Procedural AnxietyNCT04449341
Can Virtual Reality Reduce Pain and Anxiety During Blood Draw
A study testing Oculus Go headset with Ocean Rift application in people with Procedural Anxiety and Procedural Pain, run by C.R.Darnall Army Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Adult patients aged 18-50 undergoing blood draw for routine lab evaluation will be randomized to a control group or experimental group to assess if the use of virtual reality reduces procedural pain (primary outcome) and procedural anxiety (secondary outcome) during venipuncture. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Procedural Anxiety, Procedural Pain
- What is being tested?
- Oculus Go headset with Ocean Rift application
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 59 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 10 Jun 2020to 9 Jul 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults aged 18-50
- Currently scheduled to undergo venipuncture
Who cannot join
- Less than 18 years old or greater than 50 years old
- History of motion sickness (nausea or vertigo)
- Pregnant women
- Reported history of blood borne disease (no request will be made for which disease participant has)
- Use of pain medication(s) on day of study
- Current use of medical devices, including hearing aids, pacemakers, implanted cardiac defibrillators
- Currently experiencing headache/migraine
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Carl R Darnall Army Medical Center
Fort Hood, Texas, 76544
About this study
Official title: Can Virtual Reality Reduce Patient's Pain, Improve Patient's Experience, and Reduce Procedure Related Anxiety With Venipuncture? A Randomized Control Trial
Adult patients aged 18-50 undergoing blood draw for routine lab evaluation will be randomized to a control group or experimental group to assess if the use of virtual reality reduces procedural pain (primary outcome) and procedural anxiety (secondary outcome) during venipuncture.
Read the detailed description
A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing standard practice for conducting venipuncture to standard practice with the addition of Virtual Reality using the Oculus Go Head Mounted Display (HMD). The study will be performed on volunteers who are reporting to the phlebotomy lab to have venipuncture for blood draws that were previously ordered by their health care providers. Participants who were not already scheduled to undergo routine venipuncture will not be included.
When approaching the ticket stand to draw a waiting number for the lab, prospective participants will be asked by an assistant investigator located near the kiosk if they are interested in participating in the study. If the participants express interest, they will be directed to the screening station. The screening station will be set up in a private room near the lab waiting area, and participants will be screened for eligibility and educated on the benefits and risks of the study. They will also provide informed consent if they decide to participate.
All participants will be asked to fill out a self-reported data questionnaire in addition to the informed consent document to assess for inclusion and exclusion criteria discussed later in this protocol. This questionnaire will assess the participant's expected level of anxiety prior to the procedure and expected level of pain associated with the procedure by utilizing a visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS will be on a 100 millimeter line.
Once approved for participation in the study all participants will undergo a brief instructional class on how to operate the HMD and will be allowed sufficient time to become comfortable with its use. The investigators expect approximately 5-10 minutes to be required for this portion of the study. Once familiar with the use of the virtual reality headset, participants will be asked to randomly draw an envelope from a container. This envelope will contain a block and sequence number. The block and sequence number will be the subject identification and will correspond to a predetermined number set on a separate document that will determine if the participant will use the HMD during venipuncture or not. The screener will not have immediate access to the list showing which group the participant will be assigned to. One member of the study team will be present in the lab room to ensure the participant uses the virtual reality headset (or not) according to what is randomly drawn. This member of the research team will have the list showing whether or not the participant is assigned to the control arm or the experimental arm. The participants will then proceed to the specimen room to undergo venipuncture.
Venipuncture for both groups will be occur in the non-dominant arm. The reasoning for this is that the Oculus Go requires one free hand to use a controller. This will ensure that the individuals participating are able to effectively use the device. Those unable to undergo venipuncture in the nondominant arm will undergo venipuncture in the dominant arm instead and will use the Oculus Go dominant arm will undergo venipuncture in the dominant arm instead and will use the Oculus Go controller with their non-dominant hand.
