Acute-On-Chronic Liver FailureNCT04431375
Efficacy of Addition of Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT) and Plasma Exchange to Tenofovir in Comparison to Monotherapy With Tenofovir in ACLF-HBV
A study testing Plasma Exchange, Tenofovir and Fecal Mircobiota Transplantation in people with Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure and Hepatitis B, run by Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India at 1 site in India.
Trial summary
A randomized controlled trial to study the efficacy of addition of FMT \& plasma exchange to tenofovir compared to monotherapy with tenofovir in patients with HBV reactivation who develops Acute on chronic liver failure. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure, Hepatitis B
- What is being tested?
- Plasma Exchange, Tenofovir and Fecal Mircobiota Transplantation
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndia
- Study dates
- 22 Jun 2020to 10 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age - 18-75 years
- Patients with ACLF - HBV reactivation according to APASL guidelines.
- MELD < 30 WITH AKI,HE
- MELD < 30 WITH OUT EXTRAHEPATIC FAILURE
Who cannot join
- MELD > 30
- Co existing hepatitis A,E,D
- HCC
- Sepsis
- Alcohol intake, substance abuse, HIV, IBD, chronic constipation or diarrhoea
- Allergy to plasma, protamine or heparin,
Show all 10Show fewer
- Active hemorrhage or disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)
- Unstable hemodynamics (e.g., blood pressure <90/60 mmHg, heart rate >100 bpm),
- Cerebral or myocardiac infarction
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
India1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110070
Dr G Srinivasa Reddy, MD, 01146300000, srinivasareddygolamari@gmail.com
About this study
A randomized controlled trial to study the efficacy of addition of FMT \& plasma exchange to tenofovir compared to monotherapy with tenofovir in patients with HBV reactivation who develops Acute on chronic liver failure.
In this study the patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomized to either receive Tenofovir or with FMT + plasma exchange along with Tenofovir . Blood samples \& stool samples will be taken \& analysis will be done accordingly .The patients are followed for 90 days MELD,APACHE \& SOFA scores are calculated.Then statistical analysis will be done to find whether the addition of plasma exchange \& FMT adds benefit compared to tenofovir treatment alone .
Read the detailed description
A randomized controlled trial to study the efficacy of addition of FMT \& plasma exchange to tenofovir compared to monotherapy with tenofovir in patients with HBV reactivation who develops Acute on chronic liver failure.
In this study the patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomized to either receive Tenofovir or with FMT + plasma exchange along with Tenofovir . Blood samples \& stool samples will be taken \& analysis will be done accordingly .The patients are followed for 90 days MELD,APACHE \& SOFA scores are calculated.Then statistical analysis will be done to find whether the addition of plasma exchange \& FMT adds benefit compared to tenofovir treatment alone .
Study period: 2 Years
Intervention:
The patients in Group A will receive T.Tenofovir [antiviral] 300mg per oral once a day .
The patients in Group B will receive Plasma exchange 2 sessions alternate day followed by FMT for 7 days and Tenofovir [antiviral] 300mg PO once a day .
Intravenous antibiotics will be given to all patients included in study empirically, because of high risk of infection in these patients. Patients with sepsis are excluded from the study.
Methodology for FMT - Fresh Stool [30 g] is obtained from donor <3 hr before FMT. 150 mL sterile 0.9N saline is added to sample \& homogenized in a blender. It is Continued 3 times in pulses of 20-30 secs, till homogenous suspension. Slow filtration is done with membrane filter (330µm) to give adequate time. Filtration is repeated 3 times. Patient is kept NPO for 4 hrs. prior to the instillation .100 ml of fresh filtrate is given for 7 days through naso-jejunal tube over 5-10 minutes .Patient is kept reclined at 45° for 4 hr. Normal diet is given after 2 hr of procedure. IV antibiotics are continued as per institutional protocol in case of sepsis.
Methodology for plasma exchange [PE] - Circulatory access will be established through a double lumen catheter via the patient's femoral vein. The total exchanged plasma volume will be 2500-3500 mL, and the Plasma Exchange rate will be 20-25 mL/min. Fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) will be supplied by the ILBS Blood Bank. Dexamethasone (5 mg) and heparin (2500 U) will be injected routinely before PE. Heparin will be neutralized at the end of PE by an injection of 20-50 mg protamine sulfate. PE will be repeated alternate day for a total of 2 sessions Adverse effects: FMT FMT - Sore throat and difficulty in deglutition secondary to naso-gastric tube insertion Plasma exchange PE
- Hypocalcemia
- Hypokalemia
- Metabolic alkalosis
- Hypotension
- Anaphylaxis
- TRALI TENOFOVIR Tenofovir
- Reversible proximal renal tubular toxicity.
