A. Longitudinal Cohort n=400SURROuNDNCT04438161
Study to Understand Risk and Resilience Opportunity for Newborns After Delivery
A study testing PERCCS: Personalized Education Regarding Clinical and Community Supports in people with A. Longitudinal Cohort n=400 and B. Lower Risk (n=45) and Higher Risk (n=105) Randomized 2:1 to PERCCS Intervention, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Childhood Maltreatment (CM) has highly deleterious effects on human development and is a preventable known cause of enduring psychopathology in the United States. Infants and young children are at particularly high risk for physical harm from abuse and neglect, comprising over 60% of all child maltreatment fatalities. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- A. Longitudinal Cohort n=400, B. Lower Risk (n=45) and Higher Risk (n=105) Randomized 2:1 to PERCCS Intervention
- What is being tested?
- PERCCS: Personalized Education Regarding Clinical and Community Supports
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 399 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 26 Jan 2021to 31 Aug 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants will be Missouri residents
- 18 years of age or older
- Engaged in the BJC Healthcare Obstetrics or Newborn Services
Who cannot join
- Participants who are not Missouri residents
- Under the age of 18 years
- Not engaged in the BJC Healthcare Obstetrics or Newborn Services.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Identification of Newborns at High Risk for the Occurrence of Preventable Child Maltreatment: Phase 3 of Project 3 in the Overall Center for Innovation in Child Maltreatment Policy, Research, and Training (CICM), a Capstone Centers Grant.
Childhood Maltreatment (CM) has highly deleterious effects on human development and is a preventable known cause of enduring psychopathology in the United States. Infants and young children are at particularly high risk for physical harm from abuse and neglect, comprising over 60% of all child maltreatment fatalities. An increasing number of studies point to the ability to target prevention of CM by estimating individual specific risk at the time of birth, on the basis of readily-accessible data elements of birth records. This clinical trial was a small randomized controlled trial embedded within a prospective longitudinal study, in which families of infants recruited prenatally or in the newborn period are randomized to an enhanced level of engagement in resource navigation, which we refer to as Personalized Education Regarding Clinical and Community Supports (PERCCS). The enhancement involves keying recommendations for evidence-informed interventions for the prevention of CM to established risk factors for ascertained within a family.
The parent longitudinal cohort study involves enrollment of a diverse population of families of newborns (prenatally or in the immediate postnatal period) for the purpose of ascertaining sociodemographic, psychological (eg. parental stress) and family psychiatric risk factors for (a) child maltreatment (b) unmet service needs, and (c) adverse behavioral outcomes of the children. Families are contacted quarterly to track acquisition of support services that are relevant to the prevention of child maltreatment. At age 18 months early childhood behavioral outcomes are ascertained and official-report child maltreatment records from the State of Missouri are individually cross-matched with identifiers of the children and their parents.
Read more
Two major outcomes are examined:
The first is whether the engagement protocol results in a higher level of acquisition and active participation in recommended preventive intervention services by the families (including home visitation, parental mental health care, evidence-based parenting education, and others delineated in Table 1, see below).
The second is the rate of child maltreatment (CM) ascertained in official Missouri state administrative records for which individual informed consent to individually-cross reference is obtained by the families in the course of their enrollment in the parent longitudinal study.
Read the detailed description
Sample: The sample will be recruited from the Washington University School of Medicine Obstetrical Service within the Barnes Jewish Christian (BJC) Health System, on which there are over 3000 Missouri childbirths per year, serving an urban population of families that are disproportionately affected by poverty. Fifty-five per cent of patients report a family income less than $20,000, 65% of the mothers are unemployed, and the majority of the newborns are on Medicaid or are Medicaid-eligible. In preliminary screening efforts, over one third of the mothers reported their own childhood histories of maltreatment, and approximately one half score in the clinical range for depressive symptomatology.
Methods: A schematic summarizing study enrollment, participant randomization, and ascertainment of outcomes is provided in Figure 1.
