Major Depressive DisorderR2D2NCT04461327
Psychophysiological Study of Pain Perception in Depressed Patients With Suicidal Risk
A study testing Painful stimulations of major depressive patients, Blood sample and Clinical assessment in people with Major Depressive Disorder, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 2 sites in France.
Trial summary
Joiner's interpersonal theory of suicide postulates that the wish of death comes from feelings of perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness. But, only people who have acquired the capability to kill themselves will attempt suicide. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Major Depressive Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Painful stimulations of major depressive patients, Blood sample and Clinical assessment
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 144 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 25 Nov 2020to 21 Feb 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Woman;
- Being aged between 18 and 65 years;
- Currently meeting the DSM-5 major depressive episode criteria;
- Being able to understand the nature, purpose and methodology of the study and agreeing to cooperate during the assessments;
- Having signed informed consent;
- Being affiliated with a social security or equivalent.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Recent attempters: women having recently attempted suicide (less than 72 hours)
- Past attempters: women having a past suicide attempt (more than 72 hours)
- Affective control: women without lifetime history of suicidal behaviour (affective control group).
Who cannot join
- Existence of current psychotic or mixed characteristics;
- Lifetime history of schizoaffective disorder or schizophrenia;
- Current substance dependence (within the last 6 months);
- Existence of mental retardation or serious medical comorbidity interfering with measures (HIV, diabetes, cancer, chronic inflammatory pathology, neurological disorder);
- Having taken painkillers within the last 24 hours preceding the evaluation;
- Existence of a usual or current treatment with analgesics or NSAIDs (daily analgesic treatment more than 3 months);
- Existence of a sensory or cognitive handicap;
- Pregnant or lactating woman.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
France2 sites
University Hospital of Montpellier
Montpellier, Occitanie, 34295
Clinic La Lironde
Saint-Gély-du-Fesc, Occitanie, 34981
About this study
Joiner's interpersonal theory of suicide postulates that the wish of death comes from feelings of perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness. But, only people who have acquired the capability to kill themselves will attempt suicide. The acquired capability refers to a reduction of fear to death, and a higher pain tolerance. Indeed, to commit suicide involves to endure pain during the act. Thus, higher pain tolerance seems to be a necessary feature for suicidal act.
Past studies have shown higher pain threshold and tolerance in suicidal patients, whatever the stimulus was (electric, thermic or mechanical), compared to patients without suicide history. Moreover, Caceda and colleagues demonstrated higher pain threshold in recent suicide attempters (suicidal act within 72h) compared with depressed patients. Five days after the initial evaluation, pain threshold of recent suicide attempters decreased to be similar to depressed patients with suicidal ideation. Therefore, it may exist a specific state during which the pain tolerance is increased. During this "hypoalgesic state" patients with suicidal ideation could attempt suicide to get relief from suffering.
Read more
However, little is known about the specific mechanisms that are responsible for the higher pain threshold and tolerance in suicide attempters. Pain is a dynamic system that results from excitatory and inhibitory messages. The modification of one of these mechanisms could explain the higher tolerance in recent suicide attempters. Three of them are of particular interest:
- The conditioned pain modulation (CPM) is a modulatory pain mechanism. CPM works through descending pathway that reaches the spinal cord and modulates pain processing from the first nociceptive synapse.In recent suicidal patients, an increase of the CPM could explain higher pain tolerance.
- The "wind-up" mechanism is defined as the highest excitability of the second order nerve. Even if the stimulus remains stable, pain continuously raises. In recent suicide attempters, a reduction of this mechanism could explain higher pain tolerance.
- The threshold of Aδ and C nociceptors. If a nociceptive fiber is less excitable than the other, it would explain higher pain threshold.
Read the detailed description
Aim: The first objective of this project is to test different pain mechanisms that could be involved in the increase of pain thresholds and tolerance in suicidal patients. The second objective is to test whether there's a loss of pleasantness during social touch in suicidal patients.
The main aim is to compare the efficacity of CPM between three groups of depressed patients: recent or former suicide attempters and non-attempters. The secondary aims are 1) to compare the wind-up mechanism between groups, 2) to compare the difference of excitability of Aδ and C fibers between groups, 3) to correlate these physiological results to clinical variables (emotional reactivity and emotional regulation, dissociation and body perception), and 4) to compare the pleasantness associated with social touch between groups.