- Reduced bone mineral density
- Manifestations of mitochondrial toxicity (i.e., neuropathy, myopathy, lactic acidosis
Stopping rule of study:
- Allergic reactions except mild drug reactions
- Arterial hypotension or development of shock /Hypertension
- Arrhythmias
- Development or progression of organ failures during therapy
- Transfusion related lung injury
- Uncontrolled Bleeding or DIC
- Severe dyselectrolytemia( k+<2.5 or >5.5)
- Seizures/tetany
- Patients who are undergoing or listed for Transplantation
- Conditions
- Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure, Hepatitis B
- Being tested
- Plasma Exchange, Tenofovir, Fecal Mircobiota Transplantation
- Medical subject headings
- Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure, Hepatitis B
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Plasma ExchangeBiological
Plasma exchange 2 sessions alternate day followed by FMT for 7 days and Tenofovir [antiviral] 300mg PO once a day .
TenofovirDrug
Tenofovir [antiviral] 300mg PO once a day .
Fecal Mircobiota TransplantationOther
FMT for 7 days
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| plasma Exchange+Tenofovir+FMT | Experimental | Subjects will receive Plasma exchange 2 sessions alternate day followed by FMT for 7 days and Tenofovir [antiviral] 300mg PO once a day . Receives: Biological: Plasma Exchange; Drug: Tenofovir; Other: Fecal Mircobiota Transplantation |
| Tenofovir | Active comparator | TabletTenofovir [antiviral] 300mg per oral once a day Receives: Drug: Tenofovir |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall survival in both groups
Measured: Day 28
Secondary outcomes (27)
Overall survival in both groups
Measured: 3 months
Reduction in HBV DNA level
Measured: 14 days
Reduction in HBV DNA level
Measured: 60 days
Reduction in HBV DNA level
Measured: 90 days
Reduction in CTP Score in both groups
CTP Score ranges from 5 to 15 5=good 15=worst
Measured: 14 days
Reduction in CTP Score in both groups
CTP Score ranges from 5 to 15 5=good 15=worst
Measured: 30 days
Reduction in CTP Score in both groups
CTP Score ranges from 5 to 15 5=good 15=worst
Measured: 60 days
Reduction in CTP Score in both groups
CTP Score ranges from 5 to 15 5=good 15=worst
Measured: 90 days
Reduction in MELD Score in both groups
MELD Score ranges from 6 to 40 6=good 40=worst
Measured: 14 days
Reduction in MELD Score in both groups
MELD Score ranges from 6 to 40 6=good 40=worst
Measured: 30 days
Reduction in MELD Score in both groups
MELD Score ranges from 6 to 40 6=good 40=worst
Measured: 60 days
Reduction in MELD Score in both groups
MELD Score ranges from 6 to 40 6=good 40=worst
Measured: 90 days
Percentage of patient's with improvement in hepatic failure calculated by MELD Na and CTP scores.
Measured: 14 days
Percentage of patient's with improvement in hepatic failure calculated by MELD Na
Measured: 30 days
Percentage of patient's with improvement in hepatic failure calculated by CTP scores.
Measured: 30 days
Percentage of patient's with improvement in hepatic failure calculated by MELD Na
Measured: 60 days
Percentage of patient's with improvement in hepatic failure calculated by CTP scores.
Measured: 60 days
Percentage of patient's with improvement in hepatic failure calculated by MELD Na.
Measured: 90 days
Percentage of patient's with improvement in hepatic failure calculated by CTP scores.
