AzTrials
AzTrials

Hematocrit AnemiaNCT04459442

Placental Transfusion in the 'Natural' Delivery: Effect of Early and Late Umbilical Cord Clamping

A study testing Umbilical cord clamping at birth. in people with Hematocrit Anemia and Acidosis, run by Policlinico Abano Terme at 3 sites in Italy.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators conducted a randomized controlled trial (parallel group study with 1:1 randomisation) comparing early cord clamping (ECC, at 60 seconds) and delayed cord clamping (DCC, at 180 seconds) in 90 cases of 'normal', two-step vaginal deliveries. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 minute to 2 days
Conditions the study is for
Hematocrit Anemia, Acidosis
What is being tested?
Umbilical cord clamping at birth.
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
90 participants
Where
3 sitesItaly
Study dates
1 Feb 2021to 30 Dec 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 minute to 2 days
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Vaginal delivery

Who cannot join

  • Cesarean delivery

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

Italy3 sites
  • Policlinico Abano Terme

    Abano Terme, Padua, 35031

  • Policlinico Abano Terme

    Abano Terme

  • Padua University Hospital

    Padua, 35128

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Placental Transfusion in the 'Natural' Vaginal Delivery at Term: Effect of Early and Late Umbilical Cord Clamping

The investigators conducted a randomized controlled trial (parallel group study with 1:1 randomisation) comparing early cord clamping (ECC, at 60 seconds) and delayed cord clamping (DCC, at 180 seconds) in 90 cases of 'normal', two-step vaginal deliveries. DCC may result in a higher blood volume in the newborn, facilitating the maternal-placental-fetal exchange of circulating compounds, without potentially detrimental acidosis.

Read the detailed description

Introduction: Placental transfusion supports an important blood transfer to the neonate, promoting a more stable transition from fetal to extrauterine life, with the potential to prevent iron deficiency in young children. Several studies have demonstrated that cord clamping timing is greatly relevant for facilitate placental transfusion, the transfer of extra blood from the placenta to the infant in the third stage of labor. Therefore, during' natural', 'two-step delivery umbilical cord management may play a relevant role on blood passage to the neonate and it may affect neonatal hematological values (placental transfusion). The most effective way to manage umbilical cord in in 'natural', two-step delivery remains to be established. Objective: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of two different methods of umbilical cord management ECC vs. DCC) on the placental transfusion, defined by Δ haematocrit (Hct) from arterial cord blood at birth and capillary blood at 48 h of age, accounting for physiological body weight decrease. Secondary outcome included contemporary estimate of pH in arterial cord blood gas analysis at birth.

Material and methods: This is a randomized clinical trial on the effect of different cord management in newborns by 'natural', two-step delivery. After obtaining parental consent, all mothers > 38 weeks' gestation will be assigned to either ECC or DCC group in a 1:1 ratio, according to a randomized sequence generated by an opened, sealed, numbered, opaque envelope containing the cord clamping interventions allocation, ECC (at 1 minute) or DCC (at 3 minutes after delivery).

Being tested
Umbilical cord clamping at birth.
Keywords
Placental transfusion, Natural, two-step delivery, Early cord clamping, Delayed cord clamping
Medical subject headings
Acidosis, Fetofetal Transfusion

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Umbilical cord clamping at birth.Procedure or surgery

    Also called Cord clamping

    Umbilical cord clamping after delivery.

Study groups in NCT04459442
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Early cord clampingExperimentalCord clamping at 60 seconds after birth.
Receives: Procedure: Umbilical cord clamping at birth.
Delayed cord clampingExperimentalCord clamping at 180 seconds after birth.
Receives: Procedure: Umbilical cord clamping at birth.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Placental transfusion.

    Placental transfusion defined by delta hematocrit (Htc) from arterial cord blood at birth and capillaryblood at 48 h of age.

    Measured: Second day of life

  2. Cord blood pH

    pH estimate in arterial cord blood gas analysis

    Measured: Second day of life.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jul 2020
  2. Study start1 Feb 2021
  3. Primary completion15 Oct 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Parallel Assignment The investigators conducted a randomized controlled trial (parallel group study with 1:1 randomization), comparing early cord clamping (at 60 seconds) and delayed cord clamping (at 180 seconds) in 90 cases of 'normal', two-step vaginal births.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
90 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04459442
Sponsor's protocol ID
3278/AT/14
Status last verified
Sep 2021
First submitted
1 Jul 2020
Last updated
16 Sep 2021
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: No. There is not a plan to make IPD available

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Umbilical cord clamping at birth. in people with Hematocrit Anemia and Acidosis, run by Policlinico Abano Terme at 3 sites in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Placental transfusion. (time frame: Second day of life). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Sep 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in