Missing ToothNCT04492111
X-space Implants in Post-extraction Sites.
A study testing post-extraction dental implant in people with Missing Tooth and Osseointegration Failure of Dental Implant, run by University of Bari at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Several recent systematic reviews have highlighted how the macrodesign of dental implants can influence stress distribution and biomechanical and biological behavior in implants immediately inserted in post-extraction sites. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Missing Tooth, Osseointegration Failure of Dental Implant
- What is being tested?
- post-extraction dental implant
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 2 Sep 2020to 1 Oct 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Absence of systemic or local diseases that could compromise implant or prosthetic therapy
- Good periodontal health, assessed by periodontal indices
- Presence of premolar / canine / incisor teeth and with extraction indications and with the presence of two adjacent natural teeth.
- Absence of probing greater than 4mm in the vestibular wall of the crestal bone
Who cannot join
- CT scan performed in the last 5 years
- Active periodontal diseases
- Heavy smokers (more than 20 cigarettes per day)
- Consumers of high alcohol levels
- Therapy with corticosteroids, immunosuppressive therapies, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, pregnancy
- Lack of collaboration for continuous post-intervention re-evaluations
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Bone Remodelling Around Implants With Different Macro-design Placed in Post Extraction Sockets: A CBCT Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Several recent systematic reviews have highlighted how the macrodesign of dental implants can influence stress distribution and biomechanical and biological behavior in implants immediately inserted in post-extraction sites. Finite element analyzes have confirmed the benefit of the inclination of the implant threads in reducing implant displacement in post-extraction sites, increasing primary stability, and decreasing stress in contact with the trabecular bone.
Other comparative studies have shown that the design of the threads of the implant does not affect the distribution of stress in the surrounding bone.
Read more
In view of the need to evaluate the influence of implant macrodesign in the case of implants inserted in post-extraction alveoli, this study will examine the clinical results of two different types of implants with different macrodesigns, with the aim of providing scientific evidence in this regard.
The present study will investigate through a randomized controlled trial the effect of thread macrodesign of X-space implants on primary stability and osseointegration when inserted in post-extraction sites, as compared to cylindric 2P implants.
Read the detailed description
Objectives Evaluate the clinical and radiological performance of a new implant geometry (X-space) with a central and apical thread designed to increase the contact surface with the alveolar bone and allow a greater insertion torque and better primary stability in post-extraction implants.
The evaluation will be done through:
- Estimation of the difference in terms of dimensional changes of the alveolar bone between the following implants placed in fresh post-extraction sites: (1) X-space (test group), (2) Bone System 2P (control group)
- Estimation of primary stability
- Estimation of implant failure
- Estimation of influences of different clinical factors implant and patient-related to the values of the outcomes.
Expected results The null hypothesis is that the X-space implant is better than the 2P implant. Even in the event of non-statistical significance, factors concerning clinical significance and secondary variables will be assessed in order to determine the efficiency of each of the treatments.
MATERIALS AND METHODS Study design The study will be a randomized clinical trial with two arms, each arm belonging to one of the two intervention groups. The randomization sequence will be computer-generated by an independent statistical specialist.
All the interventions will be performed at the same center by 3 different clinicans following the same protocol. Surgeons will be aware of the type of intervention to be performed only after tooth extraction, therefore immediately before performing the intervention of interest.
The type of intervention will be assigned by means of sealed opaque envelopes that will be open immediately before the intervention.
Patients will be provided with adequate and exhaustive information for participation in the study and each patient must sign a detailed informed consent.
All the interventions performed and the procedures followed in this study are in accordance with the ethical standards of the committee responsible for human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, revised in 2000.
Sample size The sample size was determined for a first type error (alpha) 0.05 and a study power of 0.9 (beta 0.1). The reference variable is the dimensional change of the thickness of the vestibular crest (measured at the implant platform level).
The minimal effect of interest assessed from previous studies and the researchers' clinical evaluation was established at 1 mm, while the standard deviation was 0.6 mm.
Considering a 20% loss at follow-up, the sample size required for each group was determined at 15 participants, or 30 participants in all.
References:
- Wittes J. Sample size calculation for randomized controlled trials. Epidemiol Rev. Vol 24, No. 1, 2002.
