AzTrials
AzTrials

Dental ImplantsAO4PEEKDevNCT04446078

Hybrid Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)-Acrylic Resin Prostheses and the All-on-4 Concept for Full Arch Rehabilitation

A study testing PEEK- acrylic resin prosthesis supported by 4 dental implants in people with Dental Implants and Dental Materials, run by Malo Clinic at 1 site in Portugal.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

It is necessary to evaluate the outcome of implant supported fixed prosthetic rehabilitations using peek material. To test this, the study design to be used will be a prospective single cohort to evaluate the long term outcome of fixed prosthetic implant supported rehabilitations. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Dental Implants, Dental Materials, Mandible
What is being tested?
PEEK- acrylic resin prosthesis supported by 4 dental implants
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
37 participants
Where
1 sitePortugal
Study dates
2 May 2014to 9 Feb 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • rehabilitated with implant-supported fixed prostheses through the All-on-4 concept (Nobel Biocare)

Who cannot join

  • Patients in active chemotherapy or radiotherapy,
  • Presenting insufficient bone volume,
  • Unable to provide written informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Portugal1 site
  • Malo Clinic

    Lisbon, 1600-042

Other trials in Portugal

About this study

It is necessary to evaluate the outcome of implant supported fixed prosthetic rehabilitations using peek material. To test this, the study design to be used will be a prospective single cohort to evaluate the long term outcome of fixed prosthetic implant supported rehabilitations. The cohort will be evaluated after 5 years of follow-up, regarding prosthetic survival, implant survival, marginal bone resorption, incidence of mechanical complications (loosening or fracture of prosthetic components), biological complications (peri-implant pathology, suppuration, fistulae), incidence of biological complications (peri-implant pathology, suppuration, excessive marginal bone resorption) in-mouth comfort, overall chewing feeling, framework integrity, veneer adhesion, veneer chipping, patient tissue reaction, denture staining, manufacture issues,

Read the detailed description

Problem Peek material is already used in the dentistry field, but proof on its long-term outcome in implant supported fixed rehabilitations is lacking.

Objectives

  • To evaluate the long term outcome of fixed prosthetic implant supported rehabilitations using peek material.
  • To report the results.

Significance This investigation is of interest, because it will provide an overview of the long term outcome of implant supported fixed prosthetic rehabilitations using peek material.

Hypothesis The hypothesis that this study will evaluate, will be the distribution of survival and other variables of interest in implant supported fixed prosthetic rehabilitations using peek material.

Materials and Methods Methodology This study will be performed at Malo Clinic in Lisbon. It is estimated to last for approximately 5 years. The study design to be used will be a prospective single cohort study to evaluate the long-term outcome of implant supported fixed prosthetic rehabilitations using peek material. The cohort will be evaluated in at least 5 interventions (1 per year), regarding survival and the clinical/technical parameters established in this study. There will be no risk for the participants, has all procedures for collecting information will be minimally invasive and non- traumatizing.

Population The population of this study consists in individuals rehabilitated with a fixed prosthetic rehabilitation supported by immediate function implants, of both genders, without age restrictions.

Sample size It is expected that the sample will consist of 37 consecutively treated patients during the year of 2013.

External variables:

  • Withdrawal of the patients;
  • The patient missing the control appointment;
  • Interruption of the treatment by the patient;
  • Patient deceased.

Statistical analysis:

In this study, the data will be treated by means of descriptive and inferential statistics. The data will be treated using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows version 17.0 ®. Survival will be estimated through life tables. Inferential analysis will be performed for characterization of the cohort and independent variables.

Adverse events:

An adverse event is defined as any undesirable clinical occurrence in a subject whether it is considered to be device related or not. If the adverse event is regarded as device related it is stated as an adverse device effect. An adverse event or adverse device effect may be serious\severe or non-serious\non-severe. If, as result of an adverse event during a clinical investigation, a subject has to be hospitalized, or their hospitalization is unduly prolonged due to potential disability or danger to life because an intervention has been necessitated or the event is terminal, the adverse event or adverse effect is regarded as serious. All serious adverse events must be reported to the Ethic Committee and without any delay.

