AzTrials
AzTrials

Colonic CancerCMENCT04434508

Open Versus Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy for Right Colon Cancer

A study testing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME and central v and Open right hemicolectomy with CME and central v in people with Colonic Cancer, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility, surgical, and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME and CVL compared to open surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Colonic Cancer
What is being tested?
laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME and central v and Open right hemicolectomy with CME and central v
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
90 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Jul 2017to 25 Jan 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with right colonic cancer

Who cannot join

  • Patients with distant metastasis, large tumors with extra-colonic invasion emergency presentation (bowel obstruction or perforation)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Ayman El Nakeeb

    Al Mansurah, Outside U.S and Canada, 35111

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Open Versus Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy With Complete Mesocolic Excision and Central Vascular Ligation for Right Colon Cancer. A Randomized Prospective Study.

The aim of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility, surgical, and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME and CVL compared to open surgery.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility, surgical, and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME and CVL compared to open surgery.

Enrolled patients in the study were randomized to either laparoscopic or open right hemicolectomy with CME and central vascular ligation. The randomization process was performed using a closed envelope method which was withdrawn in the outpatient clinic by a nurse.

The primary outcome was the number of lymph nodes (LNs) harvested among both groups. Secondary outcomes included operative time, blood loss, postoperative complications, and hospital stay.

Conditions
Colonic Cancer
Being tested
laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME and central v, Open right hemicolectomy with CME and central v
Keywords
Colonic Cancer, laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, complete mesocolic excision
Medical subject headings
Colonic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME and central vProcedure or surgery

    Also called LHC with CME

    laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME and central v

  • Open right hemicolectomy with CME and central vProcedure or surgery

    Also called ORH with CME

    Open right hemicolectomy with CME and central v

Study groups in NCT04434508
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME and central vActive comparatorlaparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME and central v
Receives: Procedure: laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME and central v
open right hemicolectomy with CME and central vActive comparatoropen right hemicolectomy with CME and central v
Receives: Procedure: Open right hemicolectomy with CME and central v

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. the number of lymph nodes (LNs) harvested among both groups

    the number of lymph nodes (LNs) harvested among both groups

    Measured: 30 DAYS

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. operative time

    operative time

    Measured: INTRAOPERATIVE

  2. blood loss,

    blood loss,

    Measured: intraoperative

  3. post-operative complications

    post-operative complications

    Measured: 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jun 2020
  2. Study start1 Jul 2017
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2020
  4. Study completion25 Jan 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Enrolled patients in the study were randomized to either laparoscopic or open right hemicolectomy with CME and central vascular ligation. The randomization process was performed using a closed envelope method which was withdrawn in the outpatient clinic by a nurse.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
90 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04434508
Sponsor's protocol ID
laparoscopic hemicolectomy
Acronym
CME
Status last verified
Jun 2020
First submitted
12 Jun 2020
Last updated
17 Jun 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Study Protocol

Publications

  • Cho MS, Baek SJ, Hur H, Soh Min B, Baik SH, Kyu Kim N. Modified complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for the treatment of right-sided colon cancer: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors. Ann Surg. 2015 Apr;261(4):708-15. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000831.

    PubMed 25072438
  • Vajda K, Horti I, Cserni G, Bori R, Sikorszki L. [Laparoscopic and open complete mesocolic excision in right-sided colon cancer compared with open and laparoscopic surgery]. Magy Seb. 2020 Mar;73(1):23-28. doi: 10.1556/1046.73.2020.1.3. Hungarian.

    PubMed 32172577
  • Dewulf M, Kalmar A, Vandenberk B, Muysoms F, Defoort B, Claeys D, Pletinckx P. Complete mesocolic excision does not increase short-term complications in laparoscopic left-sided colectomies: a comparative retrospective single-center study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Aug;404(5):557-564. doi: 10.1007/s00423-019-01797-8. Epub 2019 Jun 26.

    PubMed 31243573
  • Emmanuel A, Haji A. Complete mesocolic excision and extended (D3) lymphadenectomy for colonic cancer: is it worth that extra effort? A review of the literature. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Apr;31(4):797-804. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2502-0. Epub 2016 Jan 30.

    PubMed 26833471

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME and central v and Open right hemicolectomy with CME and central v in people with Colonic Cancer, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

the number of lymph nodes (LNs) harvested among both groups (time frame: 30 DAYS). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04434508, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jun 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in