Procedures foreseen by the study Thirty implants (15 X-Space and 15 Bone System Cylindrical "2P") of variable diameter and of adequate length will be immediately inserted in the post-extraction sites of thirty patients with therapeutic indications for implantation. The implants (Bone System, Milan) are produced on machining centers and subjected to rigorous cleaning treatments and high precision dimensional checks.
The Ecotek surface of the Bone System implants boasts a long experience of 25 years of clinical applications, Implant surface treatment is obtained by sandblasting with ruby corundum and subsequent etching treatment with acids.
- Surgical protocol In all cases, the extractions will be carried out without lifting the flap and preserving the vestibular wall of the alveolus.
All implants will be inserted at the crest level and will be closed by a screw. The surgical procedure requires insertion into the implant tunnel by means of a controlled torque micromotor (max 50 Ncm), at a speed of 20/25 rpm; for this purpose it is necessary to have a special driver (40120701) inserted in the contra-angle handpiece; for manual insertion with controlled torque, a dynamometric ratchet (CRD) with the relative short (40052401) and standard (40052501) drivers are available.
However, the possibility of insertion with a manual screwdriver is maintained, with the usual tools already used for the other Bone System implants.
The post-extraction site will be closed with a collagen membrane and cross suture.
Data collection methods Variables to be measured (outcomes) Patients will undergo a CT Cone Beam examination immediately after implant insertion and 6 months later to evaluate the morphological and dimensional changes of the alveolar bone horizontally and vertically around the tooth / implant. All the measurements will be carried out in a computerized program which will allow to standardize the repeated measurements.
The measurements on the CT Cone Beam exams and the measurements of the secondary variables will be carried out by an operator not aware of the group to which the patients belong (blind examiner).
Criteria for stopping the study
- Observation of high difference between the techniques, indicating one technique as more efficient than the others or a technique as much less efficient than the other (ethical reason).
- High number of patients lost at follow-up (greater than expected when calculating the sample size).
Criteria for the exit of the subject from the study
- Missing presence at the control at 1 and 3 months (for general evaluation and oral hygiene control)
- Missed presence at check and measures at 6 months
- Lack of collaboration at the oral hygiene level (oral hygiene assessment indices)
- Ongoing presence of periodontal diseases or oral mucous membranes. Ongoing presence of systemic diseases (or related medical therapies) that may influence bone metabolism and tissue healing (e.g. Osteoporosis, corticosteroid therapy, immunodepressive therapies, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, etc.).
Expected duration The foreseeable duration of this study is 18-24 months.
Statistical data analysis The statistical analyzes will be carried out by a statistical analysis expert, on coded and non-identifiable groups. The statistical unit will be the patient.
Descriptive analyzes will be conducted for all demographic variables at the beginning and end of therapy. Mann-Whitney test will be used for statistical comparison analyzes of continuous variables between independent groups. In addition, several multilevel regression analyzes will be conducted to assess the dependence of bone changes on the initial thickness of the vestibular wall and on various patient-related variables. For statistical tests the p-value will be established at 0.05.
- Being tested
- post-extraction dental implant
- Keywords
- primary stability, dental implant, post-extraction dental implant, dental implant macrodesign, implant failure
- Medical subject headings
- Anodontia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
post-extraction dental implantProcedure or surgery
Insertion of a dental implant immediately after tooth extraction.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| X-space group | Experimental | Each patient of the experimental group will receive one X-space implant. Receives: Procedure: post-extraction dental implant |
| 2P group | Active comparator | Each patient of the control group will receive one 2P implant. Bone System Cylindric implants. Surface Ecotek. Receives: Procedure: post-extraction dental implant |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Buccal bone dimensional changes
Measurements of buccal bone dimensional changes assessed through a series of linear measurements on two cone-beam (immediately after implant insertion and after 6 months). Measurements will be calibrated using the implant as a reference and will be performed at the marginal bone level, at the central spire level and at the apex level. Outcome will be expressed in mm.