Measured: 90 days
Change in microbiota profile in both groups
Measured: 10 days
Change in microbiota profile in both groups
Measured: 30 days
Change in microbiota profile in both groups
Measured: 60 days
Change in microbiota profile in both groups
Measured: 90 days
Change in plasma cytokine profile in both groups
Measured: 10 days
Change in plasma cytokine profile in both groups
Measured: 28 days
Change in plasma cytokine profile in both groups
Measured: 60 days
Number of patients with adverse Events in both groups
Measured: 90 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jun 2020
- Study start22 Jun 2020
- Primary completion10 Jun 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion10 Jun 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute-On-Chronic Liver FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, IndiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04431375
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ILBS-ACLF-05
- Status last verified
- Jan 2022
- First submitted
- 4 Jun 2020
- Last updated
- 31 Jan 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Jan 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of Addition of Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT) and Plasma Exchange to Tenofovir in Comparison to Monotherapy With Tenofovir in ACLF-HBV
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04431375
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ILBS-ACLF-05
- Conditions
- Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure, Hepatitis B
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, IndiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 22 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Jun 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 10 Jun 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A randomized controlled trial to study the efficacy of addition of FMT \& plasma exchange to tenofovir compared to monotherapy with tenofovir in patients with HBV reactivation who develops Acute on chronic liver failure.
In this study the patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomized to either receive Tenofovir or with FMT + plasma exchange along with Tenofovir . Blood samples \& stool samples will be taken \& analysis will be done accordingly .The patients are followed for 90 days MELD,APACHE \& SOFA scores are calculated.Then statistical analysis will be done to find whether the addition of plasma exchange \& FMT adds benefit compared to tenofovir treatment alone .
Detailed description
A randomized controlled trial to study the efficacy of addition of FMT \& plasma exchange to tenofovir compared to monotherapy with tenofovir in patients with HBV reactivation who develops Acute on chronic liver failure.
In this study the patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomized to either receive Tenofovir or with FMT + plasma exchange along with Tenofovir . Blood samples \& stool samples will be taken \& analysis will be done accordingly .The patients are followed for 90 days MELD,APACHE \& SOFA scores are calculated.Then statistical analysis will be done to find whether the addition of plasma exchange \& FMT adds benefit compared to tenofovir treatment alone .
Study period: 2 Years
Intervention:
The patients in Group A will receive T.Tenofovir [antiviral] 300mg per oral once a day .
The patients in Group B will receive Plasma exchange 2 sessions alternate day followed by FMT for 7 days and Tenofovir [antiviral] 300mg PO once a day .
Intravenous antibiotics will be given to all patients included in study empirically, because of high risk of infection in these patients. Patients with sepsis are excluded from the study.
Methodology for FMT - Fresh Stool [30 g] is obtained from donor <3 hr before FMT. 150 mL sterile 0.9N saline is added to sample \& homogenized in a blender. It is Continued 3 times in pulses of 20-30 secs, till homogenous suspension. Slow filtration is done with membrane filter (330µm) to give adequate time. Filtration is repeated 3 times. Patient is kept NPO for 4 hrs. prior to the instillation .100 ml of fresh filtrate is given for 7 days through naso-jejunal tube over 5-10 minutes .Patient is kept reclined at 45° for 4 hr. Normal diet is given after 2 hr of procedure. IV antibiotics are continued as per institutional protocol in case of sepsis.
Methodology for plasma exchange [PE] - Circulatory access will be established through a double lumen catheter via the patient's femoral vein. The total exchanged plasma volume will be 2500-3500 mL, and the Plasma Exchange rate will be 20-25 mL/min. Fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) will be supplied by the ILBS Blood Bank. Dexamethasone (5 mg) and heparin (2500 U) will be injected routinely before PE. Heparin will be neutralized at the end of PE by an injection of 20-50 mg protamine sulfate. PE will be repeated alternate day for a total of 2 sessions Adverse effects: FMT FMT - Sore throat and difficulty in deglutition secondary to naso-gastric tube insertion Plasma exchange PE
- Hypocalcemia
- Hypokalemia
- Metabolic alkalosis
- Hypotension
- Anaphylaxis
- TRALI TENOFOVIR Tenofovir
- Reversible proximal renal tubular toxicity.