Study Approach and Design: Consent was in three phases to reduce burden on mothers. A total of N=400 families were the target for recruitment in the parent longitudinal study. The consent period was delayed by the onset of COVID and switching to virtual recruitment. A total of 399 were consented during phase I which included a limited screen and match to birth records. Phase II included the full risk screen with referrals. Phase III consent was conducted from the Phase II consents for for nested RCT on a rolling basis. Among those who fall in an elevated risk category (or 3+ risks) or lower category (under 3) we planned to randomize 150 families 2:1 to Personalized Education Regarding Clinical and Community Supports (PERCCS) versus Usual Care. The total final recruitment was 105 (78 from the higher risk count group and 27 from the lower risk count group). Risk counts for phase III assignment were calculated by the total number of established predictors of risk for CM ascertained from birth records. Utilization of community-based evidence-informed support services were ascertained at baseline and quarterly thereafter for all study participants. PERCCS responded to the full array of risks present in Table 1. Official-report Child Maltreatment data from Missouri state administrative data will be individually linked with participant research records when the children reach 18 months of age.
PERCCS involves i) a review with the mother of all family CM risks ascertained in the context of their own individual screening ii) recommendations of community and clinical interventions which substantively respond to those risks and are available to the subject (on the basis of each individual subject's zip code, insurance, and eligibility for the interventions), collectively the personalized family resource plan, iii) facilitation of contact between the subject and the respective provider agencies to initiate enrollment; and iv) authorization for the research team to share the personalized risk profile and support recommendations with the infant's outpatient primary care provider.
The community and clinical supports responsive to specific risk factors are listed in Table 1, which summarizes the array of evidence-informed preventions that will be presented to the families, and the correspondence with each to specific CM risks ascertained within a family. Table 2 depicts the set of scripts which are used by the study team to standardize all aspects of the review of endorsed risks, their potential adverse effects on parenting, and the opportunities for mitigation through evidence-informed intervention.
All participants will receive care as usual, including the provision of a summary document itemizing key community supports for families of infants, a continuously-updated local community resource handbook, a published parenting guide, and opportunity to enroll free-of-charge in a virtual parenting education and developmental surveillance program, babynavigator.com.
Key Measures:
The Utilization of Community Services (UCS) is a survey that will be used to ascertain engagement of families in community supports and interventions, including tracking of both frequency and duration. This survey is completed at the time of study enrollment to establish a baseline, and quarterly thereafter until the completion of the study when a child reaches 18 months of age.
State Records: The second primary outcome, rate of child maltreatment, will rely on official state records from the State of Missouri Department of Social Services. Participants are aware that accessing service records or CM report data are retrospective when acquired and do not pose any risk or liability to them nor can it impact services received.
Planned Statistical Analyses:
- Intent-to-treat analysis of impact of PERCCS on service utilization. We will calculate the total proportion of evidence-informed services indicated by risk profiles of all families within each group (the intervention group and the control group) and compare the groups using chi square analysis.
II. Intent-to-treat analysis of the impact of PERCCS on the occurrence of child maltreatment. We compared the rate of official-report abuse/neglect between the groups using chi square analysis.
III. (Secondary) We planned to conduct logistic regression analysis simultaneously examining the effects of risk count and service access on official report child maltreatment outcome, but the final sample size precluded multivariate assessment.
- Conditions
- A. Longitudinal Cohort n=400, B. Lower Risk (n=45) and Higher Risk (n=105) Randomized 2:1 to PERCCS Intervention
- Being tested
- PERCCS: Personalized Education Regarding Clinical and Community Supports
- Keywords
- Child maltreatment, preventative intervention, case management, newborn, infancy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PERCCS: Personalized Education Regarding Clinical and Community SupportsBehavioural
Also called Clinical and Community Supports
A brief follow-up to the screening provided to 50% of the consented families (randomly assigned) that links their specific familial risks to community interventions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Low Risk | Active comparator | Low risk natural history study (planned was n=250*; actual n=174). Of the 174, 105 families consented to the RCT
*Participants who consented to the RCT were randomized 2:1 PERCCS:Control, and the randomization will be within successive sets of three families who fall in either "high risk" birth record risk counts (planned n=105l; actual n=78) families for child maltreatment or "low risk" counts (planned n=45; actual n=27) families. Receives: Behavioral: PERCCS: Personalized Education Regarding Clinical and Community Supports |
| High Risk | Experimental | High risk families in prospective longitudinal study of newborns (planned n=150*; actual n=225). A total of 150 families were planned and a final 105 families consented to the RCT
*Participants were randomized 2:1 PERCCS:Control, and the randomization in successive sets of three families who fall in either "high risk" birth record risk counts (planned n=105; actual n=78) families for child maltreatment or "low risk" counts (planned n=45; actual n=27) families.