Measured: 6 months
Implant failure
Dental implant loss after insertion. Outcome will be assessed during follow-up checks and confirmed through clinical signs of loss (implant mobility) and intraoral radiograph.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Primary stability
Measurement of primary stability immediately after implant insertion through Osttell Mentor and expressed as implant stability quotient (ISQ)
Measured: immediately after implant insertion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jul 2020
- Study start2 Sep 2020
- Primary completion2 Jun 2022
- Study completion1 Oct 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Missing ToothStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized clinical trial of parallel design with a 1:1 allocation ratio
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Bari
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Felice Roberto Grassi, University of Bari
- Investigators
- Felice Roberto Grassi, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Bari
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04492111
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UniBari
- Status last verified
- Jan 2023
- First submitted
- 17 Jul 2020
- Last updated
- 5 Jan 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: IPD will be shared with researchers who make an official request
Publications
Lima de Andrade C, Carvalho MA, Bordin D, da Silva WJ, Del Bel Cury AA, Sotto-Maior BS. Biomechanical Behavior of the Dental Implant Macrodesign. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Mar/Apr;32(2):264-270. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4797.
PubMed 28291847Cali M, Zanetti EM, Oliveri SM, Asero R, Ciaramella S, Martorelli M, Bignardi C. Influence of thread shape and inclination on the biomechanical behaviour of plateau implant systems. Dent Mater. 2018 Mar;34(3):460-469. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
PubMed 29395470Grassi FR, Grassi R, Rapone B, Alemanno G, Balena A, Kalemaj Z. Dimensional changes of buccal bone plate in immediate implants inserted through open flap, open flap and bone grafting and flapless techniques: A cone-beam computed tomography randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Dec;30(12):1155-1164. doi: 10.1111/clr.13528. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
PubMed 31461183Scarano A, Assenza B, Inchingolo F, Mastrangelo F, Lorusso F. New Implant Design with Midcrestal and Apical Wing Thread for Increased Implant Stability in Single Postextraction Maxillary Implant. Case Rep Dent. 2019 Sep 5;2019:9529248. doi: 10.1155/2019/9529248. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31583139
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jan 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Bone Remodelling Around Implants With Different Macro-design Placed in Post Extraction Sockets: A CBCT Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04492111
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UniBari
- Keywords
- primary stability, dental implant, post-extraction dental implant, dental implant macrodesign, implant failure
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of BariUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 2 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Several recent systematic reviews have highlighted how the macrodesign of dental implants can influence stress distribution and biomechanical and biological behavior in implants immediately inserted in post-extraction sites. Finite element analyzes have confirmed the benefit of the inclination of the implant threads in reducing implant displacement in post-extraction sites, increasing primary stability, and decreasing stress in contact with the trabecular bone.
Other comparative studies have shown that the design of the threads of the implant does not affect the distribution of stress in the surrounding bone.
In view of the need to evaluate the influence of implant macrodesign in the case of implants inserted in post-extraction alveoli, this study will examine the clinical results of two different types of implants with different macrodesigns, with the aim of providing scientific evidence in this regard.
The present study will investigate through a randomized controlled trial the effect of thread macrodesign of X-space implants on primary stability and osseointegration when inserted in post-extraction sites, as compared to cylindric 2P implants.
Detailed description
Objectives Evaluate the clinical and radiological performance of a new implant geometry (X-space) with a central and apical thread designed to increase the contact surface with the alveolar bone and allow a greater insertion torque and better primary stability in post-extraction implants.
The evaluation will be done through:
- Estimation of the difference in terms of dimensional changes of the alveolar bone between the following implants placed in fresh post-extraction sites: (1) X-space (test group), (2) Bone System 2P (control group)
- Estimation of primary stability
- Estimation of implant failure
- Estimation of influences of different clinical factors implant and patient-related to the values of the outcomes.
Expected results The null hypothesis is that the X-space implant is better than the 2P implant. Even in the event of non-statistical significance, factors concerning clinical significance and secondary variables will be assessed in order to determine the efficiency of each of the treatments.
MATERIALS AND METHODS Study design The study will be a randomized clinical trial with two arms, each arm belonging to one of the two intervention groups. The randomization sequence will be computer-generated by an independent statistical specialist.
