel, and then eliminated via pulmonary expiration. By detecting a rise in breath H2 and CH4 values compared to baseline, SIBO can be diagnosed. However, after oral ingestion, the majority of the glucose substrate is absorbed in the duodenum and proximal jejunum. Therefore, Glucose breath test (GBT) is good for the detection of proximal SIBO, but misses distal SIBO.

Investigators have recently shown that glucose administration into the distal duodenum through upper endoscopy has a higher positive yield for SIBO in patients with negative oral GBT. However, it is unclear if the rise in breath H2 or CH4 is because of glucose fermentation by bacteria in the distal small bowel or from fermentation by bacteria in the colon, i.e. false-positive test. Study objective here is to administer a radio-labeled glucose solution into the duodenum via an endoscopically placed nasoduodenal tube, and then determine if the rise in breath hydrogen and/or methane correlates with the location of the isotopic glucose solution in the bowel by simultaneous nuclear imaging. Results of breath testing will also be compared with duodenal aspirate/cultures taken at the time of endoscopy. Clinical response to treatment will be assessed on follow up.

Being tested
Using Isotope (Tc99m-Sulfur Colloid) to label glucose and administer this directly into duodenum.

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Using Isotope (Tc99m-Sulfur Colloid) to label glucose and administer this directly into duodenum.Radiation

    Patients will be undergoing Standard of Care procedure EAGBT for collection of duodenal fluid (aspirate and culture) and placement of a catheter into the duodenum. This catheter will be used for infusion of glucose isotope into the small bowel. Subsequently Standard of Care nuclear medicine imaging will be used to track the location of the isotope in the gut.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Correlation between GBT result and isotope detection in small bowel

    Overall correlation (positive and negative) between the location of glucose isotope in small bowel (imaging) and changes in in hydrogen and methane values obtained during the breath test.

    Measured: February 6, 2019 (anticipated) - December 14, 2021 (anticipated)

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Diagnostic yield of EAGBT compared to oral GBT

    We will compare the yield (positive, negative and overall) of endoscopic assisted GBT versus orally administered GBT

    Measured: February 6, 2019 (anticipated) - December 14, 2021 (anticipated)

  2. Diagnostic yield of EAGBT compared to duodenal aspirate and culture

    We will compare the positive and negative yield of EAGBT with the positive (>1000 CFU/ml) or negative yield of aerobic and anaerobic cultures.

    Measured: February 6, 2019 (anticipated) - December 14, 2021 (anticipated)

  3. Symptom patterns and demographics

    Compare the gas and bloating symptom patterns, clinical characteristics predisposing factors including underlying dysmotility and other demographic features between patients with positive and negative EAGBT and cultures.

    Measured: February 6, 2019 (anticipated) - December 14, 2021 (anticipated)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Aug 2020
  2. Study start21 Jan 2019
  3. Primary completion14 Dec 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion14 Dec 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
25 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04499742
Sponsor's protocol ID
1328690
Status last verified
Aug 2020
First submitted
19 Feb 2019
Last updated
5 Aug 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth, run by Augusta University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Tennekoon Karunaratne, MD, PhD (7067211968, tkarunaratne@augusta.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Correlation between GBT result and isotope detection in small bowel (time frame: February 6, 2019 (anticipated) - December 14, 2021 (anticipated)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Aug 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in