Participants in this arm will be randomized to:
1. PERCCS (see attached figure and table for details)
2. Care as Usual Receives: Behavioral: PERCCS: Personalized Education Regarding Clinical and Community Supports |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Service Utilization
Mean number of evidence-informed services indicated by risk profiles of all families within group acquired over the course of follow-up.
Measured: Not more than 18 months postpartum
Child Maltreatment
Rate of official reports of child maltreatment, ascertained from records of the Missouri Department of Social Services at age 18 months. Child Maltreatment (number of cases of investigated or assessed child abuse and neglect) as measured by official state administrative records
Measured: Not more than 18 months postpartum
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jun 2020
- Study start26 Jan 2021
- Primary completion31 Aug 2025
- Study completion31 Aug 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for A. Longitudinal Cohort n=400Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Washington University School of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 399 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Washington University School of Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mini Tandon, DO, Principal investigator, Faculty
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04438161
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 202007199
- Other IDs
- 1P50HD096719
- Acronym
- SURROuND
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 16 Jun 2020
- Last updated
- 15 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Constantino JN. Child Maltreatment Prevention and the Scope of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2016 Apr;25(2):157-65. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2015.11.003. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
PubMed 26980121Jaffee SR. Child Maltreatment and Risk for Psychopathology in Childhood and Adulthood. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017 May 8;13:525-551. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045005. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
PubMed 28375720US DHHS, Children's Bureau (2017). Child Maltreatment 2015. Washington, DC: Author.U.S.
Wu SS, Ma CX, Carter RL, Ariet M, Feaver EA, Resnick MB, Roth J. Risk factors for infant maltreatment: a population-based study. Child Abuse Negl. 2004 Dec;28(12):1253-64. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.07.005.
PubMed 15607768Putnam-Hornstein, E., & Needell, B. (2011). Predictors of child protective service contact between birth and age five: An examination of California's 2002 birth cohort. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(8), 1337-1344.
Gilbert R, Widom CS, Browne K, Fergusson D, Webb E, Janson S. Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries. Lancet. 2009 Jan 3;373(9657):68-81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61706-7. Epub 2008 Dec 4.
PubMed 19056114Paulsell, D., Avellar, S., Sama Martin, E., & Del Grosso, P. Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness Review: Executive Summary. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2011. Washington, DC.
Jonson-Reid M, Kohl PL, Drake B. Child and adult outcomes of chronic child maltreatment. Pediatrics. 2012 May;129(5):839-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2529. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
PubMed 22529281Tandon M, Jonson-Reid M, Constantino JN. Documenting Opportunity for Systematic Identification and Mitigation of Risk for Child Maltreatment. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Nov;61(11):1313-1316. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2022.05.008. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
PubMed 35690303
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Identification of Newborns at High Risk for the Occurrence of Preventable Child Maltreatment: Phase 3 of Project 3 in the Overall Center for Innovation in Child Maltreatment Policy, Research, and Training (CICM), a Capstone Centers Grant.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04438161
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SURROuND / 202007199
- Conditions
- A. Longitudinal Cohort n=400, B. Lower Risk (n=45) and Higher Risk (n=105) Randomized 2:1 to PERCCS Intervention
- Keywords
- Child maltreatment, preventative intervention, case management, newborn, infancy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 399 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Washington University School of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Study start
- 26 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 15 Jun 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Childhood Maltreatment (CM) has highly deleterious effects on human development and is a preventable known cause of enduring psychopathology in the United States. Infants and young children are at particularly high risk for physical harm from abuse and neglect, comprising over 60% of all child maltreatment fatalities. An increasing number of studies point to the ability to target prevention of CM by estimating individual specific risk at the time of birth, on the basis of readily-accessible data elements of birth records. This clinical trial was a small randomized controlled trial embedded within a prospective longitudinal study, in which families of infants recruited prenatally or in the newborn period are randomized to an enhanced level of engagement in resource navigation, which we refer to as Personalized Education Regarding Clinical and Community Supports (PERCCS). The enhancement involves keying recommendations for evidence-informed interventions for the prevention of CM to established risk factors for ascertained within a family.
The parent longitudinal cohort study involves enrollment of a diverse population of families of newborns (prenatally or in the immediate postnatal period) for the purpose of ascertaining sociodemographic, psychological (eg. parental stress) and family psychiatric risk factors for (a) child maltreatment (b) unmet service needs, and (c) adverse behavioral outcomes of the children. Families are contacted quarterly to track acquisition of support services that are relevant to the prevention of child maltreatment. At age 18 months early childhood behavioral outcomes are ascertained and official-report child maltreatment records from the State of Missouri are individually cross-matched with identifiers of the children and their parents.
