Surgical InjuryNCT04410640
Surgical Planning With Patient-specific Pancreaticobiliary Disease With 3D Models
An observational study of Surgical Injury, run by Ege University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Background: Three-dimensional (3D) printing has been increasingly used in medical applications with the creation of accurate patient-specific 3D printed models in medical imaging data. However, research on 3D printing in pancreaticobiliary disease is limited with lack of studies on validation of model accuracy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 24 to 30 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Surgical Injury
- What is being tested?
- survey
- How many people
- 19 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 10 Jul 2019to 10 Jan 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 24 to 30 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Study population: Members chosen for this study group are general surgery residents present in Faculty of Medicine, Ege University
Who may be able to join
- normal pancreaticobiliary anatomy case
- common bile duct tumor case,
- acute calculous cholecystitis,
- pancreatic head cancer
- cholelithiasis
- general surgery residents present in Faculty of Medicine, Ege University
Who cannot join
- Hepatic disease
- General surgery experts
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Ege University, Faculty of Medicine
Izmir, Bornova, TR-35100
About this study
Official title: Ethical Committee at Researches of Ege University
Background: Three-dimensional (3D) printing has been increasingly used in medical applications with the creation of accurate patient-specific 3D printed models in medical imaging data. However, research on 3D printing in pancreaticobiliary disease is limited with lack of studies on validation of model accuracy.
Methods: This is a where general surgery residents, are introduced to 5 distinct hepatopancreatobiliary disease scenarios to generate a perception and required to compare their perception level of these cases with computed tomography (CT), 3D images and 1:1 solid models that the pathology, diverse diagnosis and presurgery diagnosis stages can be investigated.
Read the detailed description
2.1.Research Design This study group are general surgery residents present in Faculty of Medicine, Ege University (n=19). A quintet with stations composed of normal pancreaticobiliary anatomy, common bile duct tumor, stony cholecystitis, pancreatic head cancer and cholelithiasis is assembled for the study. Each station containes CT, 3D-STL images and 1:1 solid models of cases. Each imaging method (CT, 3D-STL image and 3D solid model) associated with the scenarios of the quintet is created in the residents of the study. An explanatory assessment measure is being used as data collection method where the perception of each imaging method is being investigated based on their effectiveness in problem identification as well as their efficiency in diverse diagnosis and pre-surgery organization.
2.2. Selection of the sample cases The patients are chosen among the CT examinations of the ones who referred to Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery for diagnose and treatment between 2016 and 2018. CT archives are screened and 5 eligible patients (age: 18-62 year) who required hepatopancreatobiliary surgery were selected. Selection of the cases is based on patients with no previous hepatopancreatobiliary operation, pathology leading to dilated biliary duct, and whose radiological imaging results are suitable for modeling. Virtual modeling of pancreaticobiliary pathways of the cases is performed and clinical histories of each case were created.
2.3. Scenarios As a mutual agreement among the specialists in medical education, general surgery, anatomy and radiology, 5 cases identified, are elected to be samples for pancreaticobiliary surgical processes. Having defined these cases, they are further converted into genuine scenarios fully equipped with a past story, medical analysis results and imaging procedures.
Scenarios for 5 cases:
Case 1. Case with normal extrahepatic biliary tract with pancreas. Case 2. Choledochal tumor leading to advanced dilatation and hydropic gallbladder appearance in extrahepatic biliary tract.
Case 3. Acute cholecystitis characterized with extrahepatic biliary dilatation, hydropic gallbladder, thickness in gallbladder wall and biliary sludge with multiple millimeter-sized stones.
Case 4. Pancreatic head cancer with severe dilatation in the pancreatic canal and extrahepatic biliary tract.
Case 5. Choledocholithiasis characterized with dilatation at the extrahepatic biliary tract and 7 mm diameter stone at the distal end of the common bile duct.
2.4. Image post-processing and segmentation Original CT images in Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format are converted to a separate workstation with Analyze 12.0 for post-processing and segmentation. A free 3D slicer (version 4.10.1) is employed in the process of attaining DICOM output from CT and MRI segments of the patients. Special attention is paid to the anatomical structures of the biliary tract including left hepatic duct (LHD), right hepatic duct (RHD), and common hepatic duct (CHD) which are segmented. The surface condition of the model is enhanced by implementing a softening filter to the segmented section output. The output is extracted into STL format to enable 3D printing.
2.5. Creating Life-size Patient-Specific 3D Model 3D printers of Mass Portal Pharaoh xd 20 and Form Labs2 are employed throughout the process of preparing the models for printing.