Target population: 153 depressed women will be enrolled and divided into three groups. I) Women having recently attempted suicide (less than 72 hours) - II) women having a past suicide attempt (more than 72 hours) - III) Women without lifetime history of suicidal behaviour (affective control group).
Materials: The heat test stimuli are performed by a thermode (TCS II, QST Lab) which produces ramping heat pulses from 32°C to 52°C. For the conditioning stimulus (cold pressor task), participants will insert their arm (up to the elbow) in circulating cold water (8°C). Pain intensity is rated by a CoVAS (computer visual analog scale). This scale is similar to a classic visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from "no pain" to the "most intense pain tolerable". The participant has just to move a cursor, thanks to the computer mouse. The stroking is performed thanks to a Natural hair Blush Brush (No. 7, The Boots Company).
Clinical assessment: A clinical assessment will be made by a trained researcher. This assessment will evaluate psychiatric diagnosis by the DSM-V (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), the severity of depression by the IDS-C30 (Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology), the intensity of suicidal thoughts by the CSSRS (Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale), and the suicidal life history by the RRRS (Risk-Rescue Rating Scale) and SIS (Suicidal Intent Scales). It will also gather information about socio-demographic variables, the number of depressed episodes, the number of psychiatric hospitalizations, the hormonal status, and the current medications. All psychotropics medications taken by the patient will be collected for the last 72 hours, as well as the dose and the date of the beginning of the treatment. The patients will also have to complete some self-report measures about the severity of their depression (BDI-II), their level of anxiety (STAI), their physical and psychological pain (EVA current and past), their childhood trauma (CTQ), their emotional state (PANAS), their difficulty in emotional regulation (DERS), their emotional reactivity (ERS), their body perception (BIS), their dissociative experiences, their borderline symptomatology (BSL-23) and the kind of non-suicidal self-injuries practiced (SHI).
Blood tests: The blood test is made between 2 and 24 hours before the experimental procedure. The biological collection is made to measure medications' concentration if the patient takes antiepileptics and/or lithium, and to measure complete blood count (CBC).
Experimental design: All three pain mechanisms and social touch will be tested in one session lasting 1h approximately.
- To distinguish the threshold of Aδ and C, a thermal stimulus will be used to provoke painful and non-painful sensations (Thermode QST lab). Successive and alternate phases of painful (hot) and non-painful (warm) stimulations will be used. The warm phase will remain stable at 38°C for 5 seconds whereas the hot phase will consist of ascending heat pulses from 39°C to 52°C for 1 second each. At every phase, the participant will be asked if she feels pain or not to determine the pain threshold. The Aδ fiber threshold will be the first time when the participant will report pain during the hot phase. The C fiber threshold will be the first time when the participant will report pain during the warm phase. These measures will be repeated five times.
- Wind-up and CPM will be evaluated successively in three steps:
- To measure the activity of the wind-up, a constant temperature (individually determined) will be applied during 2 minutes on the left forearm (stimulus test). This temperature will correspond to a painful sensation of 40/100 on the CoVAS for each patient previously evaluated. During the test, the participant will report the intensity of pain on the CoVAS in a continuous manner. The patient will move the cursor along the continuous line to indicate the pain she feels and every change.
- The CPM activation will be produced by a counter nociceptive stimulation (cold pressor task). The right forearm of the participant will be placed during 2 minutes in a cold water maintained at 8°C (conditioning stimulus).
- To measure the efficiency of the CPM, the hot constant temperature (corresponding to CoVAS= 40/100) will be re-applied, during 2 minutes on the left forearm (conditioned stimulus). As previously, participant will report her pain on the CoVAS.
Before and after the painful tests, the participant will have to complete two self-report measures. The PANAS to evaluate their emotional state and the STAI state to evaluate their anxiety.
In a final step, the pleasure associated with social touch will be tested. The experimenter stroked the participant's marked skin areas for 70 seconds with a soft brush in either CT-optimal speed (3 cm/s; slow touch group associated with pleasantness) or non-CT-optimal speed (18 cm/s; fast touch group associated with a neutral feeling). The pleasure associated with the stroke is then assessed on a 10-point Likert scale (from really unpleasant to really pleasant). In this within design, the reaped measures (slow touch vs fast touch) will be counterbalanced between participants.
