AzTrials
AzTrials

Dermatologic DiseaseNCT04495036

Acceptance of Telemedicine in Dermatology Patients, Physicians and Medical Staff

An observational study of Dermatologic Disease, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 3 sites in Switzerland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is to investigate the current use and intention to use of teledermatology in Swiss dermatology patients, dermatologists, other physicians and medical staff. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Dermatologic Disease
What is being tested?
data collection (21-items-patient descriptive survey) and data collection (23-items-physician descriptive survey)
How many people
683 participants
Where
3 sitesSwitzerland
Study dates
1 Jul 2019to 31 Jan 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients treated in the Department of Dermatology of the Cantonal Hospital Aarau and the University Hospitals Basel and Zürich and Dermatologists, other physicians and medical staff of the Department of Dermatology of the Cantonal Hospital Aarau and the University Hospitals Basel and Zürich.

Who may be able to join

  • patients treated in the Department of Dermatology of the Cantonal Hospital Aarau and the University Hospitals Basel and Zürich
  • dermatologists, other physicians and medical staff of the Department of Dermatology of the Cantonal Hospital Aarau and the University Hospitals Basel and Zürich

Who cannot join

  • -

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

Switzerland3 sites
  • Kantonsspital Aarau

    Aarau, 5001

  • Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Basel

    Basel, 4031

  • University Hospital Zürich

    Zurich, 8091

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

This study is to investigate the current use and intention to use of teledermatology in Swiss dermatology patients, dermatologists, other physicians and medical staff.

Read the detailed description

Telemedicine, the use of telecommunication and information technology to provide clinical health care from a distance, has become an increasing role in basic medical care internationally. Telemedicine is particularly suitable for skin diseases. In order to improve the use of evidence-based telemedicine, the Swiss patients' preferences regarding teledermatology versus face-to-face consultations and the patients' and physicians' determinants of acceptance for teledermatology are investigated in this study. Dermatology patients are asked to complete a newly-created 21-items-survey; Swiss dermatologists, other physicians and medical staff on telemedicine will complete a similar newly-created, 23-items-questionnaire. A descriptive statistical analysis (e.g. gender, age, place of residence (city or country), waiting time) will be performed.

Being tested
data collection (21-items-patient descriptive survey), data collection (23-items-physician descriptive survey)
Keywords
Teledermatology, Telemedicine
Medical subject headings
Skin Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • data collection (21-items-patient descriptive survey)Other

    Dermatology patients are asked to complete a 21-items-survey while waiting for the doctor's consultation. Following variables will be addressed:

    • Demographic data of telemedicine users and non-users
    • Subjective disease perception of the dermatology patients
    • Use of internet, telemedicine and telemedicine insurance model
    • Patients´ willingness for additional features of telemedicine
    • Advantages and disadvantages telemedicine and face-to-face consultation
    • Suitable fields of dermatology for telemedicine from the patient's perspective
    • Recommended structure of telemedical services by users and non-users
  • data collection (23-items-physician descriptive survey)Other

    To obtain the view of Swiss dermatologists, other physicians and medical staff on telemedicine a 23-items-survey will be completed. Following variables will be addressed:

    • Objective disease perception of the treating dermatologist (regarding the urgency of the patient's medical examination, the functional impairment and cosmetic burden due to patient's disease, the impairment of life quality due to patient's disease and the estimation of the course of the patient's disease)
    • Suitable fields of dermatology for telemedicine from the physician's and medical staff's perspective
Study groups in NCT04495036
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
dermatology patientsNot described
Receives: Other: data collection (21-items-patient descriptive survey)
physicians and medical staffNot described
Receives: Other: data collection (23-items-physician descriptive survey)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. descriptive analysis: deviation in influencing factors for the acceptance of teledermatology

    Assessment of the deviation in influencing factors for the acceptance of teledermatology (subjective disease perception versus objective assessment by physicians)

    Measured: at baseline

  2. descriptive analysis of the impact of medical education for the acceptance of telemedicine among dermatologists vs. other physicians vs. medical staff vs. patients

    Comparison of the impact of medical education for the acceptance of telemedicine among dermatologists vs. other physicians vs. medical staff vs. patients

    Measured: at baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Jul 2020
  2. Study start1 Jul 2019
  3. Primary completion31 Jan 2020
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
683 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04495036
Sponsor's protocol ID
Req-2019-00523; sp20Maul2
Status last verified
Aug 2020
First submitted
28 Jul 2020
Last updated
4 Aug 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Maul LV, Jahn AS, Pamplona GSP, Streit M, Gantenbein L, Muller S, Nielsen ML, Greis C, Navarini AA, Maul JT. Acceptance of Telemedicine Compared to In-Person Consultation From the Providers' and Users' Perspectives: Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Study in Dermatology. JMIR Dermatol. 2023 Aug 11;6:e45384. doi: 10.2196/45384.

    PubMed 37582265

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Dermatologic Disease, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 3 sites in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

descriptive analysis: deviation in influencing factors for the acceptance of teledermatology (time frame: at baseline). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04495036, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Aug 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in