AzTrials
AzTrials

Chemotherapy-induced NeutropeniaNCT04460079

Safety and Effectiveness Assessment of PeGagen® (Pegfilgrastim) in the Prevention of Chemotherapy-induced FN

An observational study of Chemotherapy-induced Neutropenia, run by Cinnagen.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The present study was an observational, multicenter, non-interventional, single arm, open label, PMS study conducted in Iran. The primary objective of this study was safety assessment, including the rate of AEs. The secondary objective was the effectiveness evaluation in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced FN. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Chemotherapy-induced Neutropenia
What is being tested?
Peg-filgrastim
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
How many people
654 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
29 Mar 2016to 7 Sep 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients receiving various tumor types and regimens with chemotherapy regimens of high FN risk, will be included.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients aged ≥18 years,
  • with the diagnosis of various types of cancers (such as lymphoma, breast, lung, testicular, prostate, ovary and gastrointestinal cancers), receiving first-line chemotherapy regimens with a high FN risk, which PegaGen® is injected due to physician decision.

Who cannot join

None listed.

About this study

Official title: Safety and Effectiveness Assessment of PeGagen® (Pegfilgrastim) in the Prevention of Chemotherapy-induced Febrile Neutropenia in Iranian Cancer Patients

The present study was an observational, multicenter, non-interventional, single arm, open label, PMS study conducted in Iran.

The primary objective of this study was safety assessment, including the rate of AEs. The secondary objective was the effectiveness evaluation in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced FN.

Read the detailed description

The present study was an observational, multicenter, non-interventional, single arm, open label, PMS study conducted in Iran.

Data was gathered in two booklets, each containing information on four cycles of chemotherapy, which was filled by the designated physician. The duration of PegaGen® treatment was at the physicians' discretion based on the patient's condition.

The primary objective of this study was safety assessment, including the rate of AEs. The secondary objective was the effectiveness evaluation in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced FN.

This study was single arm and 654 subjects participated across various tumor types and regimens.

Being tested
Peg-filgrastim
Keywords
Febrile neutropenia, Pegfilgrastim, Post-marketing surveillance, Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, myelosuppressive chemotherapy
Medical subject headings
Febrile Neutropenia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Peg-filgrastimDrug

    Also called PegaGen®

    PegaGen® was injected as a single subcutaneous dose after completion of cytotoxic chemotherapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Safety assessment, using incidence according to SOC and PT of AEs and SAEs

    Safety evaluation was reported using summary statistics. For each AE, data was summarized using incidence according to system organ class and preferred term of AEs and SAEs. Moreover, causality assessment was done and its results was reported by frequency and percentage.

    Measured: This outcome was assessed throughout the study, up to 8 chemotherapy cycles. The duration of treatment was at the physicians' discretion based on the patient's condition.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Effectiveness assessment: The frequency of neutropenia and neutropenic fever

    The frequency of neutropenia and neutropenic fever was reported

    Measured: This outcome was assessed throughout the study, up to 8 chemotherapy cycles. The duration of treatment was at the physicians' discretion based on the patient's condition.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jul 2020
  2. Study start29 Mar 2016
  3. Primary completion7 Sep 2019
  4. Study completion7 Sep 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
654 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04460079
Sponsor's protocol ID
PEGAGEN.CIN.AJ.95 (IV)
Status last verified
May 2020
First submitted
27 Jun 2020
Last updated
7 Jul 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Jenabian A, Ehsanpour A, Mortazavizadeh SMR, Raafat J, Razavi M, Khosravi A, Seifi S, Salimi B, Anjidani N, Kafi H. Evaluating the safety and effectiveness of PegaGen(R) (pegfilgrastim) for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: a post-marketing surveillance study. Support Care Cancer. 2022 Oct;30(10):8151-8158. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07265-2. Epub 2022 Jul 6.

    PubMed 35792924

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Chemotherapy-induced Neutropenia, run by Cinnagen.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Safety assessment, using incidence according to SOC and PT of AEs and SAEs (time frame: This outcome was assessed throughout the study, up to 8 chemotherapy cycles. The duration of treatment was at the physicians' discretion based on the patient's condition.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04460079, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jul 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in