Pairing: A pairing will be made on age and antidepressant class (none, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), Serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), tricyclic, others). For each category of antidepressant, a 1 will be attributed if the patient takes one medication of this category and a 0 if not. In each group, the sum of every classes of medication will have to be equal. As a reminder, class of antidepressant are exclusive between them.
Medical load: To control medication, a medication load index will be calculated as described in Olié and al., 2018. Antiepileptics and lithium medications will be dosed in plasma.
There is an ancillary study associate with this project, ID RCB : 2023-A00213-42. His main objective is to evaluate the rested functional connectivity between saliency's network areas associated to pain sensitivity in patient presenting a characterized depressive episode, with or without Suicide Attempt on his entire life. 50 patients are concerned. This study is charaterized by a third visit during which a MRI is done.
- Conditions
- Major Depressive Disorder
- Being tested
- Painful stimulations of major depressive patients, Blood sample, Clinical assessment, Social touch
- Keywords
- Pain, Pain modulation, Suicide, Affective touch
- Medical subject headings
- Depressive Disorder, Major, Pain, Suicide
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Painful stimulations of major depressive patientsBehavioural
All three pain mechanisms will be tested in one session lasting 1h approximately.
The mechanisms are tested in the following order:
- Aδ and C threshold
- Wind-up
- CPM (more details in detailed description)
Blood sampleBiological
The blood test is made between 2 and 24 hours before the experimental procedure. The biological collection is made to measure medications' concentration if the patient takes antiepileptics and/or lithium, and to measure complete blood count (CBC).
Clinical assessmentDiagnostic test
A clinical assessment will be made by a trained researcher.
(more details in detailed description)
Social touchBehavioural
Stroking
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Major Depressive patients | Experimental | 3 groups:
* Women having recently attempted suicide (less than 72 hours).
* Women having a past suicide attempt (more than 72 hours).
* Women without lifetime history of suicidal behaviour. Receives: Behavioral: Painful stimulations of major depressive patients; Biological: Blood sample; Diagnostic Test: Clinical assessment; Behavioral: Social touch |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Effectiveness of the conditioned pain modulation
The criterion will be the average difference of perceived pain (CoVAS measure) before and after modulation, i.e. before and after the cold pressor task.
It's postulated that recent suicidal patients will have a higher efficacity of CPM than past suicidal patients and depressed affective controls.
Measured: During painful stimulations which are assessed 24 hours after the inclusion
Secondary outcomes (9)
Effectiveness of the Wind-up mechanism
The criterion will be the slope of the progressive rise of the painful sensation (CoVAS measure).
It's postulated that recent suicidal patients will have a weaker wind-up mechanism than in the two other groups.
Measured: During painful stimulations which are assessed 24 hours after the inclusion
Aδ and C fibers thresholds
The criterion will be the first temperature for which the participant perceived pain for each fiber.
It's postulated that recent suicidal patients will have a higher threshold for Aδ or C fiber than in the two other groups.
Measured: During painful stimulations which are assessed 24 hours after the inclusion
Pleasantness associated with social touch
The criterion will be the score on the Likert scale. It's postulated that recent suicidal patients will have a lower score than the 2 other groups.
Measured: During painful stimulations which are assessed 24 hours after the inclusion
Emotional Reactivity Score
The score ranges from 0 to 84. A higher score indicates an elevated emotional reactivity. It's postulated that this score will be correlated with the primary outcome.
Measured: At inclusion
Emotional Regulation Score
The score ranges from 36 to 180. A higher score indicates more difficulties to regulate her emotions. It's postulated that this score will be correlated with the primary outcome.
Measured: At inclusion
Dissociative experiences score
The score ranges from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a higher frequency of dissociative experiences. It's postulated that this score will be correlated with the primary outcome.
Measured: At inclusion
Body investment score
The score ranges from 24 to 120. A higher score indicates more investment toward the body. It's postulated that this score will be correlated with the primary outcome.