2.6. Quantitative assessment of model accuracy To ensure the model accuracy, measurements of the anatomical landmarks are performed and compared at three stages of the model production, namely, the original CT images, STL file and 3D model. The internal diameter of four anatomical locations is measured from left to right and from anterior to posterior in the following landmarks: CHD, LHD, RHD and common bile ducts. .
2.7. Workshop We performed a systematic review to evaluate of bile tree modelization and 3D printing, as well as the proof of concept of the benefit of 3D solid model in planning interventions. CT images of a patient diagnosed with dilated extrahepatic ducts are used to create the patient-specific, 1-1 scale 3D pancreaticobiliary models including five scenarios as the normal anatomy, common bile duct tumor, stony cholecystitis, pancreatic head cancer and cholelithiasis. For this purpose, scenarios for each case and a five-station carousel are based on the research. For each station, a period of 5-10 minutes is given.
2.8. Survey Participants' perception of residency training is evaluated with a multi-entry survey. In these scenarios, normal pancreaticobiliary organs and cases leading to extrahepatic biliary tract dilatation such as choledochal tumor, acute stone cholecystitis, pancreatic head tumor and cholelithiasis are discussed. Assessment forms for the normal structure of the cases, differential diagnosis and imaging methods in preoperative planning and the location of the 3D solid model are prepared. The forms are then asked to be filled by the residents to discover their opinions on all models. The evaluaton is done on a scale of 10, where (01-10) defines 0 = very low and 10 = the highest rank.
2.9. Statistical analysis Analysis will be submitted into SPSS 24.0 for statistical evaluation mean ± standard deviation format is employed for continuous variables. Any significant differences in the measurements between the original CT images, 3D-STL images and the 3D model are studied by using Wilcoxon Signed Test. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test is used to determine any significant differences in the measurements between the original CT images, 3D-STL images and the 3D model. Statistical relevance is stated as a p value of less than 0.05.
- Conditions
- Surgical Injury
- Being tested
- survey
- Keywords
- Graduate medical education, Personalized medicine
- Medical subject headings
- Intraoperative Complications
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
surveyOther
Members chosen for this study group are general surgery residents. A quintet with stations composed of normal pancreaticobiliary anatomy, common bile duct tumor, stony cholecystitis, pancreatic head cancer and cholelithiasis was assembled for the study. Each station contained CT, 3D-STL images and 1:1 solid models of cases. Each imaging method associated with the scenarios of the quintet is observed by the residents of the study. An explanatory assessment measure is being used as data collection method where the perception of each imaging method is being evaluated based on their effectiveness in problem identification as well as their efficiency in diverse diagnosis and pre-surgery organization. Participants' perception of residency training was evaluated with a multi-entry survey. The focus of the survey, which was applied by our team was by domains, self determined decision-making, diverse diagnosis, academic scholarship, and scientific appraisal.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
compare the effectiveness of the solid model with CT screen, 3D-Standard Tessellation Language (STL) image and 1:1 scale model
Our aim is to compare the effectiveness of the solid model with CT screen, 3D-Standard Tessellation Language (STL) image and 1:1 scale model in 5 different hepatopancreatobiliary disease scenarios to general surgery residents in terms of recognizing the pathology, differential diagnosis and preoperative preparation stages.
Measured: 30 minute
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jun 2020
- Study start10 Jul 2019
- Primary completion10 Nov 2019
- Study completion10 Jan 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Surgical InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ege UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 19 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ege University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Figen GOVSA, Ege University
- Investigators
- Muhtar S Ersin, Prof. Dr, Study chair, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04410640
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EGE18-6.134
- Status last verified
- May 2020
- First submitted
- 12 Mar 2020
- Last updated
- 1 Jun 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Our aim is to compare the effectiveness of the solid model with CTimage, 3Dimage and 3Dmodel in 5 different hepatopancreatobiliary disease scenarios presented to general surgery residents in terms of recognizing the pathology, differential diagnosis and preoperative preparation stages. The focus of the survey applied by our team was on domains, decision-making, diverse diagnosis, scientific appraisal. In these scenarios, normal pancreaticobiliary organs and cases leading to extrahepatic biliary tract dilatation such as choledochal tumor, acute stone cholecystitis, pancreatic head tumor and cholelithiasis were discussed. Perception of the anatomical formation, impact of the procedure to diverse diagnosis, operation arrangement and presurgical preparation assistance are the main criteria in the evaluation of every imaging procedure. Any significant differences in the measurements between the CTimages, 3Dimages and the 3Dmodel were obtained by using Wilcoxon Signed Test.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Jun 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ethical Committee at Researches of Ege University
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04410640
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EGE18-6.134
- Conditions
- Surgical Injury
- Keywords
- Graduate medical education, Personalized medicine
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 19 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ege UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Jan 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background: Three-dimensional (3D) printing has been increasingly used in medical applications with the creation of accurate patient-specific 3D printed models in medical imaging data. However, research on 3D printing in pancreaticobiliary disease is limited with lack of studies on validation of model accuracy.
