AzTrials
AzTrials

Stress Disorders, Post-TraumaticAGMFMSSNCT04443075

Alterations of Gut Microbiome in the Frontline Medical Staff Under the Stress

An observational study of Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, run by First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

With the outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), the frontline medical workers faced enormous stress, including a high risk of infection and inadequate protection from contamination, isolation, patients with negative emotions, a lack of contact with their families, and exhaustion, which may cause mental health… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
What is being tested?
faecal sample collector
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
180 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
24 Jun 2020to 24 Dec 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Study population: They are all medical staff in First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University

Who may be able to join

  • taking part in the medical team to support Wuhan
  • of 18 to 50 years old
  • did not take antibiotics within 3 months before sample collection
  • 17.5<body mass index (BMI)<30

Who cannot join

  • have serious cardiovascular disease, blood disease, and endocrine disease
  • have a history of cancer or its complications
  • have active gastrointestinal diseases or complications and serious systemic diseases
  • have history of brain organic diseases or complications and mental retardation
  • have mental disorders such as mood disorder and anxiety disorders
  • pregnant or lactating
  • drink in the past week (liquor>250ml or beer>1bottle) or the previous day (liquor>50ml or beer>50ml)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Xian Jiaotong University

    Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Alterations of Gut Microbiome in the Frontline Medical Staff Under the Stress of Fighting Against 2019-nCoV

With the outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), the frontline medical workers faced enormous stress, including a high risk of infection and inadequate protection from contamination, isolation, patients with negative emotions, a lack of contact with their families, and exhaustion, which may cause mental health problems. The investigators plan to collect the faecal samples and clinical assessments from a part of frontline medical workers in three time points to analyse the changing profile of gut microbiome according to outcomes of 16s rRNA sequencing. The samples from the matched health controls will also be sequenced to compare with the exposed group in gut microbiome community.

Read the detailed description

In December, 2019, a novel coronavirus outbreak of pneumonia emerged in Wuhan, Hubei province, China, and has subsequently spread to more than 30 provinces in China and almost 100 countries in the world. In the fight against the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), medical workers in Wuhan have been facing enormous stress, including a high risk of infection and inadequate protection from contamination, isolation, patients with negative emotions, a lack of contact with their families, and exhaustion. The severe situation is causing mental health problems such as stress, anxiety, depressive symptoms, insomnia, denial, anger, and fear. These mental health problems could also cause posttraumatic stress (PTS) symptoms in a lasting time. A research examining the psychological impact of the 2003 outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome on hospital empoyees found that about 10% of the respondents had experienced high leves of PTS symptoms since the SARS outbreak.

Microbiome-gut-brain (MGB) axis has been validated in expanding studies, which means there are bidirectional communication between commensal organisms within the gut and the brain. Gut microbiota may influence brain function through neural, endocrine, and immune pathways. For example, substances produced by the gut microbiota may be absorbed reaching the brain by the blood stream. The brain, in turn, may influence the gut microbiota trough neuronal and endocrine pathways. In recent years, many reseaches support the relevance of microbiota and mental health status. Bercik et al. transplanted microbiota from adult germ-free (GF) BALB/c mice (a high-anxiety mouse strain) into adult GF NIH Swiss mice (a low-anxiety mouse strain), then found the behavioral profile of the donor was evident in the recipient animal, showing that the microbiota can directly affect behavior. Moreover, preclinical studies have shown that stress and emotions, including maternal separation and restraint, heat, and acoustic stress, alters the composition of the gut microbiota, maybe through the release of stress hormones or sympathetic neurotransmitters that influence gut physiology and alter the habitat of the microbiota. In addition, researchers found that stress has the ability to increase intestinal permeability, probably through the involvement of corticotrophin releasing factor and its receptors (CRFR1 and CRFR2), which play a key role in stress-induced gut permeability dysfunction. Increased intestinal permeability provides bacteria an opportunity to translocate across the intestinal mucosa and directly access both the immune and neuronal cells of the enteric nervous system (ENS). Stress also activates the autonomic nervous system, which affects gastric acid, bile, and mucus secretion, as well as gut motility. Gut motility is of particular importance since it is strongly associated with gut microbiota composition and richness. Based on these researches, the gut microbiome increasingly deserve attention to understand psychiatric disorders.

Therefore, the present study aim to collect the faecal samples and clinical assessments from a part of frontline medical workers in three time points to analyse the changing profile of gut microbiome according to outcomes of 16s rRNA sequencing. The samples from the matched health controls will also be sequenced to compare with the exposed group in gut microbiome community.

Methods Study design and sample collection The frontline workers in First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University will be included if they conformed with (1) taking part in the medical team to support Wuhan, (2) of 18 to 50 years old, (3) did not take antibiotics within 3 months before sample collection, (4) 17.5<body mass index (BMI)<30. The healthy controls will be selected from the staffs in First Affiliated Hospital who didn't join in the medical team but fulfill the last three conditions above to match with the frontline staffs for age, gender, BMI, and diet. Any participant will be excluded if he/she fulfill the following criteria: (1) have serious cardiovascular disease, blood disease, and endocrine disease, (2) have a history of cancer or its complications, (3) have active gastrointestinal diseases or complications and serious systemic diseases, (4) have history of brain organic diseases or complications and mental retardation, (5) have mental disorders such as mood disorder and anxiety disorders, (6) pregnant or lactating, (7) drink in the past week (liquor>250ml or beer>1bottle) or the previous day (liquor>50ml or beer>50ml). All included persons should provide signed informed consent before sample collection, and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (KYLLSL-2020-043). Faecal samples from each staff should be freshly collected at the hospital and frozen at -80℃ using specified faecal collector.