Measured: At inclusion
Acquired Capability of Suicide Scale
The score ranges from 0 to 80. This scale mainly assess the fearlessness about death, about dying and a general component of fearlessness. A higher score indicates fearlessness. It's postulated that this score will be correlated with the primary outcome.
Measured: At inclusion
Functional connectivity in saliency's network (ID-RCB :2023-A00213-42)
The functional connectivity will be represent by ALFF (Amplitude of Low Frenquency Fluctuations) and ReHo (RegionalHomogeneity) measures
Measured: During an IRM which is assessed 8 days after visite 1 or after inclusion until 24 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jul 2020
- Study start25 Nov 2020
- Primary completion21 Feb 2024
- Study completion21 Feb 2024
Why it stopped: no more inclusion
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Major Depressive DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, MontpellierThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Painful stimulations (see detailed description)
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 144 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Montpellier
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Clinea psychiatrie France
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Emilie Olie, MD-PhD, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Montpellier
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04461327
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RECHMPL20_0157
- Acronym
- R2D2
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 2 Jul 2020
- Last updated
- 25 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Psychophysiological Study of Pain Perception in Depressed Patients With Suicidal Risk
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04461327
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- R2D2 / RECHMPL20_0157
- Conditions
- Major Depressive Disorder
- Keywords
- Pain, Pain modulation, Suicide, Affective touch
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: no more inclusion
- Enrolment
- 144 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, MontpellierUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Clinea psychiatrie France
- Study start
- 25 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Feb 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Joiner's interpersonal theory of suicide postulates that the wish of death comes from feelings of perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness. But, only people who have acquired the capability to kill themselves will attempt suicide. The acquired capability refers to a reduction of fear to death, and a higher pain tolerance. Indeed, to commit suicide involves to endure pain during the act. Thus, higher pain tolerance seems to be a necessary feature for suicidal act.
Past studies have shown higher pain threshold and tolerance in suicidal patients, whatever the stimulus was (electric, thermic or mechanical), compared to patients without suicide history. Moreover, Caceda and colleagues demonstrated higher pain threshold in recent suicide attempters (suicidal act within 72h) compared with depressed patients. Five days after the initial evaluation, pain threshold of recent suicide attempters decreased to be similar to depressed patients with suicidal ideation. Therefore, it may exist a specific state during which the pain tolerance is increased. During this "hypoalgesic state" patients with suicidal ideation could attempt suicide to get relief from suffering.
However, little is known about the specific mechanisms that are responsible for the higher pain threshold and tolerance in suicide attempters. Pain is a dynamic system that results from excitatory and inhibitory messages. The modification of one of these mechanisms could explain the higher tolerance in recent suicide attempters. Three of them are of particular interest:
- The conditioned pain modulation (CPM) is a modulatory pain mechanism. CPM works through descending pathway that reaches the spinal cord and modulates pain processing from the first nociceptive synapse.In recent suicidal patients, an increase of the CPM could explain higher pain tolerance.
- The "wind-up" mechanism is defined as the highest excitability of the second order nerve. Even if the stimulus remains stable, pain continuously raises. In recent suicide attempters, a reduction of this mechanism could explain higher pain tolerance.
- The threshold of Aδ and C nociceptors. If a nociceptive fiber is less excitable than the other, it would explain higher pain threshold.
Detailed description
Aim: The first objective of this project is to test different pain mechanisms that could be involved in the increase of pain thresholds and tolerance in suicidal patients. The second objective is to test whether there's a loss of pleasantness during social touch in suicidal patients.
The main aim is to compare the efficacity of CPM between three groups of depressed patients: recent or former suicide attempters and non-attempters. The secondary aims are 1) to compare the wind-up mechanism between groups, 2) to compare the difference of excitability of Aδ and C fibers between groups, 3) to correlate these physiological results to clinical variables (emotional reactivity and emotional regulation, dissociation and body perception), and 4) to compare the pleasantness associated with social touch between groups.
Target population: 153 depressed women will be enrolled and divided into three groups. I) Women having recently attempted suicide (less than 72 hours) - II) women having a past suicide attempt (more than 72 hours) - III) Women without lifetime history of suicidal behaviour (affective control group).