Two major outcomes are examined:
The first is whether the engagement protocol results in a higher level of acquisition and active participation in recommended preventive intervention services by the families (including home visitation, parental mental health care, evidence-based parenting education, and others delineated in Table 1, see below).
The second is the rate of child maltreatment (CM) ascertained in official Missouri state administrative records for which individual informed consent to individually-cross reference is obtained by the families in the course of their enrollment in the parent longitudinal study.
Detailed description
Sample: The sample will be recruited from the Washington University School of Medicine Obstetrical Service within the Barnes Jewish Christian (BJC) Health System, on which there are over 3000 Missouri childbirths per year, serving an urban population of families that are disproportionately affected by poverty. Fifty-five per cent of patients report a family income less than $20,000, 65% of the mothers are unemployed, and the majority of the newborns are on Medicaid or are Medicaid-eligible. In preliminary screening efforts, over one third of the mothers reported their own childhood histories of maltreatment, and approximately one half score in the clinical range for depressive symptomatology.
Methods: A schematic summarizing study enrollment, participant randomization, and ascertainment of outcomes is provided in Figure 1.
Study Approach and Design: Consent was in three phases to reduce burden on mothers. A total of N=400 families were the target for recruitment in the parent longitudinal study. The consent period was delayed by the onset of COVID and switching to virtual recruitment. A total of 399 were consented during phase I which included a limited screen and match to birth records. Phase II included the full risk screen with referrals. Phase III consent was conducted from the Phase II consents for for nested RCT on a rolling basis. Among those who fall in an elevated risk category (or 3+ risks) or lower category (under 3) we planned to randomize 150 families 2:1 to Personalized Education Regarding Clinical and Community Supports (PERCCS) versus Usual Care. The total final recruitment was 105 (78 from the higher risk count group and 27 from the lower risk count group). Risk counts for phase III assignment were calculated by the total number of established predictors of risk for CM ascertained from birth records. Utilization of community-based evidence-informed support services were ascertained at baseline and quarterly thereafter for all study participants. PERCCS responded to the full array of risks present in Table 1. Official-report Child Maltreatment data from Missouri state administrative data will be individually linked with participant research records when the children reach 18 months of age.
PERCCS involves i) a review with the mother of all family CM risks ascertained in the context of their own individual screening ii) recommendations of community and clinical interventions which substantively respond to those risks and are available to the subject (on the basis of each individual subject's zip code, insurance, and eligibility for the interventions), collectively the personalized family resource plan, iii) facilitation of contact between the subject and the respective provider agencies to initiate enrollment; and iv) authorization for the research team to share the personalized risk profile and support recommendations with the infant's outpatient primary care provider.
The community and clinical supports responsive to specific risk factors are listed in Table 1, which summarizes the array of evidence-informed preventions that will be presented to the families, and the correspondence with each to specific CM risks ascertained within a family. Table 2 depicts the set of scripts which are used by the study team to standardize all aspects of the review of endorsed risks, their potential adverse effects on parenting, and the opportunities for mitigation through evidence-informed intervention.
All participants will receive care as usual, including the provision of a summary document itemizing key community supports for families of infants, a continuously-updated local community resource handbook, a published parenting guide, and opportunity to enroll free-of-charge in a virtual parenting education and developmental surveillance program, babynavigator.com.
Key Measures:
The Utilization of Community Services (UCS) is a survey that will be used to ascertain engagement of families in community supports and interventions, including tracking of both frequency and duration. This survey is completed at the time of study enrollment to establish a baseline, and quarterly thereafter until the completion of the study when a child reaches 18 months of age.
State Records: The second primary outcome, rate of child maltreatment, will rely on official state records from the State of Missouri Department of Social Services. Participants are aware that accessing service records or CM report data are retrospective when acquired and do not pose any risk or liability to them nor can it impact services received.
Planned Statistical Analyses:
- Intent-to-treat analysis of impact of PERCCS on service utilization. We will calculate the total proportion of evidence-informed services indicated by risk profiles of all families within each group (the intervention group and the control group) and compare the groups using chi square analysis.
II. Intent-to-treat analysis of the impact of PERCCS on the occurrence of child maltreatment. We compared the rate of official-report abuse/neglect between the groups using chi square analysis.