Methods: This is a where general surgery residents, are introduced to 5 distinct hepatopancreatobiliary disease scenarios to generate a perception and required to compare their perception level of these cases with computed tomography (CT), 3D images and 1:1 solid models that the pathology, diverse diagnosis and presurgery diagnosis stages can be investigated.
Detailed description
2.1.Research Design This study group are general surgery residents present in Faculty of Medicine, Ege University (n=19). A quintet with stations composed of normal pancreaticobiliary anatomy, common bile duct tumor, stony cholecystitis, pancreatic head cancer and cholelithiasis is assembled for the study. Each station containes CT, 3D-STL images and 1:1 solid models of cases. Each imaging method (CT, 3D-STL image and 3D solid model) associated with the scenarios of the quintet is created in the residents of the study. An explanatory assessment measure is being used as data collection method where the perception of each imaging method is being investigated based on their effectiveness in problem identification as well as their efficiency in diverse diagnosis and pre-surgery organization.
2.2. Selection of the sample cases The patients are chosen among the CT examinations of the ones who referred to Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery for diagnose and treatment between 2016 and 2018. CT archives are screened and 5 eligible patients (age: 18-62 year) who required hepatopancreatobiliary surgery were selected. Selection of the cases is based on patients with no previous hepatopancreatobiliary operation, pathology leading to dilated biliary duct, and whose radiological imaging results are suitable for modeling. Virtual modeling of pancreaticobiliary pathways of the cases is performed and clinical histories of each case were created.
2.3. Scenarios As a mutual agreement among the specialists in medical education, general surgery, anatomy and radiology, 5 cases identified, are elected to be samples for pancreaticobiliary surgical processes. Having defined these cases, they are further converted into genuine scenarios fully equipped with a past story, medical analysis results and imaging procedures.
Scenarios for 5 cases:
Case 1. Case with normal extrahepatic biliary tract with pancreas. Case 2. Choledochal tumor leading to advanced dilatation and hydropic gallbladder appearance in extrahepatic biliary tract.
Case 3. Acute cholecystitis characterized with extrahepatic biliary dilatation, hydropic gallbladder, thickness in gallbladder wall and biliary sludge with multiple millimeter-sized stones.
Case 4. Pancreatic head cancer with severe dilatation in the pancreatic canal and extrahepatic biliary tract.
Case 5. Choledocholithiasis characterized with dilatation at the extrahepatic biliary tract and 7 mm diameter stone at the distal end of the common bile duct.
2.4. Image post-processing and segmentation Original CT images in Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format are converted to a separate workstation with Analyze 12.0 for post-processing and segmentation. A free 3D slicer (version 4.10.1) is employed in the process of attaining DICOM output from CT and MRI segments of the patients. Special attention is paid to the anatomical structures of the biliary tract including left hepatic duct (LHD), right hepatic duct (RHD), and common hepatic duct (CHD) which are segmented. The surface condition of the model is enhanced by implementing a softening filter to the segmented section output. The output is extracted into STL format to enable 3D printing.
2.5. Creating Life-size Patient-Specific 3D Model 3D printers of Mass Portal Pharaoh xd 20 and Form Labs2 are employed throughout the process of preparing the models for printing.
2.6. Quantitative assessment of model accuracy To ensure the model accuracy, measurements of the anatomical landmarks are performed and compared at three stages of the model production, namely, the original CT images, STL file and 3D model. The internal diameter of four anatomical locations is measured from left to right and from anterior to posterior in the following landmarks: CHD, LHD, RHD and common bile ducts. .
2.7. Workshop We performed a systematic review to evaluate of bile tree modelization and 3D printing, as well as the proof of concept of the benefit of 3D solid model in planning interventions. CT images of a patient diagnosed with dilated extrahepatic ducts are used to create the patient-specific, 1-1 scale 3D pancreaticobiliary models including five scenarios as the normal anatomy, common bile duct tumor, stony cholecystitis, pancreatic head cancer and cholelithiasis. For this purpose, scenarios for each case and a five-station carousel are based on the research. For each station, a period of 5-10 minutes is given.