Materials: The heat test stimuli are performed by a thermode (TCS II, QST Lab) which produces ramping heat pulses from 32°C to 52°C. For the conditioning stimulus (cold pressor task), participants will insert their arm (up to the elbow) in circulating cold water (8°C). Pain intensity is rated by a CoVAS (computer visual analog scale). This scale is similar to a classic visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from "no pain" to the "most intense pain tolerable". The participant has just to move a cursor, thanks to the computer mouse. The stroking is performed thanks to a Natural hair Blush Brush (No. 7, The Boots Company).
Clinical assessment: A clinical assessment will be made by a trained researcher. This assessment will evaluate psychiatric diagnosis by the DSM-V (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), the severity of depression by the IDS-C30 (Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology), the intensity of suicidal thoughts by the CSSRS (Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale), and the suicidal life history by the RRRS (Risk-Rescue Rating Scale) and SIS (Suicidal Intent Scales). It will also gather information about socio-demographic variables, the number of depressed episodes, the number of psychiatric hospitalizations, the hormonal status, and the current medications. All psychotropics medications taken by the patient will be collected for the last 72 hours, as well as the dose and the date of the beginning of the treatment. The patients will also have to complete some self-report measures about the severity of their depression (BDI-II), their level of anxiety (STAI), their physical and psychological pain (EVA current and past), their childhood trauma (CTQ), their emotional state (PANAS), their difficulty in emotional regulation (DERS), their emotional reactivity (ERS), their body perception (BIS), their dissociative experiences, their borderline symptomatology (BSL-23) and the kind of non-suicidal self-injuries practiced (SHI).
Blood tests: The blood test is made between 2 and 24 hours before the experimental procedure. The biological collection is made to measure medications' concentration if the patient takes antiepileptics and/or lithium, and to measure complete blood count (CBC).
Experimental design: All three pain mechanisms and social touch will be tested in one session lasting 1h approximately.
- To distinguish the threshold of Aδ and C, a thermal stimulus will be used to provoke painful and non-painful sensations (Thermode QST lab). Successive and alternate phases of painful (hot) and non-painful (warm) stimulations will be used. The warm phase will remain stable at 38°C for 5 seconds whereas the hot phase will consist of ascending heat pulses from 39°C to 52°C for 1 second each. At every phase, the participant will be asked if she feels pain or not to determine the pain threshold. The Aδ fiber threshold will be the first time when the participant will report pain during the hot phase. The C fiber threshold will be the first time when the participant will report pain during the warm phase. These measures will be repeated five times.
- Wind-up and CPM will be evaluated successively in three steps:
- To measure the activity of the wind-up, a constant temperature (individually determined) will be applied during 2 minutes on the left forearm (stimulus test). This temperature will correspond to a painful sensation of 40/100 on the CoVAS for each patient previously evaluated. During the test, the participant will report the intensity of pain on the CoVAS in a continuous manner. The patient will move the cursor along the continuous line to indicate the pain she feels and every change.
- The CPM activation will be produced by a counter nociceptive stimulation (cold pressor task). The right forearm of the participant will be placed during 2 minutes in a cold water maintained at 8°C (conditioning stimulus).
- To measure the efficiency of the CPM, the hot constant temperature (corresponding to CoVAS= 40/100) will be re-applied, during 2 minutes on the left forearm (conditioned stimulus). As previously, participant will report her pain on the CoVAS.
Before and after the painful tests, the participant will have to complete two self-report measures. The PANAS to evaluate their emotional state and the STAI state to evaluate their anxiety.
In a final step, the pleasure associated with social touch will be tested. The experimenter stroked the participant's marked skin areas for 70 seconds with a soft brush in either CT-optimal speed (3 cm/s; slow touch group associated with pleasantness) or non-CT-optimal speed (18 cm/s; fast touch group associated with a neutral feeling). The pleasure associated with the stroke is then assessed on a 10-point Likert scale (from really unpleasant to really pleasant). In this within design, the reaped measures (slow touch vs fast touch) will be counterbalanced between participants.
Pairing: A pairing will be made on age and antidepressant class (none, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), Serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), tricyclic, others). For each category of antidepressant, a 1 will be attributed if the patient takes one medication of this category and a 0 if not. In each group, the sum of every classes of medication will have to be equal. As a reminder, class of antidepressant are exclusive between them.