III. (Secondary) We planned to conduct logistic regression analysis simultaneously examining the effects of risk count and service access on official report child maltreatment outcome, but the final sample size precluded multivariate assessment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Low Risk | Active comparator | Behavioral: PERCCS: Personalized Education Regarding Clinical and Community SupportsLow risk natural history study (planned was n=250*; actual n=174). Of the 174, 105 families consented to the RCT *Participants who consented to the RCT were randomized 2:1 PERCCS:Control, and the randomization will be within successive sets of three families who fall in either "high risk" birth record risk counts (planned n=105l; actual n=78) families for child maltreatment or "low risk" counts (planned n=45; actual n=27) families. |
| High Risk | Experimental | Behavioral: PERCCS: Personalized Education Regarding Clinical and Community SupportsHigh risk families in prospective longitudinal study of newborns (planned n=150*; actual n=225). A total of 150 families were planned and a final 105 families consented to the RCT *Participants were randomized 2:1 PERCCS:Control, and the randomization in successive sets of three families who fall in either "high risk" birth record risk counts (planned n=105; actual n=78) families for child maltreatment or "low risk" counts (planned n=45; actual n=27) families. Participants in this arm will be randomized to: 1. PERCCS (see attached figure and table for details) 2. Care as Usual |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Participants will be Missouri residents
- 18 years of age or older
- Engaged in the BJC Healthcare Obstetrics or Newborn Services
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Participants who are not Missouri residents
- Under the age of 18 years
- Not engaged in the BJC Healthcare Obstetrics or Newborn Services.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PERCCS: Personalized Education Regarding Clinical and Community SupportsAlso: Clinical and Community SupportsA brief follow-up to the screening provided to 50% of the consented families (randomly assigned) that links their specific familial risks to community interventions. | Behavioural | High Risk, Low Risk |
Primary outcome
Service Utilization
Time frame: Not more than 18 months postpartum
Mean number of evidence-informed services indicated by risk profiles of all families within group acquired over the course of follow-up.
Child Maltreatment
Time frame: Not more than 18 months postpartum
Rate of official reports of child maltreatment, ascertained from records of the Missouri Department of Social Services at age 18 months. Child Maltreatment (number of cases of investigated or assessed child abuse and neglect) as measured by official state administrative records
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jun 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 26980121Constantino JN. Child Maltreatment Prevention and the Scope of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2016 Apr;25(2):157-65. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2015.11.003. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
- Background: PubMed 28375720Jaffee SR. Child Maltreatment and Risk for Psychopathology in Childhood and Adulthood. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017 May 8;13:525-551. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045005. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
- BackgroundUS DHHS, Children's Bureau (2017). Child Maltreatment 2015. Washington, DC: Author.U.S.
- Background: PubMed 15607768Wu SS, Ma CX, Carter RL, Ariet M, Feaver EA, Resnick MB, Roth J. Risk factors for infant maltreatment: a population-based study. Child Abuse Negl. 2004 Dec;28(12):1253-64. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.07.005.
- BackgroundPutnam-Hornstein, E., & Needell, B. (2011). Predictors of child protective service contact between birth and age five: An examination of California's 2002 birth cohort. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(8), 1337-1344.
- Background: PubMed 19056114Gilbert R, Widom CS, Browne K, Fergusson D, Webb E, Janson S. Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries. Lancet. 2009 Jan 3;373(9657):68-81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61706-7. Epub 2008 Dec 4.
- BackgroundPaulsell, D., Avellar, S., Sama Martin, E., & Del Grosso, P. Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness Review: Executive Summary. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2011. Washington, DC.
- Background: PubMed 22529281Jonson-Reid M, Kohl PL, Drake B. Child and adult outcomes of chronic child maltreatment. Pediatrics. 2012 May;129(5):839-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2529. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35690303Tandon M, Jonson-Reid M, Constantino JN. Documenting Opportunity for Systematic Identification and Mitigation of Risk for Child Maltreatment. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Nov;61(11):1313-1316. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2022.05.008. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mini Tandon, DO principal investigator
Faculty
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PERCCS: Personalized Education Regarding Clinical and Community Supports in people with A. Longitudinal Cohort n=400 and B. Lower Risk (n=45) and Higher Risk (n=105) Randomized 2:1 to PERCCS Intervention, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Jun 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Service Utilization (time frame: Not more than 18 months postpartum). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04438161, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2026.