Clinical assessmant PHQ-15, PHQ-9, GAD-7, PSQI, SCL-90, and IES-R will be used for the assessment of clinical symptoms related to psychiatric disorder for exposed group in three time point and non-exposed group.

DNA extraction and 16S rRNA sequencing The investigators will perform 16S rRNA sequencing for all the collected faecal samples. Briefly, bacterial genomic DNA will be extracted, and the 16S rRNA whole region will be amplified by PCR, and then sequenced.

Statistical analysis The 16S rRNA sequencing data will be analysed using Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME). The investigators then use usearch to cluster sequences into taxonomic units (OTUs) at 97% identity and construct the OTU table. Microbial community structure, alpha diversity, and beta diversity will be analysed. LEfSe analysis, and random forest analysis will be used to find the biomarker between different group. Spearman's rank correlation will be used to identify the corrolation between clinical assessments and stress-associated microbiome.

Being tested
faecal sample collector
Medical subject headings
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • faecal sample collectorDevice

    The frontline medical workers mainly exposed under the stress of fighting against 2019-nCoV

Study groups in NCT04443075
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
exposed groupThe exposed group consists of the frontline medical workers who take part in the medical team to support Wuhan.
Receives: Device: faecal sample collector
non-exposed groupThis group includs medical workers who didn't join in the medical team to support Wuhan.
Receives: Device: faecal sample collector

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Gut microbiome composition of exposed group

    Gut microbiome composition will be anaylysed using 16S rRNA sequencing.

    Measured: immediately after the frontline workers come back to Xi'an

  2. Gut microbiome composition of exposed group

    Gut microbiome composition will be anaylysed using 16S rRNA sequencing.

    Measured: immediately after the frontline workers isolated for two weeks

  3. Gut microbiome composition of exposed group

    Gut microbiome composition will be anaylysed using 16S rRNA sequencing.

    Measured: immediately after the frontline workers going back to normal work for one month

  4. Gut microbiome composition of non-exposed group

    Gut microbiome composition will be anaylysed using 16S rRNA sequencing.

    Measured: During the procedure of collecting faecal samples from exposed group

  5. The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) of exposed group

    It's a self-report measure assessing subjective distress resulting from a traumatic life event, with a total score of 0-88. Higher score means a worse outcome

    Measured: immediately after the frontline workers come back to Xi'an

  6. The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) of exposed group

    It's a self-report measure assessing subjective distress resulting from a traumatic life event, with a total score of 0-88. Higher score means a worse outcome

    Measured: immediately after the frontline workers isolated for two weeks

  7. The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) of exposed group

    It's a self-report measure assessing subjective distress resulting from a traumatic life event, with a total score of 0-88. Higher score means a worse outcome

    Measured: immediately after the frontline workers going back to normal work for one month

  8. The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) of non-exposed group

    It's a self-report measure assessing subjective distress resulting from a traumatic life event, with a total score of 0-88. Higher score means a worse outcome

    Measured: During the procedure of collecting faecal samples from non-exposed group

Secondary outcomes (20)
  1. The 15-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15) of exposed group

    It's a self-administered measure assessing subjective common mental health with a total score of 0-30. Higher score means a worse outcome.

    Measured: immediately after the frontline workers come back to Xi'an

  2. The 15-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15) of exposed group

    It's a self-administered measure assessing subjective common mental health with a total score of 0-30. Higher score means a worse outcome.

    Measured: immediately after the frontline workers isolated for two weeks

  3. The 15-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15) of exposed group

    It's a self-administered measure assessing subjective common mental health with a total score of 0-30. Higher score means a worse outcome.

    Measured: immediately after the frontline workers going back to normal work for one month

  4. The 15-item Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15) of non-exposed group

    It's a self-administered measure assessing subjective common mental health with a total score of 0-30. Higher score means a worse outcome.

    Measured: During the procedure of collecting faecal samples from non-exposed group

  5. The 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) of exposed group

    It's a self-report measure widely used for major depression screening with a total score of 0-27. Higher score means a worse outcome.

    Measured: immediately after the frontline workers come back to Xi'an

  6. The 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) of exposed group

    It's a self-report measure widely used for major depression screening with a total score of 0-27. Higher score means a worse outcome.

    Measured: immediately after the frontline workers isolated for two weeks

  7. The 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) of exposed group

    It's a self-report measure widely used for major depression screening with a total score of 0-27. Higher score means a worse outcome.

    Measured: immediately after the frontline workers going back to normal work for one month

  8. The 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) of non-exposed group

    It's a self-report measure widely used for major depression screening with a total score of 0-27. Higher score means a worse outcome.