Those utilizing the Oculus Go HMD will be interacting with the virtual reality game Ocean Rift. They will utilize a single controller to explore an underwater safari park. Ocean Rift has multiple environments to choose from, including coral reefs, ship wrecks, lagoons, the arctic, and prehistoric seas. Participants may interact with and and learn about different creatures to include dolphins, turtles, orcas, ray, whales, sea lions, manatees, and dinosaurs. During the game users may travel where they please and interact with what they choose. The virtual reality device is equipped with head-tracking software that allows the user to choose direction by looking around. The entire interior and exterior of the headset will be cleaned with alcohol-based wipes after each use. Alcohol will be used since it is generally well-tolerated on human skin, and since it evaporates quickly. The headset will be dried in the open air for a minimum of two minutes between each subject's use.
Those not using the virtual reality will still wear a headset that will simply be turned off. This is to ensure that any significant change noted with the virtual reality is due to the use of virtual reality itself, and not simply due to "blindfolding" the patient during the procedure.
As some patients experiencing anxiety may be tempted to move during the procedure, lab personnel will instruct participants to remain still during venipuncture. Participants will be advised that they may take breaks as needed if anxiety becomes overwhelming.
After undergoing the procedure, each participant will be asked to fill out the postprocedure questionnaire and return it to the study team member present in the lab room, who will clean the headset as the participant completes the questionnaire. This questionnaire assesses the patient's pain intensity and level of anxiety with the VAS similar to the VAS assessing pain, as well as the patient's satisfaction with the visit which will be measured utilizing a Likert scale for individual questions.
- Conditions
- Procedural Anxiety, Procedural Pain
- Being tested
- Oculus Go headset with Ocean Rift application
- Keywords
- virtual reality, venipuncture, blood draw, Oculus Go
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Procedural
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Oculus Go headset with Ocean Rift applicationDevice
Information already included in arm description
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard care venipuncture with additional of virtual reality | Experimental | Patients undergoing blood draw while interacting with VR application Ocean Rift while wearing Oculus Go headset Receives: Device: Oculus Go headset with Ocean Rift application |
| Standard care venipuncture without addition of virtual reality | No intervention | Patients undergoing blood draw while wearing Oculus Go headset that is turned off |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Procedural Pain
Determine if use of Oculus Go headset reduces procedural pain perception utilizing the visual analog scale, which measures pain on a linear scale from 0 to 100 millimeters, with 0 being no pain and 100 being maximum pain
Measured: 2 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Procedural Anxiety
Determine if use of Oculus Go headset reduces procedural anxiety utilizing the visual analog scale, which measures anxiety on a linear scale from 0 to 100 millimeters, with 0 being no anxiety and 100 being maximum anxiety
Measured: 2 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jun 2020
- Study start10 Jun 2020
- Primary completion9 Jul 2020
- Study completion9 Jul 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (15)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Procedural AnxietyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 59 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- C.R.Darnall Army Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Matthew J. Perdue, DSc, PA-C, C.R.Darnall Army Medical Center
- Investigators
- Matthew J Perdue, PA, Principal investigator, C.R.Darnall Army Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04449341
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 921118
- Status last verified
- Jul 2021
- First submitted
- 22 Jun 2020
- Last updated
- 13 Jul 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Atzori B, Hoffman HG, Vagnoli L, Patterson DR, Alhalabi W, Messeri A, Lauro Grotto R. Virtual Reality Analgesia During Venipuncture in Pediatric Patients With Onco-Hematological Diseases. Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 20;9:2508. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02508. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 30618938Cassidy KL, Reid GJ, McGrath PJ, Finley GA, Smith DJ, Morley C, Szudek EA, Morton B. Watch needle, watch TV: Audiovisual distraction in preschool immunization. Pain Med. 2002 Jun;3(2):108-18. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4637.2002.02027.x.
PubMed 15102157Lee JS, Hobden E, Stiell IG, Wells GA. Clinically important change in the visual analog scale after adequate pain control. Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Oct;10(10):1128-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00586.x.
PubMed 14525749Dahlquist LM, Weiss KE, Law EF, Sil S, Herbert LJ, Horn SB, Wohlheiter K, Ackerman CS. Effects of videogame distraction and a virtual reality type head-mounted display helmet on cold pressor pain in young elementary school-aged children. J Pediatr Psychol. 2010 Jul;35(6):617-25. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp082. Epub 2009 Sep 28.
