AzTrials
AzTrials

DepressionNCT04428112

Rural Dementia Caregiver Project

A study testing Building Better Caregivers Workshop in people with Depression and Stress, Psychological, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Rural caregivers face challenges of geographic isolation and lower health care access and quality. Many rural dementia caregivers experience serious health consequences due to caregiving responsibilities that can limit their ability to maintain their caregiving role. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Depression, Stress, Psychological, Self Efficacy
What is being tested?
Building Better Caregivers Workshop
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
418 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
5 Jun 2020to 16 Oct 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged 18 years or older
  • Caring for person with dementia
  • Able to read and write in English
  • Able to access the internet
  • Providing care for ≥ 10 hours per week
  • Reporting a minimum stress level of 4 or more on a 10-point scale
  • Living in rural area of United States (self-identify or zip code is a Rural Urban Commuting Area Codes (RUCA) defined rural area)

Who cannot join

  • Have an anticipated inability to complete the 12-month follow-up (e.g., planned travel)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of California, San Francisco

    San Francisco, California, 94118

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Online Small-Group Self-Management Workshop for Rural Caregivers of Individuals With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias

Rural caregivers face challenges of geographic isolation and lower health care access and quality. Many rural dementia caregivers experience serious health consequences due to caregiving responsibilities that can limit their ability to maintain their caregiving role. Thus, there is a pressing need for effective, scalable, and accessible programs to support rural dementia caregivers.

Online programs offer a convenient and readily translatable option for program delivery because they can be accessed by caregivers in the home and at the convenience of the user. Building Better Caregivers is an online 6-week, interactive, small-group self-management, social support, and skills-building workshop developed for caregivers of individuals with Alzheimer's disease or related dementia.

Read more

The investigators will conduct a hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomized controlled trial that will enroll and randomize 640 rural dementia caregivers into two groups: the intervention (workshop) group and the attention control group. Caregivers will be recruited throughout the United States. Primary outcomes will be caregiver stress and depressive symptoms. The investigators hypothesize that stress scores and depressive symptoms will be significantly improved at 12 months in the intervention group versus control group. The investigators will also identify key strengths (facilitators) and weaknesses (barriers) of workshop implementation. The investigators will use the RE-AIM implementation framework and a mixed methods approach to identify implementation characteristics pertinent to both caregivers and rural community organizations.

If the Building Better Caregivers workshop is proven to be effective, this research has the potential to open new research horizons, particularly on how to reach and effectively support isolated dementia caregivers in rural areas with an intervention that is scalable, even in low-resourced settings. If the workshop can achieve its goals with rural dementia caregivers, some of those most isolated, it would also be expected to be scalable in other low-resourced settings (e.g., in urban or suburban environments).

Being tested
Building Better Caregivers Workshop, Attention Control
Keywords
Caregiver, Caregiving
Medical subject headings
Depression, Stress, Psychological, Social Isolation, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Dementia, Alzheimer Disease, Dementia, Vascular, Lewy Body Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Building Better Caregivers WorkshopBehavioural

    Workshops consist of small group or about 20-25 persons. Two peer co-facilitators (caregiver themselves) will guide workshop activities. Participants will receive a workshop booklet. Each week, participants will log on at least 2-3 times for a total time of approximately two hours. Participants do not require "real time" attendance at pre-determined times.

  • Attention ControlBehavioural

    Participants will receive two brief 15-30 minutes phone calls by study staff, and will receive a handbook on dementia and caregiver resources while they wait for the workshop.

Study groups in NCT04428112
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Building Better Caregivers Workshop GroupExperimentalBuilding Better Caregivers Workshop is a 6-week online self-management and skills building workshop. Participants receive the online workshop as soon as possible after randomization.
Receives: Behavioral: Building Better Caregivers Workshop
Attention Control GroupActive comparatorParticipants will be offered the online workshop after the 12 month trial is completed if they so desire.
Receives: Behavioral: Attention Control

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Personal Health Questionnaire Depression (PHQ-8) Scale Score

    Personal Health Questionnaire Depression (PHQ-8) scale. The scale score is calculated by summing each item to produce a total score between 0 and 24, with higher scores indicating worse outcome.

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Visual Numeric Stress Scale

    A visual numeric stress scale. The scale score ranges from 0 to 10, with higher score indicating worse outcome.