Ethical aspects:

This investigation will be carried out in accordance to the ethical principles and guidelines stated in the Declaration of Helsinki. The Investigation should be evaluated and approved by a National Ethic Committee prior to including the first subject in the investigation. The application to the Ethic committee is to be made by the responsible investigators, and a copy of the approval should be sent to the monitor before the investigation starts. It is also of great importance that each subject receives oral and written information about the investigation, and that she/he must only participate if they truly want to do so. Also, the subjects must be aware of the fact that they can withdraw from the investigation at any time and for any reason without jeopardizing their future treatment.

Furthermore, the subjects should be made aware of the fact that the data from his/her treatment will be registered in a computer database, but that she/he will only be registered through a code system. This means that the identity of each subject will be unknown to all others than the doctor performing the treatment. Each subject is entitled to take part of the information stored about her/his treatment. This information is to be handed out by the treating doctor.

Database management:

The data collected from the forms will be introduced in a digital database (Microsoft Office Excel 2003®). The database management will be the responsibility of the Malo Clinic.

Being tested
PEEK- acrylic resin prosthesis supported by 4 dental implants
Keywords
All-on-4; All-on-four
Medical subject headings
Prosthesis Failure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PEEK- acrylic resin prosthesis supported by 4 dental implantsDevice

    Patients rehabilitated for edentulism of one or both arches through an implant supported fixed prosthesis

Study groups in NCT04446078
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PEEK - All-on-4ExperimentalPatients rehabilitated with a PEEK-acrylic resin prosthesis supported by immediate function dental implants inserted through the All-on-4 concept
Receives: Device: PEEK- acrylic resin prosthesis supported by 4 dental implants

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. prosthetic survival

    considering the necessity of replacing the prosthesis; fracture of the infrastructure

    Measured: 5 years

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. implant survival

    considering the implants' function, censoring as a failure the first implant to fail in a given patient

    Measured: 5 years

  2. marginal bone loss

    Marginal bone level was defined as the distance between the implant's platform and the most apical bone-implant contact, while the measurements difference between baseline (connection of the definitive prosthesis) and the subsequent evaluation.

    Measured: 5 years

  3. Plaque levels

    modified plaque index

    Measured: 5 years

  4. Bleeding levels

    modified bleeding index

    Measured: 5 years

  5. Problems during manufacturing

    Evaluation of veneer adhesion by detachment of acrylic resin veneer from PEEK infrastructure.

    Measured: 5 years

  6. Biological complications

    Adverse soft tissue reaction, suppuration, abscess, fistulae and peri-implant pathology (the presence of marginal bone loss and peri-implant pockets of more than 4 mm, with or without the concurrent presence of bleeding on probing or suppuration)

    Measured: 5 years

  7. Mechanical complications

    Prosthesis, abutments or prosthetic screws fracture or loosening

    Measured: 5 years

  8. Patient subjective evaluation concerning overall chewing feeling associated with the specific feel during food mastication

    The evaluations performed by the patient were registered on a visual analogue scale ranging between 0-10 (poor to excellent)

    Measured: 5 years

  9. Patient subjective evaluation concerning in mouth comfort specified as the patients' overall evaluation according to the expectations when submitting the prosthesis to function

    The evaluations performed by the patient were registered on a visual analogue scale ranging between 0-10 (poor to excellent)

    Measured: 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Jun 2020
  2. Study start2 May 2014
  3. Primary completion29 Dec 2021
  4. Study completion9 Feb 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
prospective cohort
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
37 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04446078
Sponsor's protocol ID
AO4PEEKDevGroup
Acronym
AO4PEEKDev
Status last verified
Feb 2023
First submitted
22 Jun 2020
Last updated
24 Feb 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PEEK- acrylic resin prosthesis supported by 4 dental implants in people with Dental Implants and Dental Materials, run by Malo Clinic at 1 site in Portugal.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Portugal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

prosthetic survival (time frame: 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Feb 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in