PubMed 19786489Garrett B, Taverner T, Masinde W, Gromala D, Shaw C, Negraeff M. A rapid evidence assessment of immersive virtual reality as an adjunct therapy in acute pain management in clinical practice. Clin J Pain. 2014 Dec;30(12):1089-98. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000064.
PubMed 24535053Gold JI, Kim SH, Kant AJ, Joseph MH, Rizzo AS. Effectiveness of virtual reality for pediatric pain distraction during i.v. placement. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2006 Apr;9(2):207-12. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.207.
PubMed 16640481Gold JI, Belmont KA, Thomas DA. The neurobiology of virtual reality pain attenuation. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007 Aug;10(4):536-44. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.9993.
PubMed 17711362Hoffman HG, Patterson DR, Carrougher GJ, Sharar SR. Effectiveness of virtual reality-based pain control with multiple treatments. Clin J Pain. 2001 Sep;17(3):229-35. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200109000-00007.
PubMed 11587113Hoffman HG, Sharar SR, Coda B, Everett JJ, Ciol M, Richards T, Patterson DR. Manipulating presence influences the magnitude of virtual reality analgesia. Pain. 2004 Sep;111(1-2):162-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.06.013.
PubMed 15327820Li A, Montano Z, Chen VJ, Gold JI. Virtual reality and pain management: current trends and future directions. Pain Manag. 2011 Mar;1(2):147-157. doi: 10.2217/pmt.10.15.
PubMed 21779307Malloy KM, Milling LS. The effectiveness of virtual reality distraction for pain reduction: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Dec;30(8):1011-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
PubMed 20691523Gallagher EJ, Liebman M, Bijur PE. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Dec;38(6):633-8. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.118863.
PubMed 11719741Moore B, Stocks C, Owens P. Trends in Emergency Department Visits, 2006-2014. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Brief #227. 2017
Wiederhold BK, Gao K, Kong L, Wiederhold MD. Mobile devices as adjunctive pain management tools. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 Jun;17(6):385-9. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0202.
PubMed 24892202Ozalp Gerceker G, Ayar D, Ozdemir EZ, Bektas M. Effects of virtual reality on pain, fear and anxiety during blood draw in children aged 5-12 years old: A randomised controlled study. J Clin Nurs. 2020 Apr;29(7-8):1151-1161. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15173. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
PubMed 31889358
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jul 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Can Virtual Reality Reduce Patient's Pain, Improve Patient's Experience, and Reduce Procedure Related Anxiety With Venipuncture? A Randomized Control Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04449341
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 921118
- Conditions
- Procedural Anxiety, Procedural Pain
- Keywords
- virtual reality, venipuncture, blood draw, Oculus Go
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 59 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- C.R.Darnall Army Medical CenterUS federal agency
- Study start
- 10 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 Jul 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 11 Jun 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Adult patients aged 18-50 undergoing blood draw for routine lab evaluation will be randomized to a control group or experimental group to assess if the use of virtual reality reduces procedural pain (primary outcome) and procedural anxiety (secondary outcome) during venipuncture.
Detailed description
A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing standard practice for conducting venipuncture to standard practice with the addition of Virtual Reality using the Oculus Go Head Mounted Display (HMD). The study will be performed on volunteers who are reporting to the phlebotomy lab to have venipuncture for blood draws that were previously ordered by their health care providers. Participants who were not already scheduled to undergo routine venipuncture will not be included.
When approaching the ticket stand to draw a waiting number for the lab, prospective participants will be asked by an assistant investigator located near the kiosk if they are interested in participating in the study. If the participants express interest, they will be directed to the screening station. The screening station will be set up in a private room near the lab waiting area, and participants will be screened for eligibility and educated on the benefits and risks of the study. They will also provide informed consent if they decide to participate.
All participants will be asked to fill out a self-reported data questionnaire in addition to the informed consent document to assess for inclusion and exclusion criteria discussed later in this protocol. This questionnaire will assess the participant's expected level of anxiety prior to the procedure and expected level of pain associated with the procedure by utilizing a visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS will be on a 100 millimeter line.