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Personal Health Questionnaire Depression (PHQ-8) Scale Score

    Personal Health Questionnaire Depression (PHQ-8) scale. The scale score is calculated by summing each item to produce a total score between 0 and 24, with higher scores indicating worse outcome.

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Visual Numeric Stress Scale Score

    A visual numeric stress scale. The scale score ranges from 0 to 10, with higher score indicating worse outcome.

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Short Caregiver Self-Efficacy Scale Score

    Short Caregiver Self-Efficacy scale (8-items). The scale scores is calculated by taking the mean of the items to produce a total score between 1 and 10, with higher scores indicating better outcome.

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Zarit Burden Interview-12 (ZBI-12) Scale Score

    Short form of the Zarit Burden Interview-12 (ZBI-12) scale (12-items). The scale score is calculated by summing each item to produce a total score between 0 and 24, with higher scores indicating worse outcome.

    Measured: 12 months

  5. Caregiver Self-rated General Health Score

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure SF-1 self-rated general health single item. The scale score ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating worse outcome.

    Measured: 12 months

  6. UCLA Loneliness Scale Score

    UCLA loneliness scale (3-items). The scale score is calculated by summing each item to produce a total score between 3 and 9, with higher scores indicating worse outcome.

    Measured: 12 months

  7. Lubben Social Isolation Scale Score

    Lubben Social isolation scale (6-items). The scale score is calculated by summing each item to produce a total score between 0 and 30, with lower scores indicating worse outcome.

    Measured: 12 months

  8. Caregiver Health Care Utilization

    3-items measuring days of overnight hospitalizations, nursing home or other long-term care facility use, and hospital emergency room visits from the Health and Retirement Study, modified time frame from self-report for past 12 months to self-report for past 6 months; scored as single items; with higher scores indicating worse outcome. Scores range from 0-180.

    Measured: 12 months

  9. Person With Dementia General Health Score as Reported by Caregiver

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure SF-1 caregiver-reported general health single item. The scale score ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating worse outcome.

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jun 2020
  2. Study start5 Jun 2020
  3. Primary completion16 Oct 2023
  4. Study completion16 Oct 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
418 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04428112
Sponsor's protocol ID
18-25814
Other IDs
5R01AG057855-02, 3R01AG057855-02S1
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
9 Jun 2020
Last updated
17 Jul 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The data to be shared will be individual participant data that underlie the results reported in published article(s), after deidentification (e.g., text, tables, figures, and appendices). The additional and related documents that will be available are study protocol and data dictionary. The data will become available beginning within 3 months of article publication and ending 5 years following article publication.The access criteria for the data to be shared will include researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal in order to achieve aims in the approved proposal including performance of meta-analysis of individual participant data. Proposals should be directed to veronica.yank@ucsf.edu. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement. Data will be available for 5 years at a third party website (Link to be included later).

Publications

  • Santoyo-Olsson J, Covinsky KE, Cheng J, Gallagher Thompson D, Yank V. Utilization of home- and community-based services among rural family caregivers of persons with dementia: the role of the area deprivation index. Front Public Health. 2025 Oct 14;13:1688161. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1688161. eCollection 2025.

    PubMed 41164840
  • Santoyo-Olsson J, Covinsky KE, Chesla CA, Lorig K, Gallagher-Thompson D, Cheng J, Luzanilla M, Macias Romo E, Aguayo Ramirez G, Karliner L, Yank V. Predictors of Psychological Distress Among Rural Family/Friend Caregivers of People Living With Dementia in the United States: Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Feb 1;79(2):gbad164. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad164.

    PubMed 37897201
  • Santoyo-Olsson J, Lorig K, Romo EM, Luzanilla M, Ramirez GA, Cheng J, Chesla C, Covinsky KE, Karliner L, Thompson DG, Fahrenwald N, Yank V. Study protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of the Building Better Caregivers online workshop for rural family/friend caregivers of people living with dementia. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Oct;121:106903. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106903. Epub 2022 Aug 31.

    PubMed 36057375

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Building Better Caregivers Workshop in people with Depression and Stress, Psychological, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Jul 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Personal Health Questionnaire Depression (PHQ-8) Scale Score (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04428112, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in