Medical load: To control medication, a medication load index will be calculated as described in Olié and al., 2018. Antiepileptics and lithium medications will be dosed in plasma.
There is an ancillary study associate with this project, ID RCB : 2023-A00213-42. His main objective is to evaluate the rested functional connectivity between saliency's network areas associated to pain sensitivity in patient presenting a characterized depressive episode, with or without Suicide Attempt on his entire life. 50 patients are concerned. This study is charaterized by a third visit during which a MRI is done.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Painful stimulations (see detailed description)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Major Depressive patients | Experimental | Behavioral: Painful stimulations of major depressive patients, Biological: Blood sample, Diagnostic Test: Clinical assessment, Behavioral: Social touch3 groups: * Women having recently attempted suicide (less than 72 hours). * Women having a past suicide attempt (more than 72 hours). * Women without lifetime history of suicidal behaviour. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Woman;
- Being aged between 18 and 65 years;
- Currently meeting the DSM-5 major depressive episode criteria;
- Being able to understand the nature, purpose and methodology of the study and agreeing to cooperate during the assessments;
- Having signed informed consent;
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Existence of current psychotic or mixed characteristics;
- Lifetime history of schizoaffective disorder or schizophrenia;
- Current substance dependence (within the last 6 months);
- Existence of mental retardation or serious medical comorbidity interfering with measures (HIV, diabetes, cancer, chronic inflammatory pathology, neurological disorder);
- Having taken painkillers within the last 24 hours preceding the evaluation;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Painful stimulations of major depressive patientsAll three pain mechanisms will be tested in one session lasting 1h approximately. The mechanisms are tested in the following order: 1. Aδ and C threshold 2. Wind-up 3. CPM (more details in detailed description) | Behavioural | Major Depressive patients |
| Blood sampleThe blood test is made between 2 and 24 hours before the experimental procedure. The biological collection is made to measure medications' concentration if the patient takes antiepileptics and/or lithium, and to measure complete blood count (CBC). | Biological | Major Depressive patients |
| Clinical assessmentA clinical assessment will be made by a trained researcher. (more details in detailed description) | Diagnostic test | Major Depressive patients |
| Social touchStroking | Behavioural | Major Depressive patients |
Primary outcome
Effectiveness of the conditioned pain modulation
Time frame: During painful stimulations which are assessed 24 hours after the inclusion
The criterion will be the average difference of perceived pain (CoVAS measure) before and after modulation, i.e. before and after the cold pressor task. It's postulated that recent suicidal patients will have a higher efficacity of CPM than past suicidal patients and depressed affective controls.
9 secondary outcomes
Effectiveness of the Wind-up mechanism
Time frame: During painful stimulations which are assessed 24 hours after the inclusion
Aδ and C fibers thresholds
Time frame: During painful stimulations which are assessed 24 hours after the inclusion
Pleasantness associated with social touch
Time frame: During painful stimulations which are assessed 24 hours after the inclusion
Emotional Reactivity Score
Time frame: At inclusion
Emotional Regulation Score
Time frame: At inclusion
Dissociative experiences score
Time frame: At inclusion
Body investment score
Time frame: At inclusion
Acquired Capability of Suicide Scale
Time frame: At inclusion
Functional connectivity in saliency's network (ID-RCB :2023-A00213-42)
Time frame: During an IRM which is assessed 8 days after visite 1 or after inclusion until 24 months.
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: no more inclusion). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Mar 2025.
Related trials for Major Depressive Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
RecruitingPhase 4
Biomarker-Guided Antidepressant Selection
Depression - Major Depressive Disorder, Treatment-resistant Depression (TRD)
Recruiting
Targeting Network Dysfunction in Apathy of Late-life Depression Using Digital Therapeutics
Major Depressive Disorder, Apathy
RecruitingObservational study
Student Precarity and Psychiatry
Depressive Disorder, Major, Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Acute Intermittent Hypoxia Therapy for Depression
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Emilie Olie, MD-PhD principal investigator
University Hospital, Montpellier
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Painful stimulations of major depressive patients, Blood sample and Clinical assessment in people with Major Depressive Disorder, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 2 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: no more inclusion). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Effectiveness of the conditioned pain modulation (time frame: During painful stimulations which are assessed 24 hours after the inclusion). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Mar 2025.