All the interventions will be performed at the same center by 3 different clinicans following the same protocol. Surgeons will be aware of the type of intervention to be performed only after tooth extraction, therefore immediately before performing the intervention of interest.
The type of intervention will be assigned by means of sealed opaque envelopes that will be open immediately before the intervention.
Patients will be provided with adequate and exhaustive information for participation in the study and each patient must sign a detailed informed consent.
All the interventions performed and the procedures followed in this study are in accordance with the ethical standards of the committee responsible for human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, revised in 2000.
Sample size The sample size was determined for a first type error (alpha) 0.05 and a study power of 0.9 (beta 0.1). The reference variable is the dimensional change of the thickness of the vestibular crest (measured at the implant platform level).
The minimal effect of interest assessed from previous studies and the researchers' clinical evaluation was established at 1 mm, while the standard deviation was 0.6 mm.
Considering a 20% loss at follow-up, the sample size required for each group was determined at 15 participants, or 30 participants in all.
References:
- Wittes J. Sample size calculation for randomized controlled trials. Epidemiol Rev. Vol 24, No. 1, 2002.
Procedures foreseen by the study Thirty implants (15 X-Space and 15 Bone System Cylindrical "2P") of variable diameter and of adequate length will be immediately inserted in the post-extraction sites of thirty patients with therapeutic indications for implantation. The implants (Bone System, Milan) are produced on machining centers and subjected to rigorous cleaning treatments and high precision dimensional checks.
The Ecotek surface of the Bone System implants boasts a long experience of 25 years of clinical applications, Implant surface treatment is obtained by sandblasting with ruby corundum and subsequent etching treatment with acids.
- Surgical protocol In all cases, the extractions will be carried out without lifting the flap and preserving the vestibular wall of the alveolus.
All implants will be inserted at the crest level and will be closed by a screw. The surgical procedure requires insertion into the implant tunnel by means of a controlled torque micromotor (max 50 Ncm), at a speed of 20/25 rpm; for this purpose it is necessary to have a special driver (40120701) inserted in the contra-angle handpiece; for manual insertion with controlled torque, a dynamometric ratchet (CRD) with the relative short (40052401) and standard (40052501) drivers are available.
However, the possibility of insertion with a manual screwdriver is maintained, with the usual tools already used for the other Bone System implants.
The post-extraction site will be closed with a collagen membrane and cross suture.
Data collection methods Variables to be measured (outcomes) Patients will undergo a CT Cone Beam examination immediately after implant insertion and 6 months later to evaluate the morphological and dimensional changes of the alveolar bone horizontally and vertically around the tooth / implant. All the measurements will be carried out in a computerized program which will allow to standardize the repeated measurements.
The measurements on the CT Cone Beam exams and the measurements of the secondary variables will be carried out by an operator not aware of the group to which the patients belong (blind examiner).
Criteria for stopping the study
- Observation of high difference between the techniques, indicating one technique as more efficient than the others or a technique as much less efficient than the other (ethical reason).
- High number of patients lost at follow-up (greater than expected when calculating the sample size).
Criteria for the exit of the subject from the study
- Missing presence at the control at 1 and 3 months (for general evaluation and oral hygiene control)
- Missed presence at check and measures at 6 months
- Lack of collaboration at the oral hygiene level (oral hygiene assessment indices)
- Ongoing presence of periodontal diseases or oral mucous membranes. Ongoing presence of systemic diseases (or related medical therapies) that may influence bone metabolism and tissue healing (e.g. Osteoporosis, corticosteroid therapy, immunodepressive therapies, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, etc.).
Expected duration The foreseeable duration of this study is 18-24 months.
Statistical data analysis The statistical analyzes will be carried out by a statistical analysis expert, on coded and non-identifiable groups. The statistical unit will be the patient.