Once approved for participation in the study all participants will undergo a brief instructional class on how to operate the HMD and will be allowed sufficient time to become comfortable with its use. The investigators expect approximately 5-10 minutes to be required for this portion of the study. Once familiar with the use of the virtual reality headset, participants will be asked to randomly draw an envelope from a container. This envelope will contain a block and sequence number. The block and sequence number will be the subject identification and will correspond to a predetermined number set on a separate document that will determine if the participant will use the HMD during venipuncture or not. The screener will not have immediate access to the list showing which group the participant will be assigned to. One member of the study team will be present in the lab room to ensure the participant uses the virtual reality headset (or not) according to what is randomly drawn. This member of the research team will have the list showing whether or not the participant is assigned to the control arm or the experimental arm. The participants will then proceed to the specimen room to undergo venipuncture.
Venipuncture for both groups will be occur in the non-dominant arm. The reasoning for this is that the Oculus Go requires one free hand to use a controller. This will ensure that the individuals participating are able to effectively use the device. Those unable to undergo venipuncture in the nondominant arm will undergo venipuncture in the dominant arm instead and will use the Oculus Go dominant arm will undergo venipuncture in the dominant arm instead and will use the Oculus Go controller with their non-dominant hand.
Those utilizing the Oculus Go HMD will be interacting with the virtual reality game Ocean Rift. They will utilize a single controller to explore an underwater safari park. Ocean Rift has multiple environments to choose from, including coral reefs, ship wrecks, lagoons, the arctic, and prehistoric seas. Participants may interact with and and learn about different creatures to include dolphins, turtles, orcas, ray, whales, sea lions, manatees, and dinosaurs. During the game users may travel where they please and interact with what they choose. The virtual reality device is equipped with head-tracking software that allows the user to choose direction by looking around. The entire interior and exterior of the headset will be cleaned with alcohol-based wipes after each use. Alcohol will be used since it is generally well-tolerated on human skin, and since it evaporates quickly. The headset will be dried in the open air for a minimum of two minutes between each subject's use.
Those not using the virtual reality will still wear a headset that will simply be turned off. This is to ensure that any significant change noted with the virtual reality is due to the use of virtual reality itself, and not simply due to "blindfolding" the patient during the procedure.
As some patients experiencing anxiety may be tempted to move during the procedure, lab personnel will instruct participants to remain still during venipuncture. Participants will be advised that they may take breaks as needed if anxiety becomes overwhelming.
After undergoing the procedure, each participant will be asked to fill out the postprocedure questionnaire and return it to the study team member present in the lab room, who will clean the headset as the participant completes the questionnaire. This questionnaire assesses the patient's pain intensity and level of anxiety with the VAS similar to the VAS assessing pain, as well as the patient's satisfaction with the visit which will be measured utilizing a Likert scale for individual questions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard care venipuncture with additional of virtual reality | Experimental | Device: Oculus Go headset with Ocean Rift applicationPatients undergoing blood draw while interacting with VR application Ocean Rift while wearing Oculus Go headset |
| Standard care venipuncture without addition of virtual reality | No intervention | –Patients undergoing blood draw while wearing Oculus Go headset that is turned off |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Adults aged 18-50
- Currently scheduled to undergo venipuncture
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Less than 18 years old or greater than 50 years old
- History of motion sickness (nausea or vertigo)
- Pregnant women
- Reported history of blood borne disease (no request will be made for which disease participant has)
- Use of pain medication(s) on day of study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Oculus Go headset with Ocean Rift applicationInformation already included in arm description | Device | Standard care venipuncture with additional of virtual reality |
Primary outcome
Procedural Pain
Time frame: 2 months
Determine if use of Oculus Go headset reduces procedural pain perception utilizing the visual analog scale, which measures pain on a linear scale from 0 to 100 millimeters, with 0 being no pain and 100 being maximum pain
1 secondary outcome
Procedural Anxiety
Time frame: 2 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jul 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 30618938Atzori B, Hoffman HG, Vagnoli L, Patterson DR, Alhalabi W, Messeri A, Lauro Grotto R. Virtual Reality Analgesia During Venipuncture in Pediatric Patients With Onco-Hematological Diseases. Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 20;9:2508. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02508. eCollection 2018.
