StrokeBTX_ST-ITA14NCT04404868
Early Treatment of Post-stroke Spasticity With Botulinum Toxin
An observational study of Stroke, run by Universita di Verona at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
This was a multicentric observational study with the aim to evaluate the effect of early treatment with botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) on post-stroke spasticity in adult patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Normal clinical practice
- How many people
- 86 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 27 Jul 2015to 31 Dec 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult patients with the occurrence of post-stroke spastic hypertonia involving the main muscle groups of the affected side.
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of spasticity as a consequence of cerebral stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) documented radiologically by brain CT or MRI;
- Presence of spastic hypertonia in the main muscle groups of the affected side with an intensity equal to or greater than MAS 1+/4;
- Presence of paresis in the affected side with weakness of the main muscle groups equal to or less than 2 according to the MRC scale;
- Time elapsed since cerebral stroke less than 12 months;
- No prior focal treatment of spasticity with botulinum toxin.
Who cannot join
- Participation in other ongoing clinical studies
- Presence of joint limitation or muscle contractures to the main muscle groups of the affected side quantifiable as a score of 4/4 at the MAS
- Therapy with antispastic drugs (baclofen, dantrolene, tizanidine, benzodiazepines, clonidine, phenothiazine)
- Other neurological (previous cerebral strokes, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, medullary pathologies, extrapyramidal syndromes) or orthopaedic (severe osteoarthritis, previous arthroplasty with residual joint limitation or fracture healed with angular defects) diseases involving the affected side and able to influence the results of the study.
- Particularly vulnerable populations
- The following cannot be included in the study:
Show all 14Show fewer
- women of childbearing age who do not use contraceptives
- pregnant women
- women in the breastfeeding period
- patients in an emergency situation
- Criteria for anticipated exit from the study:
- Relapse of disease during the study period
- Withdrawal of informed consent to participate in the study
- Inability to perform the first follow-up evaluation 4 weeks after BoNT-A administration
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site
Section of Clinical Neurology, Department Neurological, Neuropsychological, Morphological and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
Verona, 37124
About this study
Official title: Role of Early Treatment With Botulinum Toxin in Adult Patients With Post-stroke Spasticity: an Observational Multicenter Study
This was a multicentric observational study with the aim to evaluate the effect of early treatment with botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) on post-stroke spasticity in adult patients. All patients enrolled (86 patients) after a baseline clinical assessment (modified Ashworth scale, motricity index, Fughl Meyer assessment and modified Rankin' scale) undergoes to a BoNT-A injection following the evidence-based clinical practice. Subsequently, at 4, 12 and 24 weeks they underwent the same clinical evaluation as a follow-up. Results are under statistical evaluation.
Read the detailed description
This was a multicentric observational study with the aim to evaluate the effect of early treatment with botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) on post-stroke spasticity in adult patients. All centres involved are in Italy. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are described in detail in the correspondent section. The main outcome measure was to assess how the time elapsed from the acute event can influence the effectiveness of the focal treatment of spasticity with BoNT-A in adult patients with cerebral stroke. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate the spasticity' grade and the level of functioning using a clinical assessment (modified Ashworth scale, motricity index, Fughl Meyer assessment, Modified Rankin' scale).
The patients were enrolled from 10 centres that agreed to participate in this study (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona - coordinating centre; Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti of Foggia; Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Ferrara; Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana; Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria "Maggiore della Carità" of Novara; Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria - Ospedali Riuniti of Ancona; Azienda Ospedaliera "Cardinale G. Panico" of Tricase; Fondazione Santa Lucia IRCCS of Rome; Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Sant'Andrea of Rome; Ospedale "Ca' Foncello" of Treviso). No patients were enrolled from the last two centers that have expressed their waiver to participate when the study was already started.
Each patient (whether hospitalized or outpatient) included in the study underwent to a baseline evaluation in which near and remote pathological history were recorded (main concomitant pathologies, drug therapy in progress, previous major surgery, date of the stroke) and the following evaluation scales were administered: modified Ashworth scale (MAS), MI (motricity index), FMA (Fughl Meyer assessment) and Modified Rankin' scale (MRS). After that received a BoNT-A injection to treat the spasticity focally following the evidence-based clinical practice.
Each patient subsequently performed a follow-up evaluation at 4, 12 and 24 weeks after the date of inoculation through the execution of a specialist visit (physiatric/neurological) and the administration of the following evaluation scales: MAS, MI, FMA and MRS. For the duration of the study, each patient may undergo integrated rehabilitation treatment at the discretion of each of the investigators of each centre involved in the study according to the guidelines and common clinical practice.