2.8. Survey Participants' perception of residency training is evaluated with a multi-entry survey. In these scenarios, normal pancreaticobiliary organs and cases leading to extrahepatic biliary tract dilatation such as choledochal tumor, acute stone cholecystitis, pancreatic head tumor and cholelithiasis are discussed. Assessment forms for the normal structure of the cases, differential diagnosis and imaging methods in preoperative planning and the location of the 3D solid model are prepared. The forms are then asked to be filled by the residents to discover their opinions on all models. The evaluaton is done on a scale of 10, where (01-10) defines 0 = very low and 10 = the highest rank.
2.9. Statistical analysis Analysis will be submitted into SPSS 24.0 for statistical evaluation mean ± standard deviation format is employed for continuous variables. Any significant differences in the measurements between the original CT images, 3D-STL images and the 3D model are studied by using Wilcoxon Signed Test. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test is used to determine any significant differences in the measurements between the original CT images, 3D-STL images and the 3D model. Statistical relevance is stated as a p value of less than 0.05.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 24 to 30 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- Members chosen for this study group are general surgery residents present in Faculty of Medicine, Ege University
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- normal pancreaticobiliary anatomy case
- common bile duct tumor case,
- acute calculous cholecystitis,
- pancreatic head cancer
- cholelithiasis
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Hepatic disease
- General surgery experts
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| surveyMembers chosen for this study group are general surgery residents. A quintet with stations composed of normal pancreaticobiliary anatomy, common bile duct tumor, stony cholecystitis, pancreatic head cancer and cholelithiasis was assembled for the study. Each station contained CT, 3D-STL images and 1:1 solid models of cases. Each imaging method associated with the scenarios of the quintet is observed by the residents of the study. An explanatory assessment measure is being used as data collection method where the perception of each imaging method is being evaluated based on their effectiveness in problem identification as well as their efficiency in diverse diagnosis and pre-surgery organization. Participants' perception of residency training was evaluated with a multi-entry survey. The focus of the survey, which was applied by our team was by domains, self determined decision-making, diverse diagnosis, academic scholarship, and scientific appraisal. | Other | – |
Primary outcome
compare the effectiveness of the solid model with CT screen, 3D-Standard Tessellation Language (STL) image and 1:1 scale model
Time frame: 30 minute
Our aim is to compare the effectiveness of the solid model with CT screen, 3D-Standard Tessellation Language (STL) image and 1:1 scale model in 5 different hepatopancreatobiliary disease scenarios to general surgery residents in terms of recognizing the pathology, differential diagnosis and preoperative preparation stages.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Jun 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Our aim is to compare the effectiveness of the solid model with CTimage, 3Dimage and 3Dmodel in 5 different hepatopancreatobiliary disease scenarios presented to general surgery residents in terms of recognizing the pathology, differential diagnosis and preoperative preparation stages. The focus of the survey applied by our team was on domains, decision-making, diverse diagnosis, scientific appraisal. In these scenarios, normal pancreaticobiliary organs and cases leading to extrahepatic biliary tract dilatation such as choledochal tumor, acute stone cholecystitis, pancreatic head tumor and cholelithiasis were discussed. Perception of the anatomical formation, impact of the procedure to diverse diagnosis, operation arrangement and presurgical preparation assistance are the main criteria in the evaluation of every imaging procedure. Any significant differences in the measurements between the CTimages, 3Dimages and the 3Dmodel were obtained by using Wilcoxon Signed Test.
Related trials for Surgical Injury
Not yet recruiting
Safety Study of Microlyte DualGuard
Wound Closure, Wound Care
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Recruiting
SIRI Levels Following PENG Block in Pediatric Hip Surgery
Hip Dysplasia
RecruitingPhase 4
PENG With LFCB vs. ESP Blocks for Pediatric Hip Surgery
Hip Disease, Hip Dysplasia
Not yet recruiting
Biodegradable Magnesium Screws for Unstable Ankle Fracture Surgery
Ankle Fractures, Syndesmotic Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Muhtar S Ersin, Prof. Dr study chair
Faculty of Medicine, Ege University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Surgical Injury, run by Ege University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
compare the effectiveness of the solid model with CT screen, 3D-Standard Tessellation Language (STL) image and 1:1 scale model (time frame: 30 minute). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jun 2020.