Descriptive analyzes will be conducted for all demographic variables at the beginning and end of therapy. Mann-Whitney test will be used for statistical comparison analyzes of continuous variables between independent groups. In addition, several multilevel regression analyzes will be conducted to assess the dependence of bone changes on the initial thickness of the vestibular wall and on various patient-related variables. For statistical tests the p-value will be established at 0.05.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized clinical trial of parallel design with a 1:1 allocation ratio
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| X-space group | Experimental | Procedure: post-extraction dental implantEach patient of the experimental group will receive one X-space implant. |
| 2P group | Active comparator | Procedure: post-extraction dental implantEach patient of the control group will receive one 2P implant. Bone System Cylindric implants. Surface Ecotek. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Absence of systemic or local diseases that could compromise implant or prosthetic therapy
- Good periodontal health, assessed by periodontal indices
- Presence of premolar / canine / incisor teeth and with extraction indications and with the presence of two adjacent natural teeth.
- Absence of probing greater than 4mm in the vestibular wall of the crestal bone
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- CT scan performed in the last 5 years
- Active periodontal diseases
- Heavy smokers (more than 20 cigarettes per day)
- Consumers of high alcohol levels
- Therapy with corticosteroids, immunosuppressive therapies, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| post-extraction dental implantInsertion of a dental implant immediately after tooth extraction. | Procedure or surgery | 2P group, X-space group |
Primary outcome
Buccal bone dimensional changes
Time frame: 6 months
Measurements of buccal bone dimensional changes assessed through a series of linear measurements on two cone-beam (immediately after implant insertion and after 6 months). Measurements will be calibrated using the implant as a reference and will be performed at the marginal bone level, at the central spire level and at the apex level. Outcome will be expressed in mm.
Implant failure
Time frame: 6 months
Dental implant loss after insertion. Outcome will be assessed during follow-up checks and confirmed through clinical signs of loss (implant mobility) and intraoral radiograph.
1 secondary outcome
Primary stability
Time frame: immediately after implant insertion
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jan 2023.
- Background: PubMed 28291847Lima de Andrade C, Carvalho MA, Bordin D, da Silva WJ, Del Bel Cury AA, Sotto-Maior BS. Biomechanical Behavior of the Dental Implant Macrodesign. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Mar/Apr;32(2):264-270. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4797.
- Background: PubMed 29395470Cali M, Zanetti EM, Oliveri SM, Asero R, Ciaramella S, Martorelli M, Bignardi C. Influence of thread shape and inclination on the biomechanical behaviour of plateau implant systems. Dent Mater. 2018 Mar;34(3):460-469. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
- Background: PubMed 31461183Grassi FR, Grassi R, Rapone B, Alemanno G, Balena A, Kalemaj Z. Dimensional changes of buccal bone plate in immediate implants inserted through open flap, open flap and bone grafting and flapless techniques: A cone-beam computed tomography randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Dec;30(12):1155-1164. doi: 10.1111/clr.13528. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 31583139Scarano A, Assenza B, Inchingolo F, Mastrangelo F, Lorusso F. New Implant Design with Midcrestal and Apical Wing Thread for Increased Implant Stability in Single Postextraction Maxillary Implant. Case Rep Dent. 2019 Sep 5;2019:9529248. doi: 10.1155/2019/9529248. eCollection 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. IPD will be shared with researchers who make an official request
Related trials for Missing Tooth
Recruiting
Effect of Changing Grafting Sequences During Sinus Lifting & Simultaneous Implant Placement in the Gained Bone Using Customized Surgical Guide
Vertical Bone Defects, Missing Tooth/Teeth
Recruiting
Dental Implant Healing With TNF-Alpha Inhibitors
Edentulism, Dental Implants
RecruitingObservational study
Post Market Clinical Follow up (PMCF) Medical Device Registry of Z-Systems Zirconia Dental Products: Z-Systems Registry
Missing Teeth
Not yet recruiting
Multicenter Clinical Study on the Efficacy and Esthetic Outcomes of Immediate Implant Placement Using the Socket-Shield Technique Versus Conventional Immediate Implantation in the Anterior Maxillary Esthetic Zone
Teeth Absent, Teeth Missing
Active, not recruiting
Enhancing Soft Tissues Around Inserted Implants by Two Different Methods
Missing Teeth
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Felice Roberto Grassi, PhD principal investigator
University of Bari
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing post-extraction dental implant in people with Missing Tooth and Osseointegration Failure of Dental Implant, run by University of Bari at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Buccal bone dimensional changes (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04492111, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jan 2023.