The estimation of the sample size was hypothesized with the aim to observe a frequency of 75% in the number of patients who will show a reduction of one point at the MAS. If there is a correlation between the time elapsed since the acute event and the reduction in the degree of spastic hypertonia after the first administration of BoNT-A, to obtain an OR = 0.5, assuming DS = 1 and R2 = 0, with α = 0.05 and β = 0.20 (study power = 80%), 90 patients will be needed. Assuming a drop-out rate of 10%, a total of 100 patients will need to be enrolled in the study.
Descriptive statistics were produced (frequency histograms; position or central trend indices: average, median; variability or sample dispersion indices: standard deviation, interquartile range; sample distribution profile estimate: Shapiro-Wilk test; construction of the intervals of confidence) as regards demographic (age, gender, the time elapsed from a stroke) and clinical (MAS, MI, FMA and MRS score at baseline, 4, 12 and 24 weeks after BoNT-A injection).
In order to evaluate the role of the time elapsed from the acute event on the therapeutic efficacy of the first administration of BoNT-A 4 weeks after the inoculation (primary endpoint), a logistic regression analysis was performed in order to evaluate the effects of time since the acute event (independent variable) on the reduction of spastic hypertonia defined in dichotomous terms (dependent variable): RESPONDER (patient who will have obtained a reduction of at least 1 point in MAS of the degree of spastic hypertonia after 4 weeks from the administration) and NON RESPONDER (patient who has not obtained a reduction of at least 1 point in MAS of the degree of spastic hypertonia 4 weeks after administration), considering as possible any covariates the gender and age of the patient at the time of the acute event.
As regards the evaluation of secondary endpoints, the analysis of correlation (Pearson correlation index; Spearman correlation coefficient) was carried out in order to evaluate the association between the effects of the time elapsed from the acute event and the change in the score at MAS 4, 12 and 24 weeks after BoNT inoculation, as well as on the variation of the score at MI, FMA and MRS at 4, 12 and 24 weeks from the administration of BoNT-A.
The statistical analysis will be performed using the Statistical Package for Social Science SPSS® version 20.0 software for Macintosh (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance will set at P <0.05.
Results are under statistical evaluation.
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- Normal clinical practice
- Keywords
- Stroke, Botulinum toxin, Spasticity
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke, Muscle Spasticity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Normal clinical practiceOther
There are no experimental interventions. The procedures are in line with normal clinical practice.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Enrolled patients | Each patient (whether hospitalized or outpatient) included in the study underwent to a baseline evaluation in which near and remote pathological history were recorded (main concomitant pathologies, drug therapy in progress, previous major surgery) and the following evaluation scales were administered: modified Ashworth scale (MAS), MI (motricity index), FMA (Fughl Meyer assessment) and Modified Rankin' scale (MRS).
Each patient will subsequently undergo to a follow-up evaluation at 4, 12 and 24 weeks after the date of inoculation through the execution of a specialist visit (physiatric/neurological) and the administration of the following evaluation scales: MAS, MI, FMA and MRS. For the duration of the study, each patient may undergo integrated rehabilitation treatment at the discretion of each of the investigators of each centre involved in the study according to the guidelines and common clinical practice. Receives: Other: Normal clinical practice |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time elapsed
In order to evaluate the role of the time elapsed since the acute event on the therapeutic efficacy of the first administration of BoNT-A, the reduction of spastic hypertonia will be considered as the primary endpoint.
Patients who gain a reduction of at least 1 point at the modified Ashworth scale (MAS) were defined as "responder". Who did not achieve that amelioration was classified as "non-responders".
Measured: T1 (4 weeks)
Secondary outcomes (4)
Modified Ashworth scale (MAS)
Evaluation of the spasticity grade's at 4 - 12 - 24 weeks from the BoNT-A injection.
MAS is a scale graded in 5 points (0 no increase in muscle tone; 4 rigid in flexion or extension).
Measured: T0 (baseline); T1 (4 weeks); T2 (12 weeks); T3 (24 weeks)
Motricity index (MI)
Evaluation of the motricity using the MI at 4 - 12 - 24 weeks from the BoNT-A injection.
Motricity Index is an ordinal scale that evaluates motor and functional capacity at the level of the limbs in patients with neurological pathologies. The movements evaluated are 6 in all (3 for each limb) and are:
- for the arm (pinch grip, elbow flexion, shoulder abduction)
- for the leg (ankle dorsiflexion, knee extension, hip flexion) To each movement assessed the points attributed may range from 0 "no movement" to 33 "normal pinch grip" or "normal power" for upper and lower extremities respectively.
Measured: T0 (baseline); T1 (4 weeks); T2 (12 weeks); T3 (24 weeks)
Fughl Meyer assessment (FMA)
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is a stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index. It is designed to assess motor functioning, balance, sensation and joint functioning in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia. The scale is comprised of five domains (motor functioning in the upper and lower extremities; sensory functioning, evaluates light touch on two surfaces of the arm and leg, and position perception for 8 joints; balance, contains 7 tests, 3 seated and 4 standing; the joint range of motion, 8 joints; joint pain). Lowest is the total for each domain, worse is the correspondent function.
Measured: T0 (baseline); T1 (4 weeks); T2 (12 weeks); T3 (24 weeks)
Modified rankin scale (MRS)
The Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) defines the physical and mental capacity to adapt to neurological deficits. The scale is divided into 6 degrees, from 0 (no deficit) to 5 (severe disability).
Measured: T0 (baseline); T1 (4 weeks); T2 (12 weeks); T3 (24 weeks)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 May 2020
- Study start27 Jul 2015
- Primary completion31 Dec 2018
- Study completion31 Dec 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 86 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universita di Verona
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Nicola Smania, MD, Clinical Professor, Universita di Verona
- Investigators
- Nicola Smania, MD, Principal investigator, Universita di Verona
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04404868
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BoNT-A early treatment
- Acronym
- BTX_ST-ITA14
- Status last verified
- May 2020
- First submitted
- 15 May 2020
- Last updated
- 28 May 2020
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 May 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Role of Early Treatment With Botulinum Toxin in Adult Patients With Post-stroke Spasticity: an Observational Multicenter Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04404868
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BTX_ST-ITA14 / BoNT-A early treatment
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Keywords
- Stroke, Botulinum toxin, Spasticity
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 86 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universita di VeronaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 27 Jul 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 May 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This was a multicentric observational study with the aim to evaluate the effect of early treatment with botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) on post-stroke spasticity in adult patients. All patients enrolled (86 patients) after a baseline clinical assessment (modified Ashworth scale, motricity index, Fughl Meyer assessment and modified Rankin' scale) undergoes to a BoNT-A injection following the evidence-based clinical practice. Subsequently, at 4, 12 and 24 weeks they underwent the same clinical evaluation as a follow-up. Results are under statistical evaluation.
Detailed description
This was a multicentric observational study with the aim to evaluate the effect of early treatment with botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) on post-stroke spasticity in adult patients. All centres involved are in Italy. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are described in detail in the correspondent section. The main outcome measure was to assess how the time elapsed from the acute event can influence the effectiveness of the focal treatment of spasticity with BoNT-A in adult patients with cerebral stroke. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate the spasticity' grade and the level of functioning using a clinical assessment (modified Ashworth scale, motricity index, Fughl Meyer assessment, Modified Rankin' scale).
The patients were enrolled from 10 centres that agreed to participate in this study (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona - coordinating centre; Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti of Foggia; Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Ferrara; Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana; Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria "Maggiore della Carità" of Novara; Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria - Ospedali Riuniti of Ancona; Azienda Ospedaliera "Cardinale G. Panico" of Tricase; Fondazione Santa Lucia IRCCS of Rome; Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Sant'Andrea of Rome; Ospedale "Ca' Foncello" of Treviso). No patients were enrolled from the last two centers that have expressed their waiver to participate when the study was already started.
Each patient (whether hospitalized or outpatient) included in the study underwent to a baseline evaluation in which near and remote pathological history were recorded (main concomitant pathologies, drug therapy in progress, previous major surgery, date of the stroke) and the following evaluation scales were administered: modified Ashworth scale (MAS), MI (motricity index), FMA (Fughl Meyer assessment) and Modified Rankin' scale (MRS). After that received a BoNT-A injection to treat the spasticity focally following the evidence-based clinical practice.
Each patient subsequently performed a follow-up evaluation at 4, 12 and 24 weeks after the date of inoculation through the execution of a specialist visit (physiatric/neurological) and the administration of the following evaluation scales: MAS, MI, FMA and MRS. For the duration of the study, each patient may undergo integrated rehabilitation treatment at the discretion of each of the investigators of each centre involved in the study according to the guidelines and common clinical practice.
The estimation of the sample size was hypothesized with the aim to observe a frequency of 75% in the number of patients who will show a reduction of one point at the MAS. If there is a correlation between the time elapsed since the acute event and the reduction in the degree of spastic hypertonia after the first administration of BoNT-A, to obtain an OR = 0.5, assuming DS = 1 and R2 = 0, with α = 0.05 and β = 0.20 (study power = 80%), 90 patients will be needed. Assuming a drop-out rate of 10%, a total of 100 patients will need to be enrolled in the study.
Descriptive statistics were produced (frequency histograms; position or central trend indices: average, median; variability or sample dispersion indices: standard deviation, interquartile range; sample distribution profile estimate: Shapiro-Wilk test; construction of the intervals of confidence) as regards demographic (age, gender, the time elapsed from a stroke) and clinical (MAS, MI, FMA and MRS score at baseline, 4, 12 and 24 weeks after BoNT-A injection).
In order to evaluate the role of the time elapsed from the acute event on the therapeutic efficacy of the first administration of BoNT-A 4 weeks after the inoculation (primary endpoint), a logistic regression analysis was performed in order to evaluate the effects of time since the acute event (independent variable) on the reduction of spastic hypertonia defined in dichotomous terms (dependent variable): RESPONDER (patient who will have obtained a reduction of at least 1 point in MAS of the degree of spastic hypertonia after 4 weeks from the administration) and NON RESPONDER (patient who has not obtained a reduction of at least 1 point in MAS of the degree of spastic hypertonia 4 weeks after administration), considering as possible any covariates the gender and age of the patient at the time of the acute event.
As regards the evaluation of secondary endpoints, the analysis of correlation (Pearson correlation index; Spearman correlation coefficient) was carried out in order to evaluate the association between the effects of the time elapsed from the acute event and the change in the score at MAS 4, 12 and 24 weeks after BoNT inoculation, as well as on the variation of the score at MI, FMA and MRS at 4, 12 and 24 weeks from the administration of BoNT-A.
The statistical analysis will be performed using the Statistical Package for Social Science SPSS® version 20.0 software for Macintosh (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance will set at P <0.05.
Results are under statistical evaluation.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Enrolled patients | – | Other: Normal clinical practiceEach patient (whether hospitalized or outpatient) included in the study underwent to a baseline evaluation in which near and remote pathological history were recorded (main concomitant pathologies, drug therapy in progress, previous major surgery) and the following evaluation scales were administered: modified Ashworth scale (MAS), MI (motricity index), FMA (Fughl Meyer assessment) and Modified Rankin' scale (MRS). Each patient will subsequently undergo to a follow-up evaluation at 4, 12 and 24 weeks after the date of inoculation through the execution of a specialist visit (physiatric/neurological) and the administration of the following evaluation scales: MAS, MI, FMA and MRS. For the duration of the study, each patient may undergo integrated rehabilitation treatment at the discretion of each of the investigators of each centre involved in the study according to the guidelines and common clinical practice. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult patients with the occurrence of post-stroke spastic hypertonia involving the main muscle groups of the affected side.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Diagnosis of spasticity as a consequence of cerebral stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) documented radiologically by brain CT or MRI;
- Presence of spastic hypertonia in the main muscle groups of the affected side with an intensity equal to or greater than MAS 1+/4;
- Presence of paresis in the affected side with weakness of the main muscle groups equal to or less than 2 according to the MRC scale;
- Time elapsed since cerebral stroke less than 12 months;
- No prior focal treatment of spasticity with botulinum toxin.
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Participation in other ongoing clinical studies
- Presence of joint limitation or muscle contractures to the main muscle groups of the affected side quantifiable as a score of 4/4 at the MAS
- Therapy with antispastic drugs (baclofen, dantrolene, tizanidine, benzodiazepines, clonidine, phenothiazine)
- Other neurological (previous cerebral strokes, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, medullary pathologies, extrapyramidal syndromes) or orthopaedic (severe osteoarthritis, previous arthroplasty with residual joint limitation or fracture healed with angular defects) diseases involving the affected side and able to influence the results of the study.
- Particularly vulnerable populations
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Normal clinical practiceThere are no experimental interventions. The procedures are in line with normal clinical practice. | Other | Enrolled patients |
Primary outcome
Time elapsed
Time frame: T1 (4 weeks)
In order to evaluate the role of the time elapsed since the acute event on the therapeutic efficacy of the first administration of BoNT-A, the reduction of spastic hypertonia will be considered as the primary endpoint. Patients who gain a reduction of at least 1 point at the modified Ashworth scale (MAS) were defined as "responder". Who did not achieve that amelioration was classified as "non-responders".
4 secondary outcomes
Modified Ashworth scale (MAS)
Time frame: T0 (baseline); T1 (4 weeks); T2 (12 weeks); T3 (24 weeks)
Motricity index (MI)
Time frame: T0 (baseline); T1 (4 weeks); T2 (12 weeks); T3 (24 weeks)
Fughl Meyer assessment (FMA)
Time frame: T0 (baseline); T1 (4 weeks); T2 (12 weeks); T3 (24 weeks)
Modified rankin scale (MRS)
Time frame: T0 (baseline); T1 (4 weeks); T2 (12 weeks); T3 (24 weeks)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 May 2020.
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nicola Smania, MD principal investigator
Universita di Verona
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Stroke, run by Universita di Verona at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time elapsed (time frame: T1 (4 weeks)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2020.