- Reduced bone mineral density
- Manifestations of mitochondrial toxicity (i.e., neuropathy, myopathy, lactic acidosis
Stopping rule of study:
- Allergic reactions except mild drug reactions
- Arterial hypotension or development of shock /Hypertension
- Arrhythmias
- Development or progression of organ failures during therapy
- Transfusion related lung injury
- Uncontrolled Bleeding or DIC
- Severe dyselectrolytemia( k+<2.5 or >5.5)
- Seizures/tetany
- Patients who are undergoing or listed for Transplantation
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| plasma Exchange+Tenofovir+FMT | Experimental | Biological: Plasma Exchange, Drug: Tenofovir, Other: Fecal Mircobiota TransplantationSubjects will receive Plasma exchange 2 sessions alternate day followed by FMT for 7 days and Tenofovir [antiviral] 300mg PO once a day . |
| Tenofovir | Active comparator | Drug: TenofovirTabletTenofovir [antiviral] 300mg per oral once a day |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age - 18-75 years
- Patients with ACLF - HBV reactivation according to APASL guidelines.
- MELD < 30 WITH AKI,HE
- MELD < 30 WITH OUT EXTRAHEPATIC FAILURE
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- MELD > 30
- Co existing hepatitis A,E,D
- HCC
- Sepsis
- Alcohol intake, substance abuse, HIV, IBD, chronic constipation or diarrhoea
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Plasma ExchangePlasma exchange 2 sessions alternate day followed by FMT for 7 days and Tenofovir [antiviral] 300mg PO once a day . | Biological | plasma Exchange+Tenofovir+FMT |
| TenofovirTenofovir [antiviral] 300mg PO once a day . | Drug | Tenofovir, plasma Exchange+Tenofovir+FMT |
| Fecal Mircobiota TransplantationFMT for 7 days | Other | plasma Exchange+Tenofovir+FMT |
Primary outcome
Overall survival in both groups
Time frame: Day 28
27 secondary outcomes
Overall survival in both groups
Time frame: 3 months
Reduction in HBV DNA level
Time frame: 14 days
Reduction in HBV DNA level
Time frame: 60 days
Reduction in HBV DNA level
Time frame: 90 days
Reduction in CTP Score in both groups
Time frame: 14 days
Reduction in CTP Score in both groups
Time frame: 30 days
Reduction in CTP Score in both groups
Time frame: 60 days
Reduction in CTP Score in both groups
Time frame: 90 days
Reduction in MELD Score in both groups
Time frame: 14 days
Reduction in MELD Score in both groups
Time frame: 30 days
Reduction in MELD Score in both groups
Time frame: 60 days
Reduction in MELD Score in both groups
Time frame: 90 days
Percentage of patient's with improvement in hepatic failure calculated by MELD Na and CTP scores.
Time frame: 14 days
Percentage of patient's with improvement in hepatic failure calculated by MELD Na
Time frame: 30 days
Percentage of patient's with improvement in hepatic failure calculated by CTP scores.
Time frame: 30 days
Percentage of patient's with improvement in hepatic failure calculated by MELD Na
Time frame: 60 days
Percentage of patient's with improvement in hepatic failure calculated by CTP scores.
Time frame: 60 days
Percentage of patient's with improvement in hepatic failure calculated by MELD Na.
Time frame: 90 days
Percentage of patient's with improvement in hepatic failure calculated by CTP scores.
Time frame: 90 days
Change in microbiota profile in both groups
Time frame: 10 days
Change in microbiota profile in both groups
Time frame: 30 days
Change in microbiota profile in both groups
Time frame: 60 days
Change in microbiota profile in both groups
Time frame: 90 days
Change in plasma cytokine profile in both groups
Time frame: 10 days
Change in plasma cytokine profile in both groups
Time frame: 28 days
Change in plasma cytokine profile in both groups
Time frame: 60 days
Number of patients with adverse Events in both groups
Time frame: 90 days
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Jan 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure
Not yet recruiting
Double Plasma Separation and Adsorption in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (DPMAS-ACLF Trial)
Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)
Not yet recruiting
Vitamin C for Acute Kidney Injury in ACLF With Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)
RecruitingObservational study
CytOSorb TreatMent Of Critically Ill PatientS Registry
Septic Shock, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Not yet recruiting
Very Low-volume Plasma Exchange in ACLF
Acute on Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)
Recruiting
A Novel Extracorporeal Liver Support Therapy In ALCF and to Evaluate the Efficacy of DIALIVE 2.0, a Liver Dialysis Device.
Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF), Liver Cirrhosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Plasma Exchange, Tenofovir and Fecal Mircobiota Transplantation in people with Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure and Hepatitis B, run by Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India at 1 site in India.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Dr G. Srinivasa Reddy, MD (01146300000, srinivasareddygolamari@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall survival in both groups (time frame: Day 28). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jan 2022.