- Background: PubMed 15102157Cassidy KL, Reid GJ, McGrath PJ, Finley GA, Smith DJ, Morley C, Szudek EA, Morton B. Watch needle, watch TV: Audiovisual distraction in preschool immunization. Pain Med. 2002 Jun;3(2):108-18. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4637.2002.02027.x.
- Background: PubMed 14525749Lee JS, Hobden E, Stiell IG, Wells GA. Clinically important change in the visual analog scale after adequate pain control. Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Oct;10(10):1128-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00586.x.
- Background: PubMed 19786489Dahlquist LM, Weiss KE, Law EF, Sil S, Herbert LJ, Horn SB, Wohlheiter K, Ackerman CS. Effects of videogame distraction and a virtual reality type head-mounted display helmet on cold pressor pain in young elementary school-aged children. J Pediatr Psychol. 2010 Jul;35(6):617-25. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp082. Epub 2009 Sep 28.
- Background: PubMed 24535053Garrett B, Taverner T, Masinde W, Gromala D, Shaw C, Negraeff M. A rapid evidence assessment of immersive virtual reality as an adjunct therapy in acute pain management in clinical practice. Clin J Pain. 2014 Dec;30(12):1089-98. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000064.
- Background: PubMed 16640481Gold JI, Kim SH, Kant AJ, Joseph MH, Rizzo AS. Effectiveness of virtual reality for pediatric pain distraction during i.v. placement. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2006 Apr;9(2):207-12. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.207.
- Background: PubMed 17711362Gold JI, Belmont KA, Thomas DA. The neurobiology of virtual reality pain attenuation. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007 Aug;10(4):536-44. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.9993.
- Background: PubMed 11587113Hoffman HG, Patterson DR, Carrougher GJ, Sharar SR. Effectiveness of virtual reality-based pain control with multiple treatments. Clin J Pain. 2001 Sep;17(3):229-35. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200109000-00007.
- Background: PubMed 15327820Hoffman HG, Sharar SR, Coda B, Everett JJ, Ciol M, Richards T, Patterson DR. Manipulating presence influences the magnitude of virtual reality analgesia. Pain. 2004 Sep;111(1-2):162-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.06.013.
- Background: PubMed 21779307Li A, Montano Z, Chen VJ, Gold JI. Virtual reality and pain management: current trends and future directions. Pain Manag. 2011 Mar;1(2):147-157. doi: 10.2217/pmt.10.15.
- Background: PubMed 20691523Malloy KM, Milling LS. The effectiveness of virtual reality distraction for pain reduction: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Dec;30(8):1011-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
- Background: PubMed 11719741Gallagher EJ, Liebman M, Bijur PE. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Dec;38(6):633-8. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.118863.
- 2018 Demographics Report: Profile of the Military CommunityLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Procedural Anxiety
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Soap-and-Water Bed Bath Versus Disposable Wipe Bath in the Same ICU Patients
Critical Illness, Pain
Not yet recruiting
Virtual Reality for Pain and Anxiety During Surgical Uterine Evacuation After Early Pregnancy Loss
Early Pregnancy Loss, Procedural Pain
Not yet recruiting
Virtual Reality to Reduce Anxiety During Thoracic Epidural Placement.
Preoperative Anxiety Score
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Short-Video Distraction During Burn Dressing on Anxiety, Pain, and Fear in Children
Burn Injury, Procedural Anxiety
Not yet recruiting
Peri-procedural Weighted Blanket Use for ECT
Post-ect Agitation, Post-ictal Agitation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Matthew J Perdue, PA principal investigator
C.R.Darnall Army Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Oculus Go headset with Ocean Rift application in people with Procedural Anxiety and Procedural Pain, run by C.R.Darnall Army Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Jun 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Procedural Pain (time frame: 2 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04449341, which also lists 15 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jul 2021.