    Measured: During the procedure of collecting faecal samples from non-exposed group

  9. The 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) of exposed group

    It is a practical self-report anxiety questionnaire with a total score of 0-21. Higher score means a worse outcome.

    Measured: immediately after the frontline workers come back to Xi'an

  10. The 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) of exposed group

    It is a practical self-report anxiety questionnaire with a total score of 0-21. Higher score means a worse outcome.

    Measured: immediately after the frontline workers isolated for two weeks

  11. The 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) of exposed group

    It is a practical self-report anxiety questionnaire with a total score of 0-21. Higher score means a worse outcome.

    Measured: immediately after the frontline workers going back to normal work for one month

  12. The 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) of non-exposed group

    It is a practical self-report anxiety questionnaire with a total score of 0-21. Higher score means a worse outcome.

    Measured: During the procedure of collecting faecal samples from non-exposed group

  13. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) of exposed group

    It is a self-report questionnaire that is widely used to assess several dimensions of sleep with a total score of 0-21. Higher score means a worse outcome

    Measured: immediately after the frontline workers come back to Xi'an

  14. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) of exposed group

    It is a self-report questionnaire that is widely used to assess several dimensions of sleep with a total score of 0-21. Higher score means a worse outcome

    Measured: immediately after the frontline workers isolated for two weeks

  15. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) of exposed group

    It is a self-report questionnaire that is widely used to assess several dimensions of sleep with a total score of 0-21. Higher score means a worse outcome

    Measured: immediately after the frontline workers going back to normal work for one month

  16. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) of non-exposed group

    It is a self-report questionnaire that is widely used to assess several dimensions of sleep with a total score of 0-21. Higher score means a worse outcome

    Measured: During the procedure of collecting faecal samples from non-exposed group

  17. The Symptom Check List 90 (SCL-90) of exposed group

    It is a self-report instrument widely used to measure clinical psychiatric symptoms and mental health status, with a total score of 0-360. Higher means a worse outcome.

    Measured: immediately after the frontline workers come back to Xi'an

  18. The Symptom Check List 90 (SCL-90) of exposed group

    It is a self-report instrument widely used to measure clinical psychiatric symptoms and mental health status, with a total score of 0-360. Higher means a worse outcome.

    Measured: immediately after the frontline workers isolated for two weeks

  19. The Symptom Check List 90 (SCL-90) of exposed group

    It is a self-report instrument widely used to measure clinical psychiatric symptoms and mental health status, with a total score of 0-360. Higher means a worse outcome.

    Measured: immediately after the frontline workers going back to normal work for one month

  20. The Symptom Check List 90 (SCL-90) of non-exposed group

    It is a self-report instrument widely used to measure clinical psychiatric symptoms and mental health status, with a total score of 0-360. Higher means a worse outcome.

    Measured: During the procedure of collecting faecal samples from non-exposed group

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jun 2020
  2. Study start24 Jun 2020
  3. Primary completion4 Dec 2020
  4. Study completion24 Dec 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
180 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04443075
Sponsor's protocol ID
XJTU1AF2020LSK-022
Acronym
AGMFMSS
Status last verified
Mar 2021
First submitted
3 Jun 2020
Last updated
3 Mar 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Wang C, Horby PW, Hayden FG, Gao GF. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):470-473. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30185-9. Epub 2020 Jan 24. No abstract available.

    PubMed 31986257
  • Kang L, Li Y, Hu S, Chen M, Yang C, Yang BX, Wang Y, Hu J, Lai J, Ma X, Chen J, Guan L, Wang G, Ma H, Liu Z. The mental health of medical workers in Wuhan, China dealing with the 2019 novel coronavirus. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;7(3):e14. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30047-X. Epub 2020 Feb 5. No abstract available.

    PubMed 32035030
  • Malan-Muller S, Valles-Colomer M, Raes J, Lowry CA, Seedat S, Hemmings SMJ. The Gut Microbiome and Mental Health: Implications for Anxiety- and Trauma-Related Disorders. OMICS. 2018 Feb;22(2):90-107. doi: 10.1089/omi.2017.0077. Epub 2017 Aug 2.

    PubMed 28767318
  • Foster JA, McVey Neufeld KA. Gut-brain axis: how the microbiome influences anxiety and depression. Trends Neurosci. 2013 May;36(5):305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Feb 4.

    PubMed 23384445
  • Wu P, Fang Y, Guan Z, Fan B, Kong J, Yao Z, Liu X, Fuller CJ, Susser E, Lu J, Hoven CW. The psychological impact of the SARS epidemic on hospital employees in China: exposure, risk perception, and altruistic acceptance of risk. Can J Psychiatry. 2009 May;54(5):302-11. doi: 10.1177/070674370905400504.

    PubMed 19497162
  • Rieder R, Wisniewski PJ, Alderman BL, Campbell SC. Microbes and mental health: A review. Brain Behav Immun. 2017 Nov;66:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2017.01.016. Epub 2017 Jan 25.

    PubMed 28131791

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, run by First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Gut microbiome composition of exposed group (time frame: immediately after the frontline workers come back to Xi'an). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04443075, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in