AzTrials
AzTrials

Vertebral Venous CollateralsNCT04492332

Influencing Factors of Intracranial Hypertension in Patients With Bilateral Transverse Sinus Stenosis

A study testing standard lumbar puncture in people with Vertebral Venous Collaterals and Serum Uric Acid, run by Capital Medical University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Bilateral transverse sinus stenosis (BTSS) is associated with intracranial hypertension (IH). However, not every BTSS patients presented with IH. The risk factors of IH in BTSS patients remained obscure. Vertebral venous collaterals (VVC) were often found in patients with bilateral transverse sinus stenosis (BTSS). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
What is being tested?
standard lumbar puncture
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
137 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Jan 2014to Dec 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • BTSS confirmed by two of magnetic resonance venography (MRV), computed tomography venography (CTV) or digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

Who cannot join

  • medicine related intracranial hypertension;
  • systemic inflammation;
  • moderate to severe stenosis in intracranial, carotid or vertebral arteries;
  • moderate to severe stenosis in intracranial or jugular veins other than transverse sinus;
  • intracranial lesions.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Xuanwu Hospital

    Beijing

Other trials in China

About this study

Bilateral transverse sinus stenosis (BTSS) is associated with intracranial hypertension (IH). However, not every BTSS patients presented with IH. The risk factors of IH in BTSS patients remained obscure. Vertebral venous collaterals (VVC) were often found in patients with bilateral transverse sinus stenosis (BTSS). The purpose of this study was to investigate the physiological role of VVC in BTSS patients.

Read the detailed description

Bilateral transverse sinus stenosis (BTSS) is characterized by narrowing of bilateral transverse sinus which resulted in obstruction of venous reflux. The majority of BTSS patients exhibited with intracranial hypertension (IH) which manifested as a triad of headaches, tinnitus and papilledema. Stenting improved the symptoms in patients with transverse sinus stenosis (TSS) and reduced the elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). It is suggested that BTSS is one of the etiologies of IH. Since an alternative pattern of venous reflux was observed in patients with occluded superior sagittal sinus, it is postulated that altered pattern of venous reflux also exists in the presence of BTSS. The drainage of cerebral veins consists of two major pathways: transverse sinus-sigmoid sinus-internal jugular vein and vertebral venous plexus. Vertebral venous plexus is an extensive paravertebral system that provides direct venous communication between peritoneum and cranial cavity. The presence of vertebral venous collaterals (VVC) was reported in 108 consecutive patients. However, whether VVC is of physiological significance in BTSS patients remained unknown. This study was aimed to investigate the physiological role of VVC and whether it is involved in the regulation of IH and related clinical symptoms in BTSS patients.

Besides, it is presumed that serum uric acid (UA) may affect the formation of vertebral venous collaterals (VVC) and intracranial pressure (ICP). It is reported that UA inhibits the endothelial NO biological activity. High concentrations of uric acid (UA) suppresses circulating VEGF in Wistar rats and VEGF secretion in human endothelial cells. It is presumed that serum UA may affect the formation of VVC and ICP. The aim of this study is to investigate whether serum UA serves as an influencing factor of VVC and an indicator of IH in BTSS patients.

Being tested
standard lumbar puncture
Keywords
vertebral venous collaterals, serum uric acid, Bilateral transverse sinus stenosis, intracranial hypertension
Medical subject headings
Intracranial Hypertension

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • standard lumbar punctureDiagnostic test

    Subjects underwent a standard lumbar puncture to measure the intracranial pressure (ICP). ICP was measured invasively through lumbar space in the morning.

Study groups in NCT04492332
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
normal controls with VVCSham comparatorBTSS was confirmed by two of magnetic resonance venography (MRV), computed tomography venography (CTV) or digital subtraction angiography (DSA). The index of TSS (ITSS) score was a useful tool for the assessment of BTSS severity. The degree of stenosis was graded from 0 to 4 based on the following scale: 0 = normal; 1 = stenosis up to 1/3; 2 = stenosis between 1/3 and 2/3; 3 = stenosis >2/3; and 4 = hypoplasia. ITSS was calculated as degree of right TSS × degree of left TSS. Vertebral venous collaterals (VVC) were found.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: standard lumbar puncture
normal controls without VVCSham comparatorBTSS was confirmed by two of magnetic resonance venography (MRV), computed tomography venography (CTV) or digital subtraction angiography (DSA). The index of TSS (ITSS) score was a useful tool for the assessment of BTSS severity. The degree of stenosis was graded from 0 to 4 based on the following scale: 0 = normal; 1 = stenosis up to 1/3; 2 = stenosis between 1/3 and 2/3; 3 = stenosis >2/3; and 4 = hypoplasia. ITSS was calculated as degree of right TSS × degree of left TSS. Vertebral venous collaterals (VVC) were not found.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: standard lumbar puncture
BTSS patients with VVCActive comparatorBTSS was confirmed by two of magnetic resonance venography (MRV), computed tomography venography (CTV) or digital subtraction angiography (DSA). The index of TSS (ITSS) score was a useful tool for the assessment of BTSS severity. The degree of stenosis was graded from 0 to 4 based on the following scale: 0 = normal; 1 = stenosis up to 1/3; 2 = stenosis between 1/3 and 2/3; 3 = stenosis >2/3; and 4 = hypoplasia. ITSS was calculated as degree of right TSS × degree of left TSS. Vertebral venous collaterals (VVC) were found.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: standard lumbar puncture
BTSS patients without VVCActive comparatorBTSS was confirmed by two of magnetic resonance venography (MRV), computed tomography venography (CTV) or digital subtraction angiography (DSA). The index of TSS (ITSS) score was a useful tool for the assessment of BTSS severity. The degree of stenosis was graded from 0 to 4 based on the following scale: 0 = normal; 1 = stenosis up to 1/3; 2 = stenosis between 1/3 and 2/3; 3 = stenosis >2/3; and 4 = hypoplasia. ITSS was calculated as degree of right TSS × degree of left TSS. Vertebral venous collaterals (VVC) were not found.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: standard lumbar puncture

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. intracranial pressure (ICP)

    ICP was detected by standard lumbar puncture

    Measured: at admission

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. serum uric acid (UA)

    Fasting venous blood was withdrawn simultaneously to assess serum UA.

    Measured: at admission

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Jul 2020
  2. Study startJan 2014
  3. Primary completionDec 2019
  4. Study completionDec 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
137 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04492332
Sponsor's protocol ID
BTSS-ICP
Status last verified
Jul 2020
First submitted
12 Jun 2020
Last updated
30 Jul 2020
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing standard lumbar puncture in people with Vertebral Venous Collaterals and Serum Uric Acid, run by Capital Medical University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

intracranial pressure (ICP